DAY 10 16TH FEBURARY 2024
I was outside waiting for a picture so i missed the court start.
As i enter we see Danielle Morgan on the screens and she goes threw the oat of telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
They confirm if the witness testimony is correct and true.
I was outside waiting for a picture so i missed the court start.
As i enter we see Danielle Morgan on the screens and she goes threw the oat of telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
They confirm if the witness testimony is correct and true.
The say they have a good sibling relationship.
And now we see a blog post with the title is he satoshi or is he my brother?
We now see the full blog post.
Have you ever known a kid who says one day they will change the world.
He knew from being a child that he knew he would change the world and she often thought craig was in contact with aliens or time travellers becaus ehe knew so much
she says he had a strong interest in japanese culture and especially the fighting side with martial arts and weapons.
He would use super hero names.
craig would have full suits and do the full movements of samurai
And now we see a blog post with the title is he satoshi or is he my brother?
We now see the full blog post.
Have you ever known a kid who says one day they will change the world.
He knew from being a child that he knew he would change the world and she often thought craig was in contact with aliens or time travellers becaus ehe knew so much
she says he had a strong interest in japanese culture and especially the fighting side with martial arts and weapons.
He would use super hero names.
craig would have full suits and do the full movements of samurai
She encountered someone in the park in a full ninja outfit. To say craig was eccentric was to say the least and she encountered a very slow and direct movements of the sword practicing and she saw this in the park at 15 years old and craig would of been about 18 or 19.
it was a real sword from his collection. They ran home to tell anyone who would listen about this crazy guy in the park swinging a sword and all you could see was his eyes and a short time later the ninja walked in to her shock and it was craig.
it was a real sword from his collection. They ran home to tell anyone who would listen about this crazy guy in the park swinging a sword and all you could see was his eyes and a short time later the ninja walked in to her shock and it was craig.
She said. To this day i still see the events clearly and when she heard the name Satoshi she knew it was Craig.
Craig took his wrapping off his face and he looked perplexed and the lawyer says that event is drawing a conclusion between craig and satoshi
Craig took his wrapping off his face and he looked perplexed and the lawyer says that event is drawing a conclusion between craig and satoshi
They talk about a bbq at a property in lisaray.
she says she uses the maps and she goes and geography is her strong point.
This was after her youngest child was born in 2007 and so it must of been 2008 and it was a little warmer and she was small and not quite walking so it was about that time.
She said she saw a room full of computers that looked like a mad professors room appeared to be a living room or bedroom converted.
Craig said he was working on something important and she said, oh what ever,.
she said it was that she didnt take it seriously it was more that the complexity of his work was so over her head that she was like oh what ever
she says she uses the maps and she goes and geography is her strong point.
This was after her youngest child was born in 2007 and so it must of been 2008 and it was a little warmer and she was small and not quite walking so it was about that time.
She said she saw a room full of computers that looked like a mad professors room appeared to be a living room or bedroom converted.
Craig said he was working on something important and she said, oh what ever,.
she said it was that she didnt take it seriously it was more that the complexity of his work was so over her head that she was like oh what ever
She later heard that he had been involved in a project in 2009 and 2010 and that she later heard the name satoshi nakamoto and that craig had been involved.
in 2008 she knew he had been working is lassiters and she had a friend who worked for lassiters and that when she knew he was working on a digital currency and she says she didnt mention that because she was told they had lassiter statements.
She says shes only written a couple of blogs so she cant of got all the details.
She first thought it was craig because he used to call himself all of those names.
the relation she made between satoshi and craig was his extensive interest in japanese cultures.
she says she hasnt looked into many people that have said they are satoshi.
that was very quick and now we move on to Mark Archibold. The witness will join at 11. so we have a short break.
in 2008 she knew he had been working is lassiters and she had a friend who worked for lassiters and that when she knew he was working on a digital currency and she says she didnt mention that because she was told they had lassiter statements.
She says shes only written a couple of blogs so she cant of got all the details.
