Warning: Ultrasonic Humidifiers with Tap Water Generate lots of PM2.5 Pollution
Since we are in winter and humidity levels are much lower this time of year, I wanted to provide this warning after a recent experience of a colleague of mine.🧵1/
It is amazing what you can discover about your environment when you actually monitor it. My colleague recently purchased a particulate matter (PM) monitor for his home & after multiple days of nothing he saw massive spikes in PM2.5 levels every night for three nights in a row. 2/
The PM2.5 levels exceeded 150 ug/m3 the first night and over 200 ug/m3 the next two nights. While no level of PM2.5 is safe, the WHO warns of exposure to levels above 5 ug/m3 annually and 15 ug/m3 in a 24 hour period ( ). 3/ who.int/news-room/fact…
He was able to track down the source to an ultrasonic humidifier that had been filled with tap water to make humidity levels more comfortable in a bedroom. 4/
The PM monitor was actually in a different part of the house and he measured 3x higher levels in the room where the ultrasonic humidifier was operating. 5/
What happened? “Ultrasonic humidifiers generate humidity by breaking water into small droplets using a piezoelectric transducer, a device that vibrates very fast at the ultrasonic frequency." ( ). 6/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
“These small water droplets are then sent into the air by a fan. That is the mist that we can see coming out of the humidifier." 7/
"Once released in the air, water evaporates quickly into the surrounding air, but the minerals and salts dissolved in tap water are left behind in the air as suspended PM.” 8/
The PM was not confined to the bedroom but spread all throughout his house where it was being breathed in by all family members. 9/
A study confirmed that using distilled water purchased from local grocery stores in ultrasonic humidifiers generated no PM pollution ( ). 10/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
@threadreaderapp please unroll
It is important to note that PM generation happens with ultrasonic humidifiers but you can use tap water with evaporative, wick-based humidifiers which does not break up the water molecules in the same way. 11/
Thankfully he had a PM monitor and noticed there was something wrong so he was able to identify and correct the issue. 12/
Why bother using distilled water, what would be the impact if he just kept using the much cheaper tap water and breathing in high levels of PM every night? 13/
Berkeley calculated that exposure for every 22 ug/m3 of PM2.5 for 24 hours is equivalent to smoking 1 cigarette so if they kept using tap water for their humidifier it would be like smoking about 9 cigarettes every night for them ( ). 14/
I used a Model E PM monitor to measure how much outside PM pollution I was letting inside the house by opening a window and also how much frying an egg generates ( ). 15/co2.click
Cooking can also cause high levels of PM so please ensure good ventilation by turning on your range hood fan or opening a windows if possible and HEPA filtration/CR boxes help too ( ). 16/
Many people have asked if carbon water filters help. People would need to measure & confirm their filter but most only remove some minerals/metal but not all so could potentially reduce PM levels but wouldn't eliminate ( ). 19/mytapscore.com/en-ca/blogs/ti…
Since PM2.5 particles of any type are so small, "PM2.5 can pass through the lung–gas–blood barrier and the 'gut–microbial–brain' axis to cause systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, or directly enter brain tissue via the olfactory nerve" ( ). 21/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
This could impact your body differently than just drinking the water with the same content that is normally safe to drink. 22/
“These particles are so small that they can evade our filtration system in the upper airway and penetrate deep into our respiratory tract,” explained Lau. “Upon doing so, they also send chemical species associated with them into our bodies." ( ) 23/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
People are also asking which PM monitors I use? I have been using air quality monitors by @IndianaTux, a Canadian company. The Model E, G, and X offer PM sensors in them. 24/co2.click
Their Model E and G are indoor monitors that measure PM and their X is an outdoor monitor for PM. The feature I like the best is that they can take measurements every minute and upload the data via WiFi so you can see what is going on in your space over time. 25/
If you are interested in learning more, this thread shows some examples of how their Model X and E work and what their online portal looks like ( … ). Model G uses the same PM sensor as Model E-Lite but uses a non-colour display and is cheaper. 26/
As for more affordable options, I cannot vouch for how accurate they are or how well they work since I have never used them but IKEA sells couple of lower cost options ranging from $13 to $50 which do not have the data saved online ( ). 27/ikea.com/ca/en/cat/air-…
Some people have asked if boiling water will "purify" the water to remove minerals. Boiling water may kill bacteria but it will not remove the mineral content and may make it even more concentrated afterwards ( ). 30/mytapscore.com/en-ca/blogs/ti…
Does the PM from tap water in ultrasonic humidifiers impact people differently than outdoor PM pollution? This study takes a looks at what happens in the lungs of mice using different types of water ( ). 31/
@SaltyPeach51 Their Model E and G are indoor monitors that measure PM and their X is an outdoor monitor for PM. The feature I like the best is that they can take measurements every minute and upload the data via WiFi so you can see what is going on in the space over time.
