Jim Bianco Profile picture
Jan 6, 2024 26 tweets 11 min read Read on X
1/23

A long 🧵on the biggest economic issue not being discussed ... global shipping problems and potential return of goods inflation.

Below uses IMF Port call data on shipping traffic (via ship transponders and satellites).



@mercoglianos @johnkonradportwatch.imf.org/pages/port-mon…
2/23

The Bab el-Mandeb is the 16 miles between Yemen and Djibouti, connecting the southern Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden.

This is where the Houthis are causing all the trouble.

BTW, Bab el-Mandeb roughly translates into "Gate of Tears" or "Gate of Grief."

How appropriate! Image
3/23

Between 12% and 15% of world shipping traverses the Red Sea. The Houthis are making an impact.

This chart shows how the volume of trade has collapsed. Updates should show it has fallen further.

FYI - March 2021 was Ever Given getting wedged in the Suez Canal. Image
4/23

High-value cargo ship traffic is down 50% from late November.

Shipping insurance does not cover war risk; that insurance is now up 300% to 500% (0.2% to 0.7% of the value of the ship/cargo).

It is too expensive and risky to travel via this route. Image
5/23

Tankers are impacted, but not to the degree that cargo ships are disrupted.

The Houthis are attacking cargo ships, not tankers. Image
6/23

The Suez Canal is at the (northern) top of the Red Sea and connects it with the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Image
7/23

This Suez Canal is one of the most important shipping lanes in the world, if not the world's most important.

We are also seeing a drop off in shipping volume moving through it.

(Not as much as the Bab el-Mandeb as the Saudis have ports in the middle of the Red Sea.) Image
8/23

Overall, ship traffic through the Suez is down about 20 ships a day in the last 3 weeks. No container ships are in the Red Sea.

The Egyptians charge a $500k toll to pass through, so they are losing some $10m/day.

There have to be unhappy people in Cairo. Image
9/23

So, where are the ships going?

Around Africa and the Cape of Good Hope.

(Note Durban on the map) Image
10/23

From Asia, going around the Cape of Good Hope (red), versus the Red Sea/Suez (green) adds about 10 days and 3,300 miles to a one-way trip. Image
11/23

Ships are now reaching the Cape (Dec 25 to Jan 2 labels).

This number is expected to spike much higher in the coming days. Image
11/23

When they get there, they have to refuel in Durban, SA.

Refueling or bunker prices are skyrocketing to 6-year highs in anticipation of demand.

The facilities were not built for the huge armada heading its way. So, congestion delays.

oilmonster.com/bunker-fuel-pr…
Image
12/23

In addition to these shipping problems, there are continuing problems in the Panama Canal.

The Canal uses a series of locks and draws water from the lake Gutan. Image
13/23

Every time the locks are used, they empty the equivalent of 400 swimming pools into the ocean.

Combine this water loss with the ongoing drought, and Lake Gutan is at its lowest in years.

(Cannot pump salt water back into a freshwater lake.) Image
14/23

The lake is below the levels where the Canal can operate at maximum capacity. Image
15/23

Consequently, the number of ships passing through the Canal is at COVID shutdown levels of 2020 (black line).

And many of these ships are not fully loaded to keep their drafts shallower. Image
16/23

There are several shipping choke points around the world.

Much of the world's shipping travels through one of these points. Image
17/23

Add it up, and the number of cargo ships traversing all these choke points is at a three-year low.

Why? They are all on the high seas, taking longer routes to get to their destinations. Image
18/23

And the amount of IMPORT cargo reaching all worldwide ports has been plunging the last few weeks.

Currently, import volumes are as low as the COVID shutdowns. Image
19/23

70% of all shipping is on long-term contracts ... a shuttle between ports (Asia and Europe).

If they have to go around Africa, that adds 20+ days to the route.

So, if a ship can make six runs yearly, the extra distance means it can only do 4 or 5 runs yearly. Image
20/23

To make up for this shortfall of runs, excess shipping capacity is contracted on the "spot" market.

We have seen a massive spike in "spot" shipping rates in the last week (bottom panel). Image
21/23

What happens when a ship docks in port? Those 15k boxes (TEUs) are unloaded.

