Jim Bianco Profile picture
Jan 6, 2024 26 tweets 11 min read Read on X
1/23

A long 🧵on the biggest economic issue not being discussed ... global shipping problems and potential return of goods inflation.

Below uses IMF Port call data on shipping traffic (via ship transponders and satellites).



@mercoglianos @johnkonradportwatch.imf.org/pages/port-mon…
2/23

The Bab el-Mandeb is the 16 miles between Yemen and Djibouti, connecting the southern Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden.

This is where the Houthis are causing all the trouble.

BTW, Bab el-Mandeb roughly translates into "Gate of Tears" or "Gate of Grief."

How appropriate! Image
3/23

Between 12% and 15% of world shipping traverses the Red Sea. The Houthis are making an impact.

This chart shows how the volume of trade has collapsed. Updates should show it has fallen further.

FYI - March 2021 was Ever Given getting wedged in the Suez Canal. Image
4/23

High-value cargo ship traffic is down 50% from late November.

Shipping insurance does not cover war risk; that insurance is now up 300% to 500% (0.2% to 0.7% of the value of the ship/cargo).

It is too expensive and risky to travel via this route. Image
5/23

Tankers are impacted, but not to the degree that cargo ships are disrupted.

The Houthis are attacking cargo ships, not tankers. Image
6/23

The Suez Canal is at the (northern) top of the Red Sea and connects it with the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Image
7/23

This Suez Canal is one of the most important shipping lanes in the world, if not the world's most important.

We are also seeing a drop off in shipping volume moving through it.

(Not as much as the Bab el-Mandeb as the Saudis have ports in the middle of the Red Sea.) Image
8/23

Overall, ship traffic through the Suez is down about 20 ships a day in the last 3 weeks. No container ships are in the Red Sea.

The Egyptians charge a $500k toll to pass through, so they are losing some $10m/day.

There have to be unhappy people in Cairo. Image
9/23

So, where are the ships going?

Around Africa and the Cape of Good Hope.

(Note Durban on the map) Image
10/23

From Asia, going around the Cape of Good Hope (red), versus the Red Sea/Suez (green) adds about 10 days and 3,300 miles to a one-way trip. Image
11/23

Ships are now reaching the Cape (Dec 25 to Jan 2 labels).

This number is expected to spike much higher in the coming days. Image
11/23

When they get there, they have to refuel in Durban, SA.

Refueling or bunker prices are skyrocketing to 6-year highs in anticipation of demand.

The facilities were not built for the huge armada heading its way. So, congestion delays.

oilmonster.com/bunker-fuel-pr…
Image
12/23

In addition to these shipping problems, there are continuing problems in the Panama Canal.

The Canal uses a series of locks and draws water from the lake Gutan. Image
13/23

Every time the locks are used, they empty the equivalent of 400 swimming pools into the ocean.

Combine this water loss with the ongoing drought, and Lake Gutan is at its lowest in years.

(Cannot pump salt water back into a freshwater lake.) Image
14/23

The lake is below the levels where the Canal can operate at maximum capacity. Image
15/23

Consequently, the number of ships passing through the Canal is at COVID shutdown levels of 2020 (black line).

And many of these ships are not fully loaded to keep their drafts shallower. Image
16/23

There are several shipping choke points around the world.

Much of the world's shipping travels through one of these points. Image
17/23

Add it up, and the number of cargo ships traversing all these choke points is at a three-year low.

Why? They are all on the high seas, taking longer routes to get to their destinations. Image
18/23

And the amount of IMPORT cargo reaching all worldwide ports has been plunging the last few weeks.

Currently, import volumes are as low as the COVID shutdowns. Image
19/23

70% of all shipping is on long-term contracts ... a shuttle between ports (Asia and Europe).

If they have to go around Africa, that adds 20+ days to the route.

So, if a ship can make six runs yearly, the extra distance means it can only do 4 or 5 runs yearly. Image
20/23

To make up for this shortfall of runs, excess shipping capacity is contracted on the "spot" market.

We have seen a massive spike in "spot" shipping rates in the last week (bottom panel). Image
21/23

What happens when a ship docks in port? Those 15k boxes (TEUs) are unloaded.

