🧵🚨Discovered hundreds of sock puppets promoting Israeli propaganda on X, Threads, FB & Insta. It also includes 'fake' websites. Recently, it has been spreading anti-UNRWA #disinformation, & trying to undermine solidarity between Palestinians & Black people. #Gaza
Analysis 👉
2/ A few people noticed that influential accounts writing about Gaza were getting replies with people linking a @WSJ article about an Israeli 'intelligence' report claiming 10% of UNRWA staff have links to Hamas. One of the authors of the WSJ was a former IDF soldier.
3/ You may have noticed that the wording of the tweets was very similar. All of them focused on the '10%' figure. All of them uncritically embraced the 10% figure of UNRWA employees being 'linked' to Hamas.
Bots gonna bot
#disinformation
4/ I counted at least 81 sock puppet accounts. Most of them include stolen photos. There's 'Morris Roger', who appears to have stolen a photo from an American by the name of Jason Farr. 'Kyle Torres' is actually using the photo of a young Les Mis actor who tragically died in 2015!
5/ Most of the accounts in the network were created on 25th September 2023. It's probably a for hire sock puppet network, as most became active somewhat later than September. The below graph shows a spike in accounts created on Sept 25. Thanks @nodexl #disinformation
6/ Some of you may have noticed the network was promoting the WSJ article, but they were also promoting screenshots of the WSJ article shared by three accounts 'Unfold Magazine', 'The Moral Alliance' and 'Non Agenda'.
But what are these? #disinformation
7/ Well, they market themselves as news sources and magazines. Unfold Magazine is apparently a 'premier source for news and stories from Israel and the vibrant tapestry of the Jewish world', Non-agenda (lol) is a 'non-partisan, non-binary, non-conforming' outlet apparently.
8/ A reverse IP look -up shows that Unfold Magazine and Non-Agenda are linked. Both are hosted on the same web server and both were created in November 2023. This is despite them not being ostensibly connected - classic 'front' website's. #disinformation
9/ But what's really bizarre is that their original content focuses on the relationship between Jewish people and the civil rights movement. You can see some of the headlines in the slide below, e.g. "The role of Jews in the Civil Rights Movement'.
10/ The articles about the cooperation between the civil rights movements are being boosted by other sock puppets. Here you can see on X how 371 accounts liked the tweet from 'non-agenda' sharing the 'original content' about the civil rights movement and Jewish solidarity.
11/ Fake accounts in the network have also tried to drive a wedge between Black people & Palestinians. In this example (left), Powell Gregory is talking about Hamas targeting an 'African student from Tanzania', using the BLM hashtag. On the right are replies by more sock puppets
12/ In addition to trying to undermine solidarity coalitions, the network has generally focused on promoting specific Israel-aligned narratives. All of 'non agenda' is dedicated to stories about Hamas, Palestine, and the new Axis of Evil (Iran, Russia, China, Hamas).
13/ Non-agenda is the most active on social media and on its website. It has over 12k followers on Instagram, and over 6k followers on Facebook, with over 9k on X. It also has a presence on Threads, with over 9k followers!
14/ Its Facebook account shows a lot of engagement, but a lot of it is clearly astroturfing (fake engagement). Look at all the comments on this post - which has 1.5k likes! They are sockpuppets, with many focusing on criticizing Russia and Iran. #disinformation
15/ Despite that, some are also repeating narratives that have been important in trying to smear pro-Palestinian activists in the US. For example, this response to the non-agenda FB post talks about walking around on campus in fear.
16/ Non-agenda's account on Instagram gets a lot of engagement for a new account. They have created a few images and a reel. You can see the reel below about the Hamas attack on Oct 7th, and the 'Axis of Evil'. It's clearly not written by a native English speaker
17/ In the past, the network has rallied around certain pro-Israel narratives. It often retweets Visegrad24 (🤮), & shared a lot of content criticizing Ivy League schools during the McCarthy trials of late 2023. Another example is directing criticism to Egypt for not opening its border
18/ Whoever is running the influence operation has access to hundreds, likely thousands of assets across platforms. The 81 images below are from a subset of the more active elements of the network, but as I mentioned, hundreds of bots are also amplifying these accounts.
19/ While the influence operation is clearly aligned with Israel, it also seems more broadly focusing on attacking Iran, Russia China and Political Islam. It is relatively crude, so I'm amazed (not) it hasn't been suspended yet by X or Meta. #disinformation #gaza
20/ TLDR: Massive cross platform pro-Israel deception operation currently trying to smear and attack UNRWA as Israel seeks to get it defunded. The network uses fake websites, bots, sockpuppets and stolen photos to try and target influencers with anti-UNRWA disinfo #Gaza #disinfo
21/ That's it for now, but I might try and do some further network analysis on the sockpuppets to see their broader behavior!
23: This campaign has subsequently been linked to the Israeli firm STOIC, who ran the operation. It was also paid for by the Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs. nytimes.com/2024/06/05/tec…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.