Radiant Energy Group recently published a massive international survey of opinions on nuclear energy.
It's full of some things you might already know, but it also contains some surprises🧵
For example, did you know French and German nuclear support isn't that different?
Nuclear does have less support than other green technologies, but in most places, it still receives net support.
This apparently low level of support looks higher when survey participants are asked about their ranked supported for different energy sources.
This support increases further if you subset to people who are techno-optimists or tech-neutral when it comes to fighting against climate change.
Unfortunately, most people aren't aware about nuclear is exceptionally clean. Even larger numbers think nuclear waste is a major point of worry.
The Simpsons has done incredible damage to the reputation of our best energy source.
Onto the demographics!
In some countries, the old are the most supportive of nuclear. In others, it's the young.
If you've seen other surveys on the demographics of nuclear support this one won't surprise you: men are universally more supportive of nuclear.
If you've seen other surveys on the relationship between science knowledge and nuclear support, this won't surprise you either: the most knowledgeable are (almost) universally the most supportive of nuclear.
Despite being the current best option for providing reliable, low-cost, and clean energy, being concerned about the climate generally predicts less support for nuclear.
When climate concern is represented by nonprofit membership, there's a similar result.
Despite the nuclear industry being aligned with numerous (typically) left-wing goals from protecting the environment to supporting labor unionization and high employee safety standards, it's the economically right wing that's more supportive of nuclear.
There's more in the report, but I'll end this thread on a happy note: globally, there's more support for additional nuclear builds than for additional nuclear shutdowns.
Compared to twenty years ago, kids are eating some types of ultraprocessed foods more and some types less🧵
For example, one thing there's proportionally less of is sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Meanwhile, there's relatively greater sweet snack consumption.
Overall, the ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption share is up across young ages to similar degrees.
The increase is definitely there, but it isn't dramatic. For example, going from 61% to 67.5% is an 11% increase in twenty years.
The increase in consumption is not differentiated by the sex of children.
In other words, boys and girls are both eating a bit more ultraprocessed food.
People tend to understand it as an indication that earlier generations were a lot less intelligent than we moderns.
Or if they're read up on the literature, they now think things are reversing.
Both are wrong! Take a look at this chart of Norwegian data:
If you don't understand what those tests are like, here are some example questions:
What we see over time with the Flynn Effect (the increase in IQ scores) and the Reverse Flynn Effect (the more recent decrease in IQ scores) is that both are due to something really boring: people interpreting tests differently than they used to.
The study took place in Germany and was centered on the experiences of 107 people aged 21-40 who lived alone and had earnings between €1,100 and €2,600 per month.
The experiment provided them with €1,200 per month for three full years.
Controls (N = 1,580) earned €10 for sticking with the program and another €30 if they made it the whole way.
There was no attrition in the treatment group, but 29% of the control group dropped out by the end of the study.
Many women have found that they get pregnant more easily after getting on GLP-1 drugs.
But women aren't the only ones noticing improved fertility:
There's now clinical trial evidence that GLP-1s improve sperm parameters.
The largest clinical trial published so far on this subject came out in 2023. It involved 110 men aged 18-35 with metabolic hypogonadism being sorted into one of three conditions:
A: The group seeking fatherhood.
B: The group not seeking fatherhood.
C: The group of already-dads.
The men in Group A were explicitly given the fertility drugs urofollitropin three times a week and human chorionic gonadotropin twice a week.