The release of new Epstein/Maxwell-related documents has refreshed allegations that Trump was somehow complicit in the blackmailing enterprise that they ran.
This could not possibly be more untrue.
Though some of the transcripts that mention Trump, Mar-a-Lago, and the Atlantic City Casino are newly public, it was previously known and recently testified to in the Maxwell trial that Epstein/Maxwell targeted Mar-a-Lago and that one of the girls in that trial, "Jane," was taken there in 1994.
It was also previously known that Trump chartered one of Epstein's planes to take him from Florida to New Jersey. This was testified to by the pilot when he took the witness stand in Maxwell's trial.
However, what is key here is that Epstein messed up by putting himself on Trump's radar. Here's how:
The Atlantic City hotel was a trap for criminals from day one. The FBI and the Trump Organization coordinated during the pre-construction phase to set it up as such. Mar-a-Lago is likely similarly set up.
Epstein/Maxwell's targeting of Mar-a-Lago employees and guests later caused Trump to ban them from the property in 2008, shortly before Epstein pleaded guilty.
Furthermore, and perhaps most significantly as it concerns these new documents, the very attorney who helped get them unsealed says that Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and was eager to help him investigate Epstein and Maxwell. And that was back in 2009.
Do you know of any other acquaintances or clients of Epstein who were eager to help any investigator or journalist who was looking into Epstein or Maxwell?
So, when you include this information (and I put the citations below), Epstein and Maxwell were walking directly into a trap set up by Commissioner Gordon and Bruce Wayne/Batman when they engaged with Trump and visited his properties!!
PS: Another bad move Epstein made was trying to "weasel" his way back into Trump's world in 2016, no doubt trying to make friends in high places ahead of a Trump Presidency (no doubt a Clinton Presidency would have been preferable to him, of course). And so Epstein had lunch with Trump ally Peter Thiel, who we now know was also a DOJ asset! Hahahaha!!
PSS: Y'all know that it was Trump's DOJ who indicted both Epstein and Maxwell, right?
: )
Citations:
Atlantic City Casino source:
Further reading:
"Jane" goes to Mar-a-Lago and pilot says Trump chartered plane
Trump bans Epstein from Mar-a-Lago
Trump and the Trump Org served as assets to the FBI/DOJ for DECADES h/t: @DawsonSField :
Video of Brad Edwards saying Trump helped him in 2009.
And look, if you don't believe me about Trump and the Trump Org serving as assets of DOJ for decades, fine. I get it. Seems wild given what the news says and what Trump says.
But I must point out to you that a journalist recently filed a FOIA that resulted in DOJ having to confirm it to be true.
I should probably advise the reader that I do not agree with the common sentiment that Guo is a "Take Down The CCP!" good guy who is being wrongfully prosecuted by the Biden DOJ. Not at all.
After going over the filings in this case, another civil case involving Guo, and watching various clips of Guo and Yvette, it is my opinion and the opinion of a few other folks, that they are agents of the Chinese Ministry of State Security who successfully infiltrated MAGA.
They have now been caught by the SDNY in a multiple fraud schemes and I think MAGA would do well to disabuse themselves of the notion the Guo was ever earnestly trying to "Take Down The CCP!"
We went over the new charges this morning on my show, post a clip later, but I have a few minutes right now so might as well thread them out here.
The other thread is worth reading if you are not caught up on the charges against Menendez and others. Items such as cash and gold bars that were presented in the first indictment as payments from his contacts for work he did on behalf of Egypt WERE ALSO payments for the work he did on behalf of Qatar.
New filing by Trump's team in support of their motion for access to Smith's CIPA 4 Filings...
"Any classification of the CIPA § 4 motion papers arises from information that was originally classified pursuant to President Trump’s authority as Commander In Chief. This information was available to President Trump while he led this Nation. Under those circumstances, it is extraordinary, unprecedented, and improper for the Special Counsel’s Office to try to withhold such information from the defense as the Office seeks to use this prosecution to target the leading candidate in the 2024 presidential election."
"...the volume of similarly sensitive classified discovery, and defense counsel’s track record of compliance in this case, there is no merit to the Office’s contention that President Trump’s cleared counsel should not be granted attorneys’- eyes-only access to the CIPA § 4 materials so that the Court has the benefit of adversarial proceedings while evaluating these complex issues."
Even though Judge Chutkan issued an ORDER back on 12/13/23 stating that "the court agrees with both parties that Defendant’s appeal automatically stays any further proceedings that would move this case towards trial or impose additional burdens of litigation on Defendant" and furthermore the court "STAYS the deadlines and proceedings scheduled by its Pretrial Order"...
Smith seeks clearance for this filing in this footnote
Motions in Limine can be fun and interesting to read as they tell us what evidence or testimony a party in the case, in this instance Special Counsel Smith, wishes the Court to exclude from being presented to or referenced in front of the Jury.
In other words, it tells us what evidence or testimony Smith does NOT want to the Jury see or hear about.
And at the same time, it can also inform us of what evidence or testimony is out there.
Parties can also ask for evidence or testimony TO BE included for the Jury using such motions.
United States v. Hunter Biden
(Gun Case out of Delaware)
Hunter's defense counsel have just filed two motions to dismiss this case- one based on "Immunity Conferred by his Diversion Agreement" which they insist is still in effect and that Special Counsel Weiss is violating... LOTS of exhibits in this one.
And the other "for Failure to Charge a Constitutionally Permissible Offense."
That's right, Hunter's team is making a Pro 2A argument based off of SCOTUS's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen! LOL!