1. It does not end catch and release. Instead, it facilitates catch and release for certain populations. This should be a MAJOR red flag for all.
2. It exempts UAC from the new "break glass" removal authority. Which means it is worthless, as UAC remain a gaping loophole, and we have seen the largest child smuggling operation in history during the Biden Administration. For context, more than 476,000 UAC have come during the Biden Admin. None of them ever go home.
3. It does nothing to end perpetual settlement agreements like Flores, which have undermined border security for decades.
4. The bill effectively codifies the Administration's absurd "asylum officer rule" that dozens of state Attorneys General are currently challenging in court. They might as well call this the "Asylum Officer Empowerment Act," meaning more and more aliens will get asylum based on lax adjudications. And asylum = path to a green card and citizenship.
5. The new "break glass" emergency authority is a disaster. The Secretary "may" use it if there are 4,000 or more aliens encountered each day (28k per week, 121k a month, 1.46 mil a year). But he "must" use it when there are more than 5,000 a day over a week or 8,500 in a single day. Those are insane numbers and totally unacceptable to the American people.
6. And Non-Mexican UAC are NOT counted in the total that triggers the emergency authority.
7. But if that wasn't bad enough, there is a provision that allows the Biden team to essentially opt anyone out from the new supposedly expedited proceedings.
8. And if that weren't bad enough, it allows Biden to SUSPEND the new authority if he wants to, rendering it meaningless:
9. Oh, and the authority is limited in time duration, going down each subsequent year, making it even more worthless:
10. The bill wastes a ton of taxpayer money.
Billions here and billions there for more "processing." Including $1.4 BILLION for more FEMA grants that provide shelter and other services to illegal aliens.
There are even nuggets like $36 million to provide attorneys for "incompetent" adult aliens.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨BREAKING — AFL has obtained thousands of pages of records exposing Biden DOJ’s SHOCKING partnership and coordination with the radical SPLC to WEAPONIZE civil rights enforcement.
No daylight between DOJ and SPLC.
Here’s round #1👇
/2 Explosive documents, obtained via FOIA, reveal Biden’s DOJ gave SPLC UNPRECEDENTED access to influence federal civil rights enforcement.
They weren’t just at the table — they were helping RUN THE SHOW.
Quarterly meetings, coffee and danish meetups, training DOJ prosecutors…
/3 SPLC, known for smearing groups like Moms for Liberty and Turning Point USA as “hate groups” alongside the KKK, got early access to FBI hate-crime data, drafted DOJ talking points, and even TRAINED federal prosecutors.
🚨EXPOSED — Biden’s HHS funneled millions to Washington University in St. Louis to embed “diversity, equity, and inclusion” into medicine and clinical research.
Yes, your tax dollars are bankrolling racial discrimination and ideological experiments.
Here’s the proof…🧵
/2 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $5 million to run a nationwide “Neurosurgeon Research Career Development Program” to “promote and foster diversity, equity, and inclusion at every level.”
It mandates DEI, builds a “pipeline program” to recruit based on identity, and embeds “diversity” into selection, mentoring, and leadership.
This is taxpayer-funded discrimination — reorienting the medical workforce around ideology instead of merit.
/3 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $3.4 million to “increase diversity, equity, and inclusion” in Alzheimer’s research through 2026.
The project builds a “culturally appropriate” registry led by “diverse researchers” to recruit participants by race, and frames disparities as products of “systemic and systematic racism,” “ethnoracial factors,” and “classism.”
Our tax dollars should fund treatments — not racial ideology in medical research.
🏛️⚖️ NEW — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has AFFIRMED the President’s Article II authority to remove appointed officials.
AFL filed an amicus brief in this case defending that presidential power.
/2 AFL, with Boyden Gray PLLC and Givens Purley LLP, filed an amicus brief in Robert P. Storch v. Pete Hegseth supporting former U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Eric J. Soskin.
Soskin was removed by President Trump — yet defended presidential removal power even in his own case.
/3 Eric Soskin is a longtime practicing constitutional lawyer with decades of experience in public service, including in the U.S. Department of Justice and as Inspector General of the Department of Transportation.
AFL filed an amicus brief on behalf of six U.S. Senators led by @SenMikeLee urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rein in the Fifth Circuit’s blatant defiance of federal law and defend federal employees and contractors from hostile state lawsuits.
/2 This case, Chevron v. Plaquemines Parish, deals with whether federal employees and contractors can transfer court cases into federal court when the underlying facts relate to their federal responsibilities.
/3 It’s simple: to keep America safe, federal officers must know they won’t be dragged into hostile state courts for carrying out their federal duties.
Because federal law enforcement often relies on private partners, contractors must also have this protection.
🚨BREAKING — AFL is taking Alvin Bragg back to court.
We just filed a new petition in the New York Supreme Court to EXPOSE his politically motivated prosecution of President Trump.
🧵👇
/2 Last year, AFL filed a lawsuit against District Attorney Alvin Bragg over records requested from his office related to the prosecution of President Trump.
Bragg’s office has refused to provide the records and issued sweeping exemptions to keep the truth hidden.