@TexasChildrens T4.01 Day 3 now. @AmerAcadPeds is up to DAY 111.
Since informing you of the STRING MECHANISM that will destroy half your childhood vaccines.
Doesn't look like Dr. Pete Hotez can show how the STRING MECHANISM is wrong? He is acknowledging that the STRING MECHANIS is CORRECT?
Since informing you of the STRING MECHANISM that will destroy half your childhood vaccines.
Doesn't look like Dr. Pete Hotez can show how the STRING MECHANISM is wrong? He is acknowledging that the STRING MECHANIS is CORRECT?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.02 So, IF that INABILITY of Dr. Hotez to show how the STRING is wrong, means it is CORRECT,
And since the STRING MECHANISM shows that the MAIN EFFECT of half your childhood vaccines is to produce PRECIPITINS or CLOTS when combined with platelets, shouldn't Texas Childrens -
And since the STRING MECHANISM shows that the MAIN EFFECT of half your childhood vaccines is to produce PRECIPITINS or CLOTS when combined with platelets, shouldn't Texas Childrens -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.03 Do the right thing? You DO realize Texas C? that every parent with a toddler who sees these post from me? wonders what the HELL pediatricians are thinking?
I explain to you the BIGGEST FLAW of any medicine or procedure in the history of ALL MEDICINE to you and?
I explain to you the BIGGEST FLAW of any medicine or procedure in the history of ALL MEDICINE to you and?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.04
You all refuse to do the RIGHT thing? Are you CERTAIN that your mission is to create a healthier future for children?
Do you REALLY lead in patient care, education and research? If you IGNORE the single BIGGEST new discover to hit your specialty?
You all refuse to do the RIGHT thing? Are you CERTAIN that your mission is to create a healthier future for children?
Do you REALLY lead in patient care, education and research? If you IGNORE the single BIGGEST new discover to hit your specialty?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.05 This isn't a popularity contest is it? I KNOW that the antivax leaders don't want to help me at all.
I KNOW that even the antivax leaders are STUNNED into silence and they're all in an ego-filled jealous rage at me because they can't be the ones to take down vaccines.
I KNOW that even the antivax leaders are STUNNED into silence and they're all in an ego-filled jealous rage at me because they can't be the ones to take down vaccines.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.06 It's incredible to me. @childrendHD
that BOTH the hypocrite anti-vax leaders who refuse to spread this new of the STRING MECHANISM to the public and
the pediatricians who refuse to inform the public of this MASSIVE mistake
you all are THIS INDIFFERENT to CHILDREN?
that BOTH the hypocrite anti-vax leaders who refuse to spread this new of the STRING MECHANISM to the public and
the pediatricians who refuse to inform the public of this MASSIVE mistake
you all are THIS INDIFFERENT to CHILDREN?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.07
When parents realize how PROFESSIONAL ADULTS on BOTH sides of the vaccine issue are weighing EVERY consideration EXCEPT for the health and safety of CHILDREN, the public will TURN on ALL OF YOU. oh, don't worry. unless the vaccine industry hires a hit man to kill me -
When parents realize how PROFESSIONAL ADULTS on BOTH sides of the vaccine issue are weighing EVERY consideration EXCEPT for the health and safety of CHILDREN, the public will TURN on ALL OF YOU. oh, don't worry. unless the vaccine industry hires a hit man to kill me -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.08 and I have NO evidence that they will do that, but I provide PLENTY of MOTIVE for them to want to do that (since the STRING and MIDDLE MAN mechanisms will destroy HALF their vaccines).
as long as I can breathe, I will keep contacting pediatricians and informing them.
as long as I can breathe, I will keep contacting pediatricians and informing them.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.09 There are plenty of anti vax leaders on THIS side of the issue that try to SHAME ME and humiliate me into staying quiet. They were SURE that they had done all the hard work to take down the COVID vaccine and they didn't want to share ANY credit with me. But, they -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.10 they NEVER even realized what the fight was about. The fight is to LET THE WORLD KNOW that
"Our body does NOT use antibodies in our fight against viruses."
That is the paradigm shift. That is why I was able to SINGLE handedly find TWO separate mechanisms-
"Our body does NOT use antibodies in our fight against viruses."
That is the paradigm shift. That is why I was able to SINGLE handedly find TWO separate mechanisms-
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.11 The STRING. ONE POST to destroy half your childhood vaccines that have a million peer reviewed papers? this is the CLOSEST THING in all of medicine to the "emperor's new clothes."
