This is higher than last month, true, but it doesn't mean the inflation situation is worsening. I noted this yesterday, saying 3.4% was the number to watch.
This is a *very* important point to keep in mind for the next *several* months. Even if things are completely normal month-by-month, the headline rate won't fall much over the next quarter.
What was the main reason for the increase to 3.4% from the 3.1% in November? Energy prices. Here's a breakdown.
It's not that gasoline went up in December. It's that they fell more in Dec 2022 than in Dec 2023.
Here's a full summary of recent price changes over the past three months (annualized). Big pressures remain mainly within shelter.
Some have strong negative feelings about this graph. Well, it's as good as I can make it so here you go anyway ... :(
Interestingly, it looks like December is the first time in a while that we haven't seen an increase in mortgage interest costs contributing more to CPI than the month prior. The start of turning the corner for this item? Rates are a policy choice, so we'll see.
As for what the Bank will do, here's the key measures they look to. These strip out volatile components. Unfortunately, all started adding more over the past three-months than they did in November. Not great. π³
To end: as inflation returns to normal, it may be increasingly relevant to recognize people experience price changes differently depending on what they buy. I estimate the "personal inflation" rate varied in Dec 2023 from 2.6% (owners, no mortgage) to 3.7% (renters). #cdnecon
It's also worth noting (I make this point regularly) that even as inflation normalizes, price levels remain higher than they otherwise would have been. This makes the affordability challenge top of mind -- and may remain so for years if/until earnings catch up.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As expected, inflation fell in October. A lot. From 3.8% in September to 3.1% in October. And monthly, adjusted for seasonality, prices were lower in October than Sept.
A big part of the reason is from lower gasoline prices. That's anticipated because oil prices were down. There's a tight connection between energy's contribution to CPI and oil prices (obviously). This has been a consistent story over the past two years.
You can see the size of the contribution from energy to the change in inflation since September here π . Basically everything else was a net wash.
Some Alberta Pension Plan proponents are concerned about Albertans paying more in contributions than they receive in benefits. Is this "overcontribution" legitimate? If so, does it imply the CPP is unfair? Would an APP solve it?
Allow me to explain. π§΅π€ #cdnpoli #ableg #cdnecon
The Government of Alberta regularly cites $60 billion in excess contributions over what has been received in benefits. The report commissioned by the government includes this figure. Red is Alberta. Positive means contributions > benefits. π
The data are accurate. You don't even need an actuary. Statistics Canada reports this annually. Total contributions from 1966-2021 amount to approximately $60 billion. Adjusting for inflation provides a clearer perspective.
The GST adds 5% to the cost of purchasing a good or service subject to this tax. Not all items are subject to it, though. I (roughly) estimate that, overall, the GST adds an average of 2.3% for consumer expenditures as a whole. (From here: )www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.β¦
So, eliminating the GST would drop the CPI by 2.3%. Since the latest inflation reading is 3.8%, that would leave us at 1.5% (assuming nothing else changed). And 1.5% is 61% lower than 3.8%.
Thrilled that my paper on an Alberta Pension Plan was accepted for publication in Canadian Public Policy! π₯³
While it will take time to appear in the journal (March issue), the final version is here: #ableg #cdnecon 𧡠π€papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfβ¦
In the paper, I develop a detailed model of an APP using the latest data and clear methods. It's also the foundation of the @FONCanada APP simulator: financesofthenation.ca/2023/10/03/a-nβ¦
It focuses on the long-term prospects for a separate provincial plan and uses the same approach as for the CPP. It estimates what the contribution rate needs to be to ensure that plan assets over time keep up with benefit expenditures.
On a monthly basis, the seasonally adjusted change in core inflation in Sept was good (0.1%) -- a welcome improvement over July and August. I'll unpack some other developments in the thread below.
Despite the rise in energy's contribution, the main reasons for the decline are falling contributions from groceries, communications, flights, and various other items. Fortunately, gains are fairly broad-based. π
Should Alberta withdraw from the Canada Pension Plan? It's a major policy question with complex pros and cons. I'll help unpack the issues, based on a new paper I'm happy to share today! 𧡠π€ #cdnecon #cdnpoli #ableg
It's not a new idea. The Western Canada Concept Party (separatists) pushed for it in '82. And even earlier some in Alberta weren't a fan of the CPP in the '60s. The @edmontonjournal editorial page at the time was π₯ !
Recent interest started in late 1990s.
CPP was in trouble, and projected to exhaust its funds soon. So reforms in 1997 boosted contributions, trimmed benefits, and created an investment fund to generate more π° .
In Alberta, the NDP opposed the change. PCs were mixed. But Stockwell Day wanted a separate Alberta plan.