HOW TO BUY BETTER SHOES WITHOUT SPENDING MORE MONEY
Let's talk about how you can buy better shoes without spending more money. This thread is aimed at people who spend less than $200 and people who buy designer shoes. 🧵
We should first talk about how shoes are made.
Shoes are made from leather, which comes from animals. And when leather arrives at a tannery, it can be marred with scars and imperfections (e.g., insect bites).
The best shoe producers use the best materials, but lower-end companies and designer brands (which are often making mediocre shoes) try to cut costs where they can. That means they are using lower-quality materials.
What does lower-quality material mean?
If a tannery is buying lower-quality hides with a lot of scars and imperfections, they will sand off the top layer to create a more uniform appearance and then coat the surface with a chemical. The result is something called "corrected grain leather."
"Corrected grain" is distinct from "full grain," which retains the full grain of the natural hide. When you see corrected grain leather shoes, they will often look a little shiny and plasticky, like this:
The problem with corrected grain is that it doesn't age very well. In the second photo, you can see how scuffs look like the marring you get on plastic packages. It doesn't dig into the leather because the leather is coated. This is bad.
In extreme cases, corrected grain leather can start to flake (pic 1). Compare this to full-grain leather (pic 2), which develops a rich patina. Corrected grain leather shoes can look OK on day one but only get worse from there. Full-grain leather gets better with age.
Cheaper producers don't just buy lower-quality hides—they try to save costs by maximizing their yield.
In a bespoke workshop, a shoemaker might only get a pair of shoes from each hide. But in a factory, a company will try to get many more in order to save costs.
That means laying the patterns onto the hide in such a way that it almost looks like a Tetris game. You are trying to maximize yield by minimizing the amount of space between each of the pieces.
In a factory, this work is typically done by someone called a boot and shoe clicker, who uses a giant machine like this. They lay out metal pieces on the hide, and the machine presses down to cut. It almost looks like a baker with cookie-cutter pieces.
The problem is that not every part of the hide is the same. The best part is located near the animal's spine. This is where the grain is the tightest, which will result in minimal wrinkling. As you move toward the shoulders and belly, the leather is prone to heavy wrinkling.
Here is a pair of shoes that were made from leather cut from the center of the hide. They are technically corrected grain because the surface has been embossed with a grain pattern, but they don't have a chemical coating. Notice that wrinkles are very fine.
As you get closer to the belly and shoulder, the more likely the shoes will develop "loose grain wrinkling," where the top layer separates from the bottom. This is especially pronounced in some leathers, like Chromexcel. Not a big deal on work boots, but bad in finer footwear
OK, so now we know that lower-quality companies:
1. Buy lower-quality hides, which are then sanded down and given a chemical coating to make the surface look more uniform.
2. Use as much of the leather as possible, even the bad parts of the hide.
Such practices are not limited to lower-end lines. It's also common in designer shoes. These Raf derbies are $1,800, but made from corrected grain. I've seen the same from Dries Van Noten, Margiela, etc. Designer shoes are often more about design than quality construction.
So, if you're trying to get the best quality you can without spending more money, what can you do?
Buy suede.
There are two types of suede: reverse suede is full-grain leather but made with the flesh side out rather than the grain side out. This is the most durable suede.
The other type is split suede, where a tannery will buy a lower-quality, blemished hide and then "split off" the top-grain, leaving the velvety, uniform suede portion below. Split-suede is not as durable as reverse suede but also not as expensive.
As a consumer, the best way to know whether something was made from reverse or split suede is to ask the sales rep. Price and brand reputation are generally the tells. If you're buying $700 Aldens, that's prob reverse suede. $150 Clarks? Split suede.
But here's the thing: even lower-quality suede will not have the problems discussed above. Since there's no chemical coating, it will not flake. For whatever reason, suede will also not develop loose grain wrinkling.
Suede does age in a particular way. The nap can get compressed; the material picks up oils. Over time, suede shoes can look kind of patchy, but this is part of the charm. IMO, bad suede looks better than bad calfskin over time.
So when shopping, consider suede over calfskin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The term "Goodyear welt construction" refers to how the soles have been attached to the uppers. In this method, the uppers, insole, and outsole are attached using a welt and some stitching. 🧵
Goodyear welting is better than the cheaper and more popular method of making shoes, which is to attach the soles to the uppers using glue. It's more durable and easier to resole. Resoling shoes is like changing tires—you don't have to throw away good shoes when soles wear down
Ostensibly, with proper care and occasionally resoling, you can keep Goodyear welted shoes in regular rotation for ~20 years. But one potential failure point is the gemming, which is the canvas rib glued to the insole. If this slips during a resoling, the shoes are finished.
Do people know how to protect shoes in the winter? If you have suede shoes, you can spray them with Saphir Super Invulner, Tarrago Nano Protector, or Allen Edmonds's Water Protector to protect them from rain.
The only thing about these sprays is that you want to avoid things with silicon, which can be bad for leather. You also want to avoid using them on smooth leather dress shoes since they can prevent the leather from taking up leather conditioner or polish.
The shoes won't be waterproof, so it's not like you can wade in streams. But they'll be water-resistant, which is good enough for light rain. I apply them once every winter or two, depending on whether I think the spray has worn off.
Some people have asked me to do a thread on how to dress shorter male figures. So here's the thread. 🧵
There are a lot of guides online that treat the process of building a wardrobe like some kind of engineering problem. Everything is deduced from supposed scientific principles, like how certain colors go together or how certain lines lengthen or widen the figure.
I think the process of building a wardrobe is more like learning how to speak a language, and less like solving a math problem. The other approaches feel very pseudo-scientific to me, and they often feel like they start from a position of fear or shame.
I don't totally disagree, but I think guys are more likely to get this wrong than get it right, largely because getting a black dress shirt right requires a lot of attention to fit, silhouette, and material. 🧵
the prob with a black dress shirt is that it can easily make you look like a kid going to prom or the host at a restaurant.
this fit is bad because the shirt is made from a smooth, dressy poplin, the tie is ugly, and the tie and pocket square are made from the same material.
12 years ago, Michael Anton—author of the "Flight 93 Election" essay and a senior national security official in the Trump administration—wrote on StyleForum that black shirts have "always been considered both in bad taste and the mark of the lower, and even criminal, classes."
One of my tailors, Fred Nieddu, made all of the menswear for The Crown, including everything from the suits to sportswear. The clothes were surprisingly accurate in some ways but also deviated in others. Let's talk about those subtle details. 🧵
Like many young men, King Charles was influenced by the fashion of his day and only found his style later in life. In the 1960s, he wore single-breasted suits and sport coats with razor-thin lapels. Narrow lapels during this time were considered very "modern" (think: Mad Men).
Again, influenced by the fashion of his day, Charles switched to a wider lapel in the 1970s but still stuck with a single-breasted closure. Note how, in the '60s, his lapel ended about 1/3rd way from collar to shoulder seam. Below, it's closer to 1/2 (a more classic width)
First, there are some immutable things about tailoring regarding fit. These are technical things—not having to do with style or silhouette, but just whether the clothes actually fit you.
The jacket's collar should always stay seated on your neck, even when you move. In the first photo, the distance between the jacket's collar and Kimmel's neck is known as a collar gap. This is bad. Aim for the second photo. It should stay like this even as you shift around.