It is a historic agreement on security cooperation signed by Sunak and Zelensky today in Kyiv. The agreement is significant for both practical and political reasons especially when the Republican lawmakers are blocking a $60 billion package to 🇺🇦.
A quick thread (1/6):
UK will continue provision of security assistance and modern military equipment, across the land, air and sea, space and cyber domains – prioritising air defence, artillery and long-range firepower, armoured vehicles, and other key capabilities as required. 2/6
such as combat air, and by promoting increased interoperability with Euro-Atlantic partners. The UK will jointly lead the Maritime Security Capability Coalition and will make significant contribution to Ukraine’s maritime fleet development. 3/6
The Maritime Capability Coalition aims to support Ukraine to become a net contributor to maritime security across the Black Sea and Azov Sea out to 2035 and beyond. 4/6
🇬🇧 and 🇺🇦 will work to transform Ukraine’s defence industry into a powerful asset for 🇺🇦 and Euro-Atlantic security, enabling 🇺🇦 to restore its territorial integrity, acting as a major driver in economic recovery and contributing to effective deterrence of future aggression. 5/6
UK will provide support for enhancing Ukraine's critical infrastructure protection, leveling up cyber capabilities and deepen cooperation on combating Russian disinformation and propaganda. 6/6
Zelensky's powerful essay on the importance of the UK-Ukraine security agreement:
"The key word in this chapter will be the word security. Security for us in Ukraine, for all free nations of Europe, for everyone in the world who values democracy."
A quick reflection 1/11
This is exactly what is at stake in Ukraine: the Euro-Atlantic security, rules-based international order and broadly, democratic values. These notions are "obsolete" for Putin and his revisionist, neo-imperialistic foreign policy. 2/11
Hence, the new equilibrium can't be achieved at the expense of the Ukrainian territorial integrity. Otherwise, Euro-Atlantic security will be largely fragile and susceptible to ever-growing threats posed by Russia. 3/11
Kyrylo Budanov's very interesting interview with Le Monde.
A long but gripping thread:
- Russian missile attacks stem from the desire to declare 2023 "victorious". The Russians did not have real military successes. 1/14
- Russian missiles have a number of shortcomings. They often miss targets. We immediately responded to their missile attacks, targeting military objects. 2/14
- If compared with previous years, from the end of the summer of 2023, we are observing an increase in the number of ammunition produced by Russia. At the same time, we noticed a decrease in the quality of these shells. 3/14
Insightful comments from Ukraine's Defense Intelligence (HUR):
A spokesperson for HUR Andriy Yusov reiterated that 462.000 Russian troops are currently fighting against Ukraine. He added that it is not sufficient for a repeated large-scale offensive. 1/9
Earlier, HUR's Deputy Vadym Skibtskyi stated: "462,000 Russian troops are now fighting against Ukraine. 35.000 Rosgvardia soldiers are tasked to ensure regimes in temporarily occupied territories" 2/9
“The number of troops on our territories allows the Russians to carry out rotation: to withdraw those units and subunits that have lost their combat capability - where the number of personnel is less than 50% - to the rear areas." 3/9
Key points from General Zaluzhnyi's press conference:
On Mobilization
- Whom the state will mobilize is not my competence. I need people and weapons to continue the war. 1/
- Everyone must defend Ukraine. This law is precisely for the sake of justice.
- I am not satisfied with the work of the enlistment services, otherwise there would be no need for the new bill on mobilization. 2/
On Mariinka & Avdiivka
- The city of Marinka no longer exists. Ukrainian troops retreated: in some places they dug in on the outskirts of the city, and in others a little further. 3/
Vladimir Putin signed the law on the Federal Budget for 2024-26 and for the first time since the Soviet Union, Russia intends to allocate almost a third of all expenditures to maintaining the army and the military-industrial complex. A quick 🧵1/4
For the next year, spending for "national defense" will be 10.775 trillion rubles (121.5 billion USD) - 70% more than in 2023 (6.8 trillion), 2.3 times more than in 2022 (4.7 trillion), and three times higher than the pre-war 2021 indicators (3.5 trillion). 2/4
Another 3.338 trillion rubles (37.5 billion USD) will be spent on Siloviki - the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the RosGvardia, the special services and the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN). 3/4
A very insightful piece by @MoscowTimes about Prigozhin's plans to win back Putin's favor hours before the mutiny.
At around 5 p.m., a few dozen people gathered for a roundtable in the State Duma’s Minor Hall. 🧵1/12
Sergei Mironov, the head of the A Just Russia – Patriots – For Truth party and a longtime ally of President Vladimir Putin, opened the session with a pre-recorded video message that was followed by remarks from several other MPs and functionaries. 2/12
In their speeches, the MPs criticized Moscow’s insufficient support for mobilized and volunteer soldiers fighting in Ukraine, suggesting introducing government bonds and a state monopoly on alcohol to boost the military’s funding. 3/12