She first thought it was craig because he used to call himself all of those names.
the relation she made between satoshi and craig was his extensive interest in japanese cultures.
she says she hasnt looked into many people that have said they are satoshi.
that was very quick and now we move on to Mark Archibold. The witness will join at 11. so we have a short break.
We are back from the break.
We see a man called Mr Mark Archibold and he is sweared in on the bible
We see a man called Mr Mark Archibold and he is sweared in on the bible
Judge Mellor enters and Mr Archibold is sworn in honouring to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth by God.
Lord Grabaner confirms the witness statement is truthful and that the signature is accurate
Lord Grabaner confirms the witness statement is truthful and that the signature is accurate
The Copa lawyer asks if he has watched the live link or read any transcripts and he says he hasnt been following it the internet.
His role was the it manager for lassiters.
His technical background has been working from the mid to late 80s. He didnt have any formal training but has worked with many systems.
Dr Wright came in to work on the security systems to get threw the governments accreditation
This was in 1999 to 2001
His role was the it manager for lassiters.
His technical background has been working from the mid to late 80s. He didnt have any formal training but has worked with many systems.
Dr Wright came in to work on the security systems to get threw the governments accreditation
This was in 1999 to 2001
We see a lassiters task documents from 2002 and it appears to be the services that demorgan would supply to lassiters
he is asked if he has written the document and he says it would of been a collaborative document written by both himself and craig.
Demorgan provided weekly monthly and annual updates.
Lassiters off the shelf purchase of firewalls was done by themselfs.
the details of lassiters network needed to be supplied to demorgan.
Craig was concentrating the check point fire walls. the cisco systems and the over all network that they put in place before craig coming online.
if it wasnt something craig needed to look they didnt bother him with it.
they was using delouts to build the system and they kept failing the government audits and after the 3rd or 4th failure craig was recommended and he came highly recommend. he cant remember who he was recommended by.
he is asked if he has written the document and he says it would of been a collaborative document written by both himself and craig.
Demorgan provided weekly monthly and annual updates.
Lassiters off the shelf purchase of firewalls was done by themselfs.
the details of lassiters network needed to be supplied to demorgan.
Craig was concentrating the check point fire walls. the cisco systems and the over all network that they put in place before craig coming online.
if it wasnt something craig needed to look they didnt bother him with it.
they was using delouts to build the system and they kept failing the government audits and after the 3rd or 4th failure craig was recommended and he came highly recommend. he cant remember who he was recommended by.
we see a demorgan weekly report.
we see the general issues and there is not many details on any of the pages.
page 7 is a list of standard tools list used
the report doesnt contain much information and that was good for demorgan. the less is better in these types of reports.
they ask how often he was in contact with dr wright.
we now see an email from dr wright to mr archibold on the friday the 13th, not a lucky day as the lawyer says.
we see the general issues and there is not many details on any of the pages.
page 7 is a list of standard tools list used
the report doesnt contain much information and that was good for demorgan. the less is better in these types of reports.
they ask how often he was in contact with dr wright.
we now see an email from dr wright to mr archibold on the friday the 13th, not a lucky day as the lawyer says.
the email from craig says "just seeing if you are still there".
it shows they wasnt in regular communication as lassiters built a in house security systems after craigs work.
We see another email saying, How the hell are you? what have you been up to, is this your company or are you contracting.
we now see a the fitness statement of him working on firewalls and router security.
mark visited craigs house and saw his server room and he was storing all the information from firewall logs for long term analyses
the data was compressed and the data could be stored for 5 or 10 years.
he was holding the files in a way that he had developed him self and the lawyers says there is no difference to a zip file and the man says that is correct.
he had just great faith and respect for him that when dr wright said his encryption was 100 times better then the encryption archibold was using. he believed him
it shows they wasnt in regular communication as lassiters built a in house security systems after craigs work.
