Gothic cathedrals were the height of medieval architecture—but how did they build these jaw-dropping structures with only rudimentary tools?
Here's the step-by-step process of building a gothic cathedral🧵
In the 11th-13th centuries, unprecedented population growth and newfound wealth in northern Europe created a need for larger church buildings. The aging Romanesque-style churches were simply too small.
In comes gothic architecture.
With a focus on large, cavernous spaces, gothic churches allowed more people to congregate inside while their pointed arches, flying buttresses, and intricate masonry meant they could serve as visible symbols of a city’s prestige.
So how did they build them?
The first hurdle in any building project is money.
Acquiring the capital for a project this large was no small task, so multiple avenues were utilized.
Wealthy financiers and bishops often contributed large sums of money, while parishioners donated smaller amounts in exchange for eventual burial under the cathedral’s floor.
Poor parishioners gave their labor, cart-animals, or raw materials for the cause.
Professional guilds also made donations so that their organization would be featured on a section of stained-glass window—medieval paid advertising.
Once funds were secured, detailed construction plans needed to be developed. In the medieval world, this meant the presence of a master mason, the main architect overseeing the project. He was responsible for preparing plans, selecting materials, and coordinating work.
A deep knowledge of theology was also needed to implement iconography and symbolism into the design.
Some masons became renowned for their expertise. Pierre de Montreuil of Notre Dame was nicknamed “doctor of stones” due to his extensive knowledge of both masonry and theology.
Because construction projects could last decades or longer, master masons often left projects to their children.
One family of builders was that of Peter Parler, who worked on St. Vitus Cathedral. After his death in 1399, construction was taken up by his sons Wenzel & Johannes.
The master mason started a design with a blueprint or scale model of the building made from papier-mâché, wood, or plaster. The plans were then presented to the bishop for his approval.
Once approved, it was time to build.
But building a gothic cathedral required material — lots of it. Salisbury Cathedral in England needed a whopping 70,000 tons of stone, for example.
Stone was extracted from a quarry. Sometimes Cathedrals owned the quarry, other times they simply rented out the rights to it.
Stone was then shipped or pulled to the site via oxen.
Wood and iron were also essential materials. Wood for scaffolding, platforms, hoists, and beams; iron for the reinforcement of walls, windows and vaults. However, iron eventually decayed forcing builders to replace it with more stable support methods like flying buttresses.
Once on site, stones were finished and placed according to the drawings or floor layout of the master mason.
Lifting these massive blocks of stone required new technologies—remember, buildings of this size hadn’t been constructed since the Roman Empire.
New cranes were developed to maneuver the heavy blocks. One innovation was the treadmill crane, a hoist that utilized the force of men walking inside a wheel-shaped treadmill—like a giant hamster wheel.
Using this device, one man could lift up to 1300 lbs (600kg).
As stones were set into place, a variety of tools were used to ensure their correct alignment. Lead-filled glass tubes made for excellent levels to ensure flat surfaces, and foreman often used compasses to translate miniature plans to full size.
After all the heavy lifting was complete, it was time for artisans to transform the stone skeleton into a work of art. This started with sculptures.
Though sculptures were common in older Romanesque churches, gothic churches incorporated them *everywhere*.
Sculptures weren’t the bare stone figures we see today though. They were colorful. Scientists have found traces of paint on the sculptures of cathedral facades.
Using lasers, they’ve reconstructed how the originals might have looked:
Stained glass windows were another defining feature of gothic architecture. These were made by specialized craftsmen who worked near forests because of the enormous amount of firewood required to heat and melt the glass.
Metal oxides were mixed into the molten glass and then blown into a bubble, which the craftsmen flattened into sheets.
The sheets were sent to the building site where windowmakers shaped and fit them into the window frame. After assembly, details were painted onto the windows.
Towers were the last structures to be built. They were sometimes not completed until decades after the main structure.
Bells were the finishing touch, and their addition signified the completion of a cathedral.
