1. Maya,
I was as blunt as it is possible to be in my lecture. All the examples of extremist assertions of apparent rights for women but not trans people, that I gave were from Sex Matters.
Any group which cannot support & respect the rights of others (in this case rights…
2. … we fought a very long & hard battle for) is suspect. You may claim your concern is women’s rights but your organisation is solely targeted on trans people & their rights.
You know by now we are not the enemy, we are not targeting women, it is misogyny which is at…
3. … issue here, but n your campaign it is trans women who are the misogynists.
There is so much that needs doing to support women’s rights but it is my community that is being charged.
It doesn’t matter what you think, but what matter is what your followers say & do.
4. I call out those in my community who threaten women or abuse them, as frequently as I am able (& get it in the neck back) but honestly believe that threats get us nowhere.
Why hasn’t HJ thought to apologise for the hurt sge caused my community for her saying TP are…
5. … a Huge problem and calling for our reduction?
I assume she hasn’t because she meant it.
Why is @sexmatters so obsessed with our lives when the problem is men. What is t that is the problem - we are not after you or anyone else. We just want to live our lives. So why?..
6. I have accumulated ‘000s of abusive messages directed at myself. You have never once thought to … suggest these people that they listen, engage & stop the abuse. It has to be both ways - or another awful thing will happen.
Go on- tell me how you are going to improve …
7. …the real lives of women & how you will stop going after the lives of a minority who ironically have always supported feminism’s aims.
So — Yes. I call @SexMattersOrg a hate group because you are obsessed with the lives of one of the smallest & most harmless minorities
@SexMattersOrg As to the lecture notes treated you like all the other guest.
I gave you space because I am not willing to live in an echo chamber
@threadreaderapp unroll
@SexMattersOrg @threadreaderapp Amendment - 1st line should read ‘As to the lecture I treated’
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. … the sex(gender) of a person. They can write man, m, male, woman, f, female.
In most cases of trans people where they perform postmortems they put the affirmed gender/sex the person is living in ir man or woman.
They won’t know if a person has a GRC but if they do…
3. … they respect that
If they have any doubts they discuss the matter with whoever is the designated next of kin.
So a TM/TW dies in an accident. The pathologist looks at all the evidence from the body & from the next of kin and makes up their own mind.
1. The law is quite clear.
The Equality Act was widely consulted on.
s7 provides protection from detrimental (discriminatory) treatment because a person is undergoing or has undergone gender reassignment.
It would be detrimental to trans women’s health & dignity to refuse ..
2. … access to the women ‘s facilities as this would prevent their participation in events or to suggest they use the men’s as they would not do so again prevent their participation.
The claim for rights is exactly the same for both women & trans women.
If a woman says she ..
3. …has a right to a single sex service the provider can explain that the facilities are provided for their use & the use of trans women.
The right to single sex service does not imply a right to single sex spaces, which are provided only to facilitate use by women & trans …
By your logic this will mean trans people with gender recognition certificate’s taking legal action - the law says we are men/women “for all purposes”.
Why assume trans men & women can share space, or do you think we are so weird we should be left …
3. .., to assault each other as it is what we deserve? L
On what basis are you suggesting this will increase safety? What evidence do you have that trans men or women go into hospital & assault others.
As we all have to be close to death or recovering from major ..,
1. Wrong - we are the adoptive mother & father in the kid ‘s certificates.
But for 35 yrs thr UK Govt argued that birth certs were historical records fact & could not be changed for trans folk.
But they were stripping birth mothers who remarried (& wanted their new …
2. … partner to become the children’s legal parent - which could only be done by a step parent adoption, were being stripped of the fact they carried their child & were given the status of adoptive mother.
Why?
Why can’t ‘mother’ & adoptive father be written on the …
3. … child’s new birth/adoption certificate where a step patent adoption has taken place.
I felt this was a dreadful thing for the law to ask if my wife. And she hated it, but at the time it was the only way up protect our children & avoid them being pls ex in care in the ..
2. … LLB, MA & PhD - all done part time whilst working
First 7yrs I worked FT & did 2 eves & Sunday. Then for 2yrs I taught for the OU on Saturdays
In 93 MMU gave me a post & I completed my PhD very late at night as we had first 2 children
1992 helped found & volunteered…
3. … with a national campaign Press For Change seeking respect & Equality for all trans people
I ran PFC’s legal advice service for 23yrs. Also ran a National support network for trans men 89-09, & volunteered with others to put @TGEUorg in its feet
2. … could on Pressure Grouo politics, & learnt from the actions of 2nd wave feminists
We took cases wherever possible that would enhance the rights of all
Birth certificate change was the mechanism govt chose to give us a right to medical privacy, marriage & personal autonomy
3. PFC would have been content with Civil Partnership or its equivalent
But CP for ‘same natal assigned sex’ would have meant trans people in pre-existing marriages could have retained them
Blair was ‘NO same sex marriage’. The only way forward was to retain a right to marry ..,