🧵Fabricated Israel genocide claim relies on misrepresented quotes by Israeli officials to show “intent” necessary to prove genocide. South Africa ICJ genocide filing says @Isaac_Herzog “made clear” Israel INTENDS to kill all Palestinians. Here is full debunking of this lie. 1/
Did Herzog "make clear" at Oct 12 press conference that Israel won’t distinguish between militants & civilians and thus intends genocide of all Pals? NO. South Africa is LYING, Herzog actually said the exact opposite, see his words below said at 11:50 2/ news.cgtn.com/news/2023-10-1…
South Africa & Israel haters deliberately ignore everything Herzog said at long press conference and misrepresent one comment. A reporter asked Herzog how Israel can alleviate impact of war on civilians “many of those who have nothing to do with Hamas.” Herzog responded: 3/
Herzog was asked a follow up question to this specific comment telling Herzog he “seemed to hold the people of Gaza the civilians of Gaza responsible for not removing Hamas and therefore by implication that makes them legitimate targets.” Herzog rejected this notion saying: 4/
Herzog noted and often comments on use of Hamas of civilian shields to attack Israel and thus the challenge. But he repeatedly noted the plan was to remove civilians from harms way. Here are three other comments by Herzog from the SAME press conference: 5/
In the SAME press conference Herzog is asked “what is the plan?”; Herzog's response is below, adding a comment about fighting terrorism. Nothing about intending to kill civilians but the challenge of fighting Hamas who hides among civilians. 6/
South Africa then cites Herzog’s words to “uproot evil” as referring to "genocide" of Palestinians but words in tweet and interview cited by South Africa specifically says Hamas not Pals. The “evil” cited is clearly Hamas, but once again South Africa and others knowingly lie. 7/
What about writing on bombs, evidence of genocide? One can argue merits of such actions but proof of genocide? No. It’s a common practice in war. NY Times covered this exact thing as a nice human interest story in Ukraine in 2023, but for Israel it’s somehow evil genocide. 8/
Main “evidence” South Africa has against Herzog is a misrepresented comment Herzog specifically clarified in the 10/12 press conference. Numerous tweets, comments and articles by Herzog saying the opposite (civilians are not a target) are ignored. Next is just a small sample: 9/
Oct 15: In an interview on CNN, Wolf Blitzer asks Herzog about civilians. Herzog’s answer (excerpts) are shown below. Nothing about killing all Palestinians, but the opposite. 10/ transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnr/date/…
Nov 5: In NY Times op-ed Herzog makes clear war is only with Hamas, goal is to remove civilians from battlefield and Palestinians will be better off without Hamas. South Africa won’t cite this – just a quote out of context from long press conference. 11/ nytimes.com/2023/11/03/opi…
Nov 16: Herzog on ANI interview makes clear civilians alerted in advance, acknowledges there are many innocent civilians and the goal is to remove Hamas. Herzog focuses on theme of how civilians are used by Hamas as shields. No intent to genocide. 12/
Dec 5: Herzog on MSNBC interview made clear war was only with Hamas and discussed actions to protect civilians with warnings and safezones. Nothing about Palestinians or genocide. 13/ thehill.com/policy/interna…
Citing Herzog as example of Israel's “intent to genocide” is an example of "maximum intent to lie" and how Israel libel works. Misrepresent one quote, ignore massive contrary evidence, even in the exact same press conference, repeat & repeat the lie and spread it. Orwell. 14/
South Africa's ICJ filing is filled with lies & misrepresented quotes like this one from Gallant debunked below. Amazing how such hateful trash is allowed in an international court like this. END
🧵IAGS lost credibility after railroading a Gaza “genocide” resolution with no debate and allowing ANYONE to be a voting member. More important: resolution itself is false led by its president Melanie O’Brien who discarded scholarship to libel Israel. 1/
The resolution could not muster any credible evidence of "special intent" to genocide, recycling the fake "human animals" line as core evidence. This is just the tip of iceberg on this sham resolution that debases all the "scholars" who voted for it. 3/
➡️Update on my membership to the the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS):
Yesterday I joined the organization as a “genocide scholar,” paid my dues, and quickly realized I had started a trend. It turns out literally anyone can join this body and vote on matters that make international headlines—like the resolution claiming Israel is committing genocide.
