🧵Fabricated Israel genocide claim relies on misrepresented quotes by Israeli officials to show “intent” necessary to prove genocide. South Africa ICJ genocide filing says @Isaac_Herzog “made clear” Israel INTENDS to kill all Palestinians. Here is full debunking of this lie. 1/
Did Herzog "make clear" at Oct 12 press conference that Israel won’t distinguish between militants & civilians and thus intends genocide of all Pals? NO. South Africa is LYING, Herzog actually said the exact opposite, see his words below said at 11:50 2/ news.cgtn.com/news/2023-10-1…
South Africa & Israel haters deliberately ignore everything Herzog said at long press conference and misrepresent one comment. A reporter asked Herzog how Israel can alleviate impact of war on civilians “many of those who have nothing to do with Hamas.” Herzog responded: 3/
Herzog was asked a follow up question to this specific comment telling Herzog he “seemed to hold the people of Gaza the civilians of Gaza responsible for not removing Hamas and therefore by implication that makes them legitimate targets.” Herzog rejected this notion saying: 4/
Herzog noted and often comments on use of Hamas of civilian shields to attack Israel and thus the challenge. But he repeatedly noted the plan was to remove civilians from harms way. Here are three other comments by Herzog from the SAME press conference: 5/
In the SAME press conference Herzog is asked “what is the plan?”; Herzog's response is below, adding a comment about fighting terrorism. Nothing about intending to kill civilians but the challenge of fighting Hamas who hides among civilians. 6/
South Africa then cites Herzog’s words to “uproot evil” as referring to "genocide" of Palestinians but words in tweet and interview cited by South Africa specifically says Hamas not Pals. The “evil” cited is clearly Hamas, but once again South Africa and others knowingly lie. 7/
What about writing on bombs, evidence of genocide? One can argue merits of such actions but proof of genocide? No. It’s a common practice in war. NY Times covered this exact thing as a nice human interest story in Ukraine in 2023, but for Israel it’s somehow evil genocide. 8/
Main “evidence” South Africa has against Herzog is a misrepresented comment Herzog specifically clarified in the 10/12 press conference. Numerous tweets, comments and articles by Herzog saying the opposite (civilians are not a target) are ignored. Next is just a small sample: 9/
Oct 15: In an interview on CNN, Wolf Blitzer asks Herzog about civilians. Herzog’s answer (excerpts) are shown below. Nothing about killing all Palestinians, but the opposite. 10/ transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnr/date/…
Nov 5: In NY Times op-ed Herzog makes clear war is only with Hamas, goal is to remove civilians from battlefield and Palestinians will be better off without Hamas. South Africa won’t cite this – just a quote out of context from long press conference. 11/ nytimes.com/2023/11/03/opi…
Nov 16: Herzog on ANI interview makes clear civilians alerted in advance, acknowledges there are many innocent civilians and the goal is to remove Hamas. Herzog focuses on theme of how civilians are used by Hamas as shields. No intent to genocide. 12/
Dec 5: Herzog on MSNBC interview made clear war was only with Hamas and discussed actions to protect civilians with warnings and safezones. Nothing about Palestinians or genocide. 13/ thehill.com/policy/interna…
Citing Herzog as example of Israel's “intent to genocide” is an example of "maximum intent to lie" and how Israel libel works. Misrepresent one quote, ignore massive contrary evidence, even in the exact same press conference, repeat & repeat the lie and spread it. Orwell. 14/
South Africa's ICJ filing is filled with lies & misrepresented quotes like this one from Gallant debunked below. Amazing how such hateful trash is allowed in an international court like this. END
🧵Report by @Mr_Andrew_Fox debunking Hamas fatality data has been predictably attacked by Hamas defense attorneys who can't accept a group that did 10/7, kidnaps babies & rapes hostages would lie. Review of criticism and why report remains accurate: 1/ henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/q…
First, critics claim, ad nauseam, that Hamas Ministry of Health (MoH) data has been reliable in the past so it's credible today. False, as HJS report and thread below prove. Hamas vastly overstated civilian deaths in prior wars like they are now. 2/