We see another email saying, How the hell are you? what have you been up to, is this your company or are you contracting.
we now see a the fitness statement of him working on firewalls and router security.
mark visited craigs house and saw his server room and he was storing all the information from firewall logs for long term analyses
the data was compressed and the data could be stored for 5 or 10 years.
he was holding the files in a way that he had developed him self and the lawyers says there is no difference to a zip file and the man says that is correct.
he had just great faith and respect for him that when dr wright said his encryption was 100 times better then the encryption archibold was using. he believed him
we see another demorgan document and mr archibold doesnt specifically mention this document in its witness documents.
we see another letter from demorgan and craig says there is no feasible method to stop access to foreign internet sites. whether gambling porn or otherwise offense sites they are NOT able to be restricted.
This is in refrence to the australian government saying they can ban online gambling sites and archibold says they cant and they still cant today
They was saying they couldnt stop aussies accessing uk gambling websites
we see another letter from demorgan and craig says there is no feasible method to stop access to foreign internet sites. whether gambling porn or otherwise offense sites they are NOT able to be restricted.
This is in refrence to the australian government saying they can ban online gambling sites and archibold says they cant and they still cant today
They was saying they couldnt stop aussies accessing uk gambling websites
He recalls discussing digital currency in 2004 and he never recorded that conversation in writting.
it was a discussion and back in the early 2000 they had a lot of discussion and any discussion in the northern territory didn't want to touch anything to do with crypto currencies or any type of digital cash and digital currencies
it was a discussion and back in the early 2000 they had a lot of discussion and any discussion in the northern territory didn't want to touch anything to do with crypto currencies or any type of digital cash and digital currencies
the fiat currencies were being blocked by the usa and so he can remember the discussions about digital currencys. the lawyer asks if he is looking back on these events with what he knows about craig being satoshi nakamoto.
he asks if he is aware now that craig says he is satoshi nakamoto. he asks if he is looking back primed with the knowledge he has now.
he believes dr wright could be satoshi because of the compression of data. he then lists the names of the usual other satoshi candidates. and lists names of people who could have been but have already publicly came forward as not being satoshi.
he says the way craig thought and acted he believes in his opinion he could be satoshi.
Mr Mark Archibold has been released and their testimony is finished. the live witness was expected at 2 oclock and as we have fired threw the witnesses very quickly we are a little bit early and so we adjourn
he asks if he is aware now that craig says he is satoshi nakamoto. he asks if he is looking back primed with the knowledge he has now.
he believes dr wright could be satoshi because of the compression of data. he then lists the names of the usual other satoshi candidates. and lists names of people who could have been but have already publicly came forward as not being satoshi.
he says the way craig thought and acted he believes in his opinion he could be satoshi.
Mr Mark Archibold has been released and their testimony is finished. the live witness was expected at 2 oclock and as we have fired threw the witnesses very quickly we are a little bit early and so we adjourn
We are no back from a short break. Cerian Jones is now on the stand. She is sworn in and confirms the contents of the statement is now true.
She says she has not been following the the court case.
They ask what her role at nchain is. She says he role is external to nchain and she works on drafting and execution of applications.
She is not a regular patent attorney in the uk.
She passed her patent exams.
She worked for udl and it merged into another company.
She was listed as being a representative on some of the patents at nchain. when she left the patents were transferred.
copa says alot of the patents listed are registered as nchain and not craig wright.
They talk about ceriann companys. her company doesnt have a website and she used to have a linked in page and she put it into hibernate mode.
She put it into hibernate mode last week more so because of the media interest and that she didnt want the extra interest.
she isnt sure if there is anything regarding nchain.
She says she is in a very fortune posistion that she doesnt need her publicity as patent attorneys are a scarcity and she actually has to turn work down and she doesnt need to advertise because of that and its not that she is hiding.
She would describe herself as a consultant.
they ask her to answer for nchain and they ask if nchain is aligned with bsv and that community.
They ask about her relationship with CSW and she says he is associated with her clients not directly her client but professional she only works with people who she thinks have cool tech and who she enjoy working with and she does a variety of activitys like restaurants, nightclubs etc as she is friends with all of her clients.
She says she believes craig wright is satoshi nakamoto and she doesnt have any prebiased out of work for bsv or crypto currencys.
She says it is her job and so she has a professional interest in crypto but not a personal one.
They ask if she has a professional opinion on craig being satoshi and she says what ever the judge states will not effect her work at all.
