Warning: Ultrasonic Humidifiers with Tap Water Generate lots of PM2.5 Pollution
Since we are in winter and humidity levels are much lower this time of year, I wanted to provide this warning after a recent experience of a colleague of mine.🧵1/
It is amazing what you can discover about your environment when you actually monitor it. My colleague recently purchased a particulate matter (PM) monitor for his home & after multiple days of nothing he saw massive spikes in PM2.5 levels every night for three nights in a row. 2/
The PM2.5 levels exceeded 150 ug/m3 the first night and over 200 ug/m3 the next two nights. While no level of PM2.5 is safe, the WHO warns of exposure to levels above 5 ug/m3 annually and 15 ug/m3 in a 24 hour period ( ). 3/ who.int/news-room/fact…
He was able to track down the source to an ultrasonic humidifier that had been filled with tap water to make humidity levels more comfortable in a bedroom. 4/
The PM monitor was actually in a different part of the house and he measured 3x higher levels in the room where the ultrasonic humidifier was operating. 5/
What happened? “Ultrasonic humidifiers generate humidity by breaking water into small droplets using a piezoelectric transducer, a device that vibrates very fast at the ultrasonic frequency." ( ). 6/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
“These small water droplets are then sent into the air by a fan. That is the mist that we can see coming out of the humidifier." 7/
"Once released in the air, water evaporates quickly into the surrounding air, but the minerals and salts dissolved in tap water are left behind in the air as suspended PM.” 8/
The PM was not confined to the bedroom but spread all throughout his house where it was being breathed in by all family members. 9/
A study confirmed that using distilled water purchased from local grocery stores in ultrasonic humidifiers generated no PM pollution ( ). 10/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
@threadreaderapp please unroll
It is important to note that PM generation happens with ultrasonic humidifiers but you can use tap water with evaporative, wick-based humidifiers which does not break up the water molecules in the same way. 11/
Thankfully he had a PM monitor and noticed there was something wrong so he was able to identify and correct the issue. 12/
Why bother using distilled water, what would be the impact if he just kept using the much cheaper tap water and breathing in high levels of PM every night? 13/
Berkeley calculated that exposure for every 22 ug/m3 of PM2.5 for 24 hours is equivalent to smoking 1 cigarette so if they kept using tap water for their humidifier it would be like smoking about 9 cigarettes every night for them ( ). 14/
I used a Model E PM monitor to measure how much outside PM pollution I was letting inside the house by opening a window and also how much frying an egg generates ( ). 15/co2.click
Cooking can also cause high levels of PM so please ensure good ventilation by turning on your range hood fan or opening a windows if possible and HEPA filtration/CR boxes help too ( ). 16/
Many people have asked if carbon water filters help. People would need to measure & confirm their filter but most only remove some minerals/metal but not all so could potentially reduce PM levels but wouldn't eliminate ( ). 19/mytapscore.com/en-ca/blogs/ti…
Since PM2.5 particles of any type are so small, "PM2.5 can pass through the lung–gas–blood barrier and the 'gut–microbial–brain' axis to cause systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, or directly enter brain tissue via the olfactory nerve" ( ). 21/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
This could impact your body differently than just drinking the water with the same content that is normally safe to drink. 22/
“These particles are so small that they can evade our filtration system in the upper airway and penetrate deep into our respiratory tract,” explained Lau. “Upon doing so, they also send chemical species associated with them into our bodies." ( ) 23/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
People are also asking which PM monitors I use? I have been using air quality monitors by @IndianaTux, a Canadian company. The Model E, G, and X offer PM sensors in them. 24/co2.click
Their Model E and G are indoor monitors that measure PM and their X is an outdoor monitor for PM. The feature I like the best is that they can take measurements every minute and upload the data via WiFi so you can see what is going on in your space over time. 25/
If you are interested in learning more, this thread shows some examples of how their Model X and E work and what their online portal looks like ( … ). Model G uses the same PM sensor as Model E-Lite but uses a non-colour display and is cheaper. 26/
As for more affordable options, I cannot vouch for how accurate they are or how well they work since I have never used them but IKEA sells couple of lower cost options ranging from $13 to $50 which do not have the data saved online ( ). 27/ikea.com/ca/en/cat/air-…
Some people have asked if boiling water will "purify" the water to remove minerals. Boiling water may kill bacteria but it will not remove the mineral content and may make it even more concentrated afterwards ( ). 30/mytapscore.com/en-ca/blogs/ti…
Does the PM from tap water in ultrasonic humidifiers impact people differently than outdoor PM pollution? This study takes a looks at what happens in the lungs of mice using different types of water ( ). 31/
@SaltyPeach51 Their Model E and G are indoor monitors that measure PM and their X is an outdoor monitor for PM. The feature I like the best is that they can take measurements every minute and upload the data via WiFi so you can see what is going on in the space over time.
