The Story Teller Profile picture
Feb 10, 2024 28 tweets 27 min read Read on X
Waqf Act - A tool of land grabbing given by the Indian National Congress to the Muslims of the Bharat

1. The Hindus who came to India after partition from Pakistan, their properties in Pakistan were occupied by the Muslims and the Government of Pakistan. But the Government of India gave the land of Muslims who went from India to Pakistan to the Waqf Boards. After which the Waqf Board Act was passed in the year 1954. But in the year 1995, by changing the Waqf Board Act, the Waqf Boards were given unlimited rights to acquire land. After which the property of the Waqf Board increased. In the year 2009, the properties of the Waqf Board were spread over four lakh acres of land. Which has now more than doubled. According to the data of Waqf Management System of India, at present there are a total 8,54,509 properties with Waqf Boards which are spread over more than eight lakh acres of land. You will be surprised to know that after the Army and Railways, LARGEST LANDBAK is with the Waqf Boards.

2. The acquisition of land by the Catholic Church of India worth more than 20,000 crores, can be attributed mainly to the Indian Churches Act of 1927, which was implemented during the British dominion. Under this act, the British dominion leased the lands acquired through their conquests in various wars at discounted rates to aid in the propagation of Christianity among the populace. This enabled the Church to acquire land across India and establish numerous institutions, including religious ones, as mentioned earlier, to disseminate their message to the masses. However, the legal status of this land acquisition remains a topic of debate.

3. The Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925 was passed by the Punjab legislative council in British India to resolve a dispute over the management of Sikh gurdwaras. The law legally defined Sikh identity and brought Sikh gurdwaras under the control of an elected body of orthodox Sikhs. As per this act any structure notified by the government as Gurudwara shall fall under the definition provided in this act along with all the properties associated with the notified structure as Gurudwara.

4. So what about Hindu temples and religious places.
Let's us explore, how Nehru and Congress did their best to wreck the Hindu Temples and their cultural heritage by creating articles in the constitution of the Bharat to give free hand to the minorities especially waqf board and the Catholic church to amass a billion-dollar empire of the properties without any abandon.Image
1. So what happened to the Hindu Temples?

Until the British came to India, temples were managed by local communities. They were centers of dance and art, and at the heart of a massive, decentralized trade network.
Every temple had charitable endowments, including property given to temples, for the benefit of the community. The benefits included rest houses, pathshalas, gaushalas, and institutions for the advancement of education and feeding of the poor.

For the British agenda of colonization and conversions to succeed, the temple organization had to be weakened. So, temples were brought under government control mainly in south India because not too many temples in the north possessed such massive property or wealth. The British introduced The Madras Regulation VII of 1817 to do this.

In 1840, there was a directive from the East India Company to return the temples to their trustees, because Christian missionaries, in India and abroad, did not like the idea of Christians managing Hindu temples.
Thus, temple management was slowly, handed over to trustees and in case of prominent temples to Mutts by 1845. The Board of Revenue supervised the administration of large temples.

Next came The Religious Endowments Act 1863, which handed over temple administration to the trustees from the British government.
The primary purposes of worship and utilization of funds for the upkeep of temples were never lost sight of by the Mutathipatis or other trustees.

Hundreds of temples in the Madras Presidency were handed over to the respective trustees with the government playing little or no role in supervising them. Trustees ran the temple following the tenets applicable to the temple.

All was well till the British introduced The Madras Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1925. It drew large protests from Muslims and Christians. Thus, it was redrafted to exclude them, made applicable to Hindus only and renamed as the Madras Hindu Religious and Endowments Act 1927.

In 1925, the Sikh Gurdwaras Act was passed that brought gurdwaras under the control of an elected body of Sikhs. So the British had one set of laws for Hindus and another for the Sikhs, Muslims and Christians.

Even today, Hindu educational institutions, temples, religious traditions are subject to government control and judicial review, look for instance at the Supreme Court order on the Sabarimala temple.

But a radical change was introduced in the legislation by way of Act XII of 1935, through which temples could be notified by the government and their administration taken over. This way the Hindu Religious Endowment Board assumed powers to take over and administer temples. The board consisted of three to five members.

Indic scholar and author @subhash_kak wrote:
"The state governments have based their policy on the recommendation of the Hindu Religious Endowments Commission headed by CP Ramaswamy Aiyer in 1960 that Hindu temples and maths be considered as belonging to the public. The government entered into the religious sphere when the Indian government was very aggressively pushing state control over all aspects of Indian life."

