No rebuttal from Dr. Pete Hotez for the String Mechanism?
If you don't remember your history, you will be condemned to repeat it. Medical history included.
Do you remember what the number 1 killer of children in the early nineteenth century was?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds
And your specialty is contributing to morbidity and mortality for children because you don't remember your medical history.
Rheumatic fever, or STREP bacteria antibodies, were the NUMBER 1 killer of children under 20 yrs of age in the early 19th century.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.03 I just spoke to one of my ophthalmology patients about her ordeal with the COVID mRNA vaccine.
She had had rheumatic fever as a child. 3 weeks following her booster, she had to have an aortic valve replacement, the hospital bill was $600,000. Her insurance paid $120,000
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.04 My patient has a relative who works at Children's hospital in LA. The employee told my patient that valve replacements for children are several hundred % higher than they have EVER been.
Which mean, YOUR hospital is ALSO seeing a HUGE number of valve replacements.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.05
Here is how antibodies cause valve damage. I do NOT think scientists and physicians found the correct mechanism whereby the STREP antibody causes heart damage.
Here is my hypothesis. It is purely a mechanical problem from increased viscosity.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.06
If you add albumin to a saline solution, you will note immediately that the solution is more viscous. You can even feel that with your fingers. Albumin is about 66,000 Daltons. IgG is a 145,000 Daltons in molecular weight. IgM is 600,000 Daltons in molecular weight.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.07
ANY pump and pipe system, mechanical or biological, increasing viscosity of the fluid increases work load on the pump and the greatest wear and tear damage to all the parts in the system? To the VALVE of the pump, or in the case of children, their heart valves.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.08
Red blood cells are shaped the way they are to MINIMIZE rotation while moving in a flowing fluid.
The shape of the RBC also creates a buffer of fluid so that there is LESS direct contact between the wall of the RBC and the wall of the blood vessels/valves, etc.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.09
The antibodies are NOT shaped in a way to reduce tumbling, but to actually MAXIMIZE tumbling and movement, to INCREASE the potential of binding to its antigen. The antibody shape does NOT allow a buffer of fluid between the antibody FC region and the arms when--
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.10
--when the antibody is colliding with the vessel walls.
The antibodies are sharp, rotating, and act like "SANDPAPER" to the walls of the blood vessels.
So, when a child in the early nineteenth century was infected with STREP throat, IgM antibodies (600,000 Daltons) -
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.11
Would form first, damage the valves which incur the MOST damage to the whole pump and pipe system and then IgG antibodies form, FURTHER damaging the valve via FRICTION and WEAR AND TEAR due to the increased viscosity.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.12
Damage to the lining of the heart, results in "myocarditis" which can affect the electrical conductivity of the heart muscle and cause ventricular fibrillation and DEATH, before the slower wear and tear of the antibodies to the heart valves is ever detected.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.13
EVERY TIME IgM antibodies and IgG antibodies actually form in the blood? There is incremental wear and tear damage on the "new valves" of these children.
You will NEVER detect a 10% accelerated wear and tear on the heart valves from your vaccines.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.14
Do you see? That if my alternate hypothesis of why there is valve damage from STREP infections is correct, the increased viscosity and increased wear and tear from the size/shape of the antibodies, then EVERY VACCINE you give is causing an incremental INCREASE in damage.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.15
Do you see? Why I say? If you do NOT remember your medical history, you are CONDEMNED to repeat it.
If I am correct about this hypothesis, then your specialty has caused MORE morbidity and mortality to children than ALL the good it has done.
Isn't that FRIGHTENING?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.16
Look how EASILY you can evaluate my information with just data from YOUR HOSPITAL.
you can look at the number of valve replacements in 2022 and 2023 and compare to 2015 and 2016.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.17
The question is, is the mission of your hospital to create a healthier future for children? Or MORE REVENUE for your hospital with a valve replacement procedure that can cost up to $600,000?
Because, my alternate hypothesis for how rheumatic fever became--
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.18
The number 1 killer of children is a MUCH MORE likely scenario for how RHEUMATIC fever AND the COVID mRNA vaccine are BOTH increasing valve damage.
