1 Remember how Gessen reacted according to an account linked in my previous thread to a Tryzub p, Ukraine’s national symbol? Here Russians similarly rationalise their aversion to the visibility of Ukraine. There is always a good reason why they cannot tolerate “seeing” Ukraine
2 Unless it is an Ukraine reduced to a Russophone colony. The visions of that differ slightly now. The liberals want a Russophone colony in which Ukrainian identity is despised as nationalism. That this is only achievable by genocide at some point should be noted.
3 The more straightforward imperialists want to genocide immediately. But they all tailor their messages via personal interaction as here or print media to toxify Ukraine appropriately to a given audience.
4 Here for example Ragozin manipulatively stigmatises Ukrainian traditional embroidery as Fascist and relies on a well established conditioned reflex Regarding the OUN. This is not dissimilar to stigmatising a Ukrainian national symbol as being linked to harassment.
5 see this thread or as in the clip above gaslighting to validate their Russian aversion to protests supporting Ukraine, to the very visibility of things Ukrainian had roots in anything other than the xenophobia driving an ongoing genocide of Ukraine.threadreaderapp.com/thread/1752211…
@threadreaderapp please unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 re the recent exposure via Rock star journalists of Russian agents. One obvious reason is that far more valuable assets are currently sabotaging US military aid to Ukraine and indeed NATO and the Europe link itself so a few pawns can be sacrificed to help slay the king.
2 I am not implying any impropriety I am trying to encourage a sceptical approach to news with links to Russia which recognises how the Kremlin manipulated discourse to manipulate us.
3 If any journalist receives or has received sensitive material including the names of agents and not via a known independent hacker then caution is needed.
1 This thread will examine how Russian soft power has manipulated journalism for many decades in light of recent incidents where Ukrainians and others have been very critical of their coverage of the genocidal war Russia wages on #Ukraine.
2 It is one of a series I am working on covering Russian soft power: the first thread is linked in this tweet
3 These incidents follow a pattern: a journalist publishes a tweet or an article that Ukrainians and others criticise- the journalist community circles the wagons. Their critics are portrayed as a mob or indeed trolls.
1 It is wildly inappropriate to give Russians a platform based on their insight into the war because a perception that Russia and Ukraine are parts of a continuous whole with Ukrainian identity an aberration is taught to them at a very young age.
2 this notion is an intrinsic part of their culture it features in the writing of Solzhenitsyn, Brodsky, Nabokov, shaping their commentary about Ukraine and in turn your perceptions.
3 It drives the current genocide which is an attempt to make this narrative true by eradicating the reality which exposes it as false; Ukrainians exist, they have culture, language and agency.
In reality any degree of agency from Ukrainians is deemed to be „nationalism“ by Russians.
This is about the dynamics of power between ethnicities. Any advocacy of Ukraine is frequently met by attempts to shift the discussion onto the demons of Bandera.
Imagine the same tactic applied to other nations.
e.g. Imagine saying What about Vietnam? to someone giving a presentation on Maya Angelou.
What about the IRA? To someone giving a talk on Heaney.
The ethnic privileging of Russians and the reflexive gaslighting of Ukrainians
Masks several colossal acts of genocide committed by Russians on Ukrainians.
Mass famines inflicted artificially mass killings, book burnings.
The history books we have to date and the farcical Russian studies discipline erode this truth.
The Ukrainian people and their genocide are becoming a backdrop for westerners and Russians to build their careers.
This is often on the basis of a stigmatising discourse shaped by Russians: accusing UkrainIans of being nationalist when they erase nation after nation.
Editors eager for Ukrainian right wing horror stories are fed by journalists building careers on feeding the beast.
centuries of imbibing Russian soft power have conditioned westerners to seek out heroes who oppose autocracy and blinded them to the peoples RusSian’s destroyed
While the initial full scale invasion shifted the focus to Ukraine the habit of privileging western and Russian voices is reasserting itself.
This is a threat to the future safety of Ukrainians.
Past and present heroes be they Osechkin or Brodsky remain imperialists.
Significant development. 1 Russia is going to burn its own operation to discredit Ukrainian armed forces in 2014/15 by exposing its shelling of the areas it occupied.facebook.com/vladimir.osech…
2 The chosen conduit is Osechkin who is passed material from the FSB via opaque mechanisms but who argues there are dissenters in its ranks. See for example the Wind of Change letters by a supposed renegade FSB officer
3 Osechkin used to be a committed supporter of Russian expansionism supporting the annexation of Ukrainian Crimea. It is possible that he is being passed this material to shape opinion in the west. Why?