DOJ, Matthew Graves calls claims House Democrats deleted, destroyed evidence "conspiratorial" and argues that even if they did--Bennie Thompson ADMITTED the videos were not preserved--Congress isn't obligated to turn over the materials
julie_kelly2/status/1754540446372462915
-
So what did Judge Rudy 'Friend of Peter Strzok" Contreras who presided over Mike Flynn case and plea deal then recused decide?
Contreras called Rep. Loudermilk's proof of deleted/destroyed evidence "unsubstantiated."
Motion denied.
julie_kelly2/status/1754542757551513737
-
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
- Oversight Dems
-
The images from Oversight Dems post above 🔼
Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the "victim" in the Epstein emails they released.
The unreacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre.
@CynicalPublius Yes, Google is misinterpreting the rules
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified."
This quote was fed into google.
-
I fed in the longer, complete quote
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released by any military member, DoW civilian employee or contract employee, even if it is unclassified.”
- still misinterpreted
-
@CynicalPublius I believe that Google interprets this from an authoritative perspective. The authority is the mainstream press.
The press is using Google, and Google is parroting their thinking in answer.