🧵Fabricated Israel genocide claim relies on misrepresented quotes by Israeli officials to show “intent” necessary to prove genocide. South Africa ICJ genocide filing says @Isaac_Herzog “made clear” Israel INTENDS to kill all Palestinians. Here is full debunking of this lie. 1/
Did Herzog "make clear" at Oct 12 press conference that Israel won’t distinguish between militants & civilians and thus intends genocide of all Pals? NO. South Africa is LYING, Herzog actually said the exact opposite, see his words below said at 11:50 2/ news.cgtn.com/news/2023-10-1…
South Africa & Israel haters deliberately ignore everything Herzog said at long press conference and misrepresent one comment. A reporter asked Herzog how Israel can alleviate impact of war on civilians “many of those who have nothing to do with Hamas.” Herzog responded: 3/
Herzog was asked a follow up question to this specific comment telling Herzog he “seemed to hold the people of Gaza the civilians of Gaza responsible for not removing Hamas and therefore by implication that makes them legitimate targets.” Herzog rejected this notion saying: 4/
Herzog noted and often comments on use of Hamas of civilian shields to attack Israel and thus the challenge. But he repeatedly noted the plan was to remove civilians from harms way. Here are three other comments by Herzog from the SAME press conference: 5/
In the SAME press conference Herzog is asked “what is the plan?”; Herzog's response is below, adding a comment about fighting terrorism. Nothing about intending to kill civilians but the challenge of fighting Hamas who hides among civilians. 6/
South Africa then cites Herzog’s words to “uproot evil” as referring to "genocide" of Palestinians but words in tweet and interview cited by South Africa specifically says Hamas not Pals. The “evil” cited is clearly Hamas, but once again South Africa and others knowingly lie. 7/
What about writing on bombs, evidence of genocide? One can argue merits of such actions but proof of genocide? No. It’s a common practice in war. NY Times covered this exact thing as a nice human interest story in Ukraine in 2023, but for Israel it’s somehow evil genocide. 8/
Main “evidence” South Africa has against Herzog is a misrepresented comment Herzog specifically clarified in the 10/12 press conference. Numerous tweets, comments and articles by Herzog saying the opposite (civilians are not a target) are ignored. Next is just a small sample: 9/
Oct 15: In an interview on CNN, Wolf Blitzer asks Herzog about civilians. Herzog’s answer (excerpts) are shown below. Nothing about killing all Palestinians, but the opposite. 10/ transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnr/date/…
Nov 5: In NY Times op-ed Herzog makes clear war is only with Hamas, goal is to remove civilians from battlefield and Palestinians will be better off without Hamas. South Africa won’t cite this – just a quote out of context from long press conference. 11/ nytimes.com/2023/11/03/opi…
Nov 16: Herzog on ANI interview makes clear civilians alerted in advance, acknowledges there are many innocent civilians and the goal is to remove Hamas. Herzog focuses on theme of how civilians are used by Hamas as shields. No intent to genocide. 12/
Dec 5: Herzog on MSNBC interview made clear war was only with Hamas and discussed actions to protect civilians with warnings and safezones. Nothing about Palestinians or genocide. 13/ thehill.com/policy/interna…
Citing Herzog as example of Israel's “intent to genocide” is an example of "maximum intent to lie" and how Israel libel works. Misrepresent one quote, ignore massive contrary evidence, even in the exact same press conference, repeat & repeat the lie and spread it. Orwell. 14/
South Africa's ICJ filing is filled with lies & misrepresented quotes like this one from Gallant debunked below. Amazing how such hateful trash is allowed in an international court like this. END
🧵@nytimes continues to spread the lie of starvation, presenting the market in Jabaliya as something new, that has not happened for "endless months," finally some food. But food markets operated here throughout war. All journalistic standards violated here. Evidence below. 1/
This 2 minute video from Dec 2024, weeks before the ceasefire, shows fruits & vegetables sold in Jabaliya, including apples. No famine, no starvation. 2/
