The RVOT or PA Doppler has a lot of underutilized potential for hemodynamic monitoring of the RV #ThePeoplesVentricle
🧵On the physiology of the RVOT/PA Doppler. Simplified understandings. Corrections are welcome!😃
#FOAMcc #EchoFirst #Cardiotwitter #FOAMed #Medtwitter #POCUS
VTI reflects stroke volume, but values are much lower than for LVOT. Lower cut-off for 60-79 year olds is actually around 10 cm.
Monitoring changes are likely more useful. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg…
AcT and Vmax/AT both reflects RV afterload. Increased afterload reduces AT and Vmax/AT.
➡️AcT correlates with mPAP and PVR. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR…
Notching in the Doppler waveform represents wave reflections from vascular stiffening and the "vascular source" of RV afterload.
➡️For details on waveforms & physiology➡️
➡️DT is a potential quantitative metric of wave reflections doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2… doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg…
PET reflects the time the RV takes to overcome PA diastolic pressure.
➡️PET is increased in PHT, likely due to RV-PA uncoupling
➡️PET correlates well with RVFAC
➡️PET increases during mechanical inspiration doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR… doi.org/10.1093/ejecho… doi.org/10.1016/1053-0…
ET reflects the ratio of displacement/velocity of fiber shortening - at least for the LV
➡️ET is decreased in PHT
➡️ET does not ⬆️after fluids, but decreases during inspiration in fluid responsive patients. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR… doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR… doi.org/10.1097/000005…
Lastly, PET/ET-ratio is also a robust marker for ventricular function (higher ratio is bad).
➡️PET/ET-ratio increases during increased RV afterload from inspiration doi.org/10.1016/1053-0…
unroll @threadreaderapp
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ The goal of monitoring is
1⃣to detecting small and early changes
2⃣so that therapies can help patients.
For successful monitoring, the measurements must be precise and acquired rapidly and effortlessly. Neither #EchoFirst nor #POCUS fulfil these criteria.
3/ Eyeballing is rapid, effortless, and OK for diagnosing LV dysfunction.
But eyeballing is NOT precise because it categorises LV function.
Changes in LVEF from 45 to 30% are important, yet still in the same category ➡️ undetectable by categorical assessment.
1/ Ventriculoarterial coupling (#VAC) determines the harms and benefits of hemodynamic therapies.
VAC describes cardiac efficiency, and offers a complementary perspective to CO, MAP and tissue perfusion.
Let’s try to understand it🧵
#FOAMcc #FOAMed #MedTwitter #CardioTwitter
2/ VAC is the matching afterload (Ea) to contractility (Ees) and reflect the heart's energy efficiency.
VAC can be understood using the analogy of riding a bicycle.
3/ The resistance in the pedals represent afterload (Ea). Your leg strength represent contractility (Ees).
With too⬆️resistance in the pedals, you spend a lot of energy without moving forward and eventually give up. This is analogous to poor VAC progressing into cardiac failure.
3/ ...during that era, physiologists were focused on cardiac pressure/volume relationships. LVEF emerged as a metric reflecting cardiac volumes, thus filling an unmet need. doi.org/10.1161/01.cir…
1⃣ Can MAPSE redefine "the hyperdynamic heart?
The term "hyperdynamic LV" - EF > 55% - is misleading. It has no relation to a hyperdyanmic circulation; SV/CO. Someone bleeding to death has a hyperdynamic heart, but the circulation is life-threatening hypodynamic.
2/n
MAPSE is cardiac motion, and defining the hyperDYNAMIC heart as good cardiac motion makes perfect sense. Recent geometrical analysis of cardiac pumping shows that MAPSE is the main determinant of SV. Fig from @mugander: tinyurl.com/mxbfmcyk
Why? 3/n