Why, do you suppose, did Garland **highlight** in this letter the section about the Special Counsel's investigation, that the AG **has carefully reviewed** the Special Counsel's conduct during the course of the investigation and FOUND NOTHING OBJECTIONABLE in any planned course of action the Special Counsel plans to take?
"inappropriate" and "unwarranted"?
"inappropriate" and "unwarranted"?
Everybody's assuming based on anonymous leaks to the Fake News Media that Hur's shut down, released his report and...nothing further is coming. If so...why would Garland include THAT paragraph?
In fact, all Garland is saying is that Hur's **investigation** has ended.
He's reviewed any further actions or plans Hur's Special Counsel's Office may be planning to make and he finds nothing 'inappropriate' or 'unwarranted' in any such plan of action.
In fact, all Garland is saying is that Hur's **investigation** has ended.
He's reviewed any further actions or plans Hur's Special Counsel's Office may be planning to make and he finds nothing 'inappropriate' or 'unwarranted' in any such plan of action.
Garland felt particularly compelled to remind everybody the AG has to very carefully review any planned course of action by the SCO and raise required objections of the SCO exceeded boundaries or did anything the AG found to be objectionable or unwarranted.
Is he covering his ass?
Is he covering his ass?
I can think of 2 reasons Garland would **stress** that the AG very carefully reviewed Hur's conduct in the course of his investigation and found nothing done that was 'unwarranted' or 'inappropriate':
1. This report is gonna so freaking expose the BLATANT ILLEGAL CONDUCT and CORRUPTION of Joe Biden & associates that when Democrats scream blue bloody murder about it being released DURING AN ELECTION YEAR in which Biden is running for reelection, Garland can just shrug helplessly and point to this and say
"Hey I understand this is bad for Joe, but look...Hur crossed all his t's and dotted his i's. What the heck was I supposed to do?"
2. Hur actually isn't finished yet, and the illegal leaks to the Fake News Media were, in fact, incorrect. He's merely ended the investigation phase. He will be taking further action, and before he does that, Garland wants to be on the record that he carefully reviewed Hur's investigation and his planned course of future action and he found nothing 'unwarranted' or 'inappropriate' that he could have used to block what Hur plans to do.
1. This report is gonna so freaking expose the BLATANT ILLEGAL CONDUCT and CORRUPTION of Joe Biden & associates that when Democrats scream blue bloody murder about it being released DURING AN ELECTION YEAR in which Biden is running for reelection, Garland can just shrug helplessly and point to this and say
"Hey I understand this is bad for Joe, but look...Hur crossed all his t's and dotted his i's. What the heck was I supposed to do?"
2. Hur actually isn't finished yet, and the illegal leaks to the Fake News Media were, in fact, incorrect. He's merely ended the investigation phase. He will be taking further action, and before he does that, Garland wants to be on the record that he carefully reviewed Hur's investigation and his planned course of future action and he found nothing 'unwarranted' or 'inappropriate' that he could have used to block what Hur plans to do.
Reminder:
Hur is going to be releasing this report [and maybe taking further action if the leaks turn out to be wrong] **while the US House of Representatives has taken action to move an impeachment inquiry forward.**
Is Hur about to hand the House more evidence to support the drafting of Articles of Impeachment?
Hur is going to be releasing this report [and maybe taking further action if the leaks turn out to be wrong] **while the US House of Representatives has taken action to move an impeachment inquiry forward.**
Is Hur about to hand the House more evidence to support the drafting of Articles of Impeachment?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
