"WILLIS GAVE STATEMENTS AND ALLOWED CASE ACCESS TO THE AUTHORS OF A NOW-PUBLISHED BOOK IN AN EFFORT TO ENHANCE HER OWN PUBLIC IMAGE AND TO PREJUDICE MR. ROMAN AND POISON THE JURY POOL"
"Before Willis made the decision to run for district attorney against Paul Howard, she was worried that if she lost she would end up in financial straits again. She told the authors of The Book that she was thinking, “I really don’t want to be financially effed up again"
Roman alleges Fulton DA #FaniWillis engaged in a purposeful PR campaign designed to "Inflate her Public Perception"
"A concerted and calculated plan to boost her personal image and create animus toward" the defendants
"the ethical rules are instructive about Willis’ knowledge as to what conduct could constitute a conflict of interest. For instance, the State did not address that Fulton County requires that “public service not be used for private gain”
"Willis violated these ethical rules by Wade with whom she had an undisclosed romantic relationship, paying Wade hundreds of thousands of dollars in county funds and accepting gifts from him which she did not disclose to the County. Based on the foregoing rules, Willis should have known that her actions would violate Fulton County’s ethical rules, and Willis should have known that her ethical violations would lead to an irreparable conflict of interest. Accordingly, she and Wade must be disqualified from further prosecuting this matter"
"In November of last year, Willis stated, “If I were to comment on any open case, it would be a reason to conflict my office out. Despite making numerous comments to the media and in The Book about this “open case”, Willis, unsurprisingly, still has not conceded that her office should be conflicted out"
Y'all can do the math, but Roman offers proof of a additional tax money in excess of $100,000 paid to Wade by Fulton DA's office
For those who are asking, a lawyer "shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact" to a court
The maximum penalty is disbarment
Roman's lawyer ends her supplemental reply to Fulton DA #FaniWillis with this ideal:
“The administration of the law, and especially that of the criminal law, should, like Caesar’s wife, be above suspicion, and should be free from all temptation, bias or prejudice, so far as it is possible for our courts to accomplish it.” Davenport v. State, 157 Ga. App. 1981
Roman says Fulton DA #FaniWillis has violated legal ethics and his due process rights by weaponizing the media
“Over the past several years, the district attorney has (used) the media to turn the screws on each of the defendants long before any trial juror was called to serve. These media appearances by a publicly-elected prosecutor are incredibly improper, but more importantly, they were designed to tear down the defendants’ pre-trial constitutional protections..This case should be, and could have been, tried on the evidence admitted at trial. Because of the actions of the district attorney, however, that is no longer possible. The damage is already done.”
Judge in the #YoungThug #YSLTrial orders a "show cause" contempt hearing for everyone who was present for his allegedly illegal secret "ex parte" meeting with #FaniWillis' top prosecutor
He is obsessed with finding the "leak" - which was perfectly legal
And in his order, he confesses to the ex parte
"Judges shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications...made to them outside the presence of the parties, or their lawyers, concerning a pending proceeding"
In my opinion, Glanville should immediately step aside from this case and retire.
I doubt he will like the blowback from all this that will eventually land on him.
He seems to be emotionally invested in everything about this case.
Jocelyn Wade files a new response to Nathan Wade's effort to get out of his support order after he left the #FaniWillis team
Wade alleges that since he was booted from the Trump RICO case by #FaniWillis that he's has a "change in circumstances"
Meaning: "I'm making less money"
Jocelyn says Nathan is lying because she says he got two checks totalling $53,000 only 3 days prior to filing his "emergency" motion to modify his support obligation
Former #FaniWillis “special prosecutor” Nathan Wade facing contempt of court allegations in his pending divorce
“Defendant urgently requires medical procedures, namely an endoscopy, colonoscopy, and ultrasound, due to severe physical symptoms she has been enduring. These symptoms have significantly impacted her ability to consume
most foods, leading to a substantial weight loss”
Despite a direct request from Defendant to Plaintiff for prepayment and an
additional demand from Defendant’s counsel to Plaintiff’s counsel, Plaintiff has
failed and neglected to fulfill his obligation under the Temporary Order to cover
these necessary healthcare costs. Instead, Plaintiff has instructed Defendant to
make payment to the provider herself, with an assurance of reimbursement.
[Exhibit C attached hereto comprises copies of emails exchanged between the
parties and a subsequent email to Plaintiff’s counsel, further elucidating the
aforementioned interactions.]
This is the application filed with the Georgia Court of Appeals asking them to hear the #FaniWillis disqualification appeal.
It will be assigned to a three judge panel. It requires only one judge to agree to allow the appeal to proceed.
While the trial court factually found DA Willis’s out-of-court statements were improper and Defendants proved an apparent conflict of interest, the trial court erred as a matter of law by not requiring dismissal and DA Willis’ disqualification. This legal error requires the Court’s immediate review.
The erroneous failure to disqualify a prosecutor is a structural error that would not just cause substantial error at trial – it would render each and every trial in this case a nullity.
Given the complexity of this case, the fact that it likely will be conducted through multiple different trials given the number of Defendants, and the projected length of each of these trials (estimated by the State to be at least four months each, but likely much longer), the time and resources that the courts, the parties, and the taxpayers of Fulton County are going to be forced to expend to go through this process even once is massive.
It is neither prudent nor efficient to require the courts, the parties, or taxpayers to run the significant and avoidable risk of having to go through this painful, divisive, and expensive process more than once when an existing structural error can be remedied by this Court now.