1. Kamikaze #drones is a nightmare scenario brought to you by the internet of things (IoT). Although many folks warned of the dangers of IoT, being hunted by drones carrying high-explosives was not on their lists. What sequence of events enabled this?
2. The history of radio-controlled (RC) aircraft provides insight. Hobbyists have been building and flying RC aircraft for decades. Fifty years ago, radio controls were simple but very expensive. This example cost $300, which is about $1,700 in 2023.
3. Radio controls steadily improved but had a range of about one km (this radio is from 1993). Each radio used a single frequency (channel), e.g., channel 42. Two radio controls transmitting on the same channel would result in a crash of the aircraft.
4. RC aircraft changed dramatically in 2006 when Spektrum released its DX6 radio controller. This transmitted data packets at 2.4 GHz and the receiver was bound to one transmitter. The pilot no longer had to worry about frequency channels.
5. Radio-controls improved with more robust radio protocols and more features. These radios use proprietary software (firmware) designed for ease of use. Range is limited to about 2 km but these are excellent for controlling many types of hobby aircraft.
6. Conceptually, the above radio controls are very straightforward. There is a radio-control transmitter operated by the pilot, and a receiver mounted in the aircraft. Both use proprietary software that allows settings for several aircraft to be stored.
7. Two developments changed things. First is the availability of powerful, low-cost microcontrollers like the STM32F4 and ESP32. Importantly, the hardware & software necessary for programming them is cheap, e.g., this ST Nucleo costs under $20.
8. Second was the introduction in 2014 of long-range wireless devices known as “LoRa”. LoRa devices are intended for the Internet of Things (IoT). Coupled with a microcontroller, they are also great for controlling drones using the ExpressLRS (ELRS) protocol.
9. A very popular radio controller in Ukraine is the RadioMaster TX16S. Internally, this has an STM32F4 microcontroller running EdgeTX software. The example shown here has a built-in LoRa SX1280 and an ESP32 microcontroller running ExpressLRS.
10. Conceptually, this radio link is somewhat complex (a simple configuration is shown). Although capable of large distances, there is a lot of software to manage: EdgeTX on the radio controller and ExpressLRS on the transmitter & receiver.
11. The flight controller is the brains of the aircraft. It contains a microcontroller and various sensors such as an accelerometer, barometer, airspeed and GPS. For software, FPV drones will often use BetaFlight and fixed-wing use INAV or Ardupilot.
12. Being open-source resulted in many vendors making components and multiple ways to configure a drone. This is likely very complicated for the defenders on the frontlines. There are groups (big & small) providing drones, training and technical support.
13. There has been a big increase in the number of drones being assembled. There is also a trend towards more custom hardware, electronics and software. This is straightforward to do as powerful design tools , e.g., CAD/CAM, are widely available.
14. We should expect to see more on-board computing power, more custom software and increased flying range. Importantly, the widespread use of electronic warfare is forcing the developers to add more automation into these drones.
15. In many ways, I wonder if the use of these drones in warfare has only just begun.
If you enjoyed this thread please consider reposting as quote: your comments are appreciated. Also, please read my previous posts (listed under the “Highlights” tab).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. What would have been unthinkable a few years ago is now routine. Several Ukrainian drones successfully attacked a russian drone factory located in Dubna, only 115 km from the kremlin. This is a smart move by Ukraine, and there may be more to this attack than at first seems.
2. Importantly, one video showed several drones attacking, one after the other. Oddly, there was remarkably little air defence heard as each drone approached over a lake. What happened to russia’s air defence?
3. This shows the factory with the lake on the left (west) side. This building is very large. The camera operator (for #1) was quite close and was almost hit by shrapnel.
1. Developing a new weapon is hard so why not just copy another company’s design? Fibre optic drones are a hot product and part 4 of this series looked at a company (Skywalker) who developed their own. Other companies have rushed to make similar weapons.
2. Here are two fibre optics kits made by the Chinese company, Skywalker. Opening the boxes is the likely owner of PGI Technology, which operates in China but is effectively russian. Initially, this photo was confusing. Was Skywalker collaborating with PGI Technology? Nope.
3. PGI bought these two Skywalker kits with the goal of copying the technology and selling their own version. The following photos are very unusual since they show the design process. Here is the Skywalker canister with a large drone frame.
1. Need to ship weapons? The previous thread in this series showed a small russian company, PGI Technology, making electronic warfare systems in China. But how do they ship these systems & other equipment to russia?
2. PGI Technology showed this photo of equipment being prepared to ship from China to russia. The packing tape has a company name & phone number on it. Note the Wallace restaurant and #24 bus across the street.
3.PGI also showed a video of this heater but it is the background that is interesting. Visible is the company name (3188 Kapro) and a phone number. There are also signs on the steps written in russian.
1. This is a look at a small russian company that operates in China and exports military equipment to russia. One interesting aspect is this company manufactures some equipment, including electronic warfare kit, and places its logo on the products.
2. It currently calls itself “PGI Technology” but there are also references to “Dongguan PGI Technology”. Its location is murky but a now-defunct website gave an address in Tangxia Town in Dongguan.
3. This is a very small company likely run by the single person shown here. He is easily identified by a distinctive tattoo on his left arm. Oddly, his face is obscured in some videos but not in others. Here he is testing a drone jammer.
1. Combining a low-cost drone with a fibre-optic communication link produces a formidable weapon that is impervious to electronic defenses. Here is a look at how a small Chinese company called Skywalker developed an easy-to-use fibre-optic kit that has changed the war.
2. Skywalker posted several videos while developing fibre optics for drones. The first was a short-range, e.g. 100 metres, test in June 12, 2024. The spool of fibre optic was not on the drone but remained on the ground. A rod prevented the fibre from tangling in the propellers.
3. The first video also showed a number of landmarks that help determine its location. The large building in the background is part of a pharmaceutical industrial park.
1. Part 3 of Making Money from a War visits an office with a fantastic view. The Chinese company, Skywalker posted a number of videos including one from a fancy office building. A close look produces questions.
2. Skywalker posted a video showing how to attach a bomb release to a pricey (€13500) DJI Matrice 300 drone. It holds two rounds under the drone with a control module mounted on the top of the drone. There is also an excellent view from the office windows.
3. One question is, where is this office? The shadows suggest this view is towards the west. There is a straight road close to a water front and a group of very tall buildings is seen in the distance. A large, low building is at the bottom of the photo.