🚨🚨🚨THREAD: Some quick hot takes on the Chevron arguments (notes for myself too!). 1/ Ridiculous whipsaw: Left Justices--Chevron never arises, it's nothing, it's really only a rare tie breaker. Biden Administration: Overruling Chevron will destroy our Republic.
2/ Oh the humility...Kagan (I think) frames overruling Chevron as proving the Court is a bunch of right-wing fanatics with no humility. Backfires totally, when humility means admitting you are wrong is raised with Scalia as example.
3/ Do what we do in every other case: Kavanaugh made the cleanest, simplest, answer to what happens post Chevron. And the one judge referenced who never gets to stage two proves it can be done. It isn't though because Chevon is an easy punt.
4/ The claims that Chevron builds stability can't fly given the constant reversal of regulations. Stability comes from Americans being able to rely on the best/most informed statutory interpretation.
5/ Congress needs to do its damn job! Clement made the point, which @NCLAlegal highlighted in Loper amicus brief that Chevron fosters extremes & prevents compromise.
@NCLAlegal 7/ Kavanaugh again nailed the point that on the ground Chevron is a much bigger problem because lower courts don't do the hard work of statutory interpretation because Supreme Court said they didn't have too.
@NCLAlegal 8/ I kept waiting for (and was disappointed when), the response to why judge and not agency make that decision, ...because that's what Article III says.
@NCLAlegal 9/ The remind them again solution Biden Administration presents is silly....because a) it doesn't work; and b) as Kavanaugh stressed re footnote 9 in Chevron, the remind them again to do step 1 IS the answer and then there is no deference.
@NCLAlegal 11/ Tea leaf reading: Chevron is overturned BUT whether based on APA or constitution, I'm unsure. My gut is base constitution because this Court is focused on constitutional structure points.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREADETTE: I'm working on a lawsplainer re section 1512(c), which is basis for 2 of counts Smith brought against Trump. As many already know, Supreme Court has granted cert. to decide scope of that section in J6 case. Two quick points: 1/
2/ First, having reviewed briefs & key cases, I'm 95% sure Supreme Court majority will hold section 1512(c) does not criminalize conduct charged against J6 or Trump; 2) I'm 99.9% sure S.Ct. grant of cert in Fischer case will keep Trump's trial from proceeding pre-decision.
3/ In the Fischer case the Court of Appeals "stayed the mandate," meaning it didn't send its decision down to lower court for execution pending Supreme Court's decision on cert. Gov't opposed stay in that case but COA nonetheless granted it. Next to impossible to see COA
In the context of the Israel-Hamas war, "free Palestine" has no meaning. Hamas, which was elected to govern Gaza, committed an act of war (and of terrorism) against Israel, and that is the war Israel is fighting. 1/
3/ And yes, the Rules of War apply to Israel, just as they Ukraine, and Hamas and Russia, although amazingly only Israel seems to be constantly reminded of that.
3/3 Okay, my thread is going to be limited to this: This is frickin' nuts that the Court thinks it is his, Fulton County, or anyone else's gosh darn business what Trump asked Clark to do or not do!!!