As it points out, the subpoena predates the formal impeachment inquiry
That means that this particular subpoena is a nullity
3/x
@thehill As if that weren’t bad enough, the letter also points out that the Oversight Committee has seemingly offered a public hearing but is backtracking on their word
4/x
@thehill And the coup de grâce—Hunter is offering to negotiate new testimony or deposition
He’s put the committee in a box & criminal contempt will not be enforced by DOJ in these circumstances
@JRubinBlogger Another important brief is based on the Midland Asphalt case that I have been musing about for some time as @AWeissmann_ & other friends will attest. That would allow dismissal on jurisdictional grounds
It’s going to be a January for the legal & political ages & we're tracking it all in our master calendar of Trump court dates & clearinghouse of ALL the materials in each case 👇
In this thread we break down the top 25 - yes 25! - dates ahead
@just_security The first was by a distinguished group of 16 conservatives led by Trump’s former White House counsel Ty Cobb & featuring representatives of Republican administrations going back to Nixon!
@nytimes @maggieNYT @jonathanvswan @lukebroadwater The @nytimes reporting is based on an email that they have that is referenced in para 57 of the indictment
However OTHER strong evidence also points to Epshteyn being co-conspirator 6