They are put on a truck or rail and sent to an unpacking center where the containers are emptied.

Then, they are put on another truck or rail and sent to distribution centers.

From there, the goods are distributed all over the country to those who purchase those goods.

This is a massive logistical undertaking.

What makes it work is predictable schedules.

Now that ships will be weeks late, the logistical network will get out of balance, and delivery schedules will be a mess for months.

We will see this again?Image
22/23

Leading to goods inflation again?

See what goods inflation did into late 2022 when supply chains were messed up in 2020 and 2021. Image
23/23

Goods are fungible. They will be diverted from the US if they get higher prices in Europe.

So yes, if these shipping problems persist, they will impact the US.

This could disrupt the "last mile" to 2% inflation and many Fed rate cuts in 2024.
Bonus

Why doesn't the US Navy end the Houthi threat to shipping?

That involves picking a side in a Sunni/Shiite Arab civil war and the potential for civilian casualties.

Very tricky politically.

What about getting more involved in "defensively" protecting ships.

This means an open-ended commitment to using weapons that cost millions to stop Houthi weapons that cost thousands.

The US tried to get other countries to sign up to help (Operation Prosperity Guardian), but that effort has yet to be successful.
I got really good feedback on this thread. I'm glad it was snowing in Chicago yesterday, which kept me inside to finish it.

One follow-up. The problem is shipping, not "stuff"(goods).

In 2020/2021, the problem that led to the rise in goods inflation (chart below) was not a lack of stuff.

The problem was it was in all the wrong places.

* In China, in the shipping department of its manufacturer

* In a container anchored off San Pedro Bay, wait for a berth in the port of LA or Long Beach to unload

* in a stack of containers waiting to be unpacked in the yard of the port.

* In a distribution center because it arrived weeks late and had no delivery scheduled (because it missed it).

And remember, a lot of "stuff" is not end-user consumer goods that go straight to the shelves. It is parts and supplies that go into other products.

So even though US car production slowed from 209K in July 2020 to 84k in September 2021, all the parts to make 200k cars every month existed, they were all in the wrong places (see the list above). This is why production slowed. The Achilles Heel of "Just-in-Time."

Goods inflation spiked (chart below) because a lot of stuff has inelasticity. This is a fancy economics term, meaning you want it now and will pay up to get what is available.

This is why cars were trading well over sticker price in 2021; you needed one now and were not going to wait months or a year for all the stuff to get to the right places so manufacturing schedules could return to normal.

The current problems with shipping described in the thread above are worrisome. Are we about to have another round of stuff all in the wrong places? And when that happens, will people start paying up to get what is available, a.k.a. goods inflation?

With stock and bond prices rallying hard in the last few months, they have profits they can use to pay up.

The thread above shows that the shipping problems are a couple of weeks old. Tell me how long this disruption will last, and I'll tell you how bad goods inflation will get.

If it ended tomorrow, the answer is not that bad. But it does not look like it is ending tomorrow, and no apparent solution to getting stuff to the right place on time is currently visible. That visibility will come; these issues will not last forever.

How long will it take?

@mercoglianos @johnkonradImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Nov 27
1/7

This analysis concludes by saying "something is seriously wrong with the housing market."

Not based on this chart.

tl:dr - New home sizes are falling to account for this spread falling below zero. Adjust for that, and there is nothing to see here.

Short 🧵
2/7

Same chart with prices in the top panel.

It is correct that the new home premium (green) above existing home prices (blue) has collapsed from 38% in 2013 to below zero today (the lowest in 54 years).

Why?

See new home prices (orange), they stalled. Image
3/7

Here is the average home price (orange) and the home's size (blue). The reason prices are falling is that builders are constructing smaller homes.

But as the bottom panel shows (green), the price per square foot is as high as ever.

No bear market, just smaller homes. Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 25
1/8

Following @deanbaker and @ezraklein ...

Homeowners will not tolerate a "fix" that will lower prices. So, nothing will get done about affordability.
=
What is housing?

* Affordable shelter?
* Piggy bank that funds retirement?