They are put on a truck or rail and sent to an unpacking center where the containers are emptied.

Then, they are put on another truck or rail and sent to distribution centers.

From there, the goods are distributed all over the country to those who purchase those goods.

This is a massive logistical undertaking.

What makes it work is predictable schedules.

Now that ships will be weeks late, the logistical network will get out of balance, and delivery schedules will be a mess for months.

We will see this again?Image
22/23

Leading to goods inflation again?

See what goods inflation did into late 2022 when supply chains were messed up in 2020 and 2021. Image
23/23

Goods are fungible. They will be diverted from the US if they get higher prices in Europe.

So yes, if these shipping problems persist, they will impact the US.

This could disrupt the "last mile" to 2% inflation and many Fed rate cuts in 2024.
Bonus

Why doesn't the US Navy end the Houthi threat to shipping?

That involves picking a side in a Sunni/Shiite Arab civil war and the potential for civilian casualties.

Very tricky politically.

What about getting more involved in "defensively" protecting ships.

This means an open-ended commitment to using weapons that cost millions to stop Houthi weapons that cost thousands.

The US tried to get other countries to sign up to help (Operation Prosperity Guardian), but that effort has yet to be successful.
I got really good feedback on this thread. I'm glad it was snowing in Chicago yesterday, which kept me inside to finish it.

One follow-up. The problem is shipping, not "stuff"(goods).

In 2020/2021, the problem that led to the rise in goods inflation (chart below) was not a lack of stuff.

The problem was it was in all the wrong places.

* In China, in the shipping department of its manufacturer

* In a container anchored off San Pedro Bay, wait for a berth in the port of LA or Long Beach to unload

* in a stack of containers waiting to be unpacked in the yard of the port.

* In a distribution center because it arrived weeks late and had no delivery scheduled (because it missed it).

And remember, a lot of "stuff" is not end-user consumer goods that go straight to the shelves. It is parts and supplies that go into other products.

So even though US car production slowed from 209K in July 2020 to 84k in September 2021, all the parts to make 200k cars every month existed, they were all in the wrong places (see the list above). This is why production slowed. The Achilles Heel of "Just-in-Time."

Goods inflation spiked (chart below) because a lot of stuff has inelasticity. This is a fancy economics term, meaning you want it now and will pay up to get what is available.

This is why cars were trading well over sticker price in 2021; you needed one now and were not going to wait months or a year for all the stuff to get to the right places so manufacturing schedules could return to normal.

The current problems with shipping described in the thread above are worrisome. Are we about to have another round of stuff all in the wrong places? And when that happens, will people start paying up to get what is available, a.k.a. goods inflation?

With stock and bond prices rallying hard in the last few months, they have profits they can use to pay up.

The thread above shows that the shipping problems are a couple of weeks old. Tell me how long this disruption will last, and I'll tell you how bad goods inflation will get.

If it ended tomorrow, the answer is not that bad. But it does not look like it is ending tomorrow, and no apparent solution to getting stuff to the right place on time is currently visible. That visibility will come; these issues will not last forever.

How long will it take?

@mercoglianos @johnkonradImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Jan 17
1/5

I have not posted a spot $BTC ETF update in a while, so here is one.

These ETFs started trading a year ago (Jan 11, 2024). Their total assets are $114 billion. (Note that they started at $29B on day 1 due to the $GBTC conversion.)

Three funds make up the vast majority. Image
2/5

The net NEW money invested in all Spot BTC ETFs was $36.69B (bottom panel).

This excludes the $29B of $GBTC conversion on day 1. Image
3/5

The dollar cost average purchase price is $BTC $74.3k (blue line), representing an unrealized gain of ~25%, or $12.73B (bottom panel).

All these gains came after the election. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 3
1/5

*US DEC. ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX RISES TO 49.3; EST. 48.2

ISM beat

And as the chart shows, this is the second-highest reading since October 2022 (26 months).

(best sure to see the last post in this thread)Image
2/5

Prices Paid 52.5 versus the estimate of 51.8

It is staying "sticky" above 50 (meaning more rising than falling prices)

Remind me again ... why is the Fed cutting rates? Image
3/5

New Orders is in the Index of Leading Economic Indicators. Economists think it is that important.

