Meet Gazan photojournalist Ashraf Amra. He's been working for media including @AP & @Reuters.
Here he is on Oct. 7 enjoying fellow photojournalist Mohammed Fayq Abu Mostafa's footage of an IDF soldier being lynched after they both infiltrated Israel's border. And there's more.🧵
Abu Mostafa, a freelancer who has been working for Reuters, says: “We were there two hours ago, since the beginning” & details what he saw at the border & in Sderot.
He describes the breaking into a room where Israelis were hiding before being taken by Hamas terrorists.
Abu Mostafa then calls on people to cross into Israel's sovereign territory: “An advice, whoever can go – go. It is a one-time event that will not happen again.”
And Amra replies: “Really, it will not repeat itself.”
Amra was also at the border earlier in the day. He says:
"I just returned from the Khuza’a area, near the Khuza’a area on the eastern border of the Gaza Strip. Tens of armed Palestinian men are constantly storming the border towards the settlements around Gaza."
Abu Mostafa’s border photos, one of which seems to show the lynching he had shared on Amra’s Instagram Live, were recently selected by Reuters and The New York Times to be included in their 2023 “Images of the Year.”
Some media outlets published a photo credited to “Ashraf Amra/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images,” showing a digger breaching the border fence.
Reuters has selected another photo by Amra, taken on October 7 inside Gaza, as one of its “Pictures of the Month” for October 2023.
In mid-Sept. Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh personally visited Amra in an Istanbul hospital, reportedly saying that he appreciated his role in exposing “the crimes of the occupation.” Amra replied that the injury won’t prevent him from returning to his “national role.”
The high-profile hospital visit was not the first time Haniyeh had honored the veteran photojournalist, to whom he presented an award back in 2012.
Does Haniyeh provide such VIP treatment to every Gaza-based journalist who may have been injured while working?
What is the nature of his connection with Amra?
Does it explain Amra’s easy access to coverage of Hamas leadership and training in Gaza?
🛑 Did these media outlets properly vet Amra and Abu Mostafa before publishing their work?
🛑 Were these outlets aware of the photojournalists' social media activity and of Amra's recognition by the leader of a proscribed terror group? If so, shouldn't they disclose it?
🛑 What exactly are their vetting procedures for freelancers in Gaza?
🛑 And, if there are different codes of conduct for freelancers vs. permanent staff, then why isn't that disclosed on every article that a freelancer works on?
A commitment to journalistic ethics should prompt the news organizations we have named to answer these very basic questions.
And basic humanity should compel them to answer these questions.
🧵 Same outlets. Same source. Two very different reactions.
Side by side, so you can see it for yourself.
On Dec 11, Amnesty International released a long-delayed report concluding Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7, 2023.
⬇️ Keep reading.
2/ Even Amnesty International – which delayed this report to avoid appearing “pro-Israel” – concluded that Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7.
Its own findings cite murder, torture, rape and sexual violence, extermination and other inhumane acts – committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians. amnesty.org/en/documents/m…
3/ Now look at how major media outlets responded.
⬅️ NBC amplifying Amnesty’s genocide accusation against Israel
➡️ NBC showing zero results for Amnesty’s report on Hamas crimes against humanity
Same organization.
Same outlet.
Very different interest.
How Western journalists turn Palestinian terrorism into something sympathetic, inevitable – or Israel’s fault.
A new “feature” repeats every move in the playbook.
Keep reading.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
2/ The piece opens with a fiction: that Palestinian attacks were basically a reaction to Israeli incursions into West Bank towns during the Second Intifada.
Reality: terror attacks on Israeli civilians surged before, during and after that period – hitting buses, cafés, hotels, families.
The Guardian flips the timeline to soften the violence.
3/ Then we get this: Israeli communities are “illegal under international law.”
That’s false.
The US, for example, rejects that framing, many legal scholars dispute it, and only some small outposts are illegal – and Israel removes them.
But the Guardian needs the word “illegal” & suggests total agreement to set up its morality play.
🚨 EXPOSED:
Foreign press elites honored terrorists as “journalists” – then gave Qatari state propaganda outlet Al Jazeera a “press freedom” cash grant.
This happened in Washington, DC.
🧵👇
2/ At its gala, @ForeignPressUSA honored top US reporters & then eulogized Gaza reporters exposed as Hamas & Islamic Jihad operatives.
Fox’s @TreyYingst praised them as “fearless and tenacious journalists.”
The room even held a moment of silence for them.
3/ 🔴 Anas Al-Sharif
• Hamas cell leader running rocket attacks
• Terror payroll & training records
• Selfies with Sinwar
• Praised Oct 7 killers as “heroes”
Memorialized as a journalist.
There is real suffering in Gaza.
But some of the “evidence” going viral isn’t real at all, and millions of people are forming opinions based on manufactured scenes.
One viral clip showed a little boy shivering from the cold as his father pleaded into the camera. But the full video shows what was cut out: the boy suddenly stops “shivering” once he thinks the camera is off.
It was staged.
Another widely shared image showed children standing in floodwater with rubble behind them. But one detail gave it away: a child with his head on backwards.
This wasn’t footage from Gaza — it was AI-generated content passed off as real.