Bells could be massive and required heavy cranes to hoist. Even after construction, it took significant manpower just to ring them—the main bell at Notre-Dame de Paris, installed in the 15th century, required eleven men to ring and was said to deafen the men for hours afterward.
The tolling of bells across a medieval city meant that its gothic cathedral was finally complete.
If you enjoyed this thread, kindly repost the first post, linked below:
The design of a cathedral is theologically based and instructive in the faith. Though beautiful, its construction is not arbitrary — it wasn’t arranged simply to look pretty.
The layout, artwork, statues, and stained glass windows all serve an edifying purpose🧵
The plan of a cathedral is cruciform in shape and is usually oriented eastward—ad orientum. Worshippers face the rising sun, a daily reminder of Christ’s resurrection.
The north and south transepts or “arms” represent Christ’s right and left hands on the cross.
The entrance at the West end corresponds with His feet; one enters at the foot of the cross and proceeds upward as they approach the altar.
The layout is divided into three parts: the narthex/vestibule for catechumens, the nave for laymen, and the sanctuary for clergy.
The Holy Roman Empire lasted ~1000 years, and it looked like this:
How did such a fractured political entity last so long?
It has to do with a concept called “subsidiarity”, and it holds the key to implementing responsible government today 🧵 (thread)
Voltaire famously derided the Holy Roman Empire (HRE) as “neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire”, but what couldn't be denied was its longevity.
Existing from 800-1806, it was birthed before William the Conqueror invaded England and continued on after the American Revolution.
It’s considered one of the longest lasting empires in history, a feat of particular intrigue when one considers its central geographical location and lack of natural defensible borders.
Early Christians had a complete Bible by the 4th century—but that’s not the only thing they were reading to deepen their faith.
Here’s what books the early Church read besides the Bible🧵
1. The Didache, Anonymous, 1st cent.
The Didache is a brief discourse that contains moral and ritualistic teachings—a handbook for a Christian life.
It’s speculated the apostles wrote it, and contains the formulas for baptism and eucharist that are still used today.
2. The Shepherd of Hermas, Hermas, 2nd cent.
St. Iranaeus considered it to be canonical scripture. Though it missed the cut, it’s a fascinating work that centers around the life of a former slave who's given mystical visions and parables informing him how to live a faithful life
Historian Will Durant was not a religious man, but he believed faith was "indispensable" to a culture.
He delivered a dire warning to societies who traded faith for comfort…🧵 (thread)
Will Durant was a 20th-century American historian and philosopher most known for his 11-volume “Story of Civilization,” telling the history of both eastern and western civilizations.
His work led him to conclude that all cultures follow a predictable pattern…
Civilizations first begin with religious fervor, giving a nation strength to overcome great difficulty.
It’s their faith in a higher power that allows them to bear the initial “growth pains” that precede prosperity.
Kenneth Clark lamented that civilization was a fragile thing.
He observed three “enemies” that could topple even the mightiest cultures.
What are they, and how can we prevent them?🧵
The first enemy is fear:
“fear of war, fear of invasion, fear of plague and famine, that make it simply not worthwhile constructing things, or planting trees or even planning next year’s crops. And fear of the supernatural, which means that you daren’t question anything.”
Fear paralyzes a people and stifles adventure, invention, and grand building projects.
Machiavelli promoted a *realistic* approach to governance.
It didn’t always involve being nice.
His work "The Prince" is packed with hard hitting truths for rulers — but there’s one lesson that modern leaders MUST pay attention to, or risk losing everything…🧵
Niccolò Machiavelli was a 15-16th century Florentine diplomat, philosopher, and author who’s best known for his political masterpiece “The Prince”.
Often called the father of modern political philosophy, he wrote the book as a guide for potential rulers.
The Prince is a practical work, covering topics like: the ideal qualities of a prince; military counsel; and how a prince should manage his state.
For example, Machiavelli proposes that two institutions are integral to a ruler’s legitimacy…