Yesterday, I asked Grok a number of questions related to my account, centered around posts that could be a problem. Even when it gave evasive answers, it still listed beneath half a dozen or more of my own posts that clearly related to my query. So I deleted them all.

These charts show the change for my account in the subsequent 24 hour period. My posts' reach today was 3x my average, and by far the biggest day I've had in nearly six months, despite having twice as many followers as I did then.

In this thread, I'll share some of the responses it gave that outline things which are clearly impacting everyone. The change was instant as soon as I began deleting old posts that no on will ever even see again anyway.

The data will appear almost entirely in screenshots because one of the things that is affected is any discussion of this very subject.

Here's what I learned...Image
Image
I first asked for specifics. All of these are undoubtedly correct for my specific account. I then asked follow-up questions to get some more details. The list it mentions isn't complete, and we all know the name of one particular one that rhymes with rub black. /2

Image
Image
Image
I then rephrased the initial question and received a new list of problems. All five are again specific to me, despite its insistence that it doesn't actually know anything about me.

#3 is something I've warned about for a while. I've stopped doing it entirely, because the impact on the post is -75% or worse. This is designed to keep people here on X. /3Image
It specifically mentioned any posts related to this entire subject. Now if you know something about Grok, you know that it's being fed by user-generated content as well as X, so this could all just be hallucinatory nonsense on its part.

As an experiment, I searched my own TL and deleted them all anyway. Those stats in the first post in this thread were the immediate result. I could actually observe the change in realtime yesterday as I posted normally, while querying Grok and deleting posts it mentioned. /4Image
It said something that made me ask this question that I had suspected for a while. Again, whether or not this was a "real" answer, it was another worthy experiment. So delete, delete, delete.

And I didn't have to work hard, because Grok kept spitting out my own posts below its answers, so I just worked through the ones it brought up to me as examples, again, even as it existed it didn't know anything about me. And again it produced extremely noticeable instant results. /5Image
I then asked for more specifics about my posts. Again, all three of these are 100% spot on. It very clearly was able to compare the internal rules to my specific timeline. Again, I deleted as many old posts as I could find that would've tripped this one. Helpfully, it suggested most of them for me. /6Image
Image
Image
I asked about word lists and it helpfully provided a number of examples. Sometimes I had to create a new session because it would stop giving account specifics, but clearly it has the ability. /7

Image
Image
Image
After getting my account cleaned up and seeing the radically positive results last night, I was curious today about other word lists. Note that these are included for information purposes only. I'm glad it will answer these questions frankly. Adults should expect nothing less. /8 Image
It mentioned that spelling variations and substitutions are known & treated the same, so I asked about that. Again, this example isn't intended to be offensive, but it was humorous to watch the engine trip over itself. It eventually stopped & chastised me for the words it used.

This video is included because it is a very good example of the futility of trying to mask such words with 90s hacker tricks. It will all be held against your account, so just don't do it. /9
When asked for variations, it taught me a few new ones. It's clear that their sentiment analysis and variation detection outstrips our ability to get away with it. This is shared because it is comical, and shows what will impact your whole account. /10
Image
Image
I asked about some other categories of subject areas that aren't inherently blue. It made very clear that much of the discourse on the right falls outside of what is permitted. This area is a a really big deal. /11


Image
Image
Image
Image
Some of the state of mind references are a completely normal part of the English language, but keep in mind using any of them will have an impact on your entire profile, not just one specific post, as demonstrated above. /12
Image
Image
In summary, X has a robust sentiment analysis regime running in realtime on everything we say. Even apart from keeping an account, or getting paid for it, these directly affect whether anyone ever sees our posts at all. I think that's something that matters to us all. /13 Image
If you want to search your own account, the Advanced Search feature is the best way to do it. Note that all searches are literal so "dog" won't find "dogs" and so forth.

twitter.com/search-advanced

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🗿 Woe to those who dwell upon the earth 🗿

🗿 Woe to those who dwell upon the earth 🗿 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @treblewoe

Jan 31
A modest proposal for how Apple can come to dominate the AI race without ever actually matching with the current leaders:

