/1🚨BREAKING — Following the disclosure of damning internal company documents, AFL has filed a formal EEOC complaint against @Disney alleging pervasive illegal discrimination based on race and sex.
THREAD:
/2 The law prohibits Disney from using race, color, religion, sex, or national origin merely as a motivating factor for hiring, training, or promotions.
/3 But a document on Disney’s “Reimagine Tomorrow” website strongly suggests that race, color, religion, sex, or national origin are often the only motivating factor in Disney’s hiring, training, and promotion decisions and that the company is intentionally discriminating against white American men, Christians, and Jews simply because of their race, sex, religion, and citizenship. reimaginetomorrow.disney.com
/4 All Disney General Entertainment productions are required to comply with Disney’s DEI “Inclusion Standards.”
Some of the standards explicitly provide that fifty percent of the following jobs must be filled by members of “Underrepresented Groups.”
Keep reading…
/5 These jobs include:
✔️Regular and recurring actors and characters in Disney content
✔️Producers and writing staff
✔️Overall crew or project staff
✔️Line producers and/or production department heads – including, for example, the director of photography, composer, costume designer, editor, production designer, and music supervisor
/6 Productions can also comply with the inclusion standards by promoting members of Underrepresented Groups, creating jobs “to facilitate union eligibility for members of Underrepresented Groups,” and facilitating a “[s]ubstantial year-over-year increase in members of Underrepresented Groups as directors and in writing staff.”
/7 In addition, a leaked FAQ document on Disney’s “Inclusion Standards” describes the company’s broader plan “to increase training and development opportunities for members of underrepresented groups” in a racially exclusionary manner.
/8 Disney admits that an example of an “inclusive hiring and employment practice” is “improving access to training and development opportunities for members of underrepresented groups.”
/9 Disney’s self-reported workforce demographic data shows that it is aggressively engaged in illegal race- and sex-based workforce balancing, with immutable characteristics apparently serving as a determinative factor in at least some of its employment and contracting practices. For example…
/10 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of Disney directors identified by Disney as “people of color” grew by 6%
/11 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “people of color” and female “series regulars/leads” increased by 4% and 1%, respectively.
/12 From FY 2020 to FY 2021, the percentage of writers identified by Disney as “people of color” also grew by 3%
/13 Interestingly, Disney’s aggregate workforce data shows that between FY 2021 and FY 2022, the percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “white” dropped by 3.6% and as “black” by 0.5%
/14 The percentage of individuals identified by Disney as “Hispanic” increased by nearly 1%
/15 However, the largest increase noted is for a category Disney labeled “not disclosed,” which grew by 3.2% percent during the relevant time.
Because Disney is not transparent, knowing precisely what the aggregated data means is impossible.
/16 For example, it is possible that some individuals who formerly were identified as white or black are now classified as “not disclosed.” Nevertheless, the data seem to support Disney’s claims that race, color, religion, sex, and/or national origin are each a motivating factor in the company’s employment practices.
/17 Finally, Disney maintains an illegal grant program that funnels $25,000 to “Underrepresented Directors.” The program unlawfully only awards grants to “women, AAPI, Black, Indigenous/Native, Latinx, LGBTQIA+, disability-identifying, and religiously marginalized individuals.”
/18 America First Legal is unrelenting in its fight to stop race and sex illegal discrimination.
🚨EXPOSED — Internal documents reveal that officials at Flagstaff Unified School District in Arizona WILLFULLY IGNORED safety risks and district policies and allowed HUNDREDS of students to leave school to attend an anti-ICE walkout.
FUSD’s internal emails and text messages uncovered by AFL show staff admitting that they:
➡️ Knew students planned to walk out in advance
➡️ Failed to communicate with parents
➡️ Failed to notify every school in the district
➡️ Failed to follow the district’s own policies
FUSD’s policies are clear:
➡️ A student’s parent is required to notify school regarding the student’s absence
➡️ The school is required to notify the parent of the student’s absence
➡️ Access to school buildings should be limited
➡️ Staff should not socialize with students outside of school grounds
➡️ Staff may only act as political advocates during non-duty time
➡️ Parental notification is required to leave school for the protest
AFL has secured a SWEEPING settlement in its lawsuit on behalf of @azjustinheap.
The settlement restores Recorder Heap’s authority over key election functions and ends the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors’ unlawful interference.
This settlement follows the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling, which reinstated a lower court’s orders granting the Recorder control over early voting and ordering the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to immediately return seized election systems and staff.
The settlement delivers EVEN MORE than what the Recorder and AFL had sought before suing the Board.
🚨NEW — AFL is demanding @CabCoSchools REPEAL its unlawful policy allowing biological males to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms.
Enough is enough.
Last week, AFL sent a letter on behalf of its clients to Cabarrus County Schools (CCS) in North Carolina, challenging its policy of allowing biological males to access female-designated restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas.
AFL’s letter follows its earlier complaint with the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice, requesting a federal investigation into CCS for potential violations of Title IX.
On June 1, 2026, the ED announced that it had launched an investigation in response to AFL’s complaint.
🚨EXPOSED — New Biden-era DOJ records obtained by AFL reveal former Acting Associate AG Matthew Colangelo’s involvement in lawfare targeting President Trump before joining Alvin Bragg’s prosecution.
The records contradict claims by officials and the media that he was uninvolved.
Matthew Colangelo served as Acting Associate Attorney General and Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General — the third-highest ranking official at DOJ — from January 2021 through November 2022.
Colangelo then resigned to help Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg “jump-start” his investigation of President Trump.
Colangelo personally delivered the prosecution’s opening statement.
🚨EXPOSED — Illegal aliens have had free rein in Fairfax, Virginia.
AFL has uncovered documents showing that Fairfax has refused to honor HUNDREDS of ICE detainers on criminal illegal aliens over the past year and a half.
Releasing lawbreakers has consequences.
Below are some of the horrible crimes allegedly committed by illegal aliens in Fairfax who should have never been in the country — and who could have been deported if localities worked with ICE.
🧵
Abdul Jalloh:
➡️ From Sierra Leone
➡️ Entered the United States illegally in 2012 under Obama
➡️ Charged with stabbing 41-year-old Stephanie Minter to death on February 23, 2026, at a bus stop
➡️ Previously arrested more than 30 times without being deported
🏛️VICTORY: This week, SCOTUS issued its landmark decision in Trump v. Slaughter:
Officials who exercise the President’s executive power must be removable by him at will.
Statutory restrictions on the President’s removal of such officers VIOLATE the separation of powers.
AFL, alongside co-counsel Mitchell Law PLLC, filed an amicus brief in Slaughter, urging the Court to restore constitutional order by overruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (Humphrey’s Executor).
By overruling Humphrey’s Executor, the Court:
➡️Reaffirms the separation of powers
➡️Ends Congress’s unconstitutional interference in executive functions
➡️Returns accountability to the American people