Which suit looks better to you? I will let you mull on it for a while and then give some of my thoughts below. 🧵
In the last 20 years, suits have become slimmer and shorter as a counter-reaction to the billowing, oversized Armani suits of the 1980s and '90s. This can look fine on certain body types, but more often, it does not look very flattering.
Here, we see Macron in a toned-down version of that look—updated, but not overly fashionable—and Henri, the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, in a more classic cut.
Macron is wearing a short jacket with trim, tapered trousers. Henri is wearing a longer jacket with fuller trousers.
One does not need to conform to classic Western ideals for gendered body types. But it helps to know that the classic male silhouette is shoulders broader than the hips, whereas the classic female silhouette is hips broader than shoulders (think: David and Venus)
Short jackets tend to emphasize the hips, which is why women's tailoring tends to feature shorter jackets than men's tailoring. (Although many women wear longer jackets for various reasons, including not wanting to conform to this feminine stereotype; and vice versa)
Compared to Henri's longer jacket, Macron's jacket tends to emphasize his hips more. But more importantly, when you shorten the jacket, you have to raise the buttoning point to keep a proper distance from the buttoning point to the hem.
When you raise the buttoning point, you do two things:
1. You shorten the lapel line 2. You limit how much the jacket can be taken in at the waist, which is the narrowest part of the person's torso.
These two things, when combined, limit that strong V-shaped figure.
When you shorten a suit jacket, you also have to make it trimmer to keep the correct proportions. And when you make the jacket trimmer, you also have to make the trousers trimmer. Everything moves in concert.
The prob is that Macron's jacket can only be taken in so much before it starts pulling. But his trousers are fairly slim. The effect is that his tailor has broken the suit into two distinct blocks: upper and lower. Henri's jacket flows into his fuller trousers, creating a whole.
Trimmer trousers are also more likely to catch on your legs, creating ripples that ruin what should be a clean line going from your waistband to cuff.
With a short jacket that emphasizes the hips, a high buttoning point, a short lapel line, a limited V-shaped silhouette, and trim trousers that dangle out from beneath the jacket like bead lines under a bell, you can end up looking like a sweet double popsicle.
I see a lot of people whose solution to improving a suit is to "take it in"—make it slimmer and slimmer until it conforms to something they saw in a magazine. But this does not work on every body type. Best to think about how the silhouette flatters you, not conform to trends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.
After this post went viral, I called Caroline Groves, a world-class bespoke shoemaker, to discuss how women's shoes are made. I normally don't talk about womenswear, but I found the information interesting, so I thought I would share what I learned here. 🧵
Footwear is broadly broken into two categories: bespoke and ready-to-wear. In London, bespoke makers, including those for women, are largely focused on traditional styles, such as wingtip derbies and loafers. Emiko Matsuda is great for this.
In Paris, there's Massaro, a historic firm that has been operating since 1894, now owned by Chanel. Their designs are less about creating the women's equivalent of traditional men's footwear and more about things such as heels or creative styles. Aesthetic is still "traditional."
Earlier today, Roger Stone announced his partnership with a menswear company, where together they've released a collection of tailored clothing items.
Here is my review of those pieces. 🧵
The line is mostly comprised of suits and sport coats, supplemented with dress shirts and one pair of odd trousers (tailor-speak for a pair of pants made without a matching jacket). Suits start at $1,540; sport coats are $1,150. One suit is $5,400 bc it's made from Scabal fabric
Let's start with the good points. These are fully canvassed jackets, meaning a free floating canvas has been tacked onto the face fabric to give it some weight and structure. This is better than a half-canvas and fully fused construction, but requires more time and labor.