Yesterday, I asked Grok a number of questions related to my account, centered around posts that could be a problem. Even when it gave evasive answers, it still listed beneath half a dozen or more of my own posts that clearly related to my query. So I deleted them all.
These charts show the change for my account in the subsequent 24 hour period. My posts' reach today was 3x my average, and by far the biggest day I've had in nearly six months, despite having twice as many followers as I did then.
In this thread, I'll share some of the responses it gave that outline things which are clearly impacting everyone. The change was instant as soon as I began deleting old posts that no on will ever even see again anyway.
The data will appear almost entirely in screenshots because one of the things that is affected is any discussion of this very subject.
Here's what I learned...
I first asked for specifics. All of these are undoubtedly correct for my specific account. I then asked follow-up questions to get some more details. The list it mentions isn't complete, and we all know the name of one particular one that rhymes with rub black. /2
I then rephrased the initial question and received a new list of problems. All five are again specific to me, despite its insistence that it doesn't actually know anything about me.
#3 is something I've warned about for a while. I've stopped doing it entirely, because the impact on the post is -75% or worse. This is designed to keep people here on X. /3
It specifically mentioned any posts related to this entire subject. Now if you know something about Grok, you know that it's being fed by user-generated content as well as X, so this could all just be hallucinatory nonsense on its part.
As an experiment, I searched my own TL and deleted them all anyway. Those stats in the first post in this thread were the immediate result. I could actually observe the change in realtime yesterday as I posted normally, while querying Grok and deleting posts it mentioned. /4
It said something that made me ask this question that I had suspected for a while. Again, whether or not this was a "real" answer, it was another worthy experiment. So delete, delete, delete.
And I didn't have to work hard, because Grok kept spitting out my own posts below its answers, so I just worked through the ones it brought up to me as examples, again, even as it existed it didn't know anything about me. And again it produced extremely noticeable instant results. /5
I then asked for more specifics about my posts. Again, all three of these are 100% spot on. It very clearly was able to compare the internal rules to my specific timeline. Again, I deleted as many old posts as I could find that would've tripped this one. Helpfully, it suggested most of them for me. /6
I asked about word lists and it helpfully provided a number of examples. Sometimes I had to create a new session because it would stop giving account specifics, but clearly it has the ability. /7
After getting my account cleaned up and seeing the radically positive results last night, I was curious today about other word lists. Note that these are included for information purposes only. I'm glad it will answer these questions frankly. Adults should expect nothing less. /8
It mentioned that spelling variations and substitutions are known & treated the same, so I asked about that. Again, this example isn't intended to be offensive, but it was humorous to watch the engine trip over itself. It eventually stopped & chastised me for the words it used.
This video is included because it is a very good example of the futility of trying to mask such words with 90s hacker tricks. It will all be held against your account, so just don't do it. /9
When asked for variations, it taught me a few new ones. It's clear that their sentiment analysis and variation detection outstrips our ability to get away with it. This is shared because it is comical, and shows what will impact your whole account. /10
I asked about some other categories of subject areas that aren't inherently blue. It made very clear that much of the discourse on the right falls outside of what is permitted. This area is a a really big deal. /11
Some of the state of mind references are a completely normal part of the English language, but keep in mind using any of them will have an impact on your entire profile, not just one specific post, as demonstrated above. /12
In summary, X has a robust sentiment analysis regime running in realtime on everything we say. Even apart from keeping an account, or getting paid for it, these directly affect whether anyone ever sees our posts at all. I think that's something that matters to us all. /13
If you want to search your own account, the Advanced Search feature is the best way to do it. Note that all searches are literal so "dog" won't find "dogs" and so forth.
Apple's accumulating public failures to deliver on promised features & full potential of its products are the direct result of Tim Cook's beancounter mismanagement, which boils down to selling the worst product they can get away with. This is an effortpost thread on Apple AI. /1
This week John Gruber on Daringfireball wrote the most scathing piece I can ever remember from him against Apple. His criticisms are entirely correct and worth a read, but they are incomplete. Here's a solid Grok tl;dr. /2 daringfireball.net/2025/03/someth…
What Gruber misses is when & why these catastrophic failures began. We're going to have to jump back in time more than once, and jump around to seemingly disconnected aspects of the business to tie this all together, which is why people miss it. /3
People haven't wargamed why Grok, OpenAI, Amazon & Apple are pouring so much effort into voice interfaces with AI. The hidden motivations are extremely bad, and are rapidly going to do tremendous harm to billions. (A brief thread) /1
1) Vocal conversation is deeply personal, intimate, & emotional. All the effort now on the voices is going into their emotional inflection & ability to pick up on those cues from us. This is going to cause seemingly real bonds to form between person & corporate datacenter. /2
2) The vast majority of the population here & abroad are practically illiterate. Even those who can read the words can't follow a train of throught or reason from it. Voice UI means anyone can (again seemingly) interact effectively with the corporate policy engine in a box. /3
Should you hear stories about FBI agents fearing for their livelihoods, their reputations, and the welfare of their families, remember this photograph, and harden your heart against them all.
And never forget why they really died.
btw the OP isn't theoretical. the bastards are really trying to run this play against us
A modest proposal for how Apple can come to dominate the AI race without ever actually matching with the current leaders:
Apple has always been a hardware company because it wanted to be, & a platform vendor because it had to be. Without the OS, their hardware wouldn't matter /1
There are only two platform vendors in the world that have ever mattered: Microsoft & Apple. Being a platform vendor has wildly different considerations than simply being a software vendor. Platform sw work is meta-work that enables everyone else to do their own work. /2
It was the most rewarding part of my time there. I made sure the apps built on the platform kept working for everyone else who was doing their own work, while we changed everything around underneath them. Every OS update is a remodel to varying degrees. There's always fallout. /3
One of the most pressing problems in evaluating AIs right now is testing to discern knowledge from memorization. Lots of models score near the limits of existing tests, until a few trivial details are changed, then the scores plummet. This is a crucial definition of reasoning. /1
A machine that can spit out 4 every time it sees 2+2 could either understand functionally how addition and numerals work, or it could simply recognize the pattern and repeat it. That's how trivial the changes are that are breaking the scores for some major models today. /2
As researchers push toward the current brass ring of artificial general intelligence (AGI), this is precisely what they're pursuing. And much of that pursuit amounts to an iterative loop through such permutations to discern whether the model is extrapolating general knowledge. /3
Once again, and tragically, Tate isn't entirely wrong here, although he has no idea why. The solution to Tate isn't for everyone to read more books. Passively reading a book is sitting in the cuck chair watching a better man think. Reading makes most men far stupider & worse. /1
By far the most wildly idiotic, braindead, irrational things I've ever heard have come from avid, moderately "intelligent" readers. It quickly becomes a vacuous lifestyle no different than video games or sportsball, a hypocritical "identity" that someone else said was upright. /2
My personal burning hatred for the book reader was cemented when I spent some time explaining something to someone again fairly "intelligent." He flatly refused to believe a word of it until I could show him what book I got it from. That's when it dawned on me. /3