@SaltyPeach51 If you are interested in learning more, this thread shows some examples of how their Model X and E work and what their online portal looks like ( ). Model G uses the same PM sensor as Model E-Lite but uses a non-colour display and is cheaper.
@SaltyPeach51 I cannot vouch for how accurate they are or how well they work since I have never used them but IKEA sells couple of lower cost options ranging from $13 to $50 which do not have the data saved online ( ).ikea.com/ca/en/cat/air-…
@spittykitty543 Since the particles are so small, "PM2.5 can pass through the lung–gas–blood barrier and the 'gut–microbial–brain' axis to cause systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, or directly enter brain tissue via the olfactory nerve" ( ). 2/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@spittykitty543 “These particles are so small that they can evade our filtration system in the upper airway and penetrate deep into our respiratory tract,” explained Lau. “Upon doing so, they also send chemical species associated with them into our bodies." ( ) 3/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Ontario, the NB.1.8.1.* "Nimbus" variant family shot to 74.7% of sequenced genomes from COVID tests while the XFG.* "Stratus" family dropped to 15.8% and the BA.3.2 "Cicada" family decreased below 10% again.🧵1/
#Ontario #COVID #Variant
Ontario released another month of sequencing data by age and we continue to see high ratios of Cicada in children with another 51 BA.3.2.2.* sequences out of 617 new sequences ( ). 2/publichealthontario.ca/-/media/docume…
With 126 Cicada sequences from 1,828 total, we see children still have the highest proportion which decreases after age 5-11 as age increases with significant drops from age 60+. 3/
There was some competition for variant dominance during the month of March but the NB.1.8.1.* "Nimbus" family currently holds first place with 49.5% while the XFG.* "Stratus" family sits at 38.1% of sequenced genomes from COVID tests. 🧵1/
The BA.3.2 "Cicada" family has been slowing climbing and now above 10%. 2/
Looking at specific variants, RC.5 Nimbus currently holds first place at 13.4%, SH.1 Nimbus is a close second at 13.3%, RC.6 Nimbus is making a comeback at 11.3%, XFG.1.1.2 Stratus is at 8.2%, RT.2 Cicada at 7.2%, PQ.2.1 Nimbus at 5.2%, and RE.1.2 Cicada at 2.1%. 3/
Hospitalizations due to COVID have gone down from 153 to 123 in the last update. Influenza hospitalizations decreased from 59 to 47 and RSV decreased from 110 to 85. 🧵1/
Looking at age groups, those age 75+ had the highest rates of hospitalization due to COVID but decreased since last update. Second place is age 0-4 and their levels are currently increasing while age 65-74 has the third highest rate and also decreased since last update. 2/
The youngest age group 0-4 currently have a hospitalization rate due to COVID that are 17x higher than age 5-17, 17x higher than age 18-49, and 2.8x higher than adults 50-64. 3/
*** Ontario COVID Hospitalization Rates by Age ***
Data is now available for hospital admissions due to COVID by age group going back to Oct 2021. This provides interesting insights into how much children have been impacted with serious infections compared to adults. 🧵1/
We have heard from many sources throughout the pandemic that COVID isn't serious in children or they are not impacted as much as adults with some people still claiming this today. 2/
What about today, with lower circulation happening more recently and not the huge waves seen in the past, is anyone even being hospitalized for COVID anymore? The most recent update (week of March 8, 2026) there were 188 people hospitalized in Ontario due to COVID. 3/
Hospitalizations due to COVID have gone down from 190 to 138 in the last update. Influenza hospitalizations remained stable around 49 and RSV decreased slightly from 194 to 184. 🧵1/
#Ontario #Virus #Variant #COVID #RSV #Influenza
Looking at age groups, those age 75+ had the highest rates of hospitalization due to COVID but decreased since last update. Second place is age 65-74 and their levels are currently decreasing while age 0-4 has the third highest rate and also decreased since last update. 2/
The youngest age group 0-4 currently have a hospitalization rate due to COVID that are 11x higher than age 5-17, 5.5x higher than age 18-49, and 2x higher than adults 50-64. 3/
Hospitalizations due to COVID increased from 176 to 241 in the last update. Influenza hospitalizations have start dropping from the peak of 1,400 to 1,095 with RSV increasing from 121 to 156. 🧵1/
Looking back over the past few years, new hospitalizations for RSV have remained pretty stable the last two years around 2,500 and a decrease from 2023, while COVID has been significantly dropping each year, 26,571 in 2023 to 15,739 in 2024 to 6,788 in 2025. 2/
Influenza has been doing the opposite, increasing significantly each year from 3,486, to 4,380 in 2024, to 12,818 in 2025. 3/