Why the first Starship Troopers movie failed as a parody, a thread:
Watching the movie, it was clear the director was aiming for a campy, over-the-top depiction of the Terran Federation. Perhaps not an outright mockery, but certainly a drastic departure from the serious novel.
First, let's tackle a writing pitfall that irks Leftists to this day. If you make your characters naturally handsome, fit, and well-groomed, then it becomes increasingly difficult to properly mock them. Beauty is self-evident, and all the characters in ST are good looking.
This extends to the overall Terran Federation as well. We see clean, beautiful streets. Life seems good for Rico in his polite high school. This is a far cry from the crime ridden and drug addicted cities we know today. Where are the homeless encampments, the ghettos?
Can we nail the Terran Federation for being cruel? I guess. But when you play off cruelty as a joke, you are undermining your own message. This isn't a dialogue about the brutal conditions for training soldiers in a futuristic setting. This is a gag, and it's hilarious.
All right, what about a critique of comparison? Perhaps the enemies of the Terran Federation have a better system. Oh wait, no, they're bugs. I've seen people genuinely argue that the bugs are supposed to be sympathetic. But they're still bugs...
THIS is not a face I can relate to, sympathize for, or even have a dialogue with. This screams at me to kill it with fire. Even IF I didn't want to kill this thing, I want to be in orbit, far away from this creature. It's horrific, and only a contrarian can argue against that.
The only thing you can really critique about the Terran Federation is the propaganda and incompetence. But when everything is so slapstick, it fails at landing a serious point. These guys are badasses in a funny movie, not a warning about the dangers of fascism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Indiana Jones was a product of its time. His ideals of putting the whole of human history in a museum could only spring up in liberal fantasy.
But history has not ended. The past is still alive, and these symbols move among us just as they did thousands of years ago.
The brilliance of Indiana Jones has always been the acknowledgement that the past has real power, and this creates a contradictory tug and pull as Indiana regularly encounters the supernatural, only to see it stuffed away at the final moment.
What’s the first movie’s answer to finding a “Conduit to God”? Shove it in a warehouse and hope science can rationalize it later. Ironically, the Nazis were more correct in their thinking, even though they got splattered. How long can something like that be locked away?
Modern people have this really naive view of Christ’s Redemption of Mankind. They think it saves you from all earthly consequences, that as soon as you say the magic words, you instantly fix everything you broke in your life. /1
But that’s not how any of this works. You break something when you sin, and just because you “repent”, that doesn’t mean you’ll get it back. A man can’t undo an adultery anymore than a woman can’t reclaim her virginity. Thinking otherwise is pure cope, and frankly, immoral. /2
None of the Saints got an out of jail card with their redemption. They had to live with the consequences of their sins for the rest of their lives. You are not lost in the sense you can still attain heaven. But if you kill someone, you can’t take that back. /3
One of the interesting things about the degeneration of modern culture is that you can trace the progressing dementia with the gradual inability to depict masculine characters.
Take Kirk for instance. In his classic iteration, he’s practically a sci-fi James Bond. 1/
He’s calm, capable, self-assured. He believes in what he’s doing, and he knows exactly what he wants out of life.
He’s a Starship Captain, and he doesn’t doubt himself in the task. It’s practically in his blood, and the adventure is what gives him life. 2/
But the best of Kirk comes with growing as an older man. His struggle with tragedy and the prospects of growing old, his ghosts from the past and his questions of legacy.
Kirk steps into his element here, and while I have quibbles, it’s that Kirk where the character shines. 3/
I’ve been thinking a lot about the vivisection of words and how they relate to the writing. I talked earlier about the dinosaur/dragon distinction, but I’ve also been interested in the evolution of our language.
You see, we don’t invent new words anymore 1/
We invent slang. We create short term words with a rapid half-life. Usually vulgar, these words are exclusively used in lowbrow contexts such as memes or the general online discourse. While they often slip out into conversation, they’re frequently used self ironically. /2
While I have no issue with slang itself per se, it’s distressing to me that all we create seems to be slang. Karen. Soyjack. Based. Cringe. Kek. Rizz. Gyatt.
Just putting these things in contrast with the classical art I have below creates an absurdity. /3
People underestimate how bad this trend is. The mainstream industry has completely locked out young men, meaning any upcoming talent is denied access to the funding and marketing to take their talents to the next level.
Now I'm usually the first to decry Tradpub and the last to criticize indie, but there is no denying the old power of institutional backing. At the end of the day, culture is mass production, and Tradpub controls many of the levers that make that possible. 2/
Indie offers great freedom and comes with sizable benefits, but you have to do everything on your own. You have to fund everything on your own. And since the market is so saturated, you're going to struggle standing out. 3/
Some quick thoughts on the future of fiction because I can't sleep, and I'm tired of politics.
The Right has the tendency to view fiction materialistically. Where are the new Tolkiens and the Gene Wolfes? We talk about marketing, funding, time, etc. etc. But this misses... /1
the more basic point that fiction is about belief.
I don't want to downplay genius--because that's very real. But IQs and artistic skill still require substance to mold. And without that substance, you're left with nothing. /2
You can see this very prominently with the Left, where the tropes and concepts and archetypes are boiled down in their most materialistic senses. Orcs are just a skin color with big muscles. The devilspawn is actually misunderstood. /3