America First Legal Profile picture
Jan 30 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
/1🚨BREAKING — A secret Obama memo, the Presidential Information Technology Committee (PITC), regarding control of Presidential records could change everything in the DOJ’s politicized prosecution of Trump…

THREAD: Image
/2 In October 2014, Russian hackers breached the Executive Office of the President’s network. In response, President Obama created, via executive action, PITC.

PITC includes representatives of the Departments of Defense and DHS, among others.
obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-offi…
/3 First, PITC creates a presumption that the President controls all information he receives.

The PITC memo established the President’s exclusive control over information resources and systems provided to the President.
/4 The memo created the presumption that information contained on information systems and resources was “EOP information.”
/5 Because the memo relied upon the Federal Records Act’s definition of “information system” as resources organized for the “use” and “disposition” of “information”, the memo gives the President exclusive control over information he receives.

This is relevant to what a President may reasonably believe about information given to him while in office.
/6 Second, and related, if information stored on the PITC network formed the basis for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of former President Trump, that evidence should have been disclosed to the former President and may be relevant to his liability.
/7 Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against former President Trump, claims “Trump was not authorized to possess or retain...classified documents.”

But Obama’s PITC memo may have created a reasonable belief in President Trump that he, in fact, had such authority.
/8 Additionally, if the records Trump allegedly destroyed are still preserved within the EOP or the U.S. Department of Defense as part of PITC-created information systems, then other claims in the indictment may be baseless.
/9 These explosive findings are consistent with America First Legal’s whitepaper contending that the President of the United States has absolute authority over presidential papers. Neither Congress nor the federal courts may lawfully abrogate or limit this authority.
/10 The American people deserve to know the truth behind this secretive memo…we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Defense Information Agency, part of the Department of Defense.


Image
Image
Image
Image
/11 More on this revelation from @dcexaminer @KaelanDC:

washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/2…
@dcexaminer @KaelanDC /12 Read more here:

aflegal.org/secretive-obam…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with America First Legal

America First Legal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @America1stLegal

Jan 30
Remember—Congress has already directed @SecMayorkas and @DHSgov to protect our borders. Repeatedly and throughout federal law, Congress has already imposed a DUTY to act.

Yet he has not only failed to act, but the policies he has overseen directly violate that duty.

A short 🧵
8 U.S.C. § 1103 (from the Homeland Security Act), the Secretary has the POWER and DUTY to prevent illegal entries by aliens.

It's not an “option.” Image
From the Secure Fence Act of 2006, the Secretary has to take action to achieve OPERATIONAL CONTROL of the border, which means the “prevention of ALL unlawful entries into the United States.”

302,000 encounters in a month is obviously not operational control. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 23
/1🚨NEW LAWSUIT — we just filed an amended complaint in a lawsuit against Ohio Northern University on behalf of legal scholar, author, and tenured professor at the University, Scott Gerber, for terminating him for objecting to illegal DEI hiring.

THREAD…
/2 In 2023, Ohio Northern University decided to terminate Dr. Gerber’s employment. Egregiously, on April 14, 2023, school security—with support from armed police officers from Ada, Ohio—removed Dr. Gerber while he was teaching his law school class.
/3 They escorted him to the office of Dean Charles H. Rose III, a defendant in this case, who told Dr. Gerber that he must either resign or face termination proceedings.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 22
/1🚨BREAKING — America First Legal FOIA request reveals partisan preservation of government records.

National Archives says Pelosi’s January 6 records CAN be destroyed, but Trump’s records cannot.

We explain in the thread below…
/2 Recent reporting reveals that the House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee was due to receive “about four terabytes of data from the outgoing Democrats but was given only about half that much…117 files were deleted, according to a House digital forensics examination seen by Fox News.”

The files were later recovered, but “[b]efore being deleted, all 117 files were encrypted and require a password Republicans don't have before their contents can be seen.”

pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/20…Image
/3 AFL was concerned that the January 6 Committee’s records might be destroyed or improperly preserved.

Anticipating this, on December 2, 2022, we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the National Archives seeking: “All policies, procedures, instructions, manuals, guides, or other written material that relate to or mention NARA's collection [of] Congressional Records at the conclusion of a session of Congress.”
Read 13 tweets
Jan 22
/1🚨LITIGATION BOMBSHELL — we sued the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the censorship arm of DHS.

Our lawsuit unearthed new docs showing that the deep state knew the risks of mass mail voting in 2020 but censored these criticisms as “disinformation.”

THREAD: Image
/2 By September 2020, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) was aware that the evidence established that in-person voting did not increase the spread of COVID-19.

CISA was also aware that mass “vote-by-mail” schemes posed “major challenges,” including “the process of mailing and returning ballots,” the “high numbers of improperly completed ballots (figures not yet released),” and “the shortage of personnel to process ballots in a prompt manner.”Image
/3 Despite its awareness of mail-in voting risks, absentee voting challenges, and the harmlessness of in-person voting, CISA continued supporting the unprecedented voting policy changes implemented across the states in 2020. Image
Read 28 tweets
Jan 18
/1🔎SHOCKING DOCS — we just filed a complaint with the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, demanding an investigation into Associate Deputy AG Austin Evers for improper involvement in the investigation and subsequent prosecution of former President Trump. 

THREAD… Image
/2 Mr. Evers is a former Obama political appointee and Democrat party operative. He was the Executive Director of American Oversight from 2017-2022.
/3 American Oversight targeted Republicans and under Mr. Evers’ leadership, the group investigated many conservatives including, President Trump, FL Governor Ron DeSantis, and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas.

americanoversight.org/american-overs…

Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 18
/1🚨HISTORIC BRIEF — We just filed a brief with @BoydenGrayPLLC in the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of @tedcruz @SteveScalise and 177 other members of Congress to defend Donald J. Trump’s right to remain on the Colorado ballot.

AFL is proud to represent: Image
/2 The Colorado Supreme Court issued an unprecedented, erroneous decision that President Donald J. Trump had engaged in an “insurrection” as described in the Fourteenth Amendment and was, therefore, not eligible to be on the ballot in Colorado.
/3 This egregiously wrong decision will, if allowed to stand, wreak havoc on our election system and the very fabric of our constitutional republic.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(