HOW TO BUY BETTER SHOES WITHOUT SPENDING MORE MONEY
Let's talk about how you can buy better shoes without spending more money. This thread is aimed at people who spend less than $200 and people who buy designer shoes. 🧵
We should first talk about how shoes are made.
Shoes are made from leather, which comes from animals. And when leather arrives at a tannery, it can be marred with scars and imperfections (e.g., insect bites).
The best shoe producers use the best materials, but lower-end companies and designer brands (which are often making mediocre shoes) try to cut costs where they can. That means they are using lower-quality materials.
What does lower-quality material mean?
If a tannery is buying lower-quality hides with a lot of scars and imperfections, they will sand off the top layer to create a more uniform appearance and then coat the surface with a chemical. The result is something called "corrected grain leather."
"Corrected grain" is distinct from "full grain," which retains the full grain of the natural hide. When you see corrected grain leather shoes, they will often look a little shiny and plasticky, like this:
The problem with corrected grain is that it doesn't age very well. In the second photo, you can see how scuffs look like the marring you get on plastic packages. It doesn't dig into the leather because the leather is coated. This is bad.
In extreme cases, corrected grain leather can start to flake (pic 1). Compare this to full-grain leather (pic 2), which develops a rich patina. Corrected grain leather shoes can look OK on day one but only get worse from there. Full-grain leather gets better with age.
Cheaper producers don't just buy lower-quality hides—they try to save costs by maximizing their yield.
In a bespoke workshop, a shoemaker might only get a pair of shoes from each hide. But in a factory, a company will try to get many more in order to save costs.
That means laying the patterns onto the hide in such a way that it almost looks like a Tetris game. You are trying to maximize yield by minimizing the amount of space between each of the pieces.
In a factory, this work is typically done by someone called a boot and shoe clicker, who uses a giant machine like this. They lay out metal pieces on the hide, and the machine presses down to cut. It almost looks like a baker with cookie-cutter pieces.
The problem is that not every part of the hide is the same. The best part is located near the animal's spine. This is where the grain is the tightest, which will result in minimal wrinkling. As you move toward the shoulders and belly, the leather is prone to heavy wrinkling.
Here is a pair of shoes that were made from leather cut from the center of the hide. They are technically corrected grain because the surface has been embossed with a grain pattern, but they don't have a chemical coating. Notice that wrinkles are very fine.
As you get closer to the belly and shoulder, the more likely the shoes will develop "loose grain wrinkling," where the top layer separates from the bottom. This is especially pronounced in some leathers, like Chromexcel. Not a big deal on work boots, but bad in finer footwear
OK, so now we know that lower-quality companies:
1. Buy lower-quality hides, which are then sanded down and given a chemical coating to make the surface look more uniform.
2. Use as much of the leather as possible, even the bad parts of the hide.
Such practices are not limited to lower-end lines. It's also common in designer shoes. These Raf derbies are $1,800, but made from corrected grain. I've seen the same from Dries Van Noten, Margiela, etc. Designer shoes are often more about design than quality construction.
So, if you're trying to get the best quality you can without spending more money, what can you do?
Buy suede.
There are two types of suede: reverse suede is full-grain leather but made with the flesh side out rather than the grain side out. This is the most durable suede.
The other type is split suede, where a tannery will buy a lower-quality, blemished hide and then "split off" the top-grain, leaving the velvety, uniform suede portion below. Split-suede is not as durable as reverse suede but also not as expensive.
As a consumer, the best way to know whether something was made from reverse or split suede is to ask the sales rep. Price and brand reputation are generally the tells. If you're buying $700 Aldens, that's prob reverse suede. $150 Clarks? Split suede.
But here's the thing: even lower-quality suede will not have the problems discussed above. Since there's no chemical coating, it will not flake. For whatever reason, suede will also not develop loose grain wrinkling.
Suede does age in a particular way. The nap can get compressed; the material picks up oils. Over time, suede shoes can look kind of patchy, but this is part of the charm. IMO, bad suede looks better than bad calfskin over time.
So when shopping, consider suede over calfskin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I should first emphasize this thread is not meant to body shame. I mean that sincerely. Few men are built like Adonis, so when shopping for clothes, most will have their own fit challenges, including muscular figures. This thread is only meant to highlight a tailoring issue.
Let's first do an experiment. Which suit do you think looks better?
But first, let's play a game. Here are two men wearing gray tailored jackets with blue pants. Which outfit looks better to you? Ignore physical attributes of the people underneath and focus on the outfits. Then reply with your answer.
If you said the right looks better, then we have the same taste. In this case, we can again go back to history to understand our views.
As I've said before, our notions in traditional men's tailoring largely derive from Britain, where suits and sport coats were invented.
If you're looking for fabrics that you can wear in the summer, it's useful to consider three things: weight, weave, and fiber. If you only pay attention to one of these dimensions (say, linen), you will miss the bigger picture.
If you're shopping for shirts, then some of the better summer materials include linen, seersucker, madras, and very lightweight, open weave cottons. In the photo below, you can see a swatch of voile, which is a featherweight 2/3oz cotton that's so open, it's almost sheer.
You can see here why most men don't wear it. Without a jacket, the material can almost be indecent (although it's more forgiving in non-white colors like light blue). For this reason, some tailors double up the front, like you see on the right, but this limits the breathability.
As a general matter, my advice isn't really "go to this store" or "buy this brand." Rather, I encourage people to think about clothes in a certain way.
My advice isn't really about brands or stores because everyone has unique fit challenges they have to solve. Perhaps you have forward pitched shoulders or a barrel chest. Or maybe you have big thighs and a prominent seat. No single suit will work for everyone.
When shopping for a suit, it helps to know how they're made. Suit jackets and sport coats are unique in that they're made from layers of haircloth, canvas, and padding, which are shaped through darts, pad stitching, and ironwork. This is how you get the 3D shape.
A lot of attention is paid to craft traditions in Western Europe and North America, such as handsewn Hermes leather goods and bespoke Savile Row suits. But the uneven focus leads some to believe that things made outside of these places are low quality.
This is not true. 🧵
When I was on a menswear forum, there was a guy whose style I greatly admired. Like others on the forum, Niyi Okuboyejo loved men's tailoring. He had a technical understanding of how a jacket should hang from the shoulders. He also knew how to put things together in a classic way
At the same time, he also knew how to do things in his own voice and style, but in a way that looked good and not haphazard. Sometimes this was about adding a funky tie; other times, it was playing with materials and silhouette. All of these are still suits and sport coats!
I think "fun socks" should be used judiciously, as a lot of what's worn today feels more childish than whimsical. IMO, most men should avoid them entirely.
But if you insist on wearing them, here are some suggestions on how to make them look less bad. 🧵
Any time this topic comes up, people invariably bring up George HW Bush, who was known to wear fun socks later in life. While I wasn't a fan of those socks, I agree that Bush was well-dressed. I also think when you reach a certain age, you have license to wear whatever you want
There are a few reasons why most outfits look bad with these sorts of socks. First, most men are not at that senior age where these socks become charming.
Second, most of these socks look like something you acquire by sending in a proof-of-purchase from a cereal box.