Post-Independence, the Tamil Nadu government took control of temples and their funds by an act passed in 1951 called the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951.The act’s provisions were challenged in the Madras High Court and subsequently in the Supreme Court in the Shirur Math case. Many provisions of the 1951 act were struck down by both courts. With some changes, The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act was passed in 1959. The Congress was in power in the country then.

It said that the purpose of the act was to see to it that religious trusts and institutions are properly administered and ensure that the income is not misused.
The new act abolished the Hindu Religious Endowments Board and vested its authority in the Hindu religious and charitable endowments department of the government headed by a commissioner.

This act opened up a template for other state governments to wrest control of the Hindu Temples and to control their functioning and management while Waqf Board, SGPC and Catholic church of India remain free at will for their functioning and management through their respective bodies with quasi-judicial powers.
The India Church Act of 1927 and the Independence Act 1947 have made Indian Church Trustees as the absolute owners of all church properties in the country. Both Catholic church of India and Church of south India are owners of a billion dollar land and property empire.Image
Image
Image
Image
2. How Congress's policy of appeasement created Waqf Board?

Congress created Waqf Act 1954 to give all properties left behind by the Muslims immigrating to Pakistan to the new body created under the tutelage of the Central Waqf Council.
Since then, Waqf Act was amended multiple times by the respective congress governments and in 1995, Congress Government created Waqf Act, 1995 to give judicial and adminisrative powers to the Waqf Board.
Till now 30 Waqf boards are functioning in India:
Andhra Pradesh Waqf Board
Assam Wakf Board
Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board
Bihar State Shia Wakf Board
Chhattisgarh Wakf Board
Delhi Wakf Board
Gujarat Wakf Board
Haryana Waqf Board
Himachal Wakf Board
Jharkhand State Sunni Waqf Board
Karnataka Wakf Board
Kerala Wakf Board
Madhya Pradesh Wakf Board
Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs
Manipur Wakf Board
Meghalaya Wakf Board
Odisha Wakf Board
Punjab Wakf Board
Rajasthan Board of Muslim Wakfs
Tamilnadu Wakf Board
Tripura Wakf Board
Telangana Waqf Board
Uttarakhand Wakf Board
Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board; Shia Wakf Board (Yogi Adityanath Govt issued notification to abolish them)
West Bengal Wakf Board
Andaman Nicobar Wakf Board
Chandigarh Wakf Board
Laxdweep Wakf Board
Dadra & Nagar Haveli Wakf Board
Puducherry Wakf Board

In 2005 The Sachar Committee was created with a seven-member high-level committee established in March 2005 by former Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The committee was headed by former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Rajinder Sachar to study the social, economic and educational condition of Muslims in India.
The committee prepared a 403-page report, titled "Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India: A Report", and presented it to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, on 30 November 2006, 20 months after obtaining the terms of reference from the Prime Minister's Office.
The Sachar Committee highlighted and presented its suggestions on how to remove impediments those preventing Indian Muslims from fully participating in the economic, political, and social mainstream of Indian life. The report was the first of its kind to reveal the "backwardness" (a term used in Indian academic and legal discourse for historically dispossessed or economically vulnerable communities, not meant to be pejorative) of Indian Muslims. An issue highlighted was that while Muslims constitute 14% of the Indian population, they only comprise 2.5% of the Indian bureaucracy. The Sachar Committee concluded that the conditions facing Indian Muslims was below that of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
In response to the committee's findings, Finance Minister P. Chidambaram proposed an increase to the National Minorities Development and Finance Corporation's (NMDFC) budget, citing new duties and expanded outreach that the institution would take on to implement the committee's recommendations.
()
This report gave a new validation to the already emboldened Waqf Board under the rule of the congress.
But in 2011 Justice Shashvat Kumar, who headed the Shashvat Committee prepared a status report on Muslims in India and the finding of this report was that Nationwide, Waqf properties constitute a land bank worth Rs. 1.2 lakh crore and could have generated annual returns of Rs. 12,000 crores but yielded only Rs. 163 crores and found that there was "a severe shortage of senior government officers who are Muslim to manage waqf affairs. A separate cadre would mean officers who are not only permanent but also qualified enough".