She has attended coin geek and nchain events and she says she has attended a maybe 4 in the lat 4 years as a requirement of her role consulting for nchain.
She says she has not been following the the court case.
They ask what her role at nchain is. She says he role is external to nchain and she works on drafting and execution of applications.
She is not a regular patent attorney in the uk.
She passed her patent exams.
She worked for udl and it merged into another company.
She was listed as being a representative on some of the patents at nchain. when she left the patents were transferred.
copa says alot of the patents listed are registered as nchain and not craig wright.
They talk about ceriann companys. her company doesnt have a website and she used to have a linked in page and she put it into hibernate mode.
She put it into hibernate mode last week more so because of the media interest and that she didnt want the extra interest.
she isnt sure if there is anything regarding nchain.
She says she is in a very fortune posistion that she doesnt need her publicity as patent attorneys are a scarcity and she actually has to turn work down and she doesnt need to advertise because of that and its not that she is hiding.
She would describe herself as a consultant.
they ask her to answer for nchain and they ask if nchain is aligned with bsv and that community.
They ask about her relationship with CSW and she says he is associated with her clients not directly her client but professional she only works with people who she thinks have cool tech and who she enjoy working with and she does a variety of activitys like restaurants, nightclubs etc as she is friends with all of her clients.
She says she believes craig wright is satoshi nakamoto and she doesnt have any prebiased out of work for bsv or crypto currencys.
She says it is her job and so she has a professional interest in crypto but not a personal one.
They ask if she has a professional opinion on craig being satoshi and she says what ever the judge states will not effect her work at all.
She has attended coin geek and nchain events and she says she has attended a maybe 4 in the lat 4 years as a requirement of her role consulting for nchain.
we see a selfie of of cerian and craig a conference. That was the first event after the bbc story was released.
She didnt understand it as a marketing events for nchain however it could be a fair description at the time. someone in UDL posted the picture.
She has friends that post about appearance at events with their clients thats a standard across most of the industry
She didnt understand it as a marketing events for nchain however it could be a fair description at the time. someone in UDL posted the picture.
She has friends that post about appearance at events with their clients thats a standard across most of the industry
We see a document stating. Blockchain connected presents in conversion with....
She talks about a organisation she runs in wales.
She talks about a organisation she runs in wales.
The description says it is a conversation with leading blockchain experts and Dr Wright was on of the speakers and it gives a brief description of bitcoin and being only promoted as BSV being the true bitcoin.
She didnt provide that. Nchain would of provided that as all the speaker were asked to provide a short blurb of information.
There is no financial gain for her via what is written on the screen and she says being associated with dr wright is not the best marketing plan as he is a very divisive charcter. so she had nothing to gain
She didnt provide that. Nchain would of provided that as all the speaker were asked to provide a short blurb of information.
There is no financial gain for her via what is written on the screen and she says being associated with dr wright is not the best marketing plan as he is a very divisive charcter. so she had nothing to gain
we see a coingeek live 2020 panel of 4 people and all the guests have an association with nchain and the lawyer says it is clear that people associate nchain with bsv.
The patents are not only available for BSV. they see themselves as a leader in blockchain tech.
We now go to a video.
The patents are not only available for BSV. they see themselves as a leader in blockchain tech.
We now go to a video.
a video with the title bitcoin sv a one world chain.
We now see Jimmy Nguyen discussing what open source tech can do for the world.
We see ceriann and she is referred as a council to nchain and she has always been an external to nchain. a council associated with an entity.
she has never been internal always external.
When a legal representative goes to a event for a client she hasnt felt the need to explain all her other clients out of nchain.
he asks if it could be mis interpretted as she was solely working for nchain. she says it maybe misinterpreted as that
We now see Jimmy Nguyen discussing what open source tech can do for the world.
We see ceriann and she is referred as a council to nchain and she has always been an external to nchain. a council associated with an entity.
she has never been internal always external.
