Radiant Energy Group recently published a massive international survey of opinions on nuclear energy.
It's full of some things you might already know, but it also contains some surprises🧵
For example, did you know French and German nuclear support isn't that different?
Nuclear does have less support than other green technologies, but in most places, it still receives net support.
This apparently low level of support looks higher when survey participants are asked about their ranked supported for different energy sources.
This support increases further if you subset to people who are techno-optimists or tech-neutral when it comes to fighting against climate change.
Unfortunately, most people aren't aware about nuclear is exceptionally clean. Even larger numbers think nuclear waste is a major point of worry.
The Simpsons has done incredible damage to the reputation of our best energy source.
Onto the demographics!
In some countries, the old are the most supportive of nuclear. In others, it's the young.
If you've seen other surveys on the demographics of nuclear support this one won't surprise you: men are universally more supportive of nuclear.
If you've seen other surveys on the relationship between science knowledge and nuclear support, this won't surprise you either: the most knowledgeable are (almost) universally the most supportive of nuclear.
Despite being the current best option for providing reliable, low-cost, and clean energy, being concerned about the climate generally predicts less support for nuclear.
When climate concern is represented by nonprofit membership, there's a similar result.
Despite the nuclear industry being aligned with numerous (typically) left-wing goals from protecting the environment to supporting labor unionization and high employee safety standards, it's the economically right wing that's more supportive of nuclear.
There's more in the report, but I'll end this thread on a happy note: globally, there's more support for additional nuclear builds than for additional nuclear shutdowns.
This study is being investigated since it includes results by convicted fraud Stephen Breuning.
Without his huge, fake estimates, the meta-analysis is riddled with publication bias. Correcting for it makes the meta-analytic estimate practically and statistically nonsignificant.
It is also just unserious to think that a meta-analysis including obvious rubbish should overturn much better established facts.
For example, one of the cited studies claimed to show IQ scores improving by 3.64 g (55 IQ points) when kids (n = 10) were offered a $5 cash prize.
You reveal a lot about yourself if you take nonsensical and unreplicable results seriously.
This meta-analysis never should have been published because of the included fraudulent work, the included garbage work, and the failure to consider psychometric bias explaining results.
People across the political aisle engage in conspiracy theorizing at markedly similar rates, just about different things.
Q: Does each side do this to the same extent?
A: Probably not! In the case above, to get the appearance of total symmetry, you have to include a lot of different conspiracies that are very Trump-related.
Q: What about general conspiracist intent and ideation?
A: That's plausibly higher on the right in the U.S., even after accounting for measurement non-invariance. It's not globally higher, but few correlates of politics are globally consistent. More on this soon.
The biggest news today should probably be about one of the Executive Orders from yesterday evening.
Trust me, it's big.
The President just authorized DOGE to start cutting regulations🧵
This order starts off huge.
Remember those recently-created DOGE Team Leads going into every agency? They're going to work with agency heads and the OMB to review all of the regulations across a number of huge categories.
The first category is those rules and regulations which violate the law of the land: unlawful and unconstitutional regulations, things that agencies enacted but which they shouldn't have been able to.
The biggest news of the day is not so much that @RobertKennedyJr was confirmed by the Senate, but what he's going to do next.
@realDonaldTrump just issued an Executive Order making it official:
America stands against chronic disease and closed science🧵
The first thing the EO does is outline the problem
It talks about how unhealthy America is, how unacceptable that is, and how we have a duty to change that
We do: Americans should not just be the richest people in the world, they should be the hottest, healthiest, and strongest
Now beyond outlining the problems America faces, the Order outlines some policy prerogatives that will be front-and-center during this new administration.
I want to preface something here: Regardless of what you think about the people involved, something here will make you happy
The biggest news of the day should once again be about DOGE.
A new Executive Order was passed a few minutes ago.
It empowers DOGE to spearhead the complete reorganization of the federal government🧵
The first part of this Order is simple:
The OMB will put out a plan to make the federal workforce smaller and more efficient, including a stipulation that agencies must remove four existing employees for each new hire, with some exceptions.
The second part is meatier.
New hires have to be approved by newly-installed DOGE Team Leads in each agency. These Team Leads will report what goes on in the agency they're assigned to on a monthly basis.