capitolhunters Profile picture
Feb 16, 2024 20 tweets 10 min read Read on X
As Mike Johnson cuts off aid to Ukraine, we need to see why he’s obeying Trump. People with secrets comply - and Johnson is almost certainly a child abuser. From 2019-2023 he told 3 different stories about his “adopted son”, all lies. This 🧵 reviews them - and Matt Gaetz. 1/
Image
Image
Shifting, contradictory stories are a red flag. Johnson's three versions of all contort truth to deny he “took in” an unrelated boy as a single man - they all insert wife Kelly in impossible ways. It looks very bad. (Sources in report.)  2/
docs.google.com/document/d/1Us…
Image
STORY 1: Johnson first announced his “son” Michael James in June 2019 in a House hearing on reparations for slavery. He said he and Kelly met a 14-year-old boy as newlyweds “22 years ago”, i.e. 1997. No one flagged the problem: Mike and Kelly met only in 1998, married in 1999. 3/
STORY 2: When Johnson talked about his ‘son’ again a year later, to Water Isaacson, he fixed the Kelly problem by making the boy 3 years younger. Now he and Kelly took in the 14-year-old “20 years ago”, i.e. 1999, the year they married. Isaacson didn’t notice the switch. 4/
Isaacson should have worried when a leader in the Southern Baptist Convention, a hotbed of abuse, spoke for a missing child, but worry isn't his style. Sam Kriss calls him a “born sycophant" built to "spread as much propagandistic bullshit as possible.” 5/
thepointmag.com/criticism/very…
Image
For 3 years, Johnson repeated Story 2 like a script. 2020: “have you seen the movie The Blind Side - that was our story except MY Michael was not an NFL prospect”  2022: “You’ve seen the movie The Blind Side, that is our story except my kid was not an NFL prospect” 6/
STORY 3: In 2023, the Daily Mail found Michael James and learned he was older. Johnson then scrambled to cover. He added the 3 years back, now saying he met James in 1996 (when the boy would be 13) but “took him in” only 3 years later, at age 16, after he married Kelly. 7/
Image
Image
Johnson’s not forgetful: he told the same story for 3 years. He or his spokeswoman said six times that James was “taken in” at 14. His story changed only when it had to. There's more (see 🧵) but the lies make it clear: Johnson's hiding something bad. 8/
No one knows Michael James’ story. The Daily Mail got a statement that feels scripted: “I always felt loved like I was a part of their family”, but James wasn’t at Mike and Kelly’s wedding. Note that Johnson's SBC routinely made abuse victims sign NDAs: payment for silence. 9/ Image
MATT GAETZ. It’s creepy that Mike Johnson used a House hearing to announce he’d informally “adopted” a young, minority boy. It’s creepier that TWO high-profile House Reps did the same. A year after Johnson, Gaetz used the same playbook to announce his own ‘son’. 10/
Image
Image
Like Johnson, Gaetz used a House hearing touching on race. But Gaetz isn't smooth; he managed only “are you suggesting..none of us have non-white children? Because you reflected on your black son and said none of us could understand..” At the end, Mike Johnson stepped in. 11/
To get the details out, Gaetz had to Tweet them - “This is my son Nestor” - and give an interview to People. He said he took the boy in at age 12, six years ago. People: “..the strangest thing about this story is that this is the first time any of it has been shared publicly” 12/
Image
Image
By Fall that year, Gaetz was under investigation for sex trafficking (of girls). He fixed up his personal life in a rush: proposed in December, then eloped in August. The month before the wedding, his future sister-in-law called him a “literal pedophile”. 13/ Image
THE BIG PICTURE: two Congressmen in the top 10 insurrection scores had fake-adopted unrelated boys. The Speakership was seized by these two, with Jim Jordan who'd covered up abuse of young men at Ohio State. That's wildly improbable by chance. The secrets look like a feature. 14/ Image
Obedient people are an asset. Rep. Robert Garcia calls it: “The Republican Party is in complete chaos because Donald Trump commands every single thing they do and tells Mike Johnson what to do every time”. Johnson delivers what Trump wants. 15/
Secrets are a useful tool in politics. Today’s GOP collects them and uses them. Kari Lake wears a wire, then ousts a rival. Matt Gaetz outs a fellow Rep, saying he “has to live a lie”.  Madison Cawthorn is booted with scandalous footage (simulating gay sex, wearing lingerie). 16/
Image
Image
Johnson was promoted by powerful people. In 2010 he was picked out by Evangelical leaders and installed at the Paul Pressler law school (a * for later). In Feb 2020 he was picked out by Trump, brought into his inner circle. He was the standby for Speaker if Jim Jordan failed. 17/ Image
Exposing secrets is the only way to negate their power. We need, desperately, investigative journalism. Johnson went on NBC’s Meet the Press: no questions about his ‘son’. It’s not just for Ukraine - Johnson's 2nd in line for the presidency. And he’s taking orders. 18/
Someone has to uncover the past that’s driving the present. Someone has to interview Michael James - in person, not by email. And his real family. And Johnson’s friends from LSU. And those who investigated abuse in the SBC. Who will do this? WaPo didn’t. 19/ Image
We don’t have much time, as Ukraine’s ammunition dwindles. U.S. media is gutted by layoffs. Will donors step up, or #NAFO...or Ukraine? @andriyYermak: we sent tanks, now give us reporters: send someone, hire someone here, do something. Both our democracies are on the line. 20/