The emperor had no clothes on.
Your antibody is useless in our fight against viruses.
The emperor had no clothes on.
Your antibody is useless in our fight against viruses.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.12
the father of vaccinology was a HUGE LIAR.
Let me explain. Edward Jenner inoculated a boy, James Phipps, with a cowpox virus. His gardener's son.
Months later, he exposed the boy several times to the smallpox virus but Phipps never devleloped smallpox.
the father of vaccinology was a HUGE LIAR.
Let me explain. Edward Jenner inoculated a boy, James Phipps, with a cowpox virus. His gardener's son.
Months later, he exposed the boy several times to the smallpox virus but Phipps never devleloped smallpox.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.13
Let me explain why he was WRONG and EVIL and a LIAR. In medicine, we have data that we can't use because the medical research was so unethically obtained. Isn't that the case with what Edward Jenner did?
Let me explain why he was WRONG and EVIL and a LIAR. In medicine, we have data that we can't use because the medical research was so unethically obtained. Isn't that the case with what Edward Jenner did?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.14 And Edward Jenner was discriminating against the boy, wasn't he? class warfare at its finest? He didn't experiment on HIS nephews or nieces?
but you all think you can still speak HIGHLY of this horrible person?
but you all think you can still speak HIGHLY of this horrible person?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.15
And he was a LIAR. why? because even if we all perfectly AGREE that antibodies are useful against viruses (which they are not), the cowpox antigen antibody looks NOTHING like the smallpox antigen antibody and the cowpox antibody would NEVER neutralize the smallpox virus.
And he was a LIAR. why? because even if we all perfectly AGREE that antibodies are useful against viruses (which they are not), the cowpox antigen antibody looks NOTHING like the smallpox antigen antibody and the cowpox antibody would NEVER neutralize the smallpox virus.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.16
Yeah, I don't need to be sherlock holmes to figure out that the FATHER of modern vaccinology was an UTTER horrible LIAR and DISCRIMINATED against the poor and performed HIGHLY UNETHICAL research, without PROPER INFORMED CONSENT on a 9 year old BOY.
Yeah, I don't need to be sherlock holmes to figure out that the FATHER of modern vaccinology was an UTTER horrible LIAR and DISCRIMINATED against the poor and performed HIGHLY UNETHICAL research, without PROPER INFORMED CONSENT on a 9 year old BOY.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.17 NONE of my allegations against Edward Jenner can be refuted. And the field of vaccinology started with LIES, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR, LACK OF PROPER INFORMED CONSENT, POOR RESEARCH DESIGNS and EGO.
Fast forward 200 years. NOTHING MUCH HAS CHANGED.
Fast forward 200 years. NOTHING MUCH HAS CHANGED.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.18
U put polyclonal antibodies into a beaker of saline. U ADD its antigen. IT WILL CLUMP or what YOUR scientists call PRECIPITINS. Google it. It's REAL.
Ur 1st vax puts antibodies into blood.
Ur BOOSTER puts antigen into blood.
Why wouldn't they clump? THEY WILL.
U put polyclonal antibodies into a beaker of saline. U ADD its antigen. IT WILL CLUMP or what YOUR scientists call PRECIPITINS. Google it. It's REAL.
Ur 1st vax puts antibodies into blood.
Ur BOOSTER puts antigen into blood.
Why wouldn't they clump? THEY WILL.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.19
That ONE assumption by your industry, that BECAUSE they found an antibody against a virus pathogen in the blood, that that antibody HAD TO BE USEFUL.
That is why your industry vaccinated tens of billions of people over the past 200 years.
That ONE assumption by your industry, that BECAUSE they found an antibody against a virus pathogen in the blood, that that antibody HAD TO BE USEFUL.
That is why your industry vaccinated tens of billions of people over the past 200 years.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.20
But, it WAS an assumption. IF HIV antibodies were the FIRST antibodies to be found against a viral pathogen in our blood? would you ALSO have concluded that the HIV antibody was USEFUL in our fight against the virus?
NO. so you have NO idea IF the antibody is useful
But, it WAS an assumption. IF HIV antibodies were the FIRST antibodies to be found against a viral pathogen in our blood? would you ALSO have concluded that the HIV antibody was USEFUL in our fight against the virus?
NO. so you have NO idea IF the antibody is useful
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.21
When we find antibodies against our joints in our blood, you don't also conclude that THAT antibody against our joints is useful do you? of course not.
