In England, police can put a marker on a central database to say you're suspected of benefiting from crime with ZERO evidence to support this false claim + the banks will close your accounts, leaving you bank-less.
I've no criminal charges/convictions, but now no banking access.
Just like for an arrest, the threshold for this marker is "reasonable suspicion".
A police officer's "reasonable suspicion" can get you de-banked for life, with no need for a judge, magistrate or independent person to review + approve this. 🤷♀️
I'm a normal person – a single mum to a 6-year-old – who hasn't benefited from crime nor done anything else illegal.
Every payment into this bank account comes from a mainstream media outlet. Yet I'm forced to figure out how to pay the bills + buy groceries with no bank account.
There's no legal mechanism for challenging these decisions + no special considerations for single parents of young kids.
Frankly, this is the oppressive reality of Britain in the 21st-century with its badly-implemented anti-money laundering legislation.
Ironically, it's 4 years today since Devon + Cornwall Police arrested me on suspicion of class A drug importation.
I'm still "released under investigation" – RUI – with zero updates on my case.
I've no idea how it can take a police force with millions of pounds in resources over 4 years to investigate a crime.
But I guess if you're trying to "prove" something that hasn't happened, then it's an endless task... just like RUI. 🤷♀️
@BillyGr67435254 I provided everything they asked for + they confirmed receipt. Then I got this. And every single payment into that account - which has only been open a few years - came from a mainstream media outlet. Yet they were obsessed with assets + my other sources of "wealth".
@brit_cop They left a voicemail + sent a letter to confirm receipt, then we had a 90 minute recorded phone call - aka an interrogation without a duty solicitor - about those sources of "wealth".
@brit_cop I've never spoke to you or been horrible to you. Nor have I broken the law.
Yet here you are making snarky comments on my Twitter when I'm doing my best to look after my family.
Maybe you should stop snarking at me + go look after your own family. Or do your job.
@AextheticIsHere The only missing document was written in 2003 + came from a law firm that's long since shut down.
@BooksProfile @Daisy3554781631 And also, given that most drug dealers trade in cash or bitcoins, freezing accounts has a limited utility. If I was actually capable of selling drugs, I'd 100% have started selling them again now I can't get paid by my clients + have a child to feed, etc.
@Notsafes_dad @paulierunner They said they can't guarantee I will get the account unblocked, but I'm really grateful for their help, as I don't even have a phone signal at home really nor internet access (renovating).
@Craig_Hearne I wasn't involved, so I'm hoping I will be okay. It's been a long four years though.
@HouseOFJerkface I had confirmation of receipt. I also had a long recorded phone call where I was interrogated about these documents to check I wasn't lying. So I complied as fully as I could. I'm obviously not going to share the personal financial info in the letter, due to fraud risk.
@nmjr0 @sofiaicarbone I didn't want to include that info, as it's very specific with names + locations, etc, despite it dating back to 2003z
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵I’m gonna go ahead + say it: the lash–filler–nail aesthetic might be a sign someone’s unsuited to policing.
The hyper-glam look – acrylic claws, oversized lips, etc – is a highly visible aesthetic that instantly screams money to burn + one that sits adjacent to crime + drugs.
In illicit markets, a lack of conventional status symbols – career progression, mortgages, declared income – means that visibility itself becomes currency.
It's the same kinda logic as monogrammed handbags, Canada Goose jackets + flashy watches.
Obviously, this doesn’t mean every woman with lashes is dating a criminal. 💅
After all, social media – including Instagram – has certainly merged influencer aesthetics with criminal glamour. 👜
🧵Devon + Cornwall Police failed Claire Chick. And it cost her life.
Claire was a loving mum + grandma + a popular Plymouth Uni lecturer. She reported her ex-husband to police 6 times + said: “I feel he will kill me.”
In Jan 2025, he did.
He got a 27 year sentence yesterday.💔
Claire met Paul Butler in 2022. He initially seemed caring, but then he got controlling + violent.
By 2024, she was really scared + asked him to leave. Then he started stalking her.
It emerged that he had 17 previous convictions for sexual offences + violence.
Claire gave six police statements from Sept to Dec 2024.
- He tracked her car
- He stalked her home + work
- He threatened suicide when she tried to leave
- He promised to financially ruin her by taking half her house + pension
🚨Ex-Met Police superintendent Bernie Gravett walked free, with a NOT GUILTY, despite 47 child abuse images on his laptop, sending one in a chat room + LYING to cops in his interview.
Now he's a child sexual exploitation expert in courts + runs the Counter Trafficking Network.🤯
Gravett’s defence was that it was all "research".
He posted about sexual fantasies with underage girls on a child sexual exploitation site to “study the replies.” 🙄
He claimed he was collecting images of child sexual exploitation for a talk in Georgia on trafficking.
There were no drafts for this Georgia talk on his computer though. 🤷♀️