Of course, the physicians who figured out the connection between STREP THROAT and rheumatic fever did a helluva job.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.19
And that was NOT an easy connection to make and it took DECADES. But, clearly that VERY PERTINENT medical history was LOST on pediatricians all over the US, all over the world.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.20
BUT, NO HYPOTHESIS explain the connection between how BOTH 1) rheumatic fever and 2) the COVID mRNA vaccine both caused SKYROCKETING valve damage in children BETTER than my hypothesis of
INCREASED wear and tear on the heart valves from antibodies.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.21
If in fact, I AM correct, then EVERY vaccine you EVER give to INCREASE antibodies in the blood?
EVERY VACCINE you EVER give a child will cause IgM antibodies which will cause INCREMENTAL INCREASED damage to those brand new young heart valves. and you will NOT see it.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.22
No, you pediatricians did NOT sign up for this, is what you're thinking.
ah, but you did. is there ANY activity that humans do that is MORE sacred than interventions in CHILDREN to supposedly HELP protect them? No. So, you DID SIGN UP FOR THIS. THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.23
THIS wear and tear via antibody hypothesis is MORE FUNDAMENTAL than the current hypothesis and simpler and covers BOTH rheumatic fever AND the COVID mRNA vaccine. In science? Without REFUTING my hypothesis, it is IMPOSSIBLE to say that my hypothesis is FALSE or WRONG.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.24
So, If you can NOT say my hypothesis is FALSE or WRONG -
then? All vaccines MUST be STOPPED until you CAN DISPROVE my hypothesis that "wear and tear" via antibodies IS what is causing damage to heart valves.
but, the STRING mechanism should be COMPELLING enough--
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.25
to STOP half the vaccines. And the MIDDLE MAN mechanism should be compelling enough to STOP half the vaccines.
And the half-life of IgG antibodies should be COMPELLING enough to stop all vaccines. just a minute. how many COMPELLING arguments do we NEED??????
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.26
Do you see now Texas Children's? you will NEVER be able to REFUTE the STRING M or the MMM with WORDS. You will NEVER be able to refute the "wear and tear on valves via antibodies" with just your "thought."
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.27
U actually have to DISPROVE my hypothesis and until you CAN DO THAT? U MUST stop ALL VACCINES since the HYPOTHESIS for how children's HEART VALVES are being DESTROYED by YOUR vaccines via the wear/tear from antibodies is SATISFACTORILY DISPROVEN.
Or, just keep making $.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.28 But then, CHANGE YOUR mission statement to more ACCURATELY reflect what you're REALLY ABOUT, which does NOT seem to be to create a healthier future for children.
Seems to be your mission statement, if you do NOT make the appropriate changes based on THESE THREADS?-- MORE $
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.29
Again, just like in science, if you can't REFUTE a very good hypothesis that is very fundamental and sounds extremely reasonable to the average person with plenty of common sense? If you can NOT refute my allegations, then are my allegations about your Hospital TRUE?
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.30
And instead of thinking about how to possibly SUE me for SLANDER, when all I am doing is bringing INCREDIBLE mechanisms and hypothesis to HELP you protect the health and safety of CHILDREN first, then
wouldn't you AGREE that I AM NOT THE BAD GUY HERE? DEFEND YOURSELVES.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.31 Don't just think about using LAWYERS to TIE ME UP IN COURT, which I WILL FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL TOO and I will fight BACK even HARDER until I can get the COURT to PUNISH you BACK for taking MY TIME away from HELPING PROTECT CHILDREN FROM VACCINES THAT CAN KILL THEM.
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds 8.32
Side note to @TacticalCivics1 . Do you see more and more why I was SOOO upset at JJ?
There is NOTHING overly simple about showing the world that "antibodies are NOT useful in our fight against viruses."
I DO show a LOT of points that ARE simple and fundamental.
The judicial system basically acknowledges that if you don't have a rebuttal, you don't have one, not because you are offended & it is beneath you to reply, not because you forgot to reply, the courts basically KNOW that
NO REBUTTAL means the other side's point is CORRECT
If you REALLY care about a healthier future for CHILDREN, and I bring MANY NIGHTMARES for your hospital, then the ONLY ethical response for your hospital? TO TRY TO GET TO THE TRUTH to HELP CHILDREN, am I WRONG about this??????