So, Congress Government again amended Waqf Act in 2013 to redefine the "Waqf" and increase its power to notify and takeover properties it considered as Waqf properties.
In the next part of the thread we will see how Hindus of the Bharat had to undergo this religious tyranny gifted by the Congress to the Waqf Baord.minorityaffairs.gov.in/show_content.p…https://www.drishtikone.com/gyanvapi-mosque-petition/
3. The Tyranny of the Waqf Board

In the year 2009, the properties of the Waqf Board were spread over four lakh acres of land. Which has now more than doubled. Whereas the land in the country is the same as it was before....!!!!
So, how is the Waqf Board’s land increasing?
Wherever the Waqf Board gets the boundary wall of the cemetery done in the country, it considers the land around it as its property. Similarly, illegal shrines and mosques are gradually declared by the Waqf Board as their property. In simple language, people call this encroachment and the Waqf Board has got the right to this encroachment.

So how this miraculous property growth happened?

Let's look at certain provisions of the Waqf Act, thanks to the Congress governments:

1. Section 3 of the Waqf Act, 1995 states that if the Waqf "thinks" that the land belongs to a Muslim, then it is the property of the Waqf. It should be noted here that just "thinking of Waqf" is enough, Waqf Board does not need any proof for this.
If Waqf accepts that your property is not yours but Waqf Board’s, then you cannot even go to court. You can approach the Waqf Tribunal Court.

2. Section 85 of the Waqf Act states that if you cannot satisfy the Waqf Board Tribunal that it is your own land, then you will be ordered to vacate the land. The decision of the Tribunal will be final. No court, not even the Supreme Court, can change the decision of the Waqf Tribunal.

3. Section 40 of the Waqf Act states that when the Waqf Board lays a claim on the land of a person, it is not the responsibility of the Waqf Board to prove the claim on the land, but the real owner of the land has to prove the ownership of his land.
That is, if the Waqf Board claims any land, then understand that the Waqf Board has become the owner of the land.

So now apply all the IQ you have and decide for yourself that how will you fight with this religious jigoism, if Waqf Board claims that your house is a Waqf property....!!!!

Video Credit: @JaipurDialogues
4. The Congress minority card of the Secularism

In 2014, just months before the elections, congress gifted 123 prime properties in Delhi to the Waqf board.
The very same Congress which keeps harping the sermon of Secularism, opened its dirty playbook of religious appeasement and opened a jackpot for the Waqf Board.
These properties are located in high-value areas such as Connaught Place, Janpath, Ashok Road, Babar Road, Lodhi Road, Mathura Road, Pandara Road, Jungpura, Karol Bagh, and Daryaganj.
Later on, in the year 2023, Modi Govt asked Delhi Waqf Board to hand over the properties to Govt of India or else provide the documents for the ownership.
Waqf Board complied silently without any victim card 😂
5. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

Waqf board has made some very strange claims to the properties across the Bharat:
In the year 2018, the the UP Sunni Waqf Board claimed that Taj Mahal is the property of the Waqf Board..😂

The Waqf board counsel told the bench of Justice Deepak Misra, CJI that Taj indeed is a Waqf property.

The Supreme Court of India asked the UP Sunni Waqf board to share the "WAQFNAMA" (A deed or document signed by the owner of the property to pledge the property to the Waqf board) signed by the Shahjahan in 1631 to prove that indeed the Taj mahal is a Waqf property belonging to the UP Sunni board..!!!
Bench also comprised of the present CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice AM Khanwilkar.
Honorable court dismissed the case as the waste of the time..😂😂Image
6. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

Waqf Board had written an application to Gujarat High Court in 2021, staking claim on the ownership of two islands in Bet Dwarka in Devbhoomi Dwarka. As per a report in Gujarati daily Divya Bhaskar, the hearing of the application was heard in the court of Justice Sangeeta Vishen.
The Waqf committee in its application claimed that the ownership of two islands on Bet Dwarka island belongs to the Waqf Board.
On hearing this, the Gujarat High Court expressed disproval and hit out, “Are you aware of what you are saying? How can Waqf Board claim ownership of land in Krishnanagari?’ and refused to hear the application.

There are total 8 small islands in the Bet Dwarka cluster. The Sunni Waqf Board has written application staking ownership claims on them. They have claimed that the land on the nearby islands in Bet Dwarka belong to the Waqf Board. On hearing this, the High Court was upset and asked them to reread their application and submit another revised application in vacation court.Image
7. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

In 2022 Tamilnadu Waqf boar claimed that the entire village of Thiruchenthurai is a waqf property...!!!
Thiruchenthurai is a village located on the Kavery river's bank in Tiruchirapalli district. It also has a 1,500-year-old Sundareswarar Temple.
When Islam itself was created 200 years after the construction of the temple, how can waqf board claim that Temple is a waqf property along with the entire village..!!!

