For people catching up, let's talk the significance of Alex Smirnov's RU Spook allegations. 1) This matters bc Bill Barr set up a back channel via which Rudy Giuliani could share dirt, including from known RU spies, to be channeled to Hunter Biden investigation
2) @ScottBradyPA claims he vetted these claims, using travel records.
The indictment makes it clear that travel records PROVE Smirnov was lying.
@ScottBradyPA 3) After Brady did or did not vet these claims, DOJ shut down the assessment. But days after Trump yelled at Bill Barr, Richard Donoghue ordered David Weiss to take a briefing on the allegation. He was supposed to check things that he only checked starting last September.
@ScottBradyPA 4) THIS CLAIM is almost certainly why David Weiss reneged on a plea deal with Hunter Biden and charged him with a bunch of shit designed to embarrass Joe Biden during an election.
@ScottBradyPA 5) THE REASON David Weiss reneged on that plea deal, while facing threats to his family, was bc of right wing pressure.
I've been writing post after post about all this since @ChuckGrassley claimed that Bill Barr's DOJ shut down an investigation into Burisma and then cycled a claim from that investigation into framing Hunter Biden.
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.