Sarvesh Tiwari Profile picture
Jan 12, 2024 30 tweets 7 min read Read on X
The Shankaracharya tradition wields more influence on Hindus than you realize.

Many popular movements can be traced ultimately to this parampara…

Ramakrishna & SV
Yogananda
Sivananda
Mahesh Yogi
Chinmayananda
Dayananda of Arya Samaj
Sri Sri
etc

A🧵

(4 Shankaracharyas, 1979) Image
This thread is basis the writings of Sir Jadunath Sarkar and Haripada Chakraborti, with some inputs from other sources.

How Shankara re-established the Advaita Vedanta and the Sanyasa parampara through a Dashanami order and 4 Mathas to reinvigorate dharma is wellknown.

2/n
The 4 Matha (monastery) that he established were:

Sringeri (KA)
Puri (OR)
Dvaraka (GJ)
Jyotirmatha (UK)

These matha in 4 different corners of India not only stood for advaita in the 4 directions but also responsible for protecting a specific Veda. Eg Puri for Rigveda.

3/n
The Sanyasi that heads each of these 4 Mathas is called “Shankaracharya” of that Matha.

He is the living Shankaracharya, and in fact it is only to distinguish him from the original Shankara that the adjective “Adi” is added to the name of Adi, the original, Shankaracharya.

4/n
While only one Sanyasi can head the Matha, all that are initiated in the order are given one of the 10 suffixes to their new name when they take Sanyasa-

bhAratI
sarasvatI
sAgara
tIrtha
purI
AShrama
giri
parvata
araNya
vana

Since 10, hence the order is called “dashanAmI”

5/n
10 have slightly different rules.

According to Jadunath Sarkar, upto some point in time, each of the 10 used to be affiliated to a specific of the 4 Mathas - however in our time such distinction doesn’t exist.

Which means theoretically now all 10 can be seen in all 4.

6/n
The Sanyasis of the order do not have to be initiated by the Matha only. Anyone with authority of giving Sanyasa in parampara can initiate another.

In fact the Sanyasis are supposed to be itinerants roaming around in respective region (parivrAjaka) to spread Vaidika dharma.

7/n
It is through such itinerant Sanyasis that many popular Gurus of modern times got Diksha such as Ramakrishna Paramahamsa or Svami Dayananda Sarasvati of Arya Samaj, etc.

Even the head Sanyasi of the Matha, the Shankaracharya, has to be continuously traveling, except during

8/n
the 4 months of the rainy season, the chaturmAsa, when Shankaracharya as well as the other Sanyasis reside at one place.

Usually at an upa-matha in a city of their region, where they study and teach Shastras to lay people as well as discuss topics amongst themselves.

9/n
As a historical development during medieval period, unique events of North India led to also a unique phenomenon of this order developing what came to be known as “Akharas”

There are 7 Akharas of this Parampara-

jUnA
niranjanI
mahAnirvANI
aTala
AvAhana
Ananda
agni

10/n
These Akharas had various roles, but one of these was active engagement in society including militant & political activities.

This can also be seen in a similar development of such institutions in other Sampradayas like Natha and Ramanandis.

This is unique to North.

11/n
(For example, the Nirmohi Akhara, that is in news for having fought for Rama Janma Bhumi for centuries — Nirmohi is an Akhara that belongs to the Ramanandi Sampradaya)

Each of the Dashanami Sanyasi belongs to an Akharas and a Matha - however more closely to the Akhara.

12/n
Like head Sanyasi of Matha is called Shankaracharya, the head Sanyasi of an Akhara is called a Maha-Mandaleshvara.

Kumbha Mela is the event when all Sanyasis of all Akharas and Mathas gather to confer on matters. Recruitments are done and successions announced.

13/n
These Mathas and their Sanyasis are not Shaiva per se.

This is a common confusion amongst most lay people because of the word Shankaracharya. (Cf the recent comment by Champat Rai)

This order equally venerates Shiva, Vishnu, Devi, Ganesha, Aditya and other deities.