The real shocker came to the villagers when a local attempted to sell his agricultural land. The man named Rajagopal, was informed by the local authorities that his 1.2-acre plot of property belonged to the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board and that in order to sell it, he needed to get a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the board, according to a report by India Today.
The sub-office registrar also reportedly gave him a 20-page document claiming ownership of the land from the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. Puzzled by this information concerning his own land, Rajagopal looked through his property paperwork but found no such claims.

Villagers who could not initially believe the claims soon after formed a queue outside the district administration's headquarters. There was no evidence regarding Muslims residing in the area, and papers proved that resettlement took place in 1927-1928. There was also no information about Muslims holding property in the area, the report further said.

However, the Waqf Board had written a 20-page letter to 12 registration offices in Trichy, claiming property in numerous districts.

An land and revenue official said that all of the lands in Thiruchendurai village belong to the Waqf Board, and anyone wishing to sell it must obtain a NOC from the board in Chennai.Image
Image
8. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

In 2021 locals in Kodavoor village in Udupi Taluk of Karnataka had managed to reverse an order that had 'granted' land where once stood a Jain Basadi to the waqf board. Through a government notification issued on 22 June 2021, the Department of Revenue had denotified the grant of land to the Waqf board and taken the same under its own administration.

Those representing the illegal structure have been claiming it is a mosque of the Tippu era, but there is enough evidence to prove that there once stood a Jain Basadi.Image
9. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

The ancient Jain temple at Kodavooru (Kodavooru is a small town belonging to the temple city of Udupi in Karnataka) was taken over by the Waqf board in 2021.
The ancient Jain temple at Kodavooru was sacked and vandalised by Tipu Sultan more than 200 years ago, the Jain temple and its premises consisting of 67 cents of land was under government control till 14th Januray 2021.
A Muslim man is said to have started living at the premises by putting up a small tent some years back. Within a period of time, many more Muslims started occupying the temple land. Recently they started claiming ownership of the place, following which the Waqf Board staked claim to the property and claimed ownership to it formally.
The ancient historic Jain Temple and its 67 cent land property in Kodavuru which was under the Revenue department of Karnataka government has now been transferred to the Waqf Board.Image
10. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

The Andhra Pradesh Waqf Board had claimed the ownership of 1,654.32 acres of Manikonda village and had said that the land belonged to Dargah Hazrat Hussain Shah Wali.
In 2022 The Supreme Court ruled the decades-old litigation regarding the Manikonda Jagir land in favour of the state government saying that ‘all the lands are held with the state government only’.
The final verdict pronounced by a division bench comprising Justice Hemnath Gupta and Justice V Ramasubramanian provided much-needed relief to several public and private institutes besides individual landowners. The lands in question are situated at Manikonda Jagir Village, Gandipet Mandal of Rangareddy district and value more than Rs 50,000 crore in market value.Image
Image
11. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board
In 2022 Chattisgarh Waqf Board claimed the property rights on the land of hundreds of acres in Nayapara, Kaysthpara, Press Complex, Panchsheel Nagar, Local Tehseel office complex..!!!
When locals started an agitation against this strange claim of the Waqf board, govt officials downplayed the matter and promised to look into the matter with Waqf board...!!!
()Image
12 Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board
In southwest Delhi, a person decided to construct a house on his own land, but he got the shock of his life when he came to know that the plot, he considers his own, is actually a waqf property...!!!!
When plot owner contested the Waqf board claim and asked waqf board persons to show the ownership documents, they could not show anything and just went back..!!!!!
13. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board
The famous Gyanwapi case where it has been clearly proved that how a thousand of years old temple was destroyed and a mosque was constructed over it, clearly worked as a great reminder of Muslim takeover of Hindu temples and associated lands by using Waqf Board as a tool thanks to the Congress patronage of the minority of 20 crores for last 70 years..!!!Image
14. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

The famous Idgaah ground in Bengaluru was claimed by the Waqf board but the administration shot down all such shenanigans...!!!Image
15. Strange Property Claims Made by the Waqf Board