The whole field of rheumatology and auto-immune disorders is THAT isn't it? the body WRONGLY attacking itself?
When we find antibodies against our joints in our blood, you don't also conclude that THAT antibody against our joints is useful do you? of course not.
The whole field of rheumatology and auto-immune disorders is THAT isn't it? the body WRONGLY attacking itself?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.22 So, we AGREE that EVERYTHING the body does is NOT PURPOSEFUL, is not PLANNED and is NOT ALWAYS BENEFICIAL?? right?
So, you have NO way of KNOWING if the antibody that you found against a virus pathogen WAS helpful right??
So, you have NO way of KNOWING if the antibody that you found against a virus pathogen WAS helpful right??
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.23 Oh, you say, but they got better. So, it must have been useful.
If I live on a farmhouse in the year 2020 with a 100 cats and I never see mice, but one day in 2021 I put out a mousetrap and I catch ONE mouse, jik. Does that mean the mousetrap is the REASON no mice?
If I live on a farmhouse in the year 2020 with a 100 cats and I never see mice, but one day in 2021 I put out a mousetrap and I catch ONE mouse, jik. Does that mean the mousetrap is the REASON no mice?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.24
I AGREE with you. you caught ONE MOUSE with your mousetrap. But, you can NOT conclude that there are no mice because of that ONE MOUSETRAP, correct?
And that is YOUR situation with your VIRUS ANTIBODY. I AGREE. You caught ONE virus. but that is ALL it did.
I AGREE with you. you caught ONE MOUSE with your mousetrap. But, you can NOT conclude that there are no mice because of that ONE MOUSETRAP, correct?
And that is YOUR situation with your VIRUS ANTIBODY. I AGREE. You caught ONE virus. but that is ALL it did.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.25
The most DANGEROUS mistake for a scientist or physician to fall under is the spell of a "false positive."
The time to use that phrase, "correlation is not causation" is NOT for the side effects of vaccines.
THAT PHRASE applies to YOUR belief that antibodies are useful.
The most DANGEROUS mistake for a scientist or physician to fall under is the spell of a "false positive."
The time to use that phrase, "correlation is not causation" is NOT for the side effects of vaccines.
THAT PHRASE applies to YOUR belief that antibodies are useful.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.26
Is it possible that there is a completely separate way that we recover from viruses, UNRELATED to your virus antibody?
Because then, your antibodies are all like antibodies against the HIV virus. you DID find them. It is ONLY a correlation.
Is it possible that there is a completely separate way that we recover from viruses, UNRELATED to your virus antibody?
Because then, your antibodies are all like antibodies against the HIV virus. you DID find them. It is ONLY a correlation.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.27
If in fact your FIRST assumption, that finding an antibody against a virus pathogen in the body IS PROOF that the antibody was useful, I destroy that TOO easily, correct? We find LOTS of antibodies in our blood that DO bind to pathogens but still are NOT USEFUL right?
If in fact your FIRST assumption, that finding an antibody against a virus pathogen in the body IS PROOF that the antibody was useful, I destroy that TOO easily, correct? We find LOTS of antibodies in our blood that DO bind to pathogens but still are NOT USEFUL right?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.28
Here's a PERFECT example of an ANTIBODY we find in our body against a PATHOGEN, but THAT ANTIBODY happened to KILL the MOST children under 20 in the early nineteenth century. Do you know which antibody I'm talking about, pediatricians?
Here's a PERFECT example of an ANTIBODY we find in our body against a PATHOGEN, but THAT ANTIBODY happened to KILL the MOST children under 20 in the early nineteenth century. Do you know which antibody I'm talking about, pediatricians?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.29
Okay, so you all DID ASSUME that because an antibody against a pathogen exists, that was the PROOF that the antibody was BENEFICIAL.
Your field has NO further scientific evidence, aside from massive studies that show NUMBERS but NO hypothesis.
Okay, so you all DID ASSUME that because an antibody against a pathogen exists, that was the PROOF that the antibody was BENEFICIAL.
Your field has NO further scientific evidence, aside from massive studies that show NUMBERS but NO hypothesis.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.30
Massive NUMBERS and statistics are NOT science though. For example, the rain dancers had MASSIVE data to show that their rain dance DID indeed cause the rain. They had a PERFECT 100% success rate. But, we know they have NO HYPOTHESIS to connect the RAIN DANCE to rain.
