1. It does not end catch and release. Instead, it facilitates catch and release for certain populations. This should be a MAJOR red flag for all.
2. It exempts UAC from the new "break glass" removal authority. Which means it is worthless, as UAC remain a gaping loophole, and we have seen the largest child smuggling operation in history during the Biden Administration. For context, more than 476,000 UAC have come during the Biden Admin. None of them ever go home.
3. It does nothing to end perpetual settlement agreements like Flores, which have undermined border security for decades.
4. The bill effectively codifies the Administration's absurd "asylum officer rule" that dozens of state Attorneys General are currently challenging in court. They might as well call this the "Asylum Officer Empowerment Act," meaning more and more aliens will get asylum based on lax adjudications. And asylum = path to a green card and citizenship.
5. The new "break glass" emergency authority is a disaster. The Secretary "may" use it if there are 4,000 or more aliens encountered each day (28k per week, 121k a month, 1.46 mil a year). But he "must" use it when there are more than 5,000 a day over a week or 8,500 in a single day. Those are insane numbers and totally unacceptable to the American people.
6. And Non-Mexican UAC are NOT counted in the total that triggers the emergency authority.
7. But if that wasn't bad enough, there is a provision that allows the Biden team to essentially opt anyone out from the new supposedly expedited proceedings.
8. And if that weren't bad enough, it allows Biden to SUSPEND the new authority if he wants to, rendering it meaningless:
9. Oh, and the authority is limited in time duration, going down each subsequent year, making it even more worthless:
10. The bill wastes a ton of taxpayer money.
Billions here and billions there for more "processing." Including $1.4 BILLION for more FEMA grants that provide shelter and other services to illegal aliens.
There are even nuggets like $36 million to provide attorneys for "incompetent" adult aliens.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL is calling for federal and state investigations into Kenyon College for illegally forcing female students to share restrooms with men — violating Title IX and Ohio law.
/2 AFL has formally requested federal and state investigations from:
➡️ The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights
➡️ Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
/3 On February 12, 2025, Kenyon College admitted that:
“The law prohibits Kenyon from knowingly permitting members of the ‘male biological sex’ to use multi-occupancy student restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms or shower rooms designated for use by members of the ‘female biological sex,’ and vice versa.”
AFL has filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court to protect parents’ constitutional right to opt their children out of Montgomery County Public Schools’ radical gender identity and sexuality indoctrination program.
MUST READ👇
/2 AFL and co-counsel Christopher Mills filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Tamer Mahmoud v. Thomas W. Taylor, opposing the Montgomery County, Maryland, Public School District’s (MCPS) radical, mandatory gender identity and sexuality program of indoctrination that denies parents their right to know or opt their children out.
/3 AFL argues:
➡️ MCPS’ radical sexuality and gender identity curriculum does not align with the historical roots of valuable education for children.
➡️ The school district disregards parental notice and opt-out rights, violating statutory and constitutional requirements.
➡️ MCPS wrongfully exposes young students to highly controversial sex and gender identity indoctrination, promoting disputed opinions as fact without allowing discussion or acknowledging dissent and disagreement.
Unelected bureaucrats are trying to undermine President Trump’s constitutional authority to remove executive branch officials.
AFL is suing the U.S. Government Accountability Office to defend the President’s executive authority and power to fire at will.
/2 AFL’s lawsuit against the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is the first-ever challenge to GAO’s unconstitutional overreach and part of AFL’s broader effort to protect the powers of the Executive Branch from legal challenges seeking to obstruct its constitutional authority.
/3 This lawsuit stems from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request AFL filed as part of its investigation into operations at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement.
America First Legal and the City of Huntington Beach are suing Gavin Newsom and the State of California to end the dangerous and illegal Sanctuary State Laws shielding criminal illegal aliens and endangering American citizens.
/2 AFL filed an amended lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of the City of Huntington Beach, which AFL is representing pro bono alongside the Huntington Beach City Attorney’s Office, to overturn the state’s illegal “Sanctuary State Laws,” which violate federal immigration, criminal, and civil rights laws.
/3 California’s Sanctuary State Laws drastically limit local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, shield illegal aliens, and threaten public safety.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL has filed an amicus brief in New Jersey v. Trump to protect our national security, defend our sovereignty, and support President Trump’s Executive Order ending birthright citizenship.
/2 AFL, partnering with Stone Hilton PLLC, filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in support of President Trump’s Executive Order 14160, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.”
/3 The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, properly interpreted, does not automatically confer citizenship to every person born on U.S. soil because it requires individuals to be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.
/1🚨📄NEW BRIEF — AFL filed an amicus brief on behalf of the State of Alabama and 21 other states defending President Trump’s Executive Orders protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation.
/2 AFL, on behalf of the coalition of 22 states, filed the brief in the U.S. District Court of Maryland in PFLAG, Inc. v. Donald J. Trump.
/3 The coalition’s brief defends two of President Trump’s Executive Orders:
➡️ Executive Order 14187: Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation
➡️ Executive Order 14168: Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism
These orders are critical to safeguarding children from unscientific, harmful procedures.