In addition to these shipping problems, there are continuing problems in the Panama Canal.
The Canal uses a series of locks and draws water from the lake Gutan.
13/23
Every time the locks are used, they empty the equivalent of 400 swimming pools into the ocean.
Combine this water loss with the ongoing drought, and Lake Gutan is at its lowest in years.
(Cannot pump salt water back into a freshwater lake.)
14/23
The lake is below the levels where the Canal can operate at maximum capacity.
15/23
Consequently, the number of ships passing through the Canal is at COVID shutdown levels of 2020 (black line).
And many of these ships are not fully loaded to keep their drafts shallower.
16/23
There are several shipping choke points around the world.
Much of the world's shipping travels through one of these points.
17/23
Add it up, and the number of cargo ships traversing all these choke points is at a three-year low.
Why? They are all on the high seas, taking longer routes to get to their destinations.
18/23
And the amount of IMPORT cargo reaching all worldwide ports has been plunging the last few weeks.
Currently, import volumes are as low as the COVID shutdowns.
19/23
70% of all shipping is on long-term contracts ... a shuttle between ports (Asia and Europe).
If they have to go around Africa, that adds 20+ days to the route.
So, if a ship can make six runs yearly, the extra distance means it can only do 4 or 5 runs yearly.
20/23
To make up for this shortfall of runs, excess shipping capacity is contracted on the "spot" market.
We have seen a massive spike in "spot" shipping rates in the last week (bottom panel).
21/23
What happens when a ship docks in port? Those 15k boxes (TEUs) are unloaded.
They are put on a truck or rail and sent to an unpacking center where the containers are emptied.
Then, they are put on another truck or rail and sent to distribution centers.
From there, the goods are distributed all over the country to those who purchase those goods.
This is a massive logistical undertaking.
What makes it work is predictable schedules.
Now that ships will be weeks late, the logistical network will get out of balance, and delivery schedules will be a mess for months.
We will see this again?
22/23
Leading to goods inflation again?
See what goods inflation did into late 2022 when supply chains were messed up in 2020 and 2021.
23/23
Goods are fungible. They will be diverted from the US if they get higher prices in Europe.
So yes, if these shipping problems persist, they will impact the US.
This could disrupt the "last mile" to 2% inflation and many Fed rate cuts in 2024.
Bonus
Why doesn't the US Navy end the Houthi threat to shipping?
That involves picking a side in a Sunni/Shiite Arab civil war and the potential for civilian casualties.
Very tricky politically.
What about getting more involved in "defensively" protecting ships.
This means an open-ended commitment to using weapons that cost millions to stop Houthi weapons that cost thousands.
The US tried to get other countries to sign up to help (Operation Prosperity Guardian), but that effort has yet to be successful.
I got really good feedback on this thread. I'm glad it was snowing in Chicago yesterday, which kept me inside to finish it.
One follow-up. The problem is shipping, not "stuff"(goods).
In 2020/2021, the problem that led to the rise in goods inflation (chart below) was not a lack of stuff.
The problem was it was in all the wrong places.
* In China, in the shipping department of its manufacturer
* In a container anchored off San Pedro Bay, wait for a berth in the port of LA or Long Beach to unload
* in a stack of containers waiting to be unpacked in the yard of the port.
* In a distribution center because it arrived weeks late and had no delivery scheduled (because it missed it).
And remember, a lot of "stuff" is not end-user consumer goods that go straight to the shelves. It is parts and supplies that go into other products.
So even though US car production slowed from 209K in July 2020 to 84k in September 2021, all the parts to make 200k cars every month existed, they were all in the wrong places (see the list above). This is why production slowed. The Achilles Heel of "Just-in-Time."
Goods inflation spiked (chart below) because a lot of stuff has inelasticity. This is a fancy economics term, meaning you want it now and will pay up to get what is available.
This is why cars were trading well over sticker price in 2021; you needed one now and were not going to wait months or a year for all the stuff to get to the right places so manufacturing schedules could return to normal.
The current problems with shipping described in the thread above are worrisome. Are we about to have another round of stuff all in the wrong places? And when that happens, will people start paying up to get what is available, a.k.a. goods inflation?
With stock and bond prices rallying hard in the last few months, they have profits they can use to pay up.
The thread above shows that the shipping problems are a couple of weeks old. Tell me how long this disruption will last, and I'll tell you how bad goods inflation will get.
If it ended tomorrow, the answer is not that bad. But it does not look like it is ending tomorrow, and no apparent solution to getting stuff to the right place on time is currently visible. That visibility will come; these issues will not last forever.
How long will it take?
@mercoglianos @johnkonrad
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is correct that the new home premium (green) above existing home prices (blue) has collapsed from 38% in 2013 to below zero today (the lowest in 54 years).
Why?
See new home prices (orange), they stalled.
3/7
Here is the average home price (orange) and the home's size (blue). The reason prices are falling is that builders are constructing smaller homes.
But as the bottom panel shows (green), the price per square foot is as high as ever.
I assume Marks is referring to the 1-year forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500, the standard Wall Street valuation metric (which is closer to 25 now, but was 23 a few weeks ago).
Here is a long-term proxy for that ... the Shiller Cyclically Adjusted Price/Earnings (CAPE) ratio back to 1881. It is a 10-year average of P/E/ ratios.
At 40, it is one of the highest readings ever, even higher than 1929.
It shows the NEXT (future) 1-year REAL (after inflation) return of the stock market on the y-axis.
The CAPE on the x-axis.
The red box is the returns when the CAPE is above 34. It's a mixed bag of positive and negative returns.
Restated, valuation is NOT a good timing tool.
3/4
But if the y-axis is extended to the NEXT (future) 5-year REAL (after inflation) return, then THERE IS NO EXAMPLE, OVER THE LAST 150 YEARS, OF THE STOCK MARKET BEATING INFLATION OVER THE NEXT 5-YEARS WHEN THE CAPE IS ABOVE 34.
Restated, valuation is an expectation tool. Unless one makes the case that corporate earnings are going to have their most significant surge in history, the stock market is destined to disappoint over the next several years.
The preliminary November University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey was released this morning (blue). The "current conditions" measure of this survey set a new ALL-TIME LOW.
Before 2020 (COVID), the stock market (red) was the primary driver of the public's economic outlook. These two series moved up and down together. Since COVID, this relationship has completely disconnected.
This leads to some uncomfortable explanations.
Half of the country owns no assets and lives paycheck to paycheck. Have they now moved to being angry at a booming stock market that worsens inequality? Is this why socialists are getting elected? Do they want their agenda to knock the market down? Is a bear market now the goal, not the concern?
2/6
Why the anger?
Since the COVID recession ended in April 2020, cumulative price increases (orange) have outpaced cumulative wage increases (blue).
This devastates the bottom 50% of wage earners (and especially the bottom 30%) who own no assets and live paycheck-to-paycheck. They are having to do with less.
3/6
For comparison, the opposite happened in the 2010s. The cumulative gain in wages (blue) beat the cumulative rise in prices (orange).
In this scenario, the bottom 50% of wage earners were able to make ends meet and maybe get a little ahead, as their paychecks bought a bit more each year.
JP Morgan has identified 41 AI-related stocks, 8% of the S&P 500. These stocks now account for 47% of the Index's market capitalization, a new record.
The other 459 stocks, 92% of the S&P 500, are 53% of the Index's market capitalization.
2/5
The list of the AI-related stocks
3/5
ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.
Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 74% of the S&P 500's total increase (blue). The other 25% came from the remaining 459 stocks (orange).