When a legal representative goes to a event for a client she hasnt felt the need to explain all her other clients out of nchain.
he asks if it could be mis interpretted as she was solely working for nchain. she says it maybe misinterpreted as that
She has been involved with nchain patents since the early days. Yes there is number 42 as its affectionately known which is a cryptographic technique that is involved in many applications.
a picture of some one flashes up on screen for a moment. and we now see a artcle about nchain and craig.
The future plans of nchain are very closely associating her with nchain as a patent attorney.
We see the coin geek convention in Slovenia and Copa say again can it be argued she is again being associated
Lord grabaner ask what is the neccasity of all this chronological associatation to craig wright and nchain.
copa moves on to say craig enjoys to boast about the amount of his patents.
He asks ceriann how many patents apply to craig.
do you regard an ep for a single invent concept as one pattern or 3 patterns if its applicable in 3 countrys and she regards each ep split into 3 countrys.
she regards the exact same inventions split into 20 countrys that would be 20 patents not 1. the distinguish the difference between patent familys and patents.
he is trying to established via individual patents or patent familys.
if you talk about patents you talk about patents if you talk about patent familys you talk about patent familys.
she says the copa lawyer is refering to her as nchains patent attorney and she thinks its disingenuous and the copa lawyer INCORRECTLY referred to her as solely nchain patent attorney and she has many other clients.
The future plans of nchain are very closely associating her with nchain as a patent attorney.
We see the coin geek convention in Slovenia and Copa say again can it be argued she is again being associated
Lord grabaner ask what is the neccasity of all this chronological associatation to craig wright and nchain.
copa moves on to say craig enjoys to boast about the amount of his patents.
He asks ceriann how many patents apply to craig.
do you regard an ep for a single invent concept as one pattern or 3 patterns if its applicable in 3 countrys and she regards each ep split into 3 countrys.
she regards the exact same inventions split into 20 countrys that would be 20 patents not 1. the distinguish the difference between patent familys and patents.
he is trying to established via individual patents or patent familys.
if you talk about patents you talk about patents if you talk about patent familys you talk about patent familys.
she says the copa lawyer is refering to her as nchains patent attorney and she thinks its disingenuous and the copa lawyer INCORRECTLY referred to her as solely nchain patent attorney and she has many other clients.
she does not have access to nchains internal systems and copa says no patents were filed with dr wright as the SOLE inventer. copa says it is 6 and they say every other patent has other names involved in the patent process
she says she has stepped back from nchain even more and there was much more internally going on with patents and in the early days there was other employees and researchers as named inventors as a kudos to them and whether or not they are the deviser of the original content and so they say dr wright could of been added as a kudos.
They say there is 60 instances where dr wright has been added years after the patent rights have been granted.
and she says its speaks to internal processes rather the a kudos adding.
They say there is 60 instances where dr wright has been added years after the patent rights have been granted.
and she says its speaks to internal processes rather the a kudos adding.
in her evidence she says craig adds small details to the patents and she demonstrates why these inventions demonstrate why he is satoshi nakamoto.
copa says anyone who invents anything and gets a patent on blockchain tech doesnt mean they could be satoshi nakamoto.
she thinks if you look at her evidence further down the page you can see why she believes he is satoshi.
She was trying to tie his ip and his way of thinking to the satoshi nakamoto question and it alligns to someone who is thinking about bitcoin and someone who is a developer for it.
copa says anyone who invents anything and gets a patent on blockchain tech doesnt mean they could be satoshi nakamoto.
she thinks if you look at her evidence further down the page you can see why she believes he is satoshi.
She was trying to tie his ip and his way of thinking to the satoshi nakamoto question and it alligns to someone who is thinking about bitcoin and someone who is a developer for it.
where does the number 42 come from and it was her understanding that it was number 42 on a list of inventions he provided. he might not be the sole named inventor and thats not the same as being named and they say it could of been the other names inventor.
the other names inventor on 42 is stef savannah and examiner regards it as novel and inventive.
The reason no objection can be given at this point is the claim could be to narrow. She says you go in first with narrow cheeky one and if asked for more you provide more information.
the other names inventor on 42 is stef savannah and examiner regards it as novel and inventive.