Waqf board had claimed the ancient mound OF Lakshagriha Baghpat near Delhi, a historical site mentioned in the ancient epic Mahabharata, as a waqf property.
The dispute started in 1970 when one Mukim Khan then "muttawali" (caretaker) of the Muslim graveyard initiated legal proceedings to claim the entire 100 bigha land around the graveyard as waqf property and requested the court to stop Hindus from encroaching upon it.
After 53 years, in Feb 2024 court gave its decision in Favour of the local Hindu community who hold the site in great reverence as a place where Pandva'S LAKSHAGRIHA PALCE STOOD DURING THE TIMES OF THE MAHABHARATA.Image
16. The sheer audacity of the Waqf board is there for all to see when it did claim a historical site belonging to the Mahabharat era...!!!
Finally, it took the Hindu community of the Baghpat 53 years of the legal battle to reclaim what was already its own cultural heritage.
This is the gift Nehru, and his dynasty gave us...!!!
17. The summary of the Congress secularism is aptly reflected in the Waqf board patronized by the Congress since the days of the Nehru...!!!
18. Here is a wakeup call and a very clear message to all from Shri @AshwiniUpadhyay Ji
It's about time now
Wake all you secular sleeping Hindus\
Before the Waqf board knocks on your door
and tell you that your house is a waqf property...!!!
19. And here is a cold-blooded example of, how our politicians are destroying our Hindu culture and Sanatan values, and temples through the reckless religious appeasement of one community at the cost of the 100 crore Hindus of the Bharat.
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal has gifted more than 100 crores to the Delhi Waqf Board and increased the salary of the Imam to 18000 INR/ Month while that of the helpers to 16,000/ Month...!!!
Watch the video and see how he is exhorting the Muslim community for his selfish political gains.
20. An example of the appeasement by the Delhi Govt, year 2019 (though old but very relevant)
Mohd. Minhajuddin pelted stones on school buses, burnt public property & created mayhem in Jamia Nagar & adjacent areas on 14 Dec 2019. He was arrested by Delhi police.

Later on Kejriwal's AAP govt's minister Amanatullah khan who is part of Waqf Board has offered him a GOVT JOB & Rs 5 LAKH cash REWARD....!!!!Image
Image
21. An example of the state patronage and demographic takeover
Kolkata mayor and TMC minister Firhad Hakim proudly announcing that one day half of the Bengal will speak Urdu...!!!
22. What happened at Haldwani is a stark and dark reminder of the things to come up in future if we Hindus do not wake up to stop the silent demographic takeover of our holy places, temples and Hindu majority areas in the rural India.
In Haldwani, allegedly motorcycles were pre-filled with full-tank petrol by Islamists so that they could use the petrol to make petrol bombs. Some reports suggest Islamists attempted to set female cops on fire.
All this for stopping a govt drive to remove an illegal building the govt land by the DARA HUA MINORITY COMMUNITY...!!!!
23. This video by @ambujbh from a slum of Rohingya s settled illegally in Haldwani, shows what the demographic invasion is and how it is funded by the institutions like Waqf board under the garb of the charity for the poor...!!!
Again, thanks to our politicians...!!
@ambujbh 24. It took us 500 years to reclaim our greatest heritage, that is Shri Ram Mandir.
If we do not learn from it, nothing can save us from becoming 8th grade citizens as @ARanganathan72 Sir said in his book.
@ambujbh @ARanganathan72 25. Be very very proud of your Sanatan Lineage which older than 10,000 years.

Sanatan is the light
Dharma is the path

Share this message with all
Let the light of Sanatan, wake up all sleeping Hindus

Radhe Radhe

Blessings from Shri Krishna
27. They will stop you
They will subjugate you.
They will give you temptations.
They will try to kill you
They will try to demoralize you.

But
you don't need to stop.
till
we reclaim every single temple.
every single place of Sanatan's cultural heritage
That is the fight we all need to fight.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Story Teller

The Story Teller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IamTheStory__

Feb 5
FROM THE EPSTEIN FILES:
Unsealed Doc EFTA02420041 confirms: In 2010, Kapil Sibal & Sam Pitroda attended a high-society Gala in NYC hosted by the International Institute of Education (IIE).
🧵
Tickets: $1,250. Tables: $12,500.
Why does this matter?
Look at who funds the IIE to run "India Centric" programs:
🔹 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Health "Capacity
Building")
🔹 Ford Foundation ("Social Change" Leaders)
🔹 George Soros’ OSF (Civil Society Scholars)
🔹 Rockefeller Foundation (Smart Power India)
🔹 Carnegie Corp (Academic Partnerships)
and
Henry Luce foundation (Luce Scholars India)

Mr. Sibal was "honored" at this event. Connecting the dots yet? 🦅🇮🇳

#EpsteinFiles #KapilSibal #SamPitroda #Soros #IndiaImage
1. Rockefeller Smart Power India (SPI)

1. Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Board of Directors)
The most significant "connection" is familial and social rather than professional.

