In addition to these shipping problems, there are continuing problems in the Panama Canal.
The Canal uses a series of locks and draws water from the lake Gutan.
13/23
Every time the locks are used, they empty the equivalent of 400 swimming pools into the ocean.
Combine this water loss with the ongoing drought, and Lake Gutan is at its lowest in years.
(Cannot pump salt water back into a freshwater lake.)
14/23
The lake is below the levels where the Canal can operate at maximum capacity.
15/23
Consequently, the number of ships passing through the Canal is at COVID shutdown levels of 2020 (black line).
And many of these ships are not fully loaded to keep their drafts shallower.
16/23
There are several shipping choke points around the world.
Much of the world's shipping travels through one of these points.
17/23
Add it up, and the number of cargo ships traversing all these choke points is at a three-year low.
Why? They are all on the high seas, taking longer routes to get to their destinations.
18/23
And the amount of IMPORT cargo reaching all worldwide ports has been plunging the last few weeks.
Currently, import volumes are as low as the COVID shutdowns.
19/23
70% of all shipping is on long-term contracts ... a shuttle between ports (Asia and Europe).
If they have to go around Africa, that adds 20+ days to the route.
So, if a ship can make six runs yearly, the extra distance means it can only do 4 or 5 runs yearly.
20/23
To make up for this shortfall of runs, excess shipping capacity is contracted on the "spot" market.
We have seen a massive spike in "spot" shipping rates in the last week (bottom panel).
21/23
What happens when a ship docks in port? Those 15k boxes (TEUs) are unloaded.
They are put on a truck or rail and sent to an unpacking center where the containers are emptied.
Then, they are put on another truck or rail and sent to distribution centers.
From there, the goods are distributed all over the country to those who purchase those goods.
This is a massive logistical undertaking.
What makes it work is predictable schedules.
Now that ships will be weeks late, the logistical network will get out of balance, and delivery schedules will be a mess for months.
We will see this again?
22/23
Leading to goods inflation again?
See what goods inflation did into late 2022 when supply chains were messed up in 2020 and 2021.
23/23
Goods are fungible. They will be diverted from the US if they get higher prices in Europe.
So yes, if these shipping problems persist, they will impact the US.
This could disrupt the "last mile" to 2% inflation and many Fed rate cuts in 2024.
Bonus
Why doesn't the US Navy end the Houthi threat to shipping?
That involves picking a side in a Sunni/Shiite Arab civil war and the potential for civilian casualties.
Very tricky politically.
What about getting more involved in "defensively" protecting ships.
This means an open-ended commitment to using weapons that cost millions to stop Houthi weapons that cost thousands.
The US tried to get other countries to sign up to help (Operation Prosperity Guardian), but that effort has yet to be successful.
I got really good feedback on this thread. I'm glad it was snowing in Chicago yesterday, which kept me inside to finish it.
One follow-up. The problem is shipping, not "stuff"(goods).
In 2020/2021, the problem that led to the rise in goods inflation (chart below) was not a lack of stuff.
The problem was it was in all the wrong places.
* In China, in the shipping department of its manufacturer
* In a container anchored off San Pedro Bay, wait for a berth in the port of LA or Long Beach to unload
* in a stack of containers waiting to be unpacked in the yard of the port.
* In a distribution center because it arrived weeks late and had no delivery scheduled (because it missed it).
And remember, a lot of "stuff" is not end-user consumer goods that go straight to the shelves. It is parts and supplies that go into other products.
So even though US car production slowed from 209K in July 2020 to 84k in September 2021, all the parts to make 200k cars every month existed, they were all in the wrong places (see the list above). This is why production slowed. The Achilles Heel of "Just-in-Time."
Goods inflation spiked (chart below) because a lot of stuff has inelasticity. This is a fancy economics term, meaning you want it now and will pay up to get what is available.
This is why cars were trading well over sticker price in 2021; you needed one now and were not going to wait months or a year for all the stuff to get to the right places so manufacturing schedules could return to normal.
The current problems with shipping described in the thread above are worrisome. Are we about to have another round of stuff all in the wrong places? And when that happens, will people start paying up to get what is available, a.k.a. goods inflation?
With stock and bond prices rallying hard in the last few months, they have profits they can use to pay up.