Both cannot be true at the same time.
2/8

For the 50 years following WWII (box), home price gains kept pace with inflation ("real" prices), making housing affordable.

Starting in the late 90s, housing went into wild boom-bust cycles.

This is when housing started to be viewed as a piggy bank to fund retirement. Image
3/8

400 years of real (inflation-adjusted) home prices in Amsterdam show that housing has remained affordable for centuries.

This view began to break down in the late 1990s, as housing became the piggy bank for retirement. Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 16
1/4

I assume Marks is referring to the 1-year forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500, the standard Wall Street valuation metric (which is closer to 25 now, but was 23 a few weeks ago).

Here is a long-term proxy for that ... the Shiller Cyclically Adjusted Price/Earnings (CAPE) ratio back to 1881. It is a 10-year average of P/E/ ratios.

At 40, it is one of the highest readings ever, even higher than 1929.Image
2/4

What does it mean that valuations are this high?

The scatter graph below goes back to 1881.

It shows the NEXT (future) 1-year REAL (after inflation) return of the stock market on the y-axis.

The CAPE on the x-axis.

The red box is the returns when the CAPE is above 34. It's a mixed bag of positive and negative returns.
Restated, valuation is NOT a good timing tool.Image
3/4

But if the y-axis is extended to the NEXT (future) 5-year REAL (after inflation) return, then THERE IS NO EXAMPLE, OVER THE LAST 150 YEARS, OF THE STOCK MARKET BEATING INFLATION OVER THE NEXT 5-YEARS WHEN THE CAPE IS ABOVE 34.

Restated, valuation is an expectation tool. Unless one makes the case that corporate earnings are going to have their most significant surge in history, the stock market is destined to disappoint over the next several years.Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 7
1/6

The preliminary November University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey was released this morning (blue). The "current conditions" measure of this survey set a new ALL-TIME LOW.

Before 2020 (COVID), the stock market (red) was the primary driver of the public's economic outlook. These two series moved up and down together. Since COVID, this relationship has completely disconnected.

This leads to some uncomfortable explanations.

Half of the country owns no assets and lives paycheck to paycheck. Have they now moved to being angry at a booming stock market that worsens inequality? Is this why socialists are getting elected? Do they want their agenda to knock the market down? Is a bear market now the goal, not the concern?Image
2/6

Why the anger?

Since the COVID recession ended in April 2020, cumulative price increases (orange) have outpaced cumulative wage increases (blue).

This devastates the bottom 50% of wage earners (and especially the bottom 30%) who own no assets and live paycheck-to-paycheck. They are having to do with less.Image
3/6

For comparison, the opposite happened in the 2010s. The cumulative gain in wages (blue) beat the cumulative rise in prices (orange).

In this scenario, the bottom 50% of wage earners were able to make ends meet and maybe get a little ahead, as their paychecks bought a bit more each year.Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 2
1/13

🧵on the stresses in the funding markets, why they are happening, and what it means. Be sure to see the last two posts (12 and 13).

Funding rates are rising relative to the Federal Reserve's administered rates (bottom panel arrow).

This signals stress in funding markets. Image
2/13

Another signal of stress is that the Fed's Standing Repo Facility (SRF) is getting used regularly, a new record on Friday.

If money is too expensive, banks can borrow from the Fed at 4.00%.

Note that only 40 banks are counterparties, no broker/dealers, no hedge funds. LimitedImage
3/13

The Fed sees the stress and is ending Quantitative Tightening (QT) on Dec 1.

This will end Fed balance sheet shrinkage and slow the decline in bank reserves, now at a 5-year low.

Lower bank reserves mean banks have less ability to supply funding to the markets. Image
Read 13 tweets
Oct 28
1/5

JP Morgan has identified 41 AI-related stocks, 8% of the S&P 500. These stocks now account for 47% of the Index's market capitalization, a new record.

The other 459 stocks, 92% of the S&P 500, are 53% of the Index's market capitalization. Image
2/5

The list of the AI-related stocks Image
3/5

ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.

Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 74% of the S&P 500's total increase (blue). The other 25% came from the remaining 459 stocks (orange). Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(