Massive NUMBERS and statistics are NOT science though. For example, the rain dancers had MASSIVE data to show that their rain dance DID indeed cause the rain. They had a PERFECT 100% success rate. But, we know they have NO HYPOTHESIS to connect the RAIN DANCE to rain.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.31
So, aside from ALL your published papers on vaccines, which I simply brush aside with my rain dancer argument, the ONLY thing your field has IS that you DID find an antibody against a virus pathogen. That is ALL you have, aside from massive studies, just like RAINDANCERs
So, aside from ALL your published papers on vaccines, which I simply brush aside with my rain dancer argument, the ONLY thing your field has IS that you DID find an antibody against a virus pathogen. That is ALL you have, aside from massive studies, just like RAINDANCERs
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.32
Now, here is ONE (I have many) CONCLUSIVE counterargument that JUST finding an antibody against a pathogen in our blood is REASON to ASSUME that the antibody is USEFUL/BENEFICIAL.
The number one killer of children? in the early nineteenth century? The STREP antibody
Now, here is ONE (I have many) CONCLUSIVE counterargument that JUST finding an antibody against a pathogen in our blood is REASON to ASSUME that the antibody is USEFUL/BENEFICIAL.
The number one killer of children? in the early nineteenth century? The STREP antibody
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.33 Just because we DO find the STREP antibody in the blood, can we ASSUME that this antibody against the pathogen was BENEFICIAL?
It could NOT have been because it was the number one KILLER of children, this STREP antibody, otherwise known as RHEUMATIC FEVER.
It could NOT have been because it was the number one KILLER of children, this STREP antibody, otherwise known as RHEUMATIC FEVER.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.34 The ONLY evidence your field has, that vaccines are useful is that you DID find antibodies against pathogens in our blood. From that finding, you JUMPED to the assumption that that ANTIBODY was BENEFICIAL.
I destroyed that assumption with the STREP antibody, correct?
I destroyed that assumption with the STREP antibody, correct?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.35
The most HUMILIATING situation for a scientist to find themselves in? UNDER THE SPELL OF A FALSE POSITIVE.
That's your whole field of vaccinology. Let's dive deeper.
The most HUMILIATING situation for a scientist to find themselves in? UNDER THE SPELL OF A FALSE POSITIVE.
That's your whole field of vaccinology. Let's dive deeper.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.36
If the US has a massive forest fire and a million homes are burned down, you will always find ash, at every home that burned down.
Do you think it will help to take that ash and sprinkle it on the unburnt 299 million homes?
Because that is what you did.
If the US has a massive forest fire and a million homes are burned down, you will always find ash, at every home that burned down.
Do you think it will help to take that ash and sprinkle it on the unburnt 299 million homes?
Because that is what you did.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.37
In 2020, 20 million Americans were infected with COVID-19. It is UNDISPUTED that 99.9% of these Americans did NOT have a COVID-19 antibody in their blood during the first week of infection.
Yet, 19 million Americans healed and many just shook it off like a BAD COLD
In 2020, 20 million Americans were infected with COVID-19. It is UNDISPUTED that 99.9% of these Americans did NOT have a COVID-19 antibody in their blood during the first week of infection.
Yet, 19 million Americans healed and many just shook it off like a BAD COLD
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.38
The COVID-19 antibody DID show up AFTER people healed, usually spiking around a few weeks to a couple of months AFTER their infections, AFTER their recovery.
We DO always say in science? that "correlation is not causation?"
The COVID-19 antibody DID show up AFTER people healed, usually spiking around a few weeks to a couple of months AFTER their infections, AFTER their recovery.
We DO always say in science? that "correlation is not causation?"
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.39
Do you see? this isn't even a PROPER "correlation."
The timing is all BACKWARDS.
If I eat a bad apple, and feel sick 3 hours later, that is "correlation" and I can blame the bad apple, but I do NOT have DEFINITE PROOF that the apple did it.
Do you see? this isn't even a PROPER "correlation."
The timing is all BACKWARDS.
If I eat a bad apple, and feel sick 3 hours later, that is "correlation" and I can blame the bad apple, but I do NOT have DEFINITE PROOF that the apple did it.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.40
But for the COVID-19 antibody, it could NOT have been involved in ANY way with how we healed, correct? because it showed up AFTER we healed, correct?
It isn't even a proper CORRELATION, much less CAUSATION.
