Fighting between posters on here turns off new readers so I try to do it as little as possible. But this case instructive for reasons beyond personal animus: thread on anti-Trump PR “operations”(parlor tricks) from bad actors, whether it’s SPLC, feds, or holdover cuckservatives:
A very instructive case is @sovereignbrah ; I have no way of knowing who he is doing anti-Trump agitation for and it may well be that he’s sincere (and therefore an imbecyle); but in so many ways this is the case of the distilled pure facelord “influencer” on the make
@sovereignbrah Like a few other “right wing” influencers (Zherga, Tate, H Pearl) his bread and butter is “degeneracy” outrage porn: panels of OnlyFans sl00ts are filmed in a “discussion debate” where he presents “Christian values”; why pornsl00ts agree to be harangued like this, you can guess.
@sovereignbrah I suspect that many of these influencers have a financially symbiotic relationship with OnlyFans and similar type roasties who they promote under the guise of Denooncing. Even if no affiliate fees are directly traded the exchange is however still in publicity; cynical and vulgar
@sovereignbrah “Degeneracy”/moral outrage porn is ineffective and makes the right look dumb. It comes precaricatured by the left; inflooencers who do this simultaneously promote sl00ts and make themselves into patsies, the schoolmarm prude fall guy of Hollywood leftist comedies
@sovereignbrah For @sovereignbrah the Moral Majority church lady denunciation shtick also serves the purpose of opposing Trump. In 2015-6 Trump shifted the conversation on the right away from this religious moralism to concrete questions of migration, trade, and losing foreign interventions
@sovereignbrah It’s worth it to remember attacks on Trump from the 2015-6 conservatives. It’s that he was a degenerate playboy multiple divorcee who fucks prosties, is not religious, not a real conservative; Ted Cruz referring to urbanite “New York values” was characteristic
@sovereignbrah To this attack on Trump as a degenerate billionaire playboy urbanite who didn’t play the GOP’s decades long stock church lady piety game was later added the accusation that he’s a foreign (Russian) agent, a scam to which the GOP was 100% on board
@sovereignbrah By the way a personal aside; Elbridge Colby who now poses as a major Trump supporter and is most likely a CIA agent was very much for Cruz during the Wisconsin primary and at that time turned vehemently against Trump, according to a friend; though he surely hides this now
@sovereignbrah I mention this because I don’t think Colby is moral majority religious fanatic for Cruz, he just glommed on to that figure and presumably that posture because it’s a cheap way to press on what he perceives as fractures in Trump coalition; “we can turn those redblooded fundies…”
@sovereignbrah Anyway back to @sovereignbrah : aside from the Pharisaic denunciation of immorality shtick he also has a long record of promoting a myth that Donald Trump is the antichrist. He organized spaces with thousands of listeners and @DonnieDarkened to try to prove Trump is antichrist
The effort to insinuate the “Trump is Antichrist” meme is as you can see a long running thing by SPLC, progressives and other AWFL who probably opportunistically took note of 2016 GOPe hysteria and said “yea that’s right if you were a REAL christphag you’d believe this!”
During these spaces that were aimed at Evangelical voters to try to pry them from Trump he repeated the moral case against Trump, that he’s a blasphemer, a flashy talker etc; it’s obviously the christcuck GOP line but this time updated with language some think appeals to fundies
Regarding Evangelicals: Trump needs them to win. This is key understand. They vote at 90% for Trump (in 2016 they thoroughly rejected the usual Pharisaic GOP “Christ-first!” Snake oil hand on Bible candidates, to their credit). This why @sovereignbrah focus on “Antichrist”
@sovereignbrah Evangelical question bears on another obsession of the fake right, Zionism. Evangelicals are Zionist for theological reasons, which over time have also become social and operational reasons (rabbis and pastors as friends etc)
@sovereignbrah Trump needs Zionist Evangelicals to win but he also needs those parts of his coalition who object to American losing interventions especially in the Middle East. He can walk the line, but—@CityBureaucrat explain in recent important essay how anti-Trumpers can try exploit this
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat The point here isn’t to litigate the pros and cons of Zionism; Trump differed in “Zionism” not at all from the other candidates in 2016 or 2020; many who objected to this in Trump could and did look the other way—same as with his support for LGBT and affirmative action.
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat The point is that obsession with “Zionism” such as you saw during the Kanye campaign (entirely a product of DC GOP consulting firms) or on the fake right in general is a cynical way to try to turn especially Evangelicals and Catholics in Trump coalition against each other
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat In general attempt to shift conversation away from migration restriction, trade and common sense nonintervention to shrill denunciations of sexual immorality, religious fanaticism, and “Zionism” are ways the fake facelord “dissidents” try to set up antiTrump hysteria for 2024
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat When you see hysterical denunciations of Milei as Zionist and photos with rabbis, the fake right don’t care about that imo: they are attacking Trump by proxy because they know similar photos exist with Trump (and Putin) and they can be denounced later in same way
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat No one in Argentina cared about Israel or Palestine in last election; Argentina is not a player on international stage, neither Israel nor Palis need them. Milei’s religious oddities are known there for long time and taken about as seriously as his cloning his dogs (he’s insane)
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat Milei, a charismatic outsider who defeated an incumbent decades long left-populist gerontocratic government that had run Argentina into the ground, and won against all odds with vast support of youth, who is a Trump ally, crazy hair etc, is meant as an obvious proxy for Trump.
