Thread by @tracybeanz

🚨🚨Missouri v. Biden: Congressman file Amicus in support of free speech in Missouri v. Biden - set to be heard by the SCOTUS on 3/18. Words aren’t sufficient to explain how important it was that Liz be elected AG. Louisiana delivered.

https://twitter.com/aglizmurrill/status/1757118009372553355

This brief is great because the Judiciary committee subpoenaed the social media companies and received responsive documents OUTSIDE of what the government has already provided in the case, giving another angle to the malfeasance. And there’s no doubt at this point that it was malfeasance. See next post.

For example, we’ve just learned that FBI agent Elvis Chan perjured himself in his deposition.

🚨 Non-public documents obtained by the Committee and Select Subcommittee demonstrate that the federal bureaucrats, "disinformation" researchers, and non-profits understood that "content moderation" and combatting so-called misinformation is, in their words, "censorship." The Committee and Select Subcommittee have obtained October 2021 presentation slides with speaker's notes in which researchers pitch their Al-powered tool to NSF as a way for "policy makers at platforms" to "externaliz(e] the difficult responsibility of censorship.”

The Committee and the Select Subcommittee have obtained nonpublic emails and other documents that reveal an intentional effort by NSF to hide its role in funding these censorship and propaganda tools. From legal scholars like @JonathanTurley to conservative journalists, NSF tracked public criticisms of its work in funding censorship projects. In fact, NSF went so far as to develop a media strategy that considered blacklisting certain American media outlets because they were scrutinizing NSF's funding of censorship and propaganda tools.