A review of the ~600 membership list revealed that large numbers have no scholarly credentials at all. The group openly encourages “activists” and anyone interested to sign up. I found at least 80 members hailing from Iraq. Who voted for the Gaza genocide resolution? We don’t know—the ~100 votes were never disclosed. Could it have been dominated by this bloc? Hard to say.
But what happened next is telling: today the IAGS shut down its new membership page and, more importantly, removed its membership list from public view. Perhaps they no longer want the public to see who is really behind these votes, now that it’s been exposed.
Yes, there are some legitimate academics who are members. But when an organization with no standards, no transparency, and no accountability makes sweeping pronouncements about “genocide,” it isn’t scholarship—it’s politics masquerading as scholarship. And everyone deserves to know the difference. x.com/Aizenberg55/st…
Important article with comments by @DrSaraEBrown on the sham process by the IAGS. The moderator deleted dissenting listserv posts about the fake "Gaza genocide." jewishinsider.com/2025/09/intern…
@DrSaraEBrown Another interesting data point: Pre-10/7 the IAGS only had about 150 members. Suddenly they ballooned to 500+, recall this organization was formed in 1994.
📌I am now officially a “genocide scholar” as a member of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. I will uphold its mission to advance research & teaching on genocide and its prevention. See next link for my viral article exposing false claims of genocide in Gaza. 1/
I became a member too late to vote against the recent resolution calling Israel's action in Gaza a genocide (only 28% of total members voted yes). See my article below exposing the false claims:
I've been getting to know some of my fellow genocide scholars. Seems that Iraq is a center of knowledge in this field with 80 listed scholars of ~600 (13%). Remarkable, especially the Mahmood family with 5 scholars in the field. I wonder who voted for the Gaza resolution.
➡️IPC tested 15,700 kids for malnutrition in July and found 12%—below 15% famine threshold
😕Problematic. So what did they do?
➡️Use a smaller incomplete 7,100 sample showing 16%
✅Solved. Now UN can claim famine in Gaza!
Evidence & sources:
IPC used MUAC (Mid-Upper Arm Circumference) of kids to assess starvation where 15%=famine. But instead of using full July dataset they dishonestly used a smaller incomplete sample of 7,127 kids. Table 18 of report shows 16.4% in Gaza Governorate—just enough to declare famine. 2/
On Aug 8, the State of Palestine Nutrition Cluster released a LARGER dataset of 15,749 kids—same Gaza sites, same methods—showing 12% malnutrition, below famine. You don’t need a PhD to know a sample twice the size is more reliable—and that ignoring it is academic fraud. 3/
🧵+972 article claims Israel killed only 8,900 combatants branding all others civilians. But piece admits those are only NAMED fighters. The fact that Israel has identified so many by name is remarkable. Pretending this proves the IDF didn't kill 20,000+ combatants is absurd. 1/
The article of course elevates Hamas data as accurate, ignoring that it includes natural deaths, deaths caused by Hamas, child combatants and numerous other anomalies. It also falsely asserts Israel accepts the Hamas data even though Israel said it officially does not. 2/
As usual for +972, it elevates anonymous and unofficial IDF sources, but buries the official statements from identified sources that contradict their entire thesis. They make much that the first response by the IDF was vague, but then later specifically disputed the data. END
🧵The “200 journalists killed in Gaza” claim is FALSE. So far at least 30 — plus the recently killed Anas Al-Sharif — are confirmed combatants based on open sources & social media. Many more will be exposed. Hamas apologists ignore the evidence. Examples next: 1/
Example 1: Mohammed Nabil Al-Zaq — listed as a “journalist” killed in Nov 23 — was in fact a confirmed combatant with multiple photos showing him in military gear and confirmed terrorist group ties. 2/
Example 2: Yaqoub Al-Barash — listed as a “journalist” killed in Nov 23 — was in fact a confirmed combatant with multiple tributes as a “mujahid” and a poster with a fighter image with the comment “with every hand fighting.” 3/