Family Tie (Raghuram Rajan): Mukund Rajan is the brother of Raghuram Rajan (former RBI Governor). Raghuram Rajan.

2. Jaideep Mukherji (CEO)
The connection here is functional and governance-based. Under his leadership, Smart Power India has partnered with state governments to implement energy projects, including those ruled by the Congress party.

Rajasthan Government Partnership (Ashok Gehlot Era): SPI worked closely with the Congress-led Rajasthan government (under former CM Ashok Gehlot) to modernize the state's power distribution.

Chhattisgarh Government (Bhupesh Baghel Era): SPI has engaged with the Chhattisgarh Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA) during the Congress administration to promote decentralized renewable energy (DRE) solutions for rural livelihoods.Image
2. Luce Scholars Program (India Placements)

Radhika Shroff

Role: Member, Board of Directors (Henry Luce Foundation).

Significance: Appointed to the board recently (August 2025), she is a key voice in the foundation's governance. Notably, she is herself an alumna of the Luce Scholars Program (placed in Thailand previously). She is a Managing Director at Nuveen (a major investment management firm).

he Henry Luce Foundation does not have its own office in India. Instead, the Luce Scholars Program is administered in Asia by The Asia Foundation. The "leadership" that manages the India placements—selecting host organizations, mentoring scholars, and handling logistics—sits within The Asia Foundation's New Delhi office.

Nandita Baruah
Role: Country Representative, India (The Asia Foundation).
Responsibility: As the head of the India office, she oversees the team that facilitates Luce Scholars' entry into India. Her team is responsible for identifying the "host organizations" (NGOs, think tanks, cultural bodies) where scholars work.

Centre for Policy Research (CPR) and SEWA (Self Employed Women’s Association host Luce scholars in India for mentorship programs.Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2
🚨 BREAKING: The Activist Industrial Complex has found a new enemy.
It’s not a politician.
It’s not a guru.
It’s code.
Ladies and Gentlemen, say Hello to "The Brahmin AI." 🤖🙏
The new chapter in the global caste narrative has dropped, and it’s more ridiculous than you think.
A Thread 🧵👇
#AI #Caste #Tech

The Set Up
Finally, after classifying all the lesser mortals under the sky, the "Seculars," the Anti-Caste Activists, and the Narrative Builders have run out of humans to cancel. So, they turned to the servers.
Apparently, Python scripts have a Varna now. 🐍📉

The Core Argument
Let’s check: How much BRAHMIN is the AI❓
Is ChatGPT waking up at 4 AM to do Sandhyavandanam?
Does Gemini refuse to eat onions?
No.
But according to the new "Academic Polarization" playbook, if an algorithm prioritizes logic, pattern recognition, and merit, it is inherently oppressive.

The "Why" ?
Why is this narrative being pushed? Because Tech was the last frontier based on competence, not identity. By labeling AI as "Casteist" or "Brahminical," the goal is simple: Control the input.
Rig the output.
Import the "Reservation" model into the Neural Networks. 🧠🚫

The Punchline
"The Brahmin AI" is a boogeyman created to keep the grievance industry alive.
If the AI gives you facts you don't like, it’s not an error. It’s "Digital Untouchability."
The mental gymnastics required to link Silicon Valley code to Ancient Indian social structures deserves a Gold Medal. 🥇🤸‍♂️

The Call to Action
Make no mistake. This isn't about equality. It's about colonizing the digital space with the same broken politics that ruined the physical one.
Don't let them gaslight you.
RT if you think Code has no Caste. 🔄
Like if you trust Math more than Activists. ❤️Image
1. The trail

Historically if you look at the kind of damage which has been done by the leftists academics to India's institutes is unfathomable.
Pre 1947
We had European scholars/ academics writing Christian missionary versions of our scriptures.
Post 1947
We have had our indigenous brown sepoys who took great pride in the desecration and distortion of of our scriptures, our social ethos and eidos while terming Ramayana and Mahabharata as a myth.

The latest UGC Equity guidelines was just another extension of this Academic - Activist - Institutional - Industrial Complex.