The reason no objection can be given at this point is the claim could be to narrow. She says you go in first with narrow cheeky one and if asked for more you provide more information.
There was a clarity objection in part of the epo decision.
There is much broader searches.
Lord Grabaner says what is the relevance and he asks we want to know who is satoshi nakamoto and it is supremely irrelevance to the issue. if these pargrapghs are not cross examined then he will have to make refrence in the closing statements.
The judge tells him to keep it short.
We now see a patent of the invention number 42. with a diagram and description of the patent information.
there is a list of various patents 183 patent ideas and that no owners are listed and there is no owner listed on 42 none listed and then at the end we see some listed as stef and one listed as craig.
There is much broader searches.
Lord Grabaner says what is the relevance and he asks we want to know who is satoshi nakamoto and it is supremely irrelevance to the issue. if these pargrapghs are not cross examined then he will have to make refrence in the closing statements.
The judge tells him to keep it short.
We now see a patent of the invention number 42. with a diagram and description of the patent information.
there is a list of various patents 183 patent ideas and that no owners are listed and there is no owner listed on 42 none listed and then at the end we see some listed as stef and one listed as craig.
another patent list document with no ownership listed. it attaches demorgans none owned patents to nchain and have them listed and transferred to nchain. we see a table of pre concept phase is dr wright 75% but in the conceptual phase craig is at 10% and the most is savannah.
copa say the majority of the work is done by stef and she says she has never seen this document before and she doesnt know what this phrases mean.
in your patent specification you have to have technical details and a large details of actual procedural works. some time just a prototype can be filed really early on pre implementation and ideally you want as much information as possible but a early fileing is very common to protect the ip and then updated later.
copa say the majority of the work is done by stef and she says she has never seen this document before and she doesnt know what this phrases mean.
in your patent specification you have to have technical details and a large details of actual procedural works. some time just a prototype can be filed really early on pre implementation and ideally you want as much information as possible but a early fileing is very common to protect the ip and then updated later.
in number 42 stefs name is listed as the owner of the patent and if you go threw the rest of this dr wright is listed 12 and mr savannah is listed 30 times and so they say on the internal records it would say mr savannah is the creator of these patents and not dr wright.
he says she has relied on 42 as evidence for craig satoshi nakamoto. she says possible and actual fact are different she says it is possible.
The judge asks what use is this document if it wasnt raised with dr wright and he assumed she might have some knowledge of this and the judge says but you havent challenged dr wright on this evidence.
the court decides to continue and not break for lunch and a little joke about it being friday and her wanting to get back to her life.
he says she has relied on 42 as evidence for craig satoshi nakamoto. she says possible and actual fact are different she says it is possible.
The judge asks what use is this document if it wasnt raised with dr wright and he assumed she might have some knowledge of this and the judge says but you havent challenged dr wright on this evidence.
the court decides to continue and not break for lunch and a little joke about it being friday and her wanting to get back to her life.
copa ask does she know who the other names are on the patent invention and he says it mr savannah and mr himenez
When they draft them they file based on the instructions given by nchain. she was not party to any internal stuff and she solely worked with the inventors and she is taking this information on face value from nchain.
there was times they would stand in front of a white board and he would run threw the tech for them to make ease of the patent.
again they mention the wikipedia article of who could be satoshi nakamoto. can someone please add mickey mouse and herculess to the list of satoshi nakamot wikipedia because this is a mockery using athe wiki pages as many of the listed people have said they are not satoshi but being misrepresented as satoshi
When they draft them they file based on the instructions given by nchain. she was not party to any internal stuff and she solely worked with the inventors and she is taking this information on face value from nchain.
there was times they would stand in front of a white board and he would run threw the tech for them to make ease of the patent.
again they mention the wikipedia article of who could be satoshi nakamoto. can someone please add mickey mouse and herculess to the list of satoshi nakamot wikipedia because this is a mockery using athe wiki pages as many of the listed people have said they are not satoshi but being misrepresented as satoshi
they discuss about dr weller and asks in the cross examination if there was anything in dr wrights responses. the judge talks about spv and check block header.
and we are finished for the day....
and we are finished for the day....
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
