@ScienceMagazine I have a question. It's super important, so i'm adding it to your pinned post.
If you add polyclonal antibodies to a beaker of saline and then add its antigen, will they clump?
the answer to this question determines the fate of the pediatricians everywhere on earth.
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds
Science,
then, the next question.
Ur 1st vax puts antibodies into blood.
Ur BOOSTER puts antigen into blood.
Will they clump? or become PRECIPITINS?
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds Science. Isn't science about debate? Isn't science about asking hard questions, even if it means half the vaccines on earth are destroyed by the questions?
Here's a video explanation if you don't like words.
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds The @AmerAcadPeds has 1200 posts from for over 125 days. They can't show how the STRING MECHANISM that I describe is WRONG. Then, since I ONLY use their BEST SCIENCE, that an antibody will bind its antigen, isn't the STRING MECHANISM CORRECT?
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds I mean, look at it from where I'm sitting.
You put polyclonal antibodies into a beaker of saline.
You then ADD its antigen.
IT WILL CLUMP or what YOUR scientists call PRECIPITINS.
Add platelets and fibrin in the blood and now? it's a CLOT
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds so, the question is this.
Why would you have a patient take a booster vaccine one to four months after their FIRST vaccine, JUST when the patient has made a LOT of polyclonal antibodies in response to the first vaccine?
The patient HAS lots of antibodies in their blood.
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds JUST when the patient has the MOST antibodies in their blood, you then give that patient a BOOSTER vaccine which ADDS its ANTIGEN to the blood that HAS a lot of ANTIBODIES?
won't the antibody and its antigen BIND together?
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds into LARGE clumps that vaccinologists call PRECIPITINS?
Kala showing Precipitins, good diagram
soothsayer showing precipitins and polyclonal antibody explanation
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds So, this STRING mechanism has NOT been refuted by the AApeds. I even call them BABY KILLERS for the HEP B vax for newborns. And they are DEATHLY afraid to BLOCK ME or delete my posts.
that part makes sense. The PREP ACT gives them vax legal immunity with an exception.
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds the PREP ACT also says that "willful misconduct" negates their vaccine legal immunity.
if I expose a HUGE oversight in their vaccine paradigm, that they ARE putting antibody and its antigen into the blood and expecting them NOT TO STICK to each other, the STRING mechanism -
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds the STRING mechanism EXPOSES that huge mistake. deleting my posts? is an act of COVERING UP that HUGE MISTAKE that the STRING mechanism exposes.
so, deleting my posts? WILLFUL MISCONDUCT then no more VACCINE IMMUNITY. which also applies to SCIENCE then.
@ScienceMagazine @AmerAcadPeds and science webmaster? you shouldn't expose SCIENCE to this MASSIVE loss of vaccine legal immunity by blocking me. there will be a tsunami of lawsuits and you don't want SCIENCE exposed to that by willful misconduct.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@Harvard H1.01 Harvard. The top university in the world? should have scientists that can either rebut this mechanism or realize that you need to CANCEL your vaccine mandate.
This is breaking news. You may have heard of it, the STRING MECHANISM.
@Harvard H1.02
Let me tag in @AmerAcadPeds as they have not been able to provide a rebuttal to the STRING for 130 days now.
Also, the @NIHDirector has not been able to provide a rebuttal.
Also, @harvardmed has not been able to provide a rebuttal for 80 days.
The STRING mechanism is extremely simple. It is only one post and not only exposes the irrationality of the COVID vaccine and booster, but also half the childhood vaccines have the identical severe flaw. Here it is-
@TexasChildrens DAY 15. Texas children's hospital. Since I informed you of the STRING theory that is like a noose around the neck of the vaccine industry.
Imagine parents all over the world are watching you. Don't you think that's how you should respond to the information I gave you?
@TexasChildrens 15.02 Let's review the information I've sent you.
1. The String Theory
2. The Middle Man Mechanism
3. How ALL antibodies, especially IgM antibodies slice and dice.
4. Webmaster, this isn't YOUR call to BLOCK ME or delete my comments.
Today's lesson? Destroying the R/B
@TexasChildrens 15.03
But, before I destroy the R/B ratio for the COVID mRNA vaccine, a little lesson on the use of FORCE/mandates to overcome BODILY Autonomy laws.
Let's say I hear of a miracle medicine. I tell my neighbor. He uses on his child who become paralyzed. yes, he will hate me.
@shazrul_wan @drob256 @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG @jjcouey I have the 73 pages with the lung barrier issue prior to the String theory. the FIRST notice to Fauci was sent SEP 2020.
Basically, the 73 pges shows that the vaccinologists had NEVER even considered HOW the FLU antibody passes through the very tight nonporous lung barrier.
@shazrul_wan @drob256 @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG @jjcouey It has a US copyright on it, FEB 2021.
The short version was sent to Fauci SEP 2020 with a response from his team, via Dr. Emily Erbelding, the Director of infectious disease at the NIH, even today.
@shazrul_wan @drob256 @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG @jjcouey The 73 pages covering every aspect of this FATAL flaw with the COVID vaccine hypothesis of a neutralizing antibody IN the lung air space was sent to hundreds of directors at the NIH, CDC and FDA. It was also sent to BIG PHARMA with explanations including the PREP act.
@drob256 @shazrul_wan @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG yes, I sent it to THOUSANDS of people. LOTS of directors at the NIH, CDC and FDA. I called HUNDREDS of people and left messages, emails and even had BACK AND FORTH discussions, and these email trails will END the job of MANY.
@drob256 @shazrul_wan @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG WITHOUT question, all those people are GUILTY TOO.
But, who was WORSE? those people we ALL KNEW were EVIL and behaving badly. Did ANYONE expect our HEROES to reject this info? isn't betrayal INFINITELY worse when it's from OUR OWN????
@drob256 @shazrul_wan @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG You EXPECT the enemy to be EVIL. You do NOT EXPECT our own HEROES to be EVIL.
The betrayal from our OWN feels INFINITELY worse.
that's why the NICKNAMING of our OWN.
@shazrul_wan @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG August 2022, RFKjr HIMSELF forwarded my lung barrier issue to all HIS docs. including Malone, McCullough, Kory, Nass, Paul Alexander.
@shazrul_wan @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @P_McCulloughMD @SenRonJohnson @DrAseemMalhotra @AaronSiriSG "So Dr. Lee is 100% correct. I find it thrilling and I appreciate his work. And yes, people, anyone linked to these vaccines to me should spend time in jail. And I will not stop my advocacy, even if posthumously we indict them.
@ScienceMagazine DAY 2. Webmaster, this is not for you to decide, to block me or delete my posts. This information has NIGHTMARISH implications for SCIENCE, for their "legal immunity" and also SCIENCE will be accused of helping COVER UP the most massive mistake in SCIENCE since Galileo-
@ScienceMagazine So, SCIENCE Webmaster, don't just on your own, delete my posts. Also, if you DO, Science will be criticized later and do you think they will hesitate? no, they will just throw YOU under the bus and say they had NOTHING to do with deleting these posts and blocking me.
@ScienceMagazine AND, if SCIENCE DOES lose reputation for your activities of possibly DELETING my posts, SCIENCE will come after YOU and sue YOU for harming their reputation. No, this is far above your pay grade. Pass this decision up the chain, to the Board of Directors and Chief Editor.