Image
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with capitolhunters

capitolhunters Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @capitolhunters

Jul 11
A part of the Epstein nothing-to-see-here fiasco no one's talking about: what happened to the "army of FBI agents" pulled off their cases in March to work on the Epstein files? Pam Bondi made people move to DC, pull all-nighters redacting the files. Did they just.. go home? 1/ Image
Bloomberg: Pam Bondi demanded all the FBI's Epstein files, then ordered "hundreds" of agents to work on them (bizarrely via their personal phones). They were "holed up in offices at the bureau’s sprawling Central Records Complex". Are they still there? 2/
bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
The public should know what happened to Bondi's redaction effort, when and why (and if) the decision was made to send FBI agents home. And if she won't answer maybe one of those hundreds of agents is mad enough to leak. Keep your eye on who is next laid off at the FBI, too. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jul 11
As Hungary's Viktor Orban sucks up to Putin and accuses Ukraine of "choos[ing] war", a reminder, again, that Orban, Netanyahu, and Trump all owe their careers to the same US political operative - Arthur Finkelstein. Arguably the man most responsible for our dystopian times. 1/
Arthur Finkelstein was the dark master of the negative campaign, orchestrating facts-free and values-free assaults on political opponents. A gay, Jewish man who specialized in electing anti-gay homophobes. 2/
No one's explained yet if Finkelstein had a direct tie to Russia, but Finkelstein created Putin's bootlicker Orban, and Finkelstein is the one who brought Paul Manafort to Trump out of Ukraine where he was busy installing pro-Russia politicians. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Jul 4
Yes, the NYT is shameful for sourcing an anti-Mamdani article from notorious white supremacist Jordan Lasker. But it's worse. Lasker, who they call an "academic", is a student whose only paper of note is INFAMOUS for unethical data use that got his tenured co-author fired. 1/ Image
Who is the NYT's "academic" source? Lasker is or was a PhD student at Texas Tech, but his only paper of note is earlier, from 2019: "Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability", whose misuse of data triggered a major investigation and got Cleveland State Prof. Bryan Pesta fired. 2/ Image
The Chronicle of Higher Ed wrote about the scandal. It wasn't just that the article was "racist pseudoscience". It was that the authors misused data from the NIH and lied on their data application - filed by Bryan Pesta. A flagrant ethics violation. 3/ archive.is/KwbGyImage
Read 6 tweets
Jun 19
Reminder: Elon Musk, whose Starship just blew up on the test stand (with its extra fuel tanks nearby), was allowed for THIRTY YEARS to lie about his training in science. He started lying in 1995, kept lying - and suffered no consequences. But physics itself has consequences. 1/
Just listen to the man's nonsense about how he is shaped by physics and consider: the press allowed him to bullshit like this for 30 YEARS. Of course he got convinced he can just make up his own reality. If anyone died in the Starship explosion tonight, blame the press too. 2/
In 2022 I did a 69-Tweet thread on Elon's fake AstroBoy Genius image, hoping to ward off what was coming: Elon helping to overthrow democracy. What you saw on the launchpad tonight, that's what he's doing now to US science, to our country: exploding it. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 11
Sure, it's funny that Fox News is now using "86" in talking about a fired reporter, when less than a month ago they demanded the FBI investigate "86" as a death threat. But the joke is on us. Performative outrage over bullshit is a test of YOU, to see if you'll accept it. 1/ Image
You can't criticize Fox's words as hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is when someone committed to the truth is inconsistent. Fox and others are post-truth: they're just making noises to see if they can get you to react. They're gaming you. 2/
All of us have a psychological need for rationality. We need to feel that words have meaning, that people mean what they say. We do understand that people lie: a lie is a meaningful but false statement, to deceive. But what Fox is doing here is worse, and harder to cope with. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 8
ABC's explanation of why they suspended correspondent Terry Moran misuses the word "objective". Moran said Stephen Miller was a "world-class hater" and "his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment". Those are objectively true statements. Miller's hatred is deeply documented. 1/
Moran ascribed to Miller an emotion: "hatred". A decade of reporting has documented, objectively, that Miller hates. In 2018, LA Mag interviewed his high school classmates and reported their stories of how Miller hated minorities. "Hate" is their word. 2/
lamag.com/politics/steph…Image
Terry Moran also said that for Stephen Miller, "hatred is his spiritual nourishment". That's colorful language, but also documented. Here's a high school classmate of Miller's with a story of Miller saying awful, provocative things to immigrants: "he wanted to be hated". 3/ Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(