Another video of active food markets in Jabaliya. This was Jan 2024, months into the war, when famine supposedly reached Gaza, especially in the north. No famine, no starvation. 3/
🧵Article in Haaretz by Professors Daniel Blatman & Amos Goldberg claiming Israel is committing genocide in Gaza relies on lies, fake analysis and several fabricated quotes. Difficult to understand why these academics would be so intellectually dishonest. Detailed analysis: 1/
On intent to genocide, authors claim it exists from Netanyahu, Herzog & Gallant. But their entire paragraph is fake, with 3 invented quotes. Nothing authors write on intent is accurate, invalidating article. Inability to tell the simple truth on the quotes is shocking. 2/
Authors put in quotes “There are no innocents in Gaza” but no Israeli leader said this. It’s a fake quote, not sure where they got this, why lie? Perhaps they associate with Herzog, but he never said this or anything genocidal as this thread proves. 3/
🧵Hamas' murder & kidnapping of Thai workers on 10/7 was closely planned; contrary to Hamas apologists it wasn't “inadvertent.” Silence by fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty is deliberate & disgusting—but since Hamas fights Israel they don't care and won't call for release of last Thai. 1/
Here is an example of how the fake “human rights NGOs” is 100% silent about Thais held hostage by Hamas, but tweets regularly critical of Thailand for detentions. If you get caught up with Israel, assume your human rights don’t count to these "NGOs." 2/
Despite Hamas brutality resulting in tragic and significant losses, the Thailand government seeks to expand the worker agreement with Israel up from 30,000. Thai workers earn about $2,300/month in Israel, many multiples of what is possible back home. 3/ asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Middl…
🧵BOMBSHELL FINDING: Hamas inadvertently admits in new data release that far more men died than shown on “identified” list of fatalities, corroborating IDF claim of 20,000 combatants killed. Hamas reports 7x more fathers killed than mothers during war! Sources & analysis: 1/
See Hamas MoH report below. 32,152 children lost father and 4,417 lost mother. This 7.3x ratio is far higher than 2.2x adult men to woman listed on Hamas fatality list from Oct 2024. It can only mean many men killed missing from Hamas fatality list. 2/
Ratio of females age 18+ listed killed to “children who lost mothers” is almost 2:1, but for males it is 0.6:1. A staggering difference of almost 28,000 more “children who lost fathers” than a mother; this can only mean far more male fatalities not counted by Hamas. 3/
51,600 total deaths broken down as follows:
22,600 civilians
20,000 combatants
7,000 natural deaths
2,000 deaths caused by Hamas
Civilian/combatant ratio: ~1:1
See detailed analysis after 15 months of close review:
Here is estimate of children & women killed in war, using Hamas’ data, but adjusting for teen combatants, infant mortality and natural deaths. Combined ~37% of total fatalities (it was never 70% or even 50%) and ~72% of civilian fatalities (this is where the 70% came from). 2/
Key change to Hamas Jan 2025 total fatality numbers is adding in ~7,000 combatants to the 46,600 number that are not on any Hamas list or total count. It has been verified that Hamas by design limits reporting on combatant deaths. See combatant analysis below: 3/
🧵Lancet article claiming 64,000+ deaths in Gaza has many flaws, but one item in authors' final data output destroys validity of their analysis. Authors claim 52% of deaths age 45-59 are female; but Hamas' identified list of 40,700 deaths from Oct 2024 shows only 35% female. 1/
In Oct 2024 Hamas issued an updated “identified” fatality with age & sex detail. For age 45-59 it was 2,861 men & 1,557 women. So according to Lancet article that says overall Gaza deaths are 41% more than Hamas says, for this age range the undercount is 100% women, 0% males. 2/
Lancet analysis results don't make sense. It’s undisputed that more men than women die in wars, and in Gaza in all age ranges, especially within fighting age men. Claiming 1,481 missing female deaths but zero males in this age range is inane. Authors don't address or explain. 3/