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat All @sovereignbrah does is a transparent positioning against Trump: efforts to prove he is the antichrist; denunciations of his playboy sexual immorality; obsessions with Zionism, Kushner, maybe his relationship with mentor Roy Cohn, etc all intended to cause split in Trump camp
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat Even the “Zionist” claim against Trump is actually a replay of the progressive-conservacuck accusations that he’s a Russian agent, only now with the country shifted (although as @CityBureaucrat points out, efforts are underway to show that Russia-Israel collaborate in darkness!)
@sovereignbrah @CityBureaucrat I’ve focused on only one poster in this thread but he’s not the worst. He’s just the most blatant and even clumsily transparent example, of very consistent discipline. It’s even possible he’s sincere and an innocent, driven merely by theater kid lust for attention and being dumb.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Who are the Wilks brothers? Same funding behind Ben Shapiro, Daily Wire, christcucked Zionism like Prager U, Heritage Foundation, etc also fund PACs associated with imbecyles and caricaturish Peasant Antisemitism scripted like on Law & Order episode, such as Nick Fuentes. Weird.
I’m told by someone I trust and have known long time, and who is in position to know, that he was told in clear terms that of he criticized Fuentes, Wilks money and network would come after him. No idea if true but would explain silence of facelords when it comes to a known doxer and federal informant like David Duke 2.0 Fuentes
Here are sources:
I don’t know if this registers on casual observers how odd it is. I’ve never heard of any frogs or frends from frogtwitter being invited to such meetings, let alone 8 hr sessions, let alone w cuckservative orgstexastribune.org/2023/10/23/def… amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/s…
For those interested in debates around the spread of Indo-European languages, I do short thred on this, with some excerpts from Robert Drews' recent (2017) book. The book is itself a revision of the claims he made earlier, principally in The Coming of the Greeks (1988).
By the way, Camille Paglia singled out Drews' 1988 book as exemplary of calm scholarship based on fact and reason as opposed to the highly ideological politicized trend in academia at the time based on trendy French theory and Marxist or post-Marxist striver moralism.
Drews' argument is definitely a minority position in these debates, and is hardly even known by most people who are posting on this matter since renewed interest in the Indo-European question a few years ago, mostly because of genetic studies. Here is again a brief restatement
A unity or common cause is supposed by some writers for more than a decade--maybe two--between whytes on one hand and "model minorities" on the other who both suffer because of affirmative action, or discrimination in job hiring and in college admissions.
They also say that whytes and "model minorities" are similar in that both are intelligent, hard-working, disciplined, lawful or orderly, able to compete peacefully in a modern economy, and so on. In my opinion the real undercurrent of this opinion is dislike and fear of Congoids.
It seems a lot of "dissident" sphere both right and Marxoid takes Dugin & co at their words regarding non-Western customs. So here is short thred about Third World """conservative""" mores and habits.
Let's start with most controversial case, the Muslim and Arab world. Leaving aside case of al ammah or "concubines"; not every woman is chaste, concubines exist and are supposed to walk unclothed with bare breasts. It is not a sin to touch their breasts, is like touching wall
But many write of Muslim world in ignorance of fact Englishmen and other Euros traveled to eg Morocco and elsewhere for boy sex. That's because they couldn't easily find it in England but such practices are widespread and easy in Arab world and Middle East more generally
I see a few replies here claiming Harvard or other similar skrewls are this Komsomol. This is wrong...short thred about this kind of "populism"...
While Ivy league & similar-tier skrewls have had decline lately; last few decades especially in quality of actual education there...
This decline in education quality is similar across all colleges in USA (tbh you can get more rigorous education in Latin, eg at University of Manila). It's also true that especially since Floyd but also from before affirmative action has meant GENERAL decline in student quality.
That being said a lot of very smart people still go to top-tier skrewls in USA (also England, not to speak of France). But unlike France, the USA does NOT select "the best and the brightest" for leadership positions, and doesn't even select as such from best skrewls.
Most nations have soap operas about the ultra rich and glamorous: Latin American/Brazilian telenovelas used to be like this. The British have them about chav lower class life. I think the former is much better, at least it's an aspiration for the lower classes...thred:
In general lower/middle classes normally aspire to elite taste. This good for many reasons: it's sign of *some* mobility where the best from lower classes are invited, enticed to have a way out. And life of lower classes is itself somewhat raised up, enhanced by looking up
British soap operas being about the underclass instead of glamorous idealizations of life of the rich isn't a good thing then; I don't think it's a Machiavellian intentional thing, but huemans love their cages...It's sign of hopelessness, lack of aspiration, acceptance of poverty