But for the COVID-19 antibody, it could NOT have been involved in ANY way with how we healed, correct? because it showed up AFTER we healed, correct?
It isn't even a proper CORRELATION, much less CAUSATION.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.41
I'm a surgeon. If I have a new assistant, are they helpful? if they do not know what my goals are and what I am attempting to achieve, HOW ARE THEY HELPFUL? they are NOT. but damn it, they KEEP handing me a scalpel when I don't NEED a scalpel.
I'm a surgeon. If I have a new assistant, are they helpful? if they do not know what my goals are and what I am attempting to achieve, HOW ARE THEY HELPFUL? they are NOT. but damn it, they KEEP handing me a scalpel when I don't NEED a scalpel.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.42
The ONLY way to assist me and FACILITATE what I am doing is to KNOW WHAT MY GOALS are and HOW I ACHIEVE THOSE GOALS, correct?
SO, the ONLY WAY to help the HUMAN body did what it did so AMAZINGLY well in healing at least 19 million Americans is to KNOW WHAT IT DID.
The ONLY way to assist me and FACILITATE what I am doing is to KNOW WHAT MY GOALS are and HOW I ACHIEVE THOSE GOALS, correct?
SO, the ONLY WAY to help the HUMAN body did what it did so AMAZINGLY well in healing at least 19 million Americans is to KNOW WHAT IT DID.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.43
One thing is CLEAR. the human body did NOT use a COVID-19 antibody to heal us from COVID in 2020.
So, if you have NO hypothesis on HOW we actually HEALED from COVID in 2020? why do you think you're in a position to HELP the human body? YOU ARE THAT NEW ASSISTANT.
One thing is CLEAR. the human body did NOT use a COVID-19 antibody to heal us from COVID in 2020.
So, if you have NO hypothesis on HOW we actually HEALED from COVID in 2020? why do you think you're in a position to HELP the human body? YOU ARE THAT NEW ASSISTANT.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.44
If you have NO hypothesis for how the INFECTED LUNG cell DESTROYED the COVID viral mRNA strands within our lung cells, WHY DO YOU THINK YOU CAN HELP?
Becuz the ONLY way we defeated the enemy? by DESTROYING the COVID viral mRNA IN our lung cells.
If you have NO hypothesis for how the INFECTED LUNG cell DESTROYED the COVID viral mRNA strands within our lung cells, WHY DO YOU THINK YOU CAN HELP?
Becuz the ONLY way we defeated the enemy? by DESTROYING the COVID viral mRNA IN our lung cells.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.45
You think the COVID-19 antibody was USEFUL in our fight against COVID. I say no
I say the RNase enzyme did INFINITELY more for us in our fight against COVID. So, Texas CHildren's. Let's make a bet. $1 million.
to get to the truth.
You think the COVID-19 antibody was USEFUL in our fight against COVID. I say no
I say the RNase enzyme did INFINITELY more for us in our fight against COVID. So, Texas CHildren's. Let's make a bet. $1 million.
to get to the truth.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.46
I bet $1 million that the RNase enzyme destroyed MORE COVID mRNA strands within lung cells in the year 2020
compared to how many COVID mRNA strands within lung cells in the year 2020, that the COVID antibody destroyed,
without destroying lung cells.
I bet $1 million that the RNase enzyme destroyed MORE COVID mRNA strands within lung cells in the year 2020
compared to how many COVID mRNA strands within lung cells in the year 2020, that the COVID antibody destroyed,
without destroying lung cells.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.47
Do u get that? If you have NO idea how the human body destroyed COVID viral mRNA strands in our lung cells, you are in NO position to HELP the human body, and without question the human body did NOT use COVID antibodies to destroy viral mRNA inside our lung cells in 2020
Do u get that? If you have NO idea how the human body destroyed COVID viral mRNA strands in our lung cells, you are in NO position to HELP the human body, and without question the human body did NOT use COVID antibodies to destroy viral mRNA inside our lung cells in 2020
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.48
You all don’t even have a single HYPOTHESIS on how we destroyed COVID mRNA in our lung cells.
I say it’s the RNase enzyme. So since my theory is incredibly the ONLY hypothesis on earth to explain how the COVID mRNA was destroyed, it IS the current science.
You all don’t even have a single HYPOTHESIS on how we destroyed COVID mRNA in our lung cells.
I say it’s the RNase enzyme. So since my theory is incredibly the ONLY hypothesis on earth to explain how the COVID mRNA was destroyed, it IS the current science.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.49
Now since I KNOW the mechanism the human body used to destroy the COVID viral mRNA inside our lung cells, I can FACILITATE that.