Just for a memory shake up, check the below list and see for yourself!!
Do our children deserve this kind of divisive, polarizing rants in our academic institutes in the name of research funded by Tax Payor money??
All of these 86 publications are based on:

1. Ramayana Mahabharat are a myth.
2. Upper caste dominance in academic institutes
3. Upper caste academic depriving lower caste academics from resources and faculty positions
4. Upper caste academics control everything in academicsImage
2. The Loudmouths

Even if you check left aligned media platforms, they are super busy in driving this propaganda to the hilt and with total shameless propaganda bordering very close to the proverbial profanities!!Image
Read 29 tweets
Feb 1
🚨Explosive Detsils on Mira Nair, mother of New York socialist fraud Zohran Mamdani🧵
Mira Nair married her teacher in Harvard.
Guess what was the name of the teacher and her first husband??
- Mitchell Epstein
Looks like Mira Nair had a special fetish for the Epstein Surname!!
Though Mitch Epstein is not all related to Jeffrey Epstein.Image
2. Meera Nair founded Salaam Baalak trust an orphan children non profit post her su cess with movie Salaam Bombay.
This trust is headed and run by her mother Dr Praveen Nair. Image
Image
3. Though Salaam Balak trust seems to be a any other non profit but actually if you explore its funding trends you will understand that it is a well entrenched well funded entity.

1. IMPACT – USAID/FHI Street Children HIV Prevention
Duration: ~August 1999 to June 2002
Amount: $104,728
Funded by: USAID (through Family Health International)

2. Samarth – USAID/FHI Demonstration Project
Start: October 2006
Duration: Project continued several years into the 2010s (through ~2011) as a USAID/FHI demonstration project on HIV/AIDS.
Funding: USAID funds channeled through FHI (exact grant amount not disclosed publicly in SBT reports).
Read 26 tweets
Jan 29
🧵 THE ANATOMY OF LAWFARE: The Indira Jaising & Anand Grover Files

How do you dismantle a nation's sovereignty using its own laws? 🇮🇳⚖️

A deep dive into the funding, foreign connections, and "anti-establishment" networks of India's most powerful legal power couple.

A thread on Money, Influence, and Dissent.

Read on..........Image
1. The Money heist

Between 2006-2015, the Lawyers Collective (LC) received approx. INR 32.39 CRORE in foreign contributions.

Who paid?
🇺🇸 Ford Foundation: ~₹7.2 Cr
🇨🇭 Open Society (Soros): ~₹4.1 Cr
🇺🇸 Levi Strauss: Part of ~₹15.3 Cr US total

Why? "Secularism" & "Policy Advocacy."

Much has been written about the foreign funding received by Indira Jaisingh and her husband Anand Grover through their non profit "The Lawyers Collective", especially form The Open Society Foundations but two organisations where both husband and wife were members and fierce advocates are:

1. Committee for Release of Political Prisoners (CRPP)

The CRPP is a "frontal organization" for the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
Investigations by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and state police forces (e.g., Telangana Police) have found that the CRPP receives funding and directives directly from the CPI (Maoist) to carry out activities that align with the banned outfit's agenda.
The NIA has labeled the CRPP, along with other organizations like the Persecuted Prisoners Solidarity Committee (PPSC), as a frontal organization of the CPI (Maoist) in its charge sheets

Rona Wilson, the Public Relations Secretary of the CRPP, was arrested in 2018 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for alleged links to the CPI (Maoist) and for facilitating funding for their activities. Balla Ravindranath, the general secretary, has also been named in police affidavits describing the organization as a Maoist front.

2. Indian People's Tribunal (IPT)

The Indian People's Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights (IPT), also known as the Independent People's Tribunal, was established in 1993 as an initiative of the Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) and the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC). Consequently, its operations are supported by the funding ecosystem of its parent bodies.
both the Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) and the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC) have received massive funding from the Open Society foundations of George Soros till 2016 just like Indira Jaisisngh's The Lawyers Collective.Image
3. THE ASG CONFLICT: SERVING INDIA OR DONORS?

While Indira Jaising was the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) of India (2009-2014), representing the sovereign state, she allegedly received ~₹96 Lakh from foreign funds.

Violating FCRA? The Home Ministry thought so. You can't serve the Govt and foreign donors simultaneously.
Read 19 tweets
Jan 28
The incredible true story of how a single recovered PL-15 transformed the Astra missile from a standard BVR into a sniper rifle for AWACS. 🧵
During the Operation Sindoor, A Pakistani pilot panic-fired a Chinese PL-15 into the grey zone towards a IAF Rafale Fighter. He thought he was safe.
He wasn’t.
The missile didn’t explode. It landed intact. And in 4 hours, DRDO engineers uncovered a secret that just boosted the IAF’s kill zone by 50%.
Here is the story of how a "dud" missile became India’s greatest strategic windfall.
China stole the tech from the US. Sold it to Pakistan. And Pakistan accidentally airmailed it to India..😂

The PL-15 "game changer" wasn't the motor—it was the fuel. CL-20.