@SaltyPeach51 If you are interested in learning more, this thread shows some examples of how their Model X and E work and what their online portal looks like ( ). Model G uses the same PM sensor as Model E-Lite but uses a non-colour display and is cheaper.
@SaltyPeach51 I cannot vouch for how accurate they are or how well they work since I have never used them but IKEA sells couple of lower cost options ranging from $13 to $50 which do not have the data saved online ( ).ikea.com/ca/en/cat/air-…
@spittykitty543 Since the particles are so small, "PM2.5 can pass through the lung–gas–blood barrier and the 'gut–microbial–brain' axis to cause systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, or directly enter brain tissue via the olfactory nerve" ( ). 2/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@spittykitty543 “These particles are so small that they can evade our filtration system in the upper airway and penetrate deep into our respiratory tract,” explained Lau. “Upon doing so, they also send chemical species associated with them into our bodies." ( ) 3/ualberta.ca/science/news/2…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
COVID-19 #Wastewater levels in #Ottawa are up again with the circulation of a new KP.3.1.1 DeFLuQE variant ( ). Wastewater is still being updated but on a weekly basis now. 🧵1/3 covid.gilchrist.ca/Ottawa.html
New hospitalizations in Ottawa *due* to COVID-19, Flu or RSV are unfortunately increasing again. There were two big spikes over the past month ( ). 2/3 ottawapublichealth.ca/en/reports-res…
One virus is causing a lot more hospitalizations than the other two over the past year. Even at the lowest point at the end of March 2024, COVID-19 still accounted for more than 40% of hospitalizations between the three viruses and more than 80% for almost half the year. 3/3
#Variant update for #Ontario, #Canada (to Aug 13, 2024)
Today's variant show is brought to you by the letters KP... Looks like KP.3.1.1 has really taken off and separated from the pack at 40% prevalence in Ontario. Graph tools by @Mike_Honey_ 🧵1/
KP.3.1.1 has the #FLuQE mutations and also a key point in the spike protein deleted which gives it much more immune evasion than other variants. 2/
Testing with a recently released monoclonal antibody treatment (pemivibart) found that while it neutralized JN.1 and KP.2 with similar performance... ( ). 3/biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
It seems Canada has not ordered any Novavax JN.1 vaccine doses for the fall which means this protein based vaccine option may not be available to anyone who wants or needs it. We are hoping you can help us change that. 🧵1/
A group of concerned stakeholders advocating for broader access to diverse COVID-19 vaccine options for Canadians, particularly those beyond the mRNA vaccines currently dominating the public offering wrote a letter to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)... 2/
...all the provinces/territories and immunization providers to address the pressing need for enhanced COVID-19 awareness and education, increased availability and access to protein-based vaccines, such as Novavax, which are currently limited in distribution. 3/
Novavax revealed they had selected the original JN.1 variant as their fall booster and recently released neutralization results on non-human primates (Macaques) including a more recent KP.2 FLiRT variant. 🧵1/
Recall that the JN.1 variant became dominant in many parts of the world in December 2023 so by the time the fall 2024 vaccine program rolls out it will be almost a year old. 2/
Lets look more closely at the neutralization results that Novavax did provide in slide 14 of their investor presentation on May 10th ( ). 3/novavax.widen.net/s/gvwfqkhbhm/2…
With wildfire smoke season here, we all need to think about air quality inside where we spend most of our time. This thread provides multiple examples measuring the air quality inside my home from wildfire smoke and cooking. 🧵1/
People now spend the vast majority of the time indoors. Adults in the USA with a 79 year life expectancy will spend on average 69 years inside of buildings and 54 of those years inside their own homes/residences ( ). 3/nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27341/…
#Variant update for #Ontario, #Canada (to May 12 2024)
The JN.1.* +FLiRT variants now make up 27% of sequences and XDK.* which is recombinant of JN.1.1.1 and XBB.1.16.11 is remaining at 5% for now. Graph tools by @Mike_Honey_ 🧵1/
JN.1 #Pirola has dropped to 7% frequency and JN.1.4 down to 9% while KP.3 FLuQE is now most prevalent at 26% while the FLiRT variants are much lower at KP.2 (6%) and KS.1 (5%). 2/
KP.3 has the F456L and Q493E mutations (FLuQE nickname) while the FLiRT variants have the same F456L mutation but a different R346T mutation. Ryan Hisner explains how FLiRT is a typical stepwise mutation but Q493E is very rare and may be different ( ). 3/