Fasting actually activate more RNase
By causing oxidation of its inhibitor which then releases the active RNase .
Now since I KNOW the mechanism the human body used to destroy the COVID viral mRNA inside our lung cells, I can FACILITATE that.
Fasting actually activate more RNase
By causing oxidation of its inhibitor which then releases the active RNase .
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.50
So the cure for COVID? Fasting. And my proof? 100 billion infants in the past 10,000 years did the same thing. Get fussy and do NOT eat when sick. Pediatricians. If you had kept an open mind -
So the cure for COVID? Fasting. And my proof? 100 billion infants in the past 10,000 years did the same thing. Get fussy and do NOT eat when sick. Pediatricians. If you had kept an open mind -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.51
-you all would have discovered this. U see it every day with all your toddler patients. But you trusted the liar father of modern vaccinology and u didn’t listen to the children.
-you all would have discovered this. U see it every day with all your toddler patients. But you trusted the liar father of modern vaccinology and u didn’t listen to the children.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.52
Do you realize how much this will help your sick toddlers?
Now you know that pedialyte with glucose should not be sold on the market. It is delivering more sickness to toddlers who are trying NOT to eat and u mix in calories with their fluids. NOT SMART.
Do you realize how much this will help your sick toddlers?
Now you know that pedialyte with glucose should not be sold on the market. It is delivering more sickness to toddlers who are trying NOT to eat and u mix in calories with their fluids. NOT SMART.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.53
Pediatricians. It IS the 21st century. We are living in the golden age of science and medicine.
And your specialty is engaged in a practice that is NO different from the ancient rituals of human child sacrifice. no, those priests did NOT kill every child. -
Pediatricians. It IS the 21st century. We are living in the golden age of science and medicine.
And your specialty is engaged in a practice that is NO different from the ancient rituals of human child sacrifice. no, those priests did NOT kill every child. -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.54
Do you know how much SUFFERING and DEATH will be prevented by this KNOWLEDGE? That when you FIRST are infected with a respiratory virus, the SINGLE MOST important thing to do? Is to FAST for two to three days.
Do you know how much SUFFERING and DEATH will be prevented by this KNOWLEDGE? That when you FIRST are infected with a respiratory virus, the SINGLE MOST important thing to do? Is to FAST for two to three days.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.55
It is the most IRONIC fact from the whole COVID pandemic.
That almost the whole WORLD thinks the COVID antibody was VERY important in our healing from COVID, but that the COVID antibody was not even PRESENT in 2020 (for the 1st week of illness) and--
It is the most IRONIC fact from the whole COVID pandemic.
That almost the whole WORLD thinks the COVID antibody was VERY important in our healing from COVID, but that the COVID antibody was not even PRESENT in 2020 (for the 1st week of illness) and--
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.56
When the COVID-19 antibody finally arrived LATE TO THE GAME, it can't even CROSS the lung barrier to access the lung air space where lung cells are being infected by the COVID virus.
The RNase quietly did INFINITELY more work than the COVID-19 antibody -
When the COVID-19 antibody finally arrived LATE TO THE GAME, it can't even CROSS the lung barrier to access the lung air space where lung cells are being infected by the COVID virus.
The RNase quietly did INFINITELY more work than the COVID-19 antibody -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.57
The RNase enzyme destroyed more than 1 sextillion COVID viral mRNA strands within lung cells.
THE COVID antibody did not destroy a SINGLE COVID viral mRNA strand within a lung cell if the lung cell was not KILLED.
And the RNase enzyme saved even MORE people.
The RNase enzyme destroyed more than 1 sextillion COVID viral mRNA strands within lung cells.
THE COVID antibody did not destroy a SINGLE COVID viral mRNA strand within a lung cell if the lung cell was not KILLED.
And the RNase enzyme saved even MORE people.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds T4.58 While the COVID vaccine was KILLING people,
RNase contamination within COVID vaccine mRNA vials, that RNase contamination DESTROYED vaccine mRNA as it was being thawed and DECREASED the injury from the COVID mRNA vaccine.
Tell me that's not ironic.
RNase contamination within COVID vaccine mRNA vials, that RNase contamination DESTROYED vaccine mRNA as it was being thawed and DECREASED the injury from the COVID mRNA vaccine.
Tell me that's not ironic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