The thread above shows that the shipping problems are a couple of weeks old. Tell me how long this disruption will last, and I'll tell you how bad goods inflation will get.
If it ended tomorrow, the answer is not that bad. But it does not look like it is ending tomorrow, and no apparent solution to getting stuff to the right place on time is currently visible. That visibility will come; these issues will not last forever.
How long will it take?
@mercoglianos @johnkonrad
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As this chart shows, they are now 45% of the S&P 500.
2/4
A list of the stocks
3/4
ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.
Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 70% of the increase in the S&P 500's value (blue). The other 30% came from the remaining 359 stocks (orange)
Following every recession, the tenor of inflation shifts.
The current post-COVID recovery, as shown in blue, indicates inflation has reached a significantly higher level, with more volatility (wider standard deviation) than during the post-financial crisis period.
3/6
Something more may be at play, as larger trends in inflation seem to have shifted with the COVID pandemic.
The problem is not mortgage rates, it's inventory (not enough).
Cut rates and home sellers raise prices, and monthly payments remain unchanged. The affordability problem remains. Greedy boomer homeowners get richer.
How to fix affordability?
Reduce zoning and building regulations to increase inventory. The problem is that selfish boomer homeowners wield these laws to restrict supply and drive up the price of their homes.
The Atlanta Federal Reserve calculates a Housing Affordability Monitor.
The median income in the United States (blue) and the income needed to qualify for a mortgage (detailed below the chart). The bottom panel shows the difference.
At 58%, this means one needs 58% more than the median income ($ 83k) to qualify for a median mortgage ($ 130k).
This is a new record, even greater than the peak before the housing crash from 2007 to 2009.
Home prices are too high. Cutting mortgage rates will only incentivize home sellers to increase their asking prices, and the problem persists.
We need more supply, that is what the record "unaffordability" is saying..
A home is considered “affordable” if it costs less than 30% of a household’s income.
The following chart indicates that the average home in the United States now costs 47% of the median household’s monthly income.
An all-time record, surpassing the bubble peak in 2006 before the housing crash.
The OMB Director and Acting CFPB Director @russvought laid out the charges of lying to Congress and mismanaging the renovation of the Fed (Eccles) building.
While the betting market still has Powell getting fired at less than 50%, it is now trending higher.
--
The Federal Reserve Act says that a Fed Governor (including the Chair) may be removed “for cause by the President.”
However, “for cause” is not defined in the statute and has never been tested in court in this context.
I would argue "for cause" is not a disagreement over Monetary Policy ("too late" cutting rates), but can be lying to Congress and/or mismanaging the rules around renovating the Fed (Eccles) building?
Powell said this to the Senate Banking Committee on June 25, 2025, as part of the semiannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress.
---
"Generally, I would just say we do take seriously our responsibility as stewards of the public’s money. ... There’s no VIP dining room. There’s no new marble—we took down the old marble, we’re putting it back up. We’ll have to use new marble where some of the old marble broke. But there’s no special elevators; there’s just old elevators that have been there. There are no new water features. There’s no beehives, and there’s no roof terrace gardens."
---
Technically, Powell is correct because the renovation has not been completed. However, such details are outlined in some plans for the renovations.
Is this a big deal? No. However, if Trump is looking for ANY reason to remove Powell, this might be enough. And it might be enough "for cause" that the Supreme Court will uphold it.
Furthermore, no one in Congress wants to spend any political capital defending a $2.5 billion marble Washington, D.C. building with private elevators, beehives, and private roof terraces.
---
Bottom line, Powell may have given Trump an opening to remove him. Will Trump take it?
Or, does Trump want/need "Too Late" Powell to stay as Fed Chairman until May 2026 to use as a punching bag?
Yesterday, Jim appeared on Bloomberg TV, warning that if the Fed cuts rates and the market thinks this is wrong, 10-year yields could surge through 5%.
(Perspective ... 10-year yields were last above 5% in October 2023 and as high as 4.85% in January).
🧵
2/8
President Trump disagrees with this thinking and believes the federal funds rate should be 1% right now.
From a "truth" posted on June 30.
3/8
If (or should I say when) Trump gets a Fed Chair to make 1% happen, how will the 10-year react?
Reminder of what happened last year to long rates when the Fed cuts rates (peach arrow) and the market does not think it's a good idea (cyan arrow).