It jumped to 52.5, equaling its highest reading since June 2022 (the month YoY CPI hit 9%).

Remind me again: why is the Fed cutting rates? Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 29, 2024
1/3

The repost below expresses a common belief that risk assets are effective inflation hedges.

History suggests they are not.

This chart shows that the inflation of the 1960s and 1970s wiped out 64% of the after-inflation stock gains by 1982 (meaning inflation beat stocks by 64%). And all inflation-adjusted gains of the previous 27+ years (back to 1954) were gone (meaning inflation beat stocks over the previous 27 years).

It took until 1992, 28 years later, for stocks to finally start beating cumulative inflation since 1966.Image
2/3

Too many vastly underestimate the devastating impact of inflation.

Since the 2021 peak, when the Fed called inflation"transitory," stocks have only beaten inflation by just 15% (with dividends).

So a 10% to 12% correct and a little bit more inflation and four years of relative purchasing power is gone (meaning you are no better off than four years ago).Image
3/3

As I argue here, the crypto crowd also forgets inflation when they make their long-term forecasts.

Read 4 tweets
Dec 28, 2024
1/6

🧵on yields and yield curve
---
The 30-year yield made a new 2024 close high yesterday.

Now, the highest yield since November 2023. Image
2/6

The 10-year yield is just eight basis points away from a new 2024 high.

Two trading days left this year. Image
3/6

The 2-year funds spread is the narrowest since March 2023 (bottom panel).

The massive reversal to negative in March 2023 was driven by the string of bank failures highlighted by Silicon Valley Bank. These failures were driven by fear of unrealized bond losses. So, while the Fed subsequently hiked three more times through July 2023, this spread inverting signaled the "end is near" for the rate-hiking cycle.

Now, at just -5 bps, this spread is the narrowest it has been in ~20 months and close to signaling "the end is near," if not already done, on the rate-cutting cycle.Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 25, 2024
1/3

What is TLT Signaling?

TLT is the iShares 20-Treasury ETF, one of today's largest and most influential bond ETFs.

I've been arguing that the bond market rise in yields as the Fed cutting rates has been a rejection of the easing cycle. The bond market is saying the Fed has the wrong policy.

Monetary easing is not necessary given the strength of the US economy (See Atlanta Fed GDPnow) and the coming "Trump Stimulus. Fed easing is raising inflation expectations and driving yields higher.

Here is a chart of TLT's price (black) and cumulative flows (red).

From the day the Fed started hiking (March 16, 2022) to the November 7, 2024, FOMC meeting (labeled), cumulative inflows were steady, totaling over $55 billion.

A reasonable interpretation is that bond investors agreed with the Fed's policy from March 2022 to November 2024, even if it was hiking, as it was fighting inflation.

However, since the Fed cut again in November, bond investors have reversed and fled the bond market. Almost $10 billion has left TLT.Image
2/3

The bottom panel is a rolling 30-day flow into TLT. The last 30 days have seen a cumulative outflow of $8.69B, easily the largest 30-day outflow in TLT's history.

Again, this outflow started with the November 7 Fed cut, which I interpret as the market screaming "no" at the Fed about its move.Image
3/3

The chart below shows TLT's volume since 2023. The blue bars label the six highest-volume days in TLT's history. No volume day was over 80 million before 2023.

Thursday, December 19, was the record volume day at 99 million. This was the day after the Fed cut. The previous record was November 6, the day before the Fed cut on November 7.

The market is focused on the Fed meeting, not payroll or CPI days. Investors believe the Fed is making a mistake by cutting rates when it is not needed.Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 20, 2024
1/6

Good Q, I will answer why.

The market is signaling the Fed is not serious about inflation.

10-year yields during rate cut cycles since 1981 (the 100-year inflation and yield high).

2024 (black) is the biggest yield rise in a cutting cycle in at least 40 years. Image
2/6

However, the 2024 yield move (black) looks similar to the yield moves during pre-1981 rate-cutting cycles.

In the 1960s and 1970s, the market worried about inflation.

When the Fed cut, the market screamed "no," and long-term yields rose—like 2024 (black). Image
3/6

The dotted vertical line is the first-rate cut in September.

Look at what inflation expectations have done! Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(