Aizenberg Profile picture
Jan 5, 2024 • 14 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
🧵Fabricated Israel genocide claim relies on quotes by Israeli officials to show “specific intent” necessary to prove genocide. South Africa ICJ filing lists 8 quotes by PM Netanyahu (numbered below) claiming intent to genocide. But each one is a lie. See debunking of all 8: 1/ Image
Quote 1: Bibi promised “to operate forcefully everywhere.” Does this prove "specific intent" to genocide? NO. Tweet literally says opposite, attacking only Hamas and telling civilians to leave! Lie #1 by South Africa, this is the FIRST evidence claiming Bibi intends genocide. 2/ Image
Quote 2: Bibi said ““[w]e are striking our enemies with unprecedented might.” Did this mean intention to kill all Pals? No. In same 3 min statement he specifically states the goal is to “eliminate Hamas” and NEVER refers to Pals or civilians. Lie #2. 3/

Image
Quote 3: South Africa claims AFTER airstrikes that killed 2,670 Pals Bibi said soldiers “understand scope of mission” & stand ready “to defeat bloodthirsty monsters who have risen against [Israel] to destroy us.” There are 2 lies here, one shows shoddiness of court document. 4/
First, South Africa claims Bibi’s words came AFTER 2,670 Pals killed, as if they were connected. But the document cited about deaths is from Oct 17 (see below) while Bibi’s statement was made on Oct 15 or two days earlier! So the supposed connection is incredibly dishonest. 5/ Image
Second, Bibi said absolutely nothing, zero, about killing Palestinians, genocide, anything like this. Here is the entire statement. It specifically names Hamas as the monsters, not civilians. Lie #3 by South Africa. 6/ gov.il/en/departments…
Image
Quote 4: South Africa cites Bibi saying to Knesset situation as “struggle between the children of light and children of darkness, between humanity and law of the jungle” as “dehumanizing” and therefore "specific intent" to genocide. This is false, just lie #4 as shown next. 7/
Bibi's words to Knesset only cite Hamas, never Palestinians or killing civilians, names Hamas often as the “darkness” & "murderers." Not Palestinians or anyone else. It’s not "dehumanizing" to call rapists & baby kidnappers these things. Below is the core of Bibi's statement. 8/ Image
Quote 5: South Africa cites a second statement by Bibi about “sons of lightness and… darkness” and “good” vs “evil” as somehow genocidal. Here is the full tweet; but the prior tweet in same thread specifically says “Hamas” – not Palestinians. Lie #5. 9/ Image
Quote 6: South Africa cites Bibi’s “Christmas message” below as “specific intent” to kill all Palestinians. It’s not clear how, there is nothing remotely “genocidal.” Calling rapists & baby kidnappers “monsters” and “barbarians” does not evidence genocidal intent. Lie #6. 10/ Image
Quote 7: South Africa claims Bibi’s reference to biblical story of Amalek evidences intent to genocide. But there is no evidence he meant Palestinians vs Hamas only. Amalek is used metaphorically in Jewish study to refer to mortal enemies of Jews, in this case Hamas. 11/
It may be true other Israelis in past used Amalek to refer to Palestinians. This does not therefore prove Bibi meant Pals. But better evidence: in SAME press statement Bibi specifically noted Hamas & “the murderers” were the target; so Hamas=Amalek. 12/ gov.il/en/departments…
Image
Quote 8: This is the second time Bibi mentioned Amalek, again the focus was clearly on Hamas. He literally said Hamas the sentence before. So how it is possible to claim Bibi really said Amalek as meaning to kill ALL Palestinians? Lie #8. 13/ Image
South Africa lies 8 times in failed effort to show Netanyahu voiced “specific intent” to genocide. Without intent proven, entire genocide charge against Israel FALLS APART. How strong can their case be if there isn't even ONE convincing "genocidal" quote by Israel’s PM? END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aizenberg

Aizenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aizenberg55

Feb 26
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded the IDF killed ONLY civilians in an Oct 10, 2023 attack has now been proven to have killed senior PIJ commander Ashraf al-Qara (ID 413317470, Age 53). This is the 3rd case found recently. Airwars will you update the data? 1/ Image
Airwars' assessment for the strike assumed civilian status for everyone, although in this case they had clues 53 year old Al-Qara was a commander. But they still counted him as a civilian. Now you know @Airwars @Emily_4319 @Anna_Zahn1 @desilva_rowena 2/
airwars.org/civilian-casua…
Here is the second case of an Airwars analysis that assumed only civilians were killed: in fact it also killed confirmed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). 3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 25
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded IDF killed ONLY civilians based on "local sources" has now been proven to have killed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). This is the 2nd case found recently. The Yassin family head was a terrorist leader. 1/ Image
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! Seriously. 2/
But with just a handful of recent Hamas & PIJ martyr notices showing Oct 2023 deaths, the narrative is badly cracking. Mo’men Amin Jabara al-Agha, age 27—listed by Airwars as a civilian—was honored by Hamas as member of al-Qassam Brigades. Yassin is the second case found. 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 24
đź§µToday we learn based on Hamas & PIJ admissions that a so-called journalist, Doctors without Borders worker & nursing supervisor at Kamal Adwan Hospital were combatants killed in action. IDF did not target civilians but terrorists posing as them. The truth will be revealed. 1/ Image
This thread identifies these persons from PIJ martyr notices. Hamas and PIJ are revealing more and more of their losses. @GabrielEpsteinX continues to expose the truth. 2/
Here is a nursing supervisor at Kamal Adwan hospital outed as a Hamas militant. END
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
🧵Airwars is often cited as “proving” excessive civilian harm in IDF airstrikes. But within only a handful of recent Hamas martyr notices, a strike they labeled “civilian-only” included a confirmed combatant. As more notices emerge, the @airwars "evidence" will collapse. 1/ Image
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! 2/
This outcome isn’t a surprise. Airwars has no reliable way to identify combatants in Gaza. Hamas & PIJ don’t publish combatant or casualty lists, fighters wear civilian clothes, live in family homes, and Gazans are instructed to conceal combatant deaths. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Feb 5
🧵The Gaza WWI cemetery story should focus on Hamas militarizing it with tunnels & rockets. That’s the war crime. That’s the depravity. The destroyed corner is where the tunnel detonation occurred. As usual, only Israel’s response is condemned. Sources & details: 1/ Image
In August 2025 the IDF destroyed a km long tunnel adjacent to the cemetery. This has been geolocated in detail, confirming the demolition occurred where the current damage is found. 2/ Image
The Guardian piece today shows the area of destruction exactly where the tunnel charge was set off. 3/ theguardian.com/world/2026/feb…Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
đź§µAccording to many military experts like @EvansRyan202 @Mpolymer apocalyptic images of Gaza, like below are prima facie evidence of disproportionate attacks. Eyesight is all you need to know. The US would not do this. Is that true? Scroll down for more photos and the answer. 1/ Image
Large areas were totally destroyed or damaged. It's true, like here: Image
And here is more of the wasteland: Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(