Dad |Crime Studier| Police Analyst | @Townhallcom Columnist I "Inside the Law" Host| WSB Radio Legal Analyst |Certified Flight Instructor ~Question Everything!
29 subscribed
29 subscribed
29 subscribed
“Defendant urgently requires medical procedures, namely an endoscopy, colonoscopy, and ultrasound, due to severe physical symptoms she has been enduring. These symptoms have significantly impacted her ability to consume
While the trial court factually found DA Willis’s out-of-court statements were improper and Defendants proved an apparent conflict of interest, the trial court erred as a matter of law by not requiring dismissal and DA Willis’ disqualification. This legal error requires the Court’s immediate review.
BUT - she can fix the defects the judge found.
From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed"" 
The "Chris" referenced here is Chris Campbell, a law partner of Nathan Wade 
"the State had an obligation to protect at all costs the fundamental fairness in the process and to avoid even the appearance of impropriety regarding the State’s motives or the district attorney’s personal or financial incentives in prosecuting the case. But the State did not do that"
"The State protests that the defense is somehow not entitled to present expert testimony regarding the cell site location information (CSLI) as they allege that the defense failed to comply with this Court’s Standing Discovery Order that mandates prior notice to the opposing party of a party’s intention to introduce expert testimony and because they claim that defense has not precleared the evidence through the process of a Daubert hearing. However, neither of those preconditions apply here because the CSLI information that the defense intends to introduce through the testimony of Mittelstadt is not being offered through expert testimony and Mittelstadt will not be offering any opinion testimony"
"1. District Attorney Willis began a romantic relationship with attorney Nathan Wade prior to hiring Mr. Wade as a special assistant district attorney, under a limited contract with a cap on the amount he could charge the County, on or about November 1, 2021. The next day, Mr. Wade filed for divorce from his wife;
Roman says #FaniWillis and Wade lied about cohabitating togther
The Open Records law exists:
"Plaintiff did not reveal to Defendant his appointment by Ms. Willis or the substantial income he has been receiving throughout this divorce case as a result of that appointment, and Defendant did not discover the same until much later in the proceedings. Plaintiff also left Defendant with little means of financial support while simultaneously spending tens of thousands of dollars per month on a very lavish lifestyle. Plaintiff willfully failed to comply with his discovery obligations in the very divorce case that he initiated, which led to the Court holding him contempt of this Court's Order on Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery"
Here’s a link to the entire opinion. The bottom line, any mask mandate must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to serve that need. To meet this standard, strong evidence that #masks are effective would need to be presented.