1/ Decided to do a quick thread on some parts of this book that describe how America and Israel's relationship with Iran went south. The whole book is interesting and I would suggest it especially if you feel what i'm presenting is lacking context. amazon.com/America-Iran-H…
2/ Israel needed a new threat to position itself against in the early 90s. In the 80s their PM had urged Reagan to keep sending weapons to Iran.
3/ Iran went from friend to enemy in Israels eyes. Iran was not invited to the Madrid conference which they felt snubbed by.
4/ In the early 90s Tehran was feeling like they were making concessions to the US for nothing in return.
5/ Iran offered contract to US oil company Conoco in 1995. The Israel lobby worked to shut it down.
6/ They introduced the Iran Libya sanctions act and it passed by a large margin despite Israel not following the law itself
7/ Irans reaction 9/11 (where thousands observed a moment of silence) provided contrast to the rest of the muslim world where leaders condemned and people celebrated.
8/ 9/11 provided opportunity for cooperation between US and Iran because of the common enemy of the Taliban. This upset certain elements in the Bush admin, and their was a rift between them and the military.
9/ There was an incident in 2002 where Iran was supposedly carrying weapons to Gaza. Many found this all to convenient, but this was swatted away by certain elements in the Bush admin.
10/ A couple weeks later Bush stated his famous Axis of Evil speech (written by David Frum I believe). People were floored.
11/ Hardliners in the Bush admin were heavily pushing the Iran nuclear angle:
12/ In 2003 Iran made a bold proposal described to the US described below part 1:
13/ part 2:
14/ The Bush admin rejected this and shut down communications. Iran had learned their lessons.
15/ Ironically the impact of Bush's main foreign policy decisions was to make the region more sympathetic to Iran.
16/ Israel was heavily pushing the idea that Iran was trying to build a bomb. The IAEA took a closer look and didn't find anything suspicious.
17/ The Bush admin took a radical turn and now claimed Iran had to prove the absence of nuclear materials.
18/ (fast forwarding a few years to the Obama admin) Israels main goal was to maintain their power in the region, they did not think Iran was an existential threat.
19/ Describes attack on Iran that was supposedly orchestrated by Mossad:
20/ Describes attacks on Iran's scientists:
21/ In private Israeli leaders admitted Irans leaders were reasonable people.
1/ THREAD on demographics of final teams in the World and European cups. This cup's final features the mostly castizo Argentinian team, facing off against the 92% white Spanish team with two prominent players with African ancestry.
2/ In the 2024 European cup, the mostly white Spanish team beat the half white English team.
3/ In 2022, the castizo Argentinian team beat the 48% black, 32% white French team in penalty kicks.
Survey that compared the opinions of the general public to expert criminologists. Only 9.4% of criminologists support the death penalty.
88% of criminologists believe solving social problems are more important for reducing crime over hiring more law enforcement. Criminologists as a whole are much less sympathetic to gun rights.
Overall most criminologists think the criminal justice system is unfair while the general public thinks it is fair.
1/ THREAD. There are two common narratives about the labor market: one that employers can't find workers and the other that employees can't find work. I wanted to read and do a thread on this book to continue to try to parse these contradictory narratives.
1/ Thread looking at paper from 2014 from dissecting claims of a labor shortage. This data is all old at this point but we see similar narratives today. On one side people claiming a labor shortage and on the other side, college graduates claiming they can't get jobs.
2/ The idea that America is falling behind in skills goes back a long time.
Some excerpts from WSJ article about the 10 million population cap referendum in Switzerland. The journal admits the historic wave of immigration to the West hasn't solved economic problems:
Economics professor from Canada admits that immigration hasn't solved Canada's problems.
Economic output per worker has stagnated across some of the countries that have accepted the most immigrants.