A few thoughts on how to strangle the Russian economy. 1. Russia lives on its exports of commodities. 90% of its exports are commodities & 2/3 used to be oil and gas. 2. Commodities require cheap transportation, shipping or pipelines.
3. Russia has already lost almost all its 150 bn cubic meters of gas exports to Europe, worth $60-70 bn a year. The dominant gas pipelines go to Europe & Russia produces little LNG. Domestic gas sales remain heavily subsidized so Gazprom can go bankrupt.
4. Oil has traditionally accounted for more than half of Russia's total exports & it probably still does. The West & Ukraine should focus on minimize Russia's oil export revenues.
5. From the beginning of 2023, the West imposed a price cap on Russian oil. It worked well during the first half of 2023, but then the prices rose. 6. The US GOV has successfully traced sanctions breakers & sanctioned many of them. This is proceeding with increasing success.
7. 90% of Russia's oil exports go from two seas, the shallow Baltic Sea and the Black Sea. Most of it is now being shipped by a shadow fleet of old, substandard ships with poor or no insurance. This should not be permitted in these environmentally highly sensitive waters.
8. The Baltic Sea is surrounded by NATO members that care about the environment. They must prohibit the dangerous shadow oil tankers from the Baltic Sea. 9. This could be done in two choke points, the narrow and shallow Öresund or the Gulf of Finland (Finland & Estonia).
10. All Russian oil exports from the Black Sea has to pass through Istanbul through the narrow Bosphorus. How can Turkey, which imposes sound environmental restrictions on the Bosphorus, allow any substandard oil tankers to pass through? High time to stop them all!
11. Ukraine has now started the next step by bombing the refineries & export ports, which are highly concentrated around two cities, St. Petersburg & Novorossiisk. By insisting on being independent from transit countries - & maltreat them - Russia has made itself vulnerable.
12. Ukraine has bombed one of three major oil ports around St. Petersburg & one in Tuapse near Novorossiisk. It has also bombed several oil depots. 13. Next, we would expect Ukraine to hit further refineries, depots & export ports in these areas.
14. After that, Ukraine can proceed upstream and bomb important oil facilities & junctures, which are not as easily repaired as pipelines. 15. In parallel, the West should prohibit Western oil service companies to work in Russia, notably Schlumberger that still works there fully.
16. But doesn't the world need Russian oil? Not really. The US is currently producing more oil than any country has ever done, 13.2 million barrels a day & it can easily increase production much further if the administration allows it. This is the right time to hit Russian oil.
17. Russia’s export revenues are projected to stop at $420 bn (-29% from nearly $600 bn in 2022). Since approximately half of this is oil, Russia's total exports can be slashed to $200 bn with effective oil sanctions & Ukrainian bombing.
Then, Russia is on its knees financially.
18. I should ad that an important reason why Ukraine can bomb Russian facilities so well is that Ukraine has developed outstanding drone production during the war. The drone producers are many & private. They are the best & the brightest Ukrainians (I know several).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For a new US policy on Ukraine: 1. Declare that Ukraine must win (@POTUS has finally done so - make it the key policy line). 2. Accept that Russia must be defeated (reject the Thomas Graham line that Russia must not be destabilized.)
3. Do not constrain Ukraine in the war! Ukraine should allow to attack any Russian military targets with any Western arms. 4. As Generals Hodges & Breedlove state: the control of the bridges to Crimea is likely to decide the war. Allow Ukraine to take out the Kerch bridge!
5. Focus on giving Ukraine the arms that can lead to its victory: ATACMS & Taurus long-distance cruise missiles & fighter planes. 6. A Western aim should be to give Ukraine (the West) air superiority.
It is vital that the Congress provides Ukraine with $61 bn of military & financial support in 2024, but I fear that will NOT happen: 1. The Senators are likely to come to some agreement that will be unpopular, but acceptable, to the democrats.
2. Next the issue goes to the House. The new speaker has no interest in any package. The worse the situation at the southern border, the better for the GOP. If Mike Johnson makes any agreement, the even worse GOP extremists will attack him. Why help Ukraine or secure the border?
3. If the GOP extremists in the House are not odious enough, the extremist in chief - Trump - is likely to make an uncommonly outrageous statement why the bipartisan agreement is wrong & all elected republicans will get dead scared & support Trump in his wisdom (=idiocy).
Little has enraged the pro-Ukrainian community more than the December 27 NYT article:
"Ukraine Doesn’t Need All Its Territory to Defeat Putin"
by the hereditary Russian nobleman Serge Schmemann, member of its editorial board.
Let me take it apart. nytimes.com/2023/12/27/opi…
1. The issue is not: "territory" as President @ZelenskyyUa persistently emphasizes but PEOPLE. Ukrainians in territories occupied by ruthless Russian soldiers are killed, tortured & deported. Even a great Russian imperialist such as Schmemann must have heard of it.
@ZelenskyyUa 2. Schmeann starts with caveats (presumably imposed by other editors): Putin "is not trustworthy;" "he may be stalling in the hope that Donald Trump...will return to the White House and stiff Ukraine."
Indeed, there is no reason to talk to Putin who violates all agreements.
All too often, you hear that Russia will win over Ukraine in the long run because it has a much larger economy & population. Historically, that is a flawed conclusion. This is why Ukraine is more likely to win. 1. Ukrainians know why they are fighting. The Russians don't.
2. Russia is wasting its soldiers' lives ruthlessly. Ukraine claims 320,000 killed Russian soldiers. Even if it is only half, it would be 160,000, that is, 10 times the Soviet losses in Afghanistan. This is hardly sustainable. 3. The Ukrainians defend their nation's existence.
4. Russia's prison population has declined from 420,000 to 260,000 during the war, that is, 160,000 prisoners have been thrown into the Ukrainian meat grinder. 5. Ukraine has qualitatively far superior Western arms, while Russia fights with substandard Soviet arms.
A few comments on Western sanctions on Russia. They are often misunderstood. Western politicians love to talk about "sanctions from hell," but good sanctions take off 2-3% of GDP each year and they have done so for Russia, whose GDP has stagnated since 2014.
Putin & his ilk, on the contrary, claim both that the sanctions just make them stronger (which is wrong) & that they have to be abolished (which them must not). Their advocacy shows that the sanctions really bite.
A third group are people who call for much tougher sanctions and claim against evidence that the sanctions don't work & are useless. While they call for tougher sanctions, their arguments help Putin.
Richard Haass and Charles Kupchan have just published a truly scary article, "Redefining Success in Ukraine." Pretty much is wrong is this article.
Together with Putin's prime US advocate Thomas Graham, Haass & Kupchan met with US-sanctioned Sergei Lavrov. foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/redefi…
As Senior Director for Europe in the National Security Council in the Obama administration, Kupchan took pride in blocking any delivery of lethal arms to Ukraine, claiming that he helped to avoid World War III, while in fact he facilitated Russia's invasion in 2022.
Haass & Kupchan appear unaware that Putin has violated virtually all relevant agreements & lies persistently. It does not make any sense to negotiate with such a man, but they do not even mention this aspect, indicating that they are incompetent to discuss talks with Putin.