Want more details on exactly how this new Senate border bill facilitates catch-and-release, empowers Biden's bureaucrats, and will lead to EVEN MORE illegal aliens getting asylum/green cards/path to citizenship?
🧵Here are some points about the new "PROVISIONAL NONCUSTODIAL REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS."
If Mayorkas feels like it, he can send an illegal alien encountered at the border to a new "provisional noncustodial removal proceeding." No real criteria, just if the illegal alien "indicates an INTENTION to apply for a protection determination" or "expresses a credible fear."
If DHS elects this pathway, the illegal alien SHALL BE RELEASED from custody into the United States and enrolled in an "alternatives to detention" program. Better known to immigration enforcement experts as "alternatives to deportation," because no one ever gets deported in the program.
The proceedings are supposed to wrap up, "to the maximum extent practicable," in 90 days. But that's an exception any liberal administration will use in every single case. And mind you, during this time period, the alien(s) are likely relying on taxpayer-funded shelter and services while they are roaming freely throughout the United States.
If you're the illegal alien, don't you worry, your interview won't happen in a place where actual law enforcement officers are located:
If the alien establishes a "positive protection determination outcome," they are then sent to a "protection merits removal proceeding."
If it's negative, then there's a different path (more on that below):
If POSITIVE, the alien SHALL get a work permit:
And the ultra-liberal USCIS asylum officers get the direct authority to grant asylum, withholding, or CAT:
The unlucky few who don't get a positive determination get even more process!
More process!
We could go on and on. But in sum here's what you need to know:
- The bill empowers Biden's liberal asylum officers to shortcut any kind of adversarial process and grant illegal aliens asylum. No cross-examination by an ICE attorney, no evaluation by an independent judge, etc.
- The bill mandates catch-and-release for the aliens subjected to these procedures.
- Aliens in these procedures SHALL get work permits. They will also likely get taxpayer-subsidized shelter and services.
- The Biden Administration WILL use the new procedures to advance their policy goals and continue the invasion. They will grant asylum, creating a pathway to a green card and citizenship for countless tens and hundreds of thousands of aliens each year.
- The new channel puts process on top of process, on top of process. End result = NO ONE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS WILL EVER BE DEPORTED.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨UNCOVERED — Internal documents show that Oregon officials knew they lacked cause to sue the Trump Administration over its new regulations intended to prevent illegal aliens from receiving welfare.
They filed the lawsuit anyway.
/2 On July 21, 2025, twenty states and the District of Columbia sued the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies, alleging that providing legal residency status verification to the federal government would cause irreparable harm.
/3 In their lawsuit, the plaintiff states allege that they would be harmed by having to “dramatically restructure” their welfare programs.
The U.S. Department of Energy has opened a public comment period on AFL’s petition calling for the rescission of an unlawful Biden-era DEI contracting regulation.
The deadline for members of the public to submit public comments is Thursday, April 9.
/2 AFL’s petition, filed in January, asks DOE to rescind a regulation requiring DOE management and operating contractors to adopt and maintain race- and sex-based DEI plans and to submit them annually as a condition of doing business with the federal government.
/3 This Biden-era rule conflicts with federal civil rights law and pressures contractors to sort, evaluate, and favor workers based on race and sex.
/1🚨EXPOSED — The Deep State’s Global Population Control Plan:
A newly retracted intelligence assessment reveals the CIA identified higher birth rates in third-world countries as a threat to global economic development — and came up with a plan to “address it.”
/2 The 2020 CIA intelligence assessment titled “Worldwide: Pandemic-Related Contraceptive Shortfalls Threaten Economic Development” warned that the COVID-19 pandemic was limiting contraception access and undermining efforts to address population pressure in the developing world.
/3 This intelligence assessment, produced by the CIA’s Directorate of Analysis, Office of Global Issues, is 1 of 19 intelligence products that “did not meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft standards and FAILED TO BE INDEPENDENT OF POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS.
/1🚨EXPOSED — AFL has released a report finding that 80% of the American Bar Association’s filings from the last decade support leftist causes and lawfare against President Trump.
The ABA is not a neutral arbiter and does not deserve to be treated like one.
/2 AFL’s examination of the ABA’s amicus brief program, which includes 87 briefs filed from April 2016 to February 2026, reveals that 80% of the organization’s filings advocated for liberal or progressive outcomes.
/3 It also reveals a 100% opposition rate to the Trump Administration across both President Trump’s first and second terms, in cases in which the ABA filed a brief.
Newly released CIA documents reveal the Biden Administration identified “motherhood” and “homemaking” as indicators of “white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism” (REMVE).
/2 The intelligence assessment reveals the top-to-bottom bias at Biden’s CIA.
An agency with critical intelligence responsibilities was spending its resources targeting women promoting motherhood.
/3 The Trump Administration recently retracted a 2021 intelligence assessment titled “Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment.”
/1🚨NEW — The Eleventh Circuit should affirm Judge Cannon’s ruling and order the destruction of Volume II of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL investigation into President Trump.
/2 AFL’s amicus brief, filed in United States v. Knight First Amendment Institute, argues that because Volume II is the product of an unconstitutional investigation, it is not subject to the Federal Records Act and therefore does not need to be preserved under those provisions.
/3 AFL also argues that even if Volume II is subject to the Federal Records Act, it would still qualify for authorized disposition under the Records Disposal Act, and its disclosure would be prohibited by the Privacy Act of 1974.