Tymofiy Mylovanov Profile picture
Feb 3, 2024 26 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The drama continues

Ukraine has informed the White House that President Zelensky plans to fire top commander Zaluzhny. The White House did not object, seeing it as Ukraine's sovereign choice.

1/


Image
Zelensky and Zaluzhny have clashed over strategy, including Zaluzhny's call for mobilizing 500,000 more troops which Zelensky opposes 2/
Zaluzhny argues more troops are needed to counter Russia's superiority, while Zelensky cites lack of funds and political unpopularity. 3/
This is what the Washington Post and Ukrainian media write.

However, there is at least two other underlying reasons for a conflict. First, the government believes that the army doesn’t use people it recruits efficiently there are old school commanders and practices 4/
There is criticism about lack of strategy and that the army simply tries to throw bodies at the Russians. While I don’t believe it to be completely true, I agree that the Ukrainian military still has a minority but Soviet style officers and practices. Those have to go 5/
Indirectly, this criticism is acknowledge by Zaluzhny who has been recently public about the new strategy for the army and the need for production and deployment of drones rather than people 6/
The second line of the conflict is about responsibility for mobilization. Legally the recruitment offices are under military command, while in public the responsibility appears to be shifted to the civilian govt. So, the govt puts pressure on the military to become accountable 7/
Of course, the true underlying cause for the conflict is at once deeper and simpler. It is economics 101 - as resources become scarce and weapon stockpiles depleted due to delays in the aid from the allies, the competition over the remaining resources becomes tougher 8/
Similarly, the consequences of policy mistakes become more dire as they are fewer resources to reinforce the policy actions that didn’t go as planned. As a result, disagreements about the right policies are now much more pronounced and fought out 9/
The media writes that Zelensky believes a new commander could help turn the tide of the war, but finding a qualified replacement will be challenging. 10/
Options include intel chief Kyrylo Budanov, known for special ops, or current ground forces commander Oleksandr Syrsky, though both have drawbacks. 11/
Personally, I have been told that Budanov really does NOT want to job. I am not sure about Syrsky. 11/
The Washington Post is pretty critical about Zelensky decision to fire Zaluzhny. To me it signals lack of u estranging of how politics works in Ukraine and what is feasible. Ukraine is not the U.S. and the politics here is even messier. 12/
Nonetheless, this is what WP says:

Four days after telling Zaluzhny he'd be fired, Zelensky still hasn't selected a replacement, leaving Ukraine uncertain about the change.13/
Zelensky's move to oust the popular Zaluzhny appears impulsive and poorly planned. Delay suggests indecision or disarray in finding a successor. 14/
My comment: I view delays differently. It is typical in Ukraine to have a gap between a somewhat official announcement of firing a top official and its actual formal implementation 15/
The reasons are complex but basically have to do with the news cycle and disruption of coordination of the opposition to the policy choice. There is less mobilization and resistance if it is unclear whether an official it truly fired and when it actually happens 16/
This is a bit strange for the audience in developed economies and democracies but the moment you realize that institutions are still being developed in Ukraine, you can see how mobilization of the supporters of the person to be fired can derail institutions. 17/
Yesterday, I discussed with some prominent politicians and businessmen Zaluzhny recent public actions. 18/
The WP notices this too: Zaluzhny wrote an article calling for mobilizing more troops and upgrading tech, amounting to a rebuke of Zelensky's stance. 19/
This is one view - Zaluzhny is fighting Zelensky in public. Another one - shared by some of your allies - he is just trying to defend himself. But I am not sure what good this strategy would do him 20/
The WP also points out that Zelensky questioned Zaluzhny's ambitious battle plan for 2024, seeing it as unrealistic given limited personnel and supplies21/
In response, Zaluzhny proposed a futuristic high-tech overhaul to provide intelligence and reduce casualties, claiming it could be done in 5 months. 22/
I personally agree with Zaluzhny proposal - it seems reasonable to me. But it is not new and de facto it is underway. With both the govt and the military trying to develop and provide high tech platforms to the battlefield to save people. So this discussion is rhetorical 23/
The bottom line - Zaluzhny is likely to be replaced shortly, but it won’t have as much political effect as many media and experts write. It will be unpleasant for everyone but won’t have much of an effect on the battlefield either 24X

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tymofiy Mylovanov

Tymofiy Mylovanov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mylovanov

Jul 7
The NYPost wrote an appeal to President Trump: Putin has rejected peace, Mr. President, we must rearm Ukraine.

Putin only understands strength. Don’t walk away. 1/ Image
Putin insisted he was unwilling to commit to a ceasefire until the “root causes” of the conflict were addressed. For Putin, the “root cause” is the existence of Ukraine.

He followed Trump's call with the largest drone and missile strike of the war. 2/
So why is the Trump administration punishing Ukraine?

The Pentagon has halted the anti-missile and drone weapons needed to protect the civilians of Kyiv. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Jul 7
Bessent: For 20 years, U.S. was told immigration didn’t hurt workers. Now economists admit it does.

I call for parallel prosperity: Wall Street has done well, now Main Street should too. Big Beautiful Bill helps both. 1/
Bessent: Trump's trade and tax deals are going to bring back working class jobs with good wages, with good health care. 2/
Bessent: I disagree with Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. The data shows no inflation so far. What we are seeing is Southeast Asian producers absorbing tariff costs in their margins. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jul 7
Ukraine isn’t just waiting to join NATO. It already fulfills its core mission - degrading Russia as the most direct threat to allied security, Andriy Yermak in The Hill.

1/ Image
Right after the NATO Summit in The Hague, Russia launched one of its biggest strikes on Kyiv. Zelenskyy spoke to Trump.

They agreed to boost air defense, expand drone production, and strengthen joint defense tech efforts. 2/
Yermak: Trump was well-informed and attentive.

Protecting cities from Russian missile and drone terror was a top issue. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jul 7
Ukraine now outperformes the US in speed, cost, and scale of drone production

It builds 200,000 drones a month — up from 20,000 a year ago. FPVs cost ~$400, long-range ~$200,000

US systems like Switchblade 600 cost $100,000 [they don’t f..ng work!!!], Finer & Shiner in FA. 1/
Ukraine’s drone revolution began in 2023 after its counteroffensive exposed the limits of armor.

The U.S. responded with $1.5B in targeted funding. Drone production scaled 10× in one year. 2/
Ukrainian drone firms integrate frontline feedback within 24–72 hours. Pilots report issues via secure chat.

Engineers adjust software or hardware in real time. In one case, software to counter jamming was patched within 48 hours of field use. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jul 6
FT: The China–Russia axis is not about shared values.

It’s a marriage of convenience, powered by war, resentment, and trade.

Europe calls it the biggest geopolitical threat today. The Dragon-Bear alliance is real.

1/ Image
Trade between China and Russia hit $245B in 2024, up 30% since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

China gets cheap energy and battlefield lessons. Russia gets cash and dual-use tech.

2/
Putin calls the West hypocritical and colonial.

Xi says the U.S. encircles and suppresses China.

Both frame their rise as historic revenge for imperial humiliation.

3/
Read 11 tweets
Jul 6
Kasparov: I'm highly concerned that ICE's focus may shift from migrants to political opponents.

Unlike the military or police, ICE is directly under Trump. This is a really dangerous case. 1/
Kasparov: War has become a way to hold on to power for Putin.

No war, and Putin begins to crumble. War is what holds the monolith of power together. 2/
Kasparov: The goal of the Palestine Liberation Organization, since foundation, was clearly stated — the destruction of the state of Israel. All Jews had to leave “the holy land”. This was their goal, written down. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(