14/n
These Sanyasis are particularly known for their strict adherence to Vaidika Pramana and way of life.

They are historically known to excel in Sanskrit studies, Nyaya and wide scholarship in general.

While orthodox, they are known to be quite non-sectarian comparatively.

15/n
In their writings and speeches they freely quote scholars and saints of other Sampradaya.

For instance in the literature of Puri and Dvaraka parampara Acharyas you can see profuse quotations from Goswami Tulasidas - who belonged to a very different parallel parampara.

16/n
The successor Shankaracharya of the Matha is usually nominated by the present Shankaracharya.

There are qualifications also to be followed - most important being a scholarly reputation. The Shankaracharya needs to know Veda, Vedanga, Darshanas and be expert in Sanskrit etc

17/n
Because of their deep erudition, non-sectarian attitude, and active engagement with society - Shankaracharyas have historically held influence in matters of Dharma beyond this Sampradaya.

Hindu royals used to approach them for consultations and for deciding the matters.

18/n
Shankaracharya influence was also through its Gurukulas.

Since each Matha was to propagate a Veda and its branches - they were to produce Vaidika scholars and operate networks of Gurukulas. In South, and to some extent East, this continues.

19/n
Coming back to succession.

Only the Shringeri matha, representing South and Yajurveda, has an unbroken Shankaracharya lineage going back to Adi Shankara.

In case of the other 3 Mathas, Jadunath Sarkar and others note the times when no living Shankaracharya headed a Matha.

20/n
Among the Mathas of Puri, Jyotish, and Dvaraka, the line of succession has been interrupted at times, for a variety of historical reasons.

The longest gap has been in case of the Matha representing North.

Between 1776 and 1941 - there was no Shankaracharya at Jyotirmatha.

21/n
Shringeri is a Matha whose Shankaracharya has always been a Sanyasi that directly took Sanyasa from Brahmacharya without ever being a married person.

In case of the others, there have been cases when a Shankaracharya had been once a Grihastha.

22/n
The 4 Mathas operate independent of each other without interfering in other Matha’s matters, unless invited to.

However, in the last few centuries due to the political situation in North India, such interventions had been needed.

23/n
Because of relatively more stability in South and to some extent in East, Shringeri and some times Puri had to play some role in other Matha’s affairs, especially in case of North where a Shankaracharya had been absent for many decades.

24/n
Shankaracharyas were also kingmakers during the Hindu sovereignty.

Royals drew ritual authority from their blessings. Notice the epithet Shankaracharya of South uses.

Contrast it with that of the Shankaracharya of North.

From letters written in same month of 1955.

25/n
Image
Image
Their role in blessing the state was not forgotten.

Dr. Rajendra Prasad, taking over as the first head of state of independent India, took blessings of the 4 Shankaracharyas.

Here he is with Shankaracharya of Jyotirmatha, and despite being the President, sitting below him

26/n Image
New Shankaracharya of a Matha is nominated by present one, but installed by the Acharyas of the other 3.

Report in Washington Post, Dec 9 1973 in words of a foreign correspondent who observed Swami Swarupananda Sarasvati being installed as the Jyotirmatha Shankaracharya.

27/n
Image
Image
Shankaracharyas hold enough influence (at least used to until recent times) to mobilize masses on political or legislative causes.

The report mentioned above remembers the massive mobilization by Shankaracharyas on Goraksha movement, only 5 years earlier.

28/n Image
Remember, President Dr. Rajendra Prasad, sitting beneath the Shankaracharya?

No More.

Here in this IE op-ed of 9/9/94, governments are criticized for giving official reception to Shringeri Shankaracharya visiting Delhi.

Doing it for Pope is ok - but he is no Pope!

29/n Image
In the same op-ed, written by Justice Sachar, it is reported how a Governor of a state refused to visit a Shankaracharya when former was told that convention was to sit beneath the Acharya.