Many react to report's key chart showing male overrepresentation in fatalities with “so what, it's known men die in wars more then women”—thereby admitting the narrative of IDF targeting women & children is false and admitting fatality list probably has many male combatants. 3/
🧵Libelous new @Airwars analysis on Israel bombing of Gaza in Oct 2023 assumes all deaths are civilian unless proven otherwise. This crazy assumption leads to their conclusion that of 606 IDF airstrikes only 32 combatants died versus 5,139 civilians or 99.4%. Analysis: 1/
According to Airwars, IDF invested millions of dollars sending up F35 & F16s, huge air force resources on 606 bombing attacks but could not kill even ONE combatant in 96% of these sorties, but did kill 8 civilians/strike. Are we supposed to take this Airwars report seriously? 2/
Fatal flaw is the "lack of information bias": Airwars does not know which males age >13 was civilian vs combatant as it does not have master list of 40,000 Hamas/PIJ militants. Airwars also does not know how many combatant deaths were omitted from any casualty list by Hamas. 3/
🧵Why does Ireland want ICJ to “broaden its interpretation” of genocide as legally defined? Why did Amnesty find law “cramped” and change it? Because ICJ 2015 ruling in Croatia case clearly proves no genocide in Gaza. Here is review of case. Worth a read to really understand: 1/
Core issue is the very high bar ICJ required to prove “special intent” under the Genocide Convention. For acts by an accused party to be genocide the “ONLY reasonable conclusion to be drawn” from those acts is to kill the group. A strict hurdle that requires hard evidence. 2/
ICJ ruling notes that Croatia argues that Serbia’s crimes are in fact such that the “ONLY reasonable inference to be drawn is that Serb leaders were motivated by genocidal intent.” But if ICJ accepts that Serbia had other specific aims, then this hurdle of intent is not met. 3/
🧵Amnesty invents new laws of genocide 5 times in its “report” which it admits. Amnesty cannot find “intent to genocide” by Israel so it literally created new standards & legal terms in a desperate attempt to find "dolus specialis." It still fails. Detail on 5 fabrications: 1/
Amnesty admits it is not following “international law” but a vague “jurisprudence” allowing them to mix & match opinions & interpretations as they wish. They falsely claim that if "direct evidence" of intent cannot be found, circumstantial evidence is good enough, voila! 2/
Amnesty fabricates more ways to show intent this time by claiming that other violations of int'l law, such as “ill-treatment of Palestinians” and basically anything bad is good enough. It gets easier and easier for Amnesty to prove intent after every page of its report. 3/
🧵Here is a pre-war image of the luxury Hamad towers where Hamas dug under to build a tunnel network where it held and killed 6 Israeli hostages. The lie of Gaza exposed: luxury civilian homes exploited by Hamas for combat. Israel is then blamed for its destruction. Detail: 1/
As disclosed today, 6 hostages were held by Hamas, then murdered, in a tunnel network with many shafts dug right under this complex of 60 5-story buildings comprising 3,000 apartments built by Qatar, in the "open air prison." Here is a map of the tunnels: 2/
Hamad Towers is a microcosm of the entire Gaza war: massive int'l aid pouring in, Gaza is actually a modern urban enclave, Hamas exploitation of civilian Gaza for war, careful IDF action within rules of war and tragic destruction blamed on Israel only. 3/ gulf-times.com/story/557266/w…
🧵Hezbollah vs IDF killed casualty ratio in Lebanon corroborates the IDF claim of at ~18,000 Hamas/PIJ combatants killed in Gaza. The 48:1 ratio in Lebanon precisely matches the ratio of Hamas vs IDF killed in Gaza. Key data & analysis below: 1/
IDF reports 46 soldiers killed in ground operations in Lebanon. Hezbollah killed are at least 2,200, identified individually by death notification, compiled by a number of observers like the one below. Hezbollah casualty counts do not appear disputed. 2/
The 2,200 killed in the ground operation matches the 3,000 Hezbollah the IDF says have been killed since 10/7. Several 100 were killed before the ground operation, others in the beeper attack, etc. Again, I have not seen disputes on these numbers. 3/