Seriously.
What the heck is happening to boys aged 10-14 in England and Wales?
I mean it would be great if someone in the media even acknowledged this, let alone asked questions about it.
Maybe something like "the mysterious and silent tragedy of the near doubling in the numbers of 10-14 year old males dying in England and Wales".
Girls v Boys
Girls' deaths have risen... but boys' deaths have leapt.
Here's the cumulative difference between boys and girls deaths in that age bracket since the start of 2020.
Do you see how it goes ballistic in August 2022?
This is the ratio between the three month rolling average of weekly deaths of boys and girls.
That scale on the left is *how many times as many deaths of boys are being registered than deaths of girls*.
You can see that at one point nearly THREE TIMES as many boys deaths were being registered.
The red line is when the same number are happening.
And remember, this is *how many more* are happening - girls has risen too.
I don't know if it's caused by anything.
It may just be one of those random fluctuations.
I'm not suggesting it's caused by any specific thing.
But don't you think someone should be looking at it?
Why isn't anyone from the government or opposition talking about what they think is happening and what they're going to do about it?
And, *AS ALWAYS*, if increased deaths are occurring in any non-elderly population, they'll almost certainly be linked to increased disability across that age group.
If ten kids are dying in a week, how many are being disabled?
Let's put it another way.
On any day, you can look back and see how many 10-14 year old boys died in the previous 365 days, right?
Here's that rolling graph.
Three years ago, it was 138.
Now it's 231.
Do you understand yet?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just imagine for a moment that you are infected with a virus that harms the lining of your arteries. The virus doesn't damage the artery walls in every part of your body to exactly the same degree. Some parts will be more damaged, some less.
At your next infection, will the parts of your artery wall that were more damaged first time round be more or less vulnerable to the virus?
It's an interesting question, isn't it.
Will those damaged parts be better equipped the next time round?
Sadly the answer is no
Those harder-hit patches do not reset to factory condition once the acute infection passes.
The minimisers would have you believe that every bad health condition develops immediately, symptoms of it appear immediately, medical attention is found immediately, and the condition is diagnosed immediately.
The truth is very different.
It can take years for conditions to develop after they have been triggered.
It can take years for the symptoms to become bad enough to need medical attention.
I think we've let the damage that covid infections do to *linings* slip into the background of all the other problems that covid infections cause.
I think this may be a *big* problem.
Across all of these, the pattern is the same: structural cell loss is followed by repair that restores structural continuity but not precision of purpose.
The tissue remains present, but its behaviour changes.
Function becomes uneven.
Symptoms emerge from loss of fine control