President of India did it in 1952 - but governors of 1980s can't. Note the Change.

30/n Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarvesh Tiwari

Sarvesh Tiwari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bhAratenduH

Oct 8
Was “Pandit Jackson” a Shady Indologist, eliminated by Abhinava Bharat for his subversive project? - 🧵

1/

Our friend @Kal_Chiron ji is positing that Jackson was a “shady Indologist”, running a subversive anti-Brahmin narrative project in Maharashtra — like Macauliffe in Punjab or Caldwell in Tamil Nadu.

He further posits that Savarkar brothers saw through his subversive narrative project, and therefore “nipped it in the bud” by Abhinav Bharat / Anant Kanhere assassinating him.

Let’s use the occasion to look at a) Jackson’s own works and how the nationalistic Indian and Hinduphile British scholars saw him, and b) what the revolutionary sources and Savarkar say about the reasons for killing him, and test these claims 🙏🏽

@vikramsampathImage
2/

Despite being a full-time ICS officer, Jackson was a prolific scholar:

• 6 major papers in JBBRAS (1899-1905) such as Two Inscriptions from Thana District (1899), The Caves of Nasik and Their Inscriptions (1901), Two New Valabhi Copper-plates (1902), A Note on the Hemadpanti Temples of the Deccan (1905) etc.

• 20+ articles in Indian Antiquary, mostly on folklore & epigraphy

• Several Public lectures - last one only days before his assassination - on methods in Indian antiquities.

• Posthumously published 2 volumes on Folk-Lore Notes about customs, beliefs, local deities, village festivals of Gujarat and Konkan.

• some 17 of his unpublished manuscripts in BBRAS Library

Most of the above - except the last - is available in public domain on Internet and I scanned through his works.

I don’t see any trace of a subversive element in his writings. He as a scholar comes across as respectful for Hindu civilization.Image
3/

Did Jackson move in the circle that painted Shivaji as not a Hindu monarch and a secularist king?

Charles Kincaid, author of “The Grand Rebel” (1910) — and father of Dennis Kincaid who later wrote a novel of the same title — was Jackson’s ICS colleague and a personal friend. When Kincaid was posted in Poona, Jackson was in Nashik.

In writing this very moving and inspiring sketch of Shivaji, Kincaid relied on the help of his scholarly friend Jackson. Jackson not only supplied him the historical sources but also reviewed the entire draft of “The Grand Rebel”, edited and approved it before he was killed.

In the preface of the book, published after Jackson died, Kincaid profusely thanks Jackson and dedicates it partly to him.

This 1910 book was the second English book on Shivaji — first one came out a year back by Sir Jadunath Sarkar — and unlike Sarkar’s book this presents Shivaji as a Hindu hero, the founder of the renewed Hindu vigor.

It became very popular amid Indian Nationalist circles. To the extent that Sir Jadunath Sarkar himself acknowledged that Kincaid’s book was far more popular than his own.

Kesari (BG Tilak’s journal) reviewed the book and wrote: “Mr. Kincaid’s Grand Rebel is a strange book to have come from an English pen. He has tried to feel as an Indian might feel about the founder of Hindavi Swarajya.”

R G Bhandarkar wrote (a letter in Feb 1911):

“Mr. Kincaid has written with that same sympathy and insight which the late Mr. Jackson so abundantly possessed. The Grand Rebel may be taken as a monument to both.”

Are we going to label Kincaid too as subversive?

In fact this book alone should debunk the claim that Jackson moved in the circles that were presenting Shivaji as not a Hindu monarch!Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 3, 2024
Acharya Abhinavagupta on Casteist interpreters of BhGita. 🧵

The savant makes a harsh rebuke to those he considers “casteist”.

While commenting on BhG 9.32-33, he calls such scholars जात्यादिमहाग्रहाविष्टा: i.e. “Those Who are Seized Greatly by Biases for Caste etc...”

