The @washingtonpost ran an article about the journalists killed during the Hamas conflict.
My own research suggests whoever put it together engaged in deception
The end result is that the WP lies to its readers and spread raw Hamas propaganda 1/9
Thread
⬇️⬇️
My own research suggests whoever put it together engaged in deception
The end result is that the WP lies to its readers and spread raw Hamas propaganda 1/9
Thread
⬇️⬇️
The WP ran its article about 78 Gaza journalists who it holds up as heroes.
1. It used the list provided by @pressfreedom
2. It chose seven journalists to profile
3. It searched their social media.
But I did my own research on this a month ago so know the WP is lying . 2/9
1. It used the list provided by @pressfreedom
2. It chose seven journalists to profile
3. It searched their social media.
But I did my own research on this a month ago so know the WP is lying . 2/9
For example. 50% of those in the CPJ list worked for Hamas or Islamic Jihad. Some even put out a 'call to arms' on the morning of Oct 7.
The WP missed them all.
How did the WP randomly select seven journos to profile and avoid all those who work for terrorist groups? 3/9
The WP missed them all.
How did the WP randomly select seven journos to profile and avoid all those who work for terrorist groups? 3/9
It gets worse.
79% of the Gazan 'journos' used their social media to praise terrorists and celebrate the murder of innocent Jews.
The WP avoided every single one of those too.
This is beyond all reasonable statistical probability. 4/9
79% of the Gazan 'journos' used their social media to praise terrorists and celebrate the murder of innocent Jews.
The WP avoided every single one of those too.
This is beyond all reasonable statistical probability. 4/9
About 20% of the 'journos' didn't work in Journalism and some had obvious ties to key terrorist targets. For example Ahmed Shehab was killed alongside his uncle who was Islamic Jihad royalty.
The WP somehow avoided all these dubious choices too 5/9
The WP somehow avoided all these dubious choices too 5/9
We can therefore dismiss the possibility that the seven perfect profiles were chosen at random.
Someone carefully selected which ones to profile and must have found and needed to ignore many unsuitable candidates because of their ties to terrorism or visible extremism. 6/9
Someone carefully selected which ones to profile and must have found and needed to ignore many unsuitable candidates because of their ties to terrorism or visible extremism. 6/9
The Washington Post article does not mention many of the journalists work for terrorist groups.
Nor mention most journalists openly supported the slaughter of Israeli civilians
And yet this must have been known by whoever did the Washington Post research. 7/9
Nor mention most journalists openly supported the slaughter of Israeli civilians
And yet this must have been known by whoever did the Washington Post research. 7/9
Instead the WP article paints them all as heroes. How did the WP choose their seven and not find out the truth? It is impossible.
I sent these questions to the three journos named in the article -Ellen Francis, Artur Galocha and Joe Snell
I never recevied a response 8/9
I sent these questions to the three journos named in the article -Ellen Francis, Artur Galocha and Joe Snell
I never recevied a response 8/9
The Washinton Post motto reads ‘democracy dies in darkness’.
They are right, democracy does die in darkness – and they are some of those helping to kill it.
Full story here. david-collier.com/washington-pos…
They are right, democracy does die in darkness – and they are some of those helping to kill it.
Full story here. david-collier.com/washington-pos…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