How DRDO cracked the "impossible" chemistry in 6 months to turn the Astra Mk-1 into a 160km monster without changing a single bolt.

Look at this image. That’s not just scrap metal. That’s a billion-dollar R&D budget delivered to DRDO by a foolish adversary.

Because of one unexploded PL-15, the Indian Air Force just collapsed a 10-year development timeline into 6 months.

The tables have turned. Made in China. Refined in India. Ready to burn. 🔥

They claimed it was a 200km Apex Predator. Physics proved them wrong. DRDO proved them obsolete.
#IndianAirForce #DRDO #DefenseNews #AstraMissile #Geopolitics #India #China #MilitaryTech #PL15Image
1. The Incident:
A Pakistani J-10 pilot found himself locked up by an Indian Rafale. Panic set in.
He didn't have the position, but he had a weapon his Chinese suppliers promised was an apex predator: The PL-15.
He fired blindly into the Grey Zone, praying for a miracle.
The miracle didn't happen. The missile burned hot, exhausted its first pulse, and ran out of kinetic energy miles short. It became a lawn dart. It tumbled out of the sky, skipped like a stone off the soft earth, and came to rest... intact.Image
2. The Gift

Standard procedure for a lost advanced weapon is immediate airstrikes. You bomb the wreck until it's dust.
But the adversary was in disarray. Within minutes, Indian special response teams were moving. This wasn't a recovery; it was a snatch-and-grab of the highest order.
Four hours later, the PL-15 was under X-ray scanners at a DRDO complex in Hyderabad.
Engineers didn't care about the radar seeker or software.
They wanted to know the range. How was China claiming 200km on a missile that size? The geometry didn't make sense.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 27
🚨 UGC Equity Guidelines Impact on the General Category
🧵
If an "Equity" rule creates a new marginalized group, is it still Equity? 🤔
The new #UGC 2026 guidelines effectively strip General Category students of protection against reverse discrimination.
No safeguards. No representation.
Are we witnessing the institutionalization of bias in the name of solving it?
Here is a brief explainer of this debate with data backed points.
Do read..............Image
1. Definition of Caste-Based Discrimination

Defines discrimination as any unfair, biased, or differential treatment based on caste, religion, race, gender, place of birth, or disability, explicitly extending protections to SC, ST, OBC, and other marginalized groups. Excludes general category as potential victims in the framing.

Impact on General Category Students
Creates a presumption that discrimination primarily affects reserved categories, potentially leading to "reverse bias" where general category students are seen as inherent perpetrators without safeguards, fostering divisions and a chilling effect on campus interactions. This exacerbates competition, as general category enrollment has declined from 56.9% in 2010-11 to 39.2% in 2022-23, amid rising reserved category shares.

What Data says:
UGC data shows a 118.4% rise in reported caste-based discrimination cases (from 173 in 2019–20 to 378 in 2023–24, totaling 1,160 complaints), but critics argue the definition marginalizes general category students by ruling them out as victims.

Enrollment data indicates SC/ST/OBC share rose from 43.1% in 2010-11 to 60.8% in 2022-23, reducing general category access.

The regulations' wording "particularly against" reserved groups implies exclusivity, raising fears of uneven enforcement.

NEP 2020 supports equity for SEDGs but does not address general category safeguards, contributing to perceptions of systemic disadvantage..
2. Mandate for Equal Opportunity Centres (EOCs) and Equity Committees

Requires every HEI to establish EOCs for promoting inclusion and supporting disadvantaged students, along with equity committees that must include representatives from SC, ST, OBC, PwD, and women, but no mandatory representation for general category members.

Impact on General Category Students

Leads to one-sided committees that may presume guilt against general category students in complaints, eroding trust in impartial investigations and increasing vulnerability to misuse for personal or academic rivalries. This is compounded by higher dropout risks for general students due to stress, with 75% of disadvantaged students reporting discrimination in a 2019 study, indirectly heightening general category fears.

Committees lack general category representation, potentially creating biased bodies that prioritize reserved groups, as highlighted in protests and resignations.

What Data says:
A 2019 IIT Delhi study found 75% of historically disadvantaged students faced discrimination, but this setup could widen caste divisions and make general category students feel unsafe.

NEP 2020 calls for institutional plans for SEDG participation but omits balanced representation, leading to uneven resource allocation.

UGC resolved 1,052 of 1,160 complaints (90.68%), but pending cases rose from 18 to 108, signaling backlog risks for all.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(