A thread.

First, the shlokas and their literal meaning. Then Acharya’s remarks.

1/
मां हि पार्थ व्यपाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः।
स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शूद्रास्तेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्॥
किं पुनर्ब्राह्मणाः पुण्या भक्ता राजर्षयस्तथा।
अनित्यमसुखं लोकमिमं प्राप्य भजस्व माम्॥
९.३२-३३

Near Literally:

They, O Partha, who take refuge in Me, verily even if they be born in a sinful yoni, women, vaishya, even shudra — they too attain the ultimate goal. How much (more easily) then, the Brahmanas, those (born of) virtuous (births), the Bhaktas and the Kshatriya Sages! (Therefore) having arrived in this unhappy and temporary world, devote yourself to Me.

2/
Now Acharya Abhinavagupta’s comment.

Translation follows.

3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 1, 2024
Two other legal luminaries who contributed to the Temple case in All’d HC in a unique significant way, although not in capacity of official lawyers due to legal reasons:

1. Deoki Nandan Agarwal, Retd Judge of Allahabad HC

2. VKS Chaudhary, Retd Advocate General of UP

A 🧶

1/n

Image
Image
Deoki Nandan Agarwal was a judge in All’d HC from 1977 to 1983.

When he retired in 83, he immersed himself in studying the case in multiple suits.

It was Agarwal who came up with a unique angle to the case in 1989, that changed its course and ultimately decided it!

2/n
In 1989, Agarwal filed a law suit in the High Court - where he made the lead plaintiff as “Bhagwan Sri Ram Lala Virajman”!

He argued that the temple is a property of none but Rama himself, who is a “juristic person”, and representing himself as Rama’s “next friend”!

3/n
Read 14 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
RS Prasad represented in Allahabad HC not Ram Lala Virajman but Mahant Suresh Das.

He was also not the “main lawyer”, which was Adv PN Mishra (arguing the case in courts since 1989).

Here is the **full list** of lawyers who argued for the temple in All’d HC.

A Thread 🧶

1/n
1. Adv. PN Mishra, representing Ram Janmabhumi Punaruddhar Samiti

2/n Image
2. Adv Ranjana Agnihotri, also representing the Ram Janmabhumi Punaruddhar Samiti, and assisting Adv PN Mishra

3/n Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 17, 2023
Ayodhya 6-12-1992

RSS Vs Karsevaks

While Karsevaks were determined to bring it down, Swayamsevaks were protecting the mosque. They had formed a security cardon around it.

Karsevaks first taunted the swayamsevaks, and then fought with them to break the Babri.

local report: Image
*cordon
RSS/VHP only wanted to do this “symbolic” Karseva - washing the Ram Chabutra, brushing and cleaning dust.

Read Ashok Singhal’s statement from a new report one day before the historic day - what he thought of Karseva.

They were confident and proud of RSS crowd enforcement.

2/n Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 17, 2023
Krishna-Karna discussion, a thread.

Towards the end of his diplomatic mission to Hastinapura to avoid the war, Krishna met Karna.

1//n Image
In words of Sanjaya, Krishna spoke-

आनुपूर्व्येण वाक्यानि
श्लक्ष्णानि च मृदूनि च।
प्रियाणि धर्मयुक्तानि
सत्यानि च हितानि च॥

His words were smooth and mild. He made statements that were attractive and virtuous, credible and beneficial.

2/n
Krishna begins by acknowledging Karna’s learning.

उपासितास्ते राधेय ब्राह्मणा वेदपारगाः
तत्त्वार्थं परिपृष्टाश्च नियतेनानसूयया।
त्वमेव कर्ण जानासि वेदवादान् सनातनान्
त्वंह्येव धर्मशास्त्रेषु सूक्ष्मेषु परिनिष्ठितः॥

He addresses him as Radha’s Son.

3/n
Read 43 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(