Found this amazing book review in the fourth issue of National Review (1957), “Integration is Communisation” by Richard M Weaver—he saw gay race communism’s for what it was, from the very beginning.
Thread 🧵
“The Supreme Court's extraordinary dictate to the public schools promises to keep race relations inflamed for an indefinite period. It is therefore to be expected that there will be a continuing spate of books from "liberal" sources, filled with self-righteousness and preaching the funeral of what is pejoratively called "discrimination."
“In his discussion of race relations in South Africa, he notes that Communism is there being progressively redefined in racial terms. That is to say, Communism is coming to be identified in racial integration.”
“The Communist attitude toward race stems from Communism's positivistic representation of man, which has always had as one of its cardinal tenets the dogma that there are no real differences between people except economic differences.”
“Remove the economic differences and all the others -racial, cultural, social, and moral. disappear. Thus the collectivizing of the economy can be depended on to obliterate the various differences that keep people from being "socialized."”
“…the Communist tactic most aggressively used in this country now is the one hinted at by Mr. Kuper--the approach through the idea of "racial collectivism."
“This phase of the levelling or obliterating process can now be presented with a great deal of moral unction. Moreover, it has the tactical advantage of undermining our historic constitutional structure.”
“The common people often perceive elemental things which the over-educated cannot see. That they have been right in identifying this as the opening tactic of Communism in this country now seems beyond question.”
“We can observe in a number of areas how "racial collectivism" is being used as a crowbar to pry loose rights over private property.“
[end]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The unhinged Manhattan college professor who went viral for cursing out anti-abortion students shockingly held a machete to a Post reporter’s neck Tuesday — and made wild threats that she was going to “chop” him up"
Can someone who understands us con law better than I do please help me understand wtf he is talking about? I don't understand which aspect of the 14th amendment gives Biden authority to override the congressional slap fight over the debt ceiling?
If you are caught shoplifting you can have the implied consent to enter a certain retail premises revoked by the retailer. This revocation means that should you enter the premises, you are trespassing & you can be charged & arrested. Start doing this with subway menaces. Simple.
Also you should ban begging & busking in subways. It's coercive & intimidating because people have nowhere to go and no way to get away from them. This isn't actually complicated. You cannot just impose your stupid performances on people in public spaces & demand they pay you.
Ban busking + begging on subway. Arrest vagrants. Ban repeat offenders from trains & premises. Arrest if they violate ban. This isn't complicated at all. AI can scan faces on security cameras & match to database of banned persons & issue warrant for arrest if violations occur.
"The whole system failed him" say absent father (who allowed Neely to grow up in a single parent home where his mothers boyfriend murdered her and dumped her body in a suitcase), and aunt who did fuck all to help him after his mother's brutal death.
His FAMILY SYSTEM failed him.
Then the libs consumed his mothers brutal death as true crime entertainment on television at night after work, while Neely was shucking and jiving for them on the way to and from the office in the subway. I guess his absent father was too busy to pay attention or care.
His mom died when he was 14. Most of his moonwalking videos are 10+ years old. He hasn't been any use entertaining the libtards for a decade or more, so they ignored him while he racked up 40+ arrests, many for violent felonies. He only became useful to them again when dead.
At the core of the leftist delusion is a vulgar materialist proposition, ie. that man does violent things only due to a lack of material resources & thus material resources alone are posited as the solution to complex human problems BUT only when perpetrator is a democrat client.
When a black person, a transsexual, a liberal college educated woman, a white BLM activist etc. is brutal, deceitful, cruel or malicious, it's because WE deprived or failed them. We denied them resources or affirmation or whatever the fuck.
HOWEVER this crude materialism doesn't go both ways. It's not a totalising worldview: they're perfectly content to condemn individuals as immoral, evil, malicious, inherently or morally corrupted—materialism be damned—so long as they tend to vote Republican rather than democrat.
A lifelong criminal with a warrant out for his arrest, who is assaulting & terrorising passengers on train is not “someone in distress”. He is CAUSING distress!
Steve suggests incentivising violent criminals like him by PAYING them $100!? 🤡
“Just throw hundred dollar bills at problems and they go away! Let the hired help take care of them!”
These problems require MORAL LEADERSHIP AND COURAGE AND VISION. There is no Uber eats to throw money at the problem and have it instantly solved. These people are fucking morons.