Yesterday, I asked Grok a number of questions related to my account, centered around posts that could be a problem. Even when it gave evasive answers, it still listed beneath half a dozen or more of my own posts that clearly related to my query. So I deleted them all.
These charts show the change for my account in the subsequent 24 hour period. My posts' reach today was 3x my average, and by far the biggest day I've had in nearly six months, despite having twice as many followers as I did then.
In this thread, I'll share some of the responses it gave that outline things which are clearly impacting everyone. The change was instant as soon as I began deleting old posts that no on will ever even see again anyway.
The data will appear almost entirely in screenshots because one of the things that is affected is any discussion of this very subject.
Here's what I learned...
I first asked for specifics. All of these are undoubtedly correct for my specific account. I then asked follow-up questions to get some more details. The list it mentions isn't complete, and we all know the name of one particular one that rhymes with rub black. /2
I then rephrased the initial question and received a new list of problems. All five are again specific to me, despite its insistence that it doesn't actually know anything about me.
#3 is something I've warned about for a while. I've stopped doing it entirely, because the impact on the post is -75% or worse. This is designed to keep people here on X. /3
It specifically mentioned any posts related to this entire subject. Now if you know something about Grok, you know that it's being fed by user-generated content as well as X, so this could all just be hallucinatory nonsense on its part.
As an experiment, I searched my own TL and deleted them all anyway. Those stats in the first post in this thread were the immediate result. I could actually observe the change in realtime yesterday as I posted normally, while querying Grok and deleting posts it mentioned. /4
It said something that made me ask this question that I had suspected for a while. Again, whether or not this was a "real" answer, it was another worthy experiment. So delete, delete, delete.
And I didn't have to work hard, because Grok kept spitting out my own posts below its answers, so I just worked through the ones it brought up to me as examples, again, even as it existed it didn't know anything about me. And again it produced extremely noticeable instant results. /5
I then asked for more specifics about my posts. Again, all three of these are 100% spot on. It very clearly was able to compare the internal rules to my specific timeline. Again, I deleted as many old posts as I could find that would've tripped this one. Helpfully, it suggested most of them for me. /6
I asked about word lists and it helpfully provided a number of examples. Sometimes I had to create a new session because it would stop giving account specifics, but clearly it has the ability. /7
After getting my account cleaned up and seeing the radically positive results last night, I was curious today about other word lists. Note that these are included for information purposes only. I'm glad it will answer these questions frankly. Adults should expect nothing less. /8
It mentioned that spelling variations and substitutions are known & treated the same, so I asked about that. Again, this example isn't intended to be offensive, but it was humorous to watch the engine trip over itself. It eventually stopped & chastised me for the words it used.
This video is included because it is a very good example of the futility of trying to mask such words with 90s hacker tricks. It will all be held against your account, so just don't do it. /9
When asked for variations, it taught me a few new ones. It's clear that their sentiment analysis and variation detection outstrips our ability to get away with it. This is shared because it is comical, and shows what will impact your whole account. /10
I asked about some other categories of subject areas that aren't inherently blue. It made very clear that much of the discourse on the right falls outside of what is permitted. This area is a a really big deal. /11
Some of the state of mind references are a completely normal part of the English language, but keep in mind using any of them will have an impact on your entire profile, not just one specific post, as demonstrated above. /12
In summary, X has a robust sentiment analysis regime running in realtime on everything we say. Even apart from keeping an account, or getting paid for it, these directly affect whether anyone ever sees our posts at all. I think that's something that matters to us all. /13
If you want to search your own account, the Advanced Search feature is the best way to do it. Note that all searches are literal so "dog" won't find "dogs" and so forth.
This statement must be opposed by all men, Christian and pagan alike. It is a gross abuse of Scripture & reason, and is a subversive attack on the most core matter of our day. This brief 🧵is just a cursory glance at the most glaring, irredeemable errors contained therein.
The definition & body go out of their way to avoid that Nations are quite literally races, and that the places/jurisdictions God appoints each race are downstream from that. A Nation isn't the happenstance collection of "particular" "people" (another racial term) on a grid square
Confusing the Great Commission with Christian Nationalism conflates the two Kingdoms of Christ. Conquest is the only means by which a Christian Nation could be said to fulfill that. A Nation is a household, writ large. The GC is very explicitly about teaching the moral law.
Will Spencer first DM'd me last December after enjoying the EO episode. We talked on and off intermittently until the beginning of May when he was getting much more into Stone Choir. He had been reading both of us on X for some time. He asked to have us as paywall guests. /1
I had no agenda or goal with him. We were just friends chatting. I knew he was a full-blooded jew, but from what I had seen online, he seemed a genuine Christian who had left that wickedness behind. We discussed WWII frankly (at his prompting) and were in agreement. /2
We talked about deprogramming people who are slaves to the modern lies, and about the demonic nature of The Big Lie. He mentions here that what he really thinks he won't even "say near phones," so you certainly won't find it in his attack episode released today. /3
A long screenshot thread of my cross-examination of Claude to get to what I already knew I'd find when I started, but it was fun getting there.
A brief history of hebrew black magick, and other contributions to Christendom: 1/🧵
This is occultism they picked up 2700 years ago, but its roots are much deeper than that. They simply preserved what everyone else (thankfully) lost. /2
This is pretty much more than I want to know about any of this, but it was necessary to get from thesis to conclusion. /3
The Right is a fractured, schizophrenic, roiling mass of conflicting values & agendas. To the extent that there's any unifying cause it's probably that we've gone too far as a society, & need to roll some number of things back. The conflicts are about which ones & how far.
🧵
Within the Right, many different personalities rise to prominence as impactful "voices" for the rest. Some are fantastic at branding, some are incisive analysts, some are simply astroturfed as part of a non-obvious controlled opposition play, & some are just entertaining posters.
When someone rises to any degree of prominence, there is an unfortunate natural tendency for the rest to think "leader."
Personally I don't look at anyone as a leader. Instead I look at all of them as ammunition factories, producing weapons I can use to my own ends.
Did you know that there's corn liquor in your gas tank because of the riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago?
The modern preëminence of the Iowa Caucuses came from the aftermath, & lead to the disasters we have today. This is how history is really made… 🧵1
Held from August 26-29, 1968, the Chicago DNC convention occurred only months after both MLK and JFK were assassinated. The country had been rocked by race riots and antiwar protests. Things seemed much closer to the cusp of implosion than even today. 🧵2
Unlike the pro forma conventions today, in 1968 even the slates of candidates had not been settled for every delegation until the action began on the floor. Actual decisions on the Convention floor would define the outcome, which made the fighting very real & consequential. 🧵3
Have you ever heard someone refer to God as "Yahweh"? That's just the English for His revealed name in the OT, right? That must mean it's the ancient Christian practice!
In Stone Choir spirit (link in bio), let's look at the genealogy of this one, because it is wild. 1🧵
N.b. this thread is *not* about "the secret name of God," or YHWH, or Jehovah, or vowel pointing, or any other such debate. It is solely focused how & when the six letters "Yahweh" came into common use in English.
* denotes url links at the end since twitter suppresses them. 2🧵
A friend asked this week whether a CPH commentary that insists on translating Lord as "Yahweh" is subversive.
My first instinct was "yes, absolutely." But what do I know? So I turned next to Google Ngrams, which searches over 8M books going back centuries. 3🧵