/1🚨BREAKING — Following the disclosure of damning internal company documents, AFL has filed a formal EEOC complaint against @Disney alleging pervasive illegal discrimination based on race and sex.
THREAD:
/2 The law prohibits Disney from using race, color, religion, sex, or national origin merely as a motivating factor for hiring, training, or promotions.
/3 But a document on Disney’s “Reimagine Tomorrow” website strongly suggests that race, color, religion, sex, or national origin are often the only motivating factor in Disney’s hiring, training, and promotion decisions and that the company is intentionally discriminating against white American men, Christians, and Jews simply because of their race, sex, religion, and citizenship. reimaginetomorrow.disney.com
/4 All Disney General Entertainment productions are required to comply with Disney’s DEI “Inclusion Standards.”
Some of the standards explicitly provide that fifty percent of the following jobs must be filled by members of “Underrepresented Groups.”
Keep reading…
/5 These jobs include:
✔️Regular and recurring actors and characters in Disney content
✔️Producers and writing staff
✔️Overall crew or project staff
✔️Line producers and/or production department heads – including, for example, the director of photography, composer, costume designer, editor, production designer, and music supervisor
/6 Productions can also comply with the inclusion standards by promoting members of Underrepresented Groups, creating jobs “to facilitate union eligibility for members of Underrepresented Groups,” and facilitating a “[s]ubstantial year-over-year increase in members of Underrepresented Groups as directors and in writing staff.”
/7 In addition, a leaked FAQ document on Disney’s “Inclusion Standards” describes the company’s broader plan “to increase training and development opportunities for members of underrepresented groups” in a racially exclusionary manner.
/8 Disney admits that an example of an “inclusive hiring and employment practice” is “improving access to training and development opportunities for members of underrepresented groups.”
/9 Disney’s self-reported workforce demographic data shows that it is aggressively engaged in illegal race- and sex-based workforce balancing, with immutable characteristics apparently serving as a determinative factor in at least some of its employment and contracting practices. For example…
/10 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of Disney directors identified by Disney as “people of color” grew by 6%
/11 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “people of color” and female “series regulars/leads” increased by 4% and 1%, respectively.
/12 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of writers identified by Disney as “people of color” also grew by 3%
/13 Interestingly, Disney’s aggregate workforce data shows that between FY 2021 and FY 2022, the percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “white” dropped by 3.6% and as “black” by 0.5%
/14 The percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “Hispanic” increased by nearly 1%
/15 However, the largest increase noted is for a category Disney labeled “not disclosed,” which grew by 3.2% percent during the relevant time.
Because Disney is not transparent, knowing precisely what the aggregated data means is impossible.
/16 For example, it is possible that some individuals who formerly were identified as white or black are now classified as “not disclosed.” Nevertheless, the data seem to support Disney’s claims that race, color, religion, sex, and/or national origin are each a motivating factor in the company’s employment practices.
/17 Finally, Disney maintains an illegal grant program that funnels $25,000 to “Underrepresented Directors.” The program unlawfully only awards grants to “women, AAPI, Black, Indigenous/Native, Latinx, LGBTQIA+, disability-identifying, and religiously marginalized individuals.”
/18 America First Legal is unrelenting in its fight to stop race and sex illegal discrimination.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education requesting a federal investigation into five Virginia school districts over radical “gender identity” policies that violate Title IX and President Trump’s order ending indoctrination in K-12 schools.
/2 AFL has requested that the Department of Education investigate:
🏫 Alexandria City
🏫 Arlington County
🏫 Fairfax County
🏫 Loudoun County
🏫 Prince William County
These school districts’ radical “gender identity” policies violate federal law and infringe on students’ rights.
/3 Title IX prohibits public schools from engaging in unlawful sex discrimination, such as allowing males who “identify” as female access to girls’ sports teams, bathrooms, and locker rooms, while denying such access to males who “identify” as male.
AFL and the State of Iowa, leading a coalition of 14 states, just filed an amicus brief defending President Trump against civil litigation, urging the court to dismiss the case and allow him to serve his full term without undue legal distractions.
DETAILS 👇
/2 AFL, representing the State of Iowa, filed an amicus brief in the Delaware Court of Chancery in United Atlantic Ventures, LLC, v. Trump Media and Technology Group Corp., asking the court to hold or dismiss the case against President Trump and let him serve his full term without the undue distraction of civil litigation.
/3 In January 2021, Twitter (now X) permanently suspended President Trump’s account, citing alleged threats of violence after the 2020 election.
/1 AFL has long fought to protect children, defend parental rights, and end radical indoctrination in our nation’s schools.
🧵
/2 AFL sued the Fairfax County School Board for forcing female students to share bathrooms with biological men and forcing them to use female pronouns when addressing male classmates.
/3 AFL filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to support parent’s rights and reject Montgomery County Public School’s attempt to indoctrinate students with a mandatory curriculum on sexuality and “gender identity.”
/1‼️ REMINDER: It’s a violation of federal law for career officials at the Department of Justice (DOJ) to send sensitive information on nominees directly to Senate Judiciary Committee staff.
/2 Legal information sharing between the Senate Judiciary Committee, White House, and DOJ happens under authorized Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs):
Senate Judiciary Committee 🔄 White House
White House 🔄 DOJ
/3 There is no legal agreement allowing sensitive information sharing between the DOJ and the Senate Judiciary Committee.
AFL just sued CBS Broadcasting and its parent company, Paramount Global, for allegedly engaging in employment discrimination against a decorated U.S. Navy combat veteran.
Details below 🧵
/2 AFL filed the lawsuit against CBS Broadcasting and Paramount Global for allegedly violating California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) by unlawfully discriminating against AFL’s client because of his race, sex, and military service status.
/3 AFL’s client is a white, heterosexual male and veteran who served as a combat cameraman and reconnaissance expert in the U.S. Navy for more than a decade.
He received numerous commendations for his service, including:
🎖️ Joint Service Commendation Medal
🎖️ Iraq Campaign Medal
🎖️ Meritorious Unit Commendation Medal
After retiring from the military, AFL’s client began working as a videographer at CBS in 2018.
The Biden-Harris ATF has reversed its unlawful “zero-tolerance” policy that allowed the agency to revoke federal firearms licenses (FFL) over minor paperwork errors, following AFL and @TPPF’s lawsuit.
/2 Historically, FFL holders were required to “willfully” violate the Gun Control Act (GCA) to lose their licenses.
This required intentional and reckless disregard for the GCA’s requirements in filling out the federal form.
/3 In 2021, ATF issued a punitive and unlawful policy redefining “willfulness” to allow the federal government to revoke FFLs for typographical or inadvertent errors and minor violations.