Apple has always been a hardware company because it wanted to be, & a platform vendor because it had to be. Without the OS, their hardware wouldn't matter /1 Image
There are only two platform vendors in the world that have ever mattered: Microsoft & Apple. Being a platform vendor has wildly different considerations than simply being a software vendor. Platform sw work is meta-work that enables everyone else to do their own work. /2
It was the most rewarding part of my time there. I made sure the apps built on the platform kept working for everyone else who was doing their own work, while we changed everything around underneath them. Every OS update is a remodel to varying degrees. There's always fallout. /3
Read 28 tweets
Jan 20
One of the most pressing problems in evaluating AIs right now is testing to discern knowledge from memorization. Lots of models score near the limits of existing tests, until a few trivial details are changed, then the scores plummet. This is a crucial definition of reasoning. /1
A machine that can spit out 4 every time it sees 2+2 could either understand functionally how addition and numerals work, or it could simply recognize the pattern and repeat it. That's how trivial the changes are that are breaking the scores for some major models today. /2
As researchers push toward the current brass ring of artificial general intelligence (AGI), this is precisely what they're pursuing. And much of that pursuit amounts to an iterative loop through such permutations to discern whether the model is extrapolating general knowledge. /3
Read 15 tweets
Jan 18
Once again, and tragically, Tate isn't entirely wrong here, although he has no idea why. The solution to Tate isn't for everyone to read more books. Passively reading a book is sitting in the cuck chair watching a better man think. Reading makes most men far stupider & worse. /1
By far the most wildly idiotic, braindead, irrational things I've ever heard have come from avid, moderately "intelligent" readers. It quickly becomes a vacuous lifestyle no different than video games or sportsball, a hypocritical "identity" that someone else said was upright. /2
My personal burning hatred for the book reader was cemented when I spent some time explaining something to someone again fairly "intelligent." He flatly refused to believe a word of it until I could show him what book I got it from. That's when it dawned on me. /3
Read 12 tweets
Jan 17
"Identity politics" is an extraordinarily subversive term that relies on deliberately inverting basic ideas and then telling a brazen lie with the result. Here's how they pulled it off. /1 Image
Identity has a very specific, narrow, established definition. Going back thousands of years to its Latin root, identity means sameness. An identical thing is exactly the same, not merely similar. Webster 1828 explicitly separates identity from similarity. /2Image
Image
Image
As we dicussed in this week's Friend & Enemy episode of @StoneChoir, one of the principal examples of political identification is the mutual defense treaty. NATO Article 5 says an armed attack on one member country is an armed attack on all member countries. /3
Read 22 tweets
Dec 30, 2024
Since techbro work hours are on the docket, here's the trajectory of someone who started at Apple as a contractor working 100 hour weeks and ended up managing a team where making sure nothing like that ever happened to my guys was paramount. /1 Image
My first five months at Apple in 2000 were as a Volt contractor. Contractors are even more disposable than H-1Bs. But at the time there was still a realistic path to full-time employment. The upside of contracting was you were hourly, not salaried. /2
Being eligible for overtime was a pretty sweet deal in a place where crunchtime was a recurring theme. As we got to the end of my first major project, there was more testing to do than hours in the day. I only worked 100 hour weeks 2 weeks in a row, & it was entirely voluntary /3
Read 18 tweets
Dec 29, 2024
Even in this post-Christian West, our notion of "gods" is entirely shaped by the Christian relationship with God.

Every non-European race has preserved their gods too, but those relationships are so wildly alien, we can't see their aftermath right before our eyes. /1 Image
Even semi-accurate depictions of Greek or Roman life capture the essence of the problem. They had gods with myths, domains, and rites. But the key distinction was the utterly transactional nature of the relationship between god and supplicant. /2
They didn't love their gods in any sense we appreciate today. They knew the gods controlled the harvest & fertility & the outcomes of war, so they prayed and sacrificed for their own advantage. "Worship" was negotiation and fulfillment of contracts. Utterly alien to the West. /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(