And Dr. Pete Hotez, the MOST famous vaccinologist on earth IS on your staff.
And what would that mean if HE CAN NOT DEBATE ME? Wouldn't that mean that my many hypotheses that DESTROY your vaccines should be ASSUMED TO BE CORRECT until proven false by more research??
IF I have such IMPRESSIVE hypotheses and YOUR world famous Dr. Pete Hotez REFUSES to DEBATE ME, isn't that BASICALLY because he knows he can NOT debate me?
that's why SNEAKY people and LIARS and CORRUPT officials hate to debate. Because the TRUTH comes OUT.
@TexasChildrens Texas Children's Hospital webmaster. You DID forward all my posts to the BOARD of the hospital? and to the Chief Medical Officer? Don't be stupid and on your own delete my posts or block me or mute me.
Why should YOU lose your job for the pediatrician's sins?
@TexasChildrens remember, the @AmerAcadPeds webmaster didn't BLOCK ME or delete my posts either. He forwarded all my info to their board. Their attorneys have looked at all my info and concluded that they can't take the risk of LOSING vaccine legal immunity for "willful misconduct."
@TexasChildrens @AmerAcadPeds If I explain EXACTLY how half your childhood vaccines are HURTING and KILLING children and you are aware that the AAPeds also has NO REBUTTAL and you've tried to run it by Dr. Pete Hotez but he REFUSES to acknowledge any info you give him from me,
@TexasChildrens Pediatricians. After reading my threads, do you STILL think you're a good person?
I can't imagine what I would think of myself if I was a pediatrician right now. I can't imagine the self-loathing I would feel. If you're a decent ethical physician, how can you not feel this?
@TexasChildrens I mean, look at the situation.
"Ur 1st vax puts antibodies into blood. Ur BOOSTER puts antigen into blood. Why wouldn't they clump? THEY WILL."
Less than 20 words. To take down HALF your vaccines? What were you all thinking? every day while you were vaccinating children?
@dadaradada99 @BlackTomThePyr8 @geoffsoulsby @SharpieDj @TheChiefNerd You’re hiding who u are. This is not your main account. Go away Dan.
@dadaradada99 @BlackTomThePyr8 @geoffsoulsby @SharpieDj @TheChiefNerd And when I give an answer, most people are surprised at the info and express some appreciation. You’re just looking to find a chink in the armor without showing any appreciation. 3 followers and u don’t show appreciation? Second account.
@GEGarrison @TacticalCivics1 @SoothSpider @RealCandaceO @AmerAcadPeds @TexasChildrens and didn't make the connection? that putting antibody and its antigen in the blood of a child isn't a good idea? still offered the parents a "choice?"
I'm a surgeon. there are refractive surgeries available that I despise. I don't offer a "choice."
@GEGarrison @TacticalCivics1 @SoothSpider @RealCandaceO @AmerAcadPeds @TexasChildrens If you perform any intervention on a patient, you are saying that the benefits far exceed the risk.
offering a "choice?" there's a weirdness there. patients clearly have a choice just to leave u.
but, how can you say there isn't some bit of a "soft sell" going on there?
@GEGarrison @TacticalCivics1 @SoothSpider @RealCandaceO @AmerAcadPeds @TexasChildrens and yes, this is how critical i am. and why is talking bad. talking badly about "heroes" is bad?
offering a "choice" is not really offering a choice. it's saying we know so LITTLE about the vaccines, but I'm willing to do it for the money and willing to give U more -
@TexasChildrens T5.01 DAY 5 now since you received the STRING mechanism.
Also, these posts have all been archived by the Wayback machine. Deleting now will clearly be acknowledgement that you've RECEIVED the info about the STRING MECHANISM and that it was actively deleted.
@TexasChildrens T5.02
Can we trust that you will do what is GOOD for the health and safety of children and that you will keep that as your top priority? Because, if NO ONE can show how the STRING mechanism is WRONG, then it is RIGHT and it shows that the MAIN EFFECT of half your vaccines?
@TexasChildrens T5.03
The MAIN EFFECT of HALF your childhood vaccines is CLOTS. And not a single pediatrician or physician or scientist has come up with a SINGLE scientific rebuttal.
Then, aren't your options